The CAE Driven Safety Development Process of the new Ford Fiesta

Similar documents
epsilon Structural Design of Body and Battery Housing

Lighter and Safer Cars by Design

ULSAB-AVC Program Targets

Optimal Design Solutions for Two Side SORB using Bumper Design Space. SMDI Bumper Group - Detroit Engineered Products

The Development of the new XJ Jaguar in Advanced Aluminium; Opportunities and Challenges

DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS

Ford Fiesta 84% 87% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Press-Hardened and Roll-Formed Lightweight Bumpers in Steels with Enhanced Strength

Highly Engineered Structural Solutions for the 21 st Century Autobody

Sponsors. Lyndon Sanders. Director & General Manager Axon Automotive

2013 Infiniti JX35. David Coakley / John Latimer Nissan Technical Center North America. w w w. a u t o s t e e l. o r g

Side Impact Protection. Technical perfection, automotive passion.

Design and analysis of door stiffener using finite element analysis against FMVSS 214 pole impact test

Body Structure & Chassis Optimization

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

Renault Trafic SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

Citroën C3 Aircross 82% 85% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant.

Modeling & Impact Analysis of a Car Bumper with Different Loads on Different Materials

Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

Crashworthiness of an Electric Prototype Vehicle Series

Product Development Strategy To Response to Global NCAP Requirements

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Frontalaufprall im Verbraucherschutz Frontal Impact In Consumer Test Programms

Renault Trafic 91% 52% 53% 57% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Fiat 500X 85% 86% 74% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Ford S-MAX 87% 87% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Kia Sportage 83% 90% 71% 66% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Kia Optima 86% 89% 71% 67% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Lancia Ypsilon 79% 44% 64% 38% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

The all-new Volvo S40

MINI Clubman 68% 90% 68% 67% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Opel/Vauxhall Crossland X

Kia Sportage 83% 90% 66% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Kia Optima 86% 89% 67% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

2014 GREAT DESIGNS IN STEEL CONFERENCE Wednesday, May 14 th 2014

Opel/Vauxhall Grandland X

Dacia Duster 66% 71% 56% 37% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

FIMCAR. Frontal Impact Assessment Approach FIMCAR. frontal impact and compatibility assessment research

Renault Scenic 82% 90% 67% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Explicit Simulation of Dampened Starter System using Altair Radioss

Crashworthiness Simulation of Automobiles with ABAQUS/Explicit

Honda Jazz 85% 93% 73% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Fiat Panda Cross 77% 70% 50% 46% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Jeep Wrangler 69% 50% 49% 32% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Kia Picanto 64% 79% 54% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Ford Focus 85% 87% 75% 72% SPECIFICATION TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist. Vulnerable Road Users

Ford Galaxy 87% 87% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Volvo XC60 87% 98% 76% 95% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

RCAR Bumper Test. Issue 2.1. February 2018

BMW X1 90% 87% 77% 74% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.

Opel/Vauxhall Karl 72% 74% 68% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

DS 7 Crossback 87% 91% 73% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Honda HR-V 79% 86% 72% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Skoda Kodiaq 77% 92% 71% 54% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Ford Edge 76% 85% 67% 89% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Suzuki Swift 75% 83% 69% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Renault Kadjar 81% 89% 74% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Subaru Levorg 83% 92% 75% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Hyundai i20 73% 85% 79% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Skoda Superb 86% 86% 76% 71% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.

Kia Picanto 64% 87% 54% 47% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. With Safety Pack. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

VW T-Roc 87% 96% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Audi Q7 94% 88% 76% 70% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Off-Road. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist.

Volvo XC40 87% 97% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Front Bumper Crashworthiness Optimization

Jaguar XE 82% 92% 81% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

A Winner: Car Body Design Development of the Hyundai Sonata

Škoda Karoq 79% 93% 73% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Suzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

VW Polo 85% 96% 76% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Bodyshell...2 New features of body structure...2

Opel/Vauxhall Astra 84% 86% 83% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Peugeot % 86% 67% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Design Evaluation of Fuel Tank & Chassis Frame for Rear Impact of Toyota Yaris

Kia Rio 84% 85% 62% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT)

Suzuki Jimny 84% 73% 52% 50% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Audi TT SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet

Peugeot Rifter 81% 91% 58% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Suzuki Swift 75% 88% 69% 44% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. With Safety Pack. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Pedestrian.

Volvo XC90 97% 87% 100% 72% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Off-Road 4x4. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Renault Talisman 84% 86% 68% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Jaguar XE 82% 92% 81% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Jaguar XF 84% 92% 80% 83% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Executive. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

ADVANCED HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL FRONT RAIL SYSTEM PHASE II

Seat Ibiza 77% 95% 76% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Porsche Cayenne 80% 95% 73% 62% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

VW Touran 89% 88% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Audi A4 90% 87% 75% 75% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist.

Suzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

FIMCAR Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research

Technology for Safe and Lightweight Automobiles

Stakeholder Meeting: FMVSS Considerations for Automated Driving Systems

Transcription:

The CAE Driven Safety Development Process of the new Ford Fiesta A. Hänschke Ford Werke GmbH, Köln, Germany M. Spurling Ford Motor Company Limited, Dunton, United Kingdom R. Santos TECOSIM Technical Simulation Ltd Altair HyperWorks Technology Conference Nov., 2 nd 4 th, 2009 Ludwigsburg Germany

Ford Fiesta CAE Driven Safety Process Agenda The New Ford Fiesta Safety Requirements and Achievements Structural and Safety Strategy CAE Development Process Questions & Answers 3

The New Fiesta 4

Safety Requirements European Crash Sign-off Modes High and Low Speed Full Frontal Rigid Vehicle = 48.3 kph & 56 kph Thatcham / GDV 10deg Rigid Vehicle = 15 kph Side Pole Rigid Vehicle = 29 kph Thatcham / GDV 10deg Rigid Barrier = 15 kph Full Rear Rigid Barrier = 38 kph & 50 kph Various Adult & child head, leg-form and thigh pedestrian impacts 40% Offset Deformable (L&R) Vehicle = 56 kph & 64 kph Side Deformable Barrier = 50 kph Fuel Filler Rear Deformable Barrier = 80 kph 70% Offset Deformable (L&R) Barrier = 80 kph 5

Safety Achievements Final ratings 5-star EuroNCAP rating 1E Thatcham Insurance rating 6

Safety Achievements EuroNCAP High Speed Crash CAE Simulation Results EuroNCAP Front Offset Impact EuroNCAP Side Impact 7

Safety Achievements EuroNCAP High Speed Crash Films EuroNCAP Front Offset Impact EuroNCAP Side Impact 8

Structural and Safety Strategy High Speed Impact DP600 rear side rails optimised for energy absorption in 80km/h crash mode Safety cell for fueltank survival space and door openability post test DP600 front rails with TWB front section to achieve an efficient crush followed by bend and counter-bend collapse strategy A/B Pillars hot-stamped from UHS Boron Steel Low velocity vertical B-Pillar intrusion profile Limit intrusion into the occupant cabin Prevent rocker panel rotation Transfer load through the underbody 9

Structural and Safety Strategy Low Speed Impact Hood controlled folding to avoid damage to other parts Strong shotgun closing plate Fender bracket with integrated headlamp catcher Headlamp housing controlled failure Rear/Front bumper beam and crash cans fitted and optimised Lower leg stiffener optimisation to avoid cooling pack damage 10

Structural and Safety Strategy Low Speed Impact Low Speed Impact (GDV/AZT) 11

CAE Development Process up front CAE Support Parametric Concept Geometry to Support early Attribute Assessments 705.2 706.1 202 605 211 707 202.1 702 703 704 708 712 709 713 710 714 715 Master Sections 5dr B-Pillar proposal and Design scan Top Hat FEA-Model merged with Platform FEA-Model 5dr upper structure (template) 12

CAE Development Process The Modular Safety CAE Approach SAV_BIW 1000500 Front Doors Front BumperBeam Cockpit Structure Front Subframe LMV_BIW Rear Doors Rear BumperBeam HVAC Rear Subframe Dashboard_RHD/LHD DoorTrims Front BumperFacia Interiour Interior Trim Front Strut & Knuckle Energy Body In Prime Loudspeaker Rear BumperFacia IP-Assembly Steering Column Window Regulator GOR Front Seats Steering Gear FE_Solver Radioss Hood Headlamps / FogLamp Rear Seats PedalBox & Booster LoadCases Liftgate Batterie Battery Brackets Body Interiour Interior Tire & Wheels Barriers Hinges ABS Module Dummies Fuel System PreProcess Body Closures Body Exteriour Exterior Chassis PostProcess Safety 13

CAE Development Process Material History in Crash Simulation / Mapping Component residual plastic strain distribution is extracted The work hardening affects of Dual Phase steel are significant and must be included! Fully Automated Data Mapping Tool MAPIT* Component thickness distribution is extracted Projects forming CAE material properties data onto full vehicle models using mesh independent algorithms Pre-Strain and thickness distribution included into the full vehicle simulation * MAPIT is a Ford Motor Company in-house developed software tool 14

Extensively engineered using CAE methodologies Crash simulation models have over 1,000,000 elements. Super computers are used to run the models, which can take 24 multi-processors over 20hrs to complete! 15

Questions & Answers Thanks for listening 16