SF-LA (125 mph) 2: : :32. SF-SJ (110 mph)

Similar documents
August 6 th, Board of Directors. Kent Riffey Tony Daniels. Chief Engineer Program Director. Project Implementation & Phasing Workshop

Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design (CARRD)

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Caltrain Modernization & High Speed Train Projects City of Millbrae

Caltrain Modernization EMU Procurement

Southern California - CHSRA

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

CONNECTING AND TRANSFORMING CALIFORNIA

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Agenda. Open House Presentation Question and Answer Break Out Groups Report Out & Close

SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE PROJECT UPDATE

San Francisco to San Jose Preliminary Alternatives Analysis

High-speed Rail in California:

Rail~Volution 2012 R. Gregg Albright

High Speed Rail Conference

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Staff Contact: Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, (650)

VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding you the following: Comments regarding 2016 Peninsula Corridor SEIR. Member of the Public. Thank you.

Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update

SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE PROJECT SECTION

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

U.S. System Summary: CALIFORNIA

Train Operations Analysis of Two versus Three Mainline Tracks for the San Francisco Downtown Rail Extension

EMU Procurement Seats/Standees/Bikes/Bathroom

This Evening s Agenda. Open House 7:00 7:30 Presentation 7:30 8:00 Community Feedback8:00 9:00 Adjourn

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Caltrain Downtown Extension Project (DTX)

Agenda. Preliminary Station Footprint High Speed Train Station in the City of Millbrae

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project

Caltrain / California HSR Blended Operations Analysis Supplemental Analysis Requested by Stakeholders. Service Plan / Operations Considerations Study

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

Caltrain Business Plan

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

3.17 Energy Resources

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

DE ALTAS PRESTACIONES

High Speed Passenger Rail Interoperability in North America

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development. Establishment of LAX FlyAway Stop in Santa Monica

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Update Meeting

SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE PROJECT SECTION. City of Brisbane Baylands Public Hearing June 7, 2017

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Key Findings. February 2009 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

TTC Phase I increases to $1.59B; Phase II (DTX) estimated $ B. CHSRA Business Plan grade separates 16 th & Mission Bay Dr (trenching)

Item No. 10 Town of Atherton

CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Agenda

Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles

Fleet Penetration of Automated Vehicles: A Microsimulation Analysis

Caltrain Late Night Service White Paper

REALIZING THE AIR QUALITY BENEFITS OF PORT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. A Case Study of the Alameda Corridor

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: VTA, Inter-Agency Partners, and Contracted Services: Ridership for February 2013

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

Agenda. Transbay Program. Brief History. Benefits of Transbay Ridership Financial Program Project Risks

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Partial Automation for Truck Platooning

Solano County Transit

What is the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)?

CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Agenda

Design of the High Speed Rail System in California. Orange County to Los Angeles Segment

February 2011 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

November Dear Stakeholders, Caltrain needs to be modernized.

Streetcar Level Boarding Background Memo

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force. HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs.

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

TOLL TRUCKWAYS: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement. By Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Peter Samuel

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

2.0 INTRODUCTION. Around the Bay Rail Study LS Transit Systems, Inc. in association with DKS & Nelson\Nygaard

Table Common AREMA Lateral Turnouts Currently in Use in Passenger Rail Systems

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

CalMod Program EMU Procurement Update. TJPA Board May 14, 2015

Transportation Demand Management January 25, 2017 Waterfront Plan Transportation Working Group. Date & Location

Amtrak Fleet Strategy

Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program

APPENDIX E: BIBLIOGRAPHY

Exposition Light Rail Transit Project

Bicycle Advisory Committee CORRESPONDENCE. March 17, 2016

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

CALIFORNIA S COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM FOR REDUCING HEAVY- DUTY VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Transcription:

