Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 The 9 th International Conference on Traffic & Transportation Studies (ICTTS 2014) Improving the Voyage Energy Efficiency by Using EEOI Nicoleta Acomi a,*, Ovidiu Cristian Acomi b a Constanta Maritime University, 104 Mircea cel Batran Str., Constanta 900663, Romania b Nemo Shipping Constanta, 50A Ferdinand Blvd., Constanta 900693, Romania Abstract The environment protection is one of the main concerns of our society and this paper aims at presenting some of the international efforts in the maritime transport. Marine pollution consists of water pollution and also air pollution. Regardless of the delay in recognizing the latter type of pollution, it rapidly gains many organizations to argue on it. The first step was including a dedicated annex in the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, which seek to minimize the airborne emissions from ships. The efforts continued and the International Maritime Organization has developed a series of measures for monitoring the emissions. These are grouped in three main directions: technical, operational and management related. The subject of our study is the concept of Energy Efficiency Operational Index, developed to provide ship-owners and ship-operators with assistance in the process of establishing a mechanism to achieve the limitation or reduction of emissions from ships in operation. It serves as a monitoring tool and it represents the mass of CO 2 emitted per unit of transport work. The paper presents the way how the commercial software can be used for estimating the EEOI value before the voyage, in comparison with the true value calculated on board. The true value is calculated based on unpredictable factors that might appear during the voyage: varying the speed, days on anchor, or waiting for orders period. The authors included these in a software solution, which allows to emphasize the influence of the on board measures over voyage energy efficiency. 2014 Elsevier The Authors. Ltd. This Published an open by Elsevier access article Ltd. under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of Beijing Jiaotong University (BJU), Systems Engineering Society of China (SESC). Peer-review under responsibility of Beijing Jiaotong University(BJU), Systems Engineering Society of China (SESC). Keywords: voyage energy efficiency; marine pollution; air pollution; CO2 emission; energy efficiency operational index * Corresponding author. Tel.: +40-241-664-742; Fax: +40-241-664-714. E-mail address: nicoleta.acomi@cmu-edu.eu. 1877-0428 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of Beijing Jiaotong University(BJU), Systems Engineering Society of China (SESC). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.234
532 Nicoleta Acomi and Ovidiu Cristian Acomi / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 1. Introduction Carbon dioxide is the most important Greenhouse Gas emitted by ships. A set of technical and operational measures has been identified by the International Maritime Organization in the last period, in order to reduce the GHG. The studies related to the marine pollution show that it takes several years from the proposal till the moment of ratification (Anechitoae, 2012), even if the problem is international recognized and thoroughly investigated (Ghita, 2007; Ghita and Ardelean I. 2010). If applied, these measures would improve the energy efficiency of the voyage by acting on the emissions rate. Shipping has been shown to be