California High-Speed Rail Program Management Team To: Fr: Re: 3 January 203 Jeff Morales, CEO, California High-Speed Rail Authority Frank Vacca, Chief Program Manager, California High-Speed Rail Authority Joe Metzler, PMT Operations and Maintenance Manager John Chirco, PMT Engineering Manager Ken Jong, PMT Program Development Manager Brent Felker, PMT Program Director Phase Blended Travel Time Purpose The purpose of this memo is to present a technical assessment of the travel times and assumptions for a Phase Blended service between San Francisco and San Jose and between San Francisco and Los Angeles. This assessment is based on the results of computer model simulations that demonstrate the pure run time of the modeled trains operating on a blended system can meet the Prop A mandates of design for a maximum 30 minutes of travel time for a non-stop SF-SJ and a 2hr 40min for non-stop San Francisco Los Angeles service. Assessment of Phase Blended Modeling Phase Blended infrastructure consists of proposed full high-speed rail only improvements between San Jose and Los Angeles combined with blended service alignments on the Caltrain Corridor between San Francisco and San Jose. Travel times are generated from the California High-Speed Train Project (CHSTP) computer simulation model. The travel times generated from the computer model account for the physical characteristics of the proposed route geometry and the times are considered pure travel time, or best time that might be achieved. Travel times between San Francisco and Los Angeles follow for options for the blended service between San Francisco and San Jose, including differing maximum speeds. Phase Blended (No Midline Overtake) Phase Full (Dedicated) SF-SJ (0 mph) SF-LA SF-SJ (25 mph) SF-LA 2:02 32 2:34 30 2:32 2:02 Not applicable 30 2:32 The travel times indicate two possible conditions where the Phase Blended options can provide for a travel time of 2hr 40min or less between SF and LA are from CHSTP model which include: 0 mph SF-SJ corridor maximum speed with an unimpeded path for a non-stop HST service 25 mph SF-SJ corridor maximum speed with an unimpeded path for a non-stop HST service Berkeley Simulation Software (BSS) Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) railroad operations simulation model software was used to produce the San Francisco Los Angeles travel time in this analysis. The Train Performance Calculator (TPC) feature in the RTC model is capable of accurately representing the train movements over alignments with different complexity, such as grades, curves, and speed limits, based on the available tractive and braking effort specified for the train set technology taking into account the high-speed rail vehicle rolling resistance coefficients.

California High-Speed Rail Program Management Team Assumptions Following are the assumptions made in CHSTP model for calculating these travel times: These simulations may not reflect actual operating conditions. Pure run time is calculated based on modeled trainset performance over a given segment of the alignment geometry. Pad is not included. It is common to anticipate a range of 3% to 7%, based on operational characteristics when planning service times. Travel times are for representative alignments based on alternatives included in the environmental documents. Alternative alignment may alter travel time. Advancement in train technology would allow train to operate safely at 220 mph on sustained steep grades. For example, the grade between Bakersfield and the Tehachapi Mountains requires a sustained average grade ranging of 2.5%-2.8% of approximately 20 miles. A speed restriction to approximately 50 mph may be required to mitigate a safety issue related to wheel adhesion in the downhill direction at very high-speeds. If required, this speed reduction would increase the northbound travel time by approximately two to three minutes. FRA strategies and regulations are in place to support mixed fleet traffic (freight, conventional passenger, high-speed passenger) to operate at speeds up to 25 mph. The proposed strategies and regulations are under review and require additional operational and railway safety improvements to qualify. These requirements will need to meet Federal regulations for the Phase Blended service. CPUC approval for increased speeds (greater than 79 mph) and increased train service when highspeed rail services are operated in the Caltrain corridor. Caltrain train service will allow for a high-speed express train to run unimpeded between SF and SJ. Caltrain tracks will be upgraded to Track Class 6 (0 mph) or Track Class 7 (25 mph) as required. Existing infrastructure in Caltrain corridor will be upgraded, as required, to accommodate increases in maximum operating speeds to 0 mph or 25 mph. Grade crossings in Caltrain corridor will be upgraded, as required, to meet FRA requirements for quad-gates for speeds up to 0 mph and for vehicle arresting barriers for speeds up to 25 mph. Train speed approaching the terminal station at Transbay Transit Center (TTC) is reduced to 25 mph due to constraints of existing infrastructure. Conclusion Based on the CHSTP computer model simulations and stated assumptions, a 2hr 40 min travel time between San Francisco and Los Angeles and 30-minute travel time between San Francisco and San Jose can be achieved for the Phase Blended service. Attachments. Train Performance Curve LA to SF Phase Full 2. Train Performance Curve SF to LA Phase Full 3. Train Performance Curve SF to SJ 0 mph 4. Train Performance Curve SF to SJ 25 mph 2

California High-Speed Rail Program Management Team Phase Blended Travel Time Assessment 5 February 203 Purpose The purpose of this memo is to present a technical assessment of the travel times and assumptions for a Phase Blended service between San Francisco and San Jose and between San Francisco and Los Angeles. This assessment is based on the results of computer model simulations that demonstrate the pure run time of the modeled trains operating on a blended system can meet the Prop A mandates to design for a maximum 30 minutes of travel time for a non stop SF SJ and a 2hr 40min for non stop San Francisco Los Angeles service. Assessment of Phase Blended Modeling Phase Blended infrastructure consists of proposed full high speed rail only improvements between San Jose and Los Angeles combined with blended service alignments on the Caltrain Corridor between San Francisco and San Jose. Travel times are generated from the California High Speed Train Project (CHSTP) computer simulation model. The travel times generated from the computer model account for the physical characteristics of the proposed route geometry and the times are considered pure travel time, or best time that might be achieved. Simulations may not reflect actual operating conditions. Travel times between San Francisco and Los Angeles include the blended service between San Francisco and San Jose with a 25 mph maximum speed with an unimpeded path for a non stop HST service options in the SF SJ corridor. Travel Time SF SJ SF LA Phase Blended (No Midline Overtake) 30 2:32 Phase Full (Dedicated) 30 2:32 Assumptions Following are the assumptions made in CHSTP model for calculating these travel times: Pure run time is calculated based on modeled trainset performance over a given segment of the alignment geometry. Travel times are for representative alignments based on alternatives included in the environmental documents. Alternative alignment may alter travel time. Advancement in train technology would allow train to operate safely at 220 mph on sustained steep grades. For example, the grade between Bakersfield and the Tehachapi Mountains requires a sustained average grade ranging of 2.5% 2.8% of approximately 20 miles. A speed restriction to approximately 50 mph may be required to mitigate a safety issue related to wheel adhesion in the Berkeley Simulation Software (BSS) Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) railroad operations simulation model software was used to produce the San Francisco Los Angeles travel time in this analysis. The Train Performance Calculator (TPC) feature in the RTC model is capable of accurately representing the train movements over alignments with different complexity, such as grades, curves, and speed limits, based on the available tractive and braking effort specified for the train set technology taking into account the high speed rail vehicle rolling resistance coefficients.

California High-Speed Rail Program Management Team downhill direction at very high speeds. If required, this speed reduction would increase the northbound travel time by approximately two to three minutes. FRA strategies and regulations are in place to support mixed fleet traffic (freight, conventional passenger, high speed passenger) to operate at speeds up to 25 mph. Caltrain train service will allow for a high speed express train to run unimpeded between SF and SJ. Track infrastructure will be constructed or upgraded, as required, to achieve FRA/CPUC regulatory requirements and AREMA standards for the speeds modeled. Train speed approaching the terminal station at Transbay Transit Center (TTC) is reduced to 25 mph due to constraints of existing infrastructure. Conclusion Based on the CHSTP computer model simulations and stated assumptions, a 2hr 40 min travel time between San Francisco and Los Angeles and 30 minute travel time between San Francisco and San Jose can be achieved for the Phase Blended service. Attachments. Train Performance Curve LA to SF Phase Full 2. Train Performance Curve SF to LA Phase Full 3. Train Performance Curve SF to SJ 25 mph 2

Parker, Annie@HSR From: Vacca, Frank@HSR Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 203 3:46 PM To: Chirco, John Cc: Felker, Brent R. Subject: Phase I Blended Travel Time Assessment John, Reviewed The Trip Time assessment with staff and we have some edits suggestions. We would prefer to use the 0mph run between SJ and SF rather than the 25. Although they both meet the Prop A requirement (30min between SJ and SF) the 0mph is a more practical approach to this section of railroad. That would trigger removing the last bullet assumption on page 2 before conclusions and removing all references to the 25mph run (such as first bullet on page 2 and attachment of the 25 Performance curve). 2. Page Under Assessment of Phase Blended Modeling heading second paragraph last sentence Simulations..Conditions we believe it would be better to remove that sentence and replace with They are in accordance with the requirements of AB3034, relating to system design capability Let me know your thoughts on these suggestions. Frank

Phase Blended Travel Time Assessment California High-Speed Rail Program 2 February 203 Purpose The purpose of this memo is to present a technical assessment of the travel times and assumptions for a Phase Blended service between San Francisco and San Jose and between San Francisco and Los Angeles. This assessment is based on the results of computer model simulations that demonstrate the pure run time of the modeled trains operating on a blended system can meet the Prop A mandates to design for a maximum 30 minutes of travel time for a non stop SF SJ and a 2hr 40min for non stop San Francisco Los Angeles service. Assessment of Phase Blended Modeling Phase Blended infrastructure consists of proposed full high speed rail only improvements between San Jose and Los Angeles combined with blended service alignments on the Caltrain Corridor between San Francisco and San Jose. Travel times are generated from the California High Speed Train Project (CHSTP) computer simulation model. The travel times generated from the computer model account for the physical characteristics of the proposed route geometry and the times are considered pure travel time, or best time that might be achieved under the current proposed alignment and conditions. Actual travel times will be based on the final alignment in the approved environmental documents. Travel times between San Francisco and Los Angeles include the blended service between San Francisco and San Jose with a 0 mph maximum speed with an unimpeded path for a non stop HST service options in the SF SJ corridor. Travel Time SF SJ SF LA Phase Blended (No Midline Overtake) 30 2:32 Assumptions Following are the assumptions made in CHSTP model for calculating these travel times: Pure run time is calculated based on modeled trainset performance over a given segment of the alignment geometry. Travel times are for representative alignments based on alternatives included in the environmental documents. Alternative alignment may alter travel time. Advancement in train technology would allow train to operate safely at 220 mph on sustained steep grades. For example, the grade between Bakersfield and the Tehachapi Mountains requires a sustained average grade ranging of 2.5% 2.8% of approximately 20 miles. A speed restriction to approximately 50 mph may be required to mitigate a safety issue related to wheel adhesion in the Berkeley Simulation Software (BSS) Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) railroad operations simulation model software was used to produce the San Francisco Los Angeles travel time in this analysis. The Train Performance Calculator (TPC) feature in the RTC model is capable of accurately representing the train movements over alignments with different complexity, such as grades, curves, and speed limits, based on the available tractive and braking effort specified for the train set technology taking into account the high speed rail vehicle rolling resistance coefficients.

California High-Speed Rail Program downhill direction at very high speeds. If required, this speed reduction would increase the northbound travel time by approximately two to three minutes. FRA strategies and regulations are in place to support mixed fleet traffic (freight, conventional passenger, high speed passenger) to operate at speeds up to 0 mph. Caltrain train service will allow for a high speed express train to run unimpeded between SF and SJ. Track infrastructure will be constructed or upgraded, as required, to achieve FRA/CPUC regulatory requirements and AREMA standards for the speeds modeled. Conclusion Based on the CHSTP computer model simulations and stated assumptions, a 2hr 40 min travel time between San Francisco and Los Angeles and 30 minute travel time between San Francisco and San Jose can be achieved for the Phase Blended service. Attachments. Train Performance Curve LA to SF Phase Full 2. Train Performance Curve SF to LA Phase Full 3. Train Performance Curve SF to SJ 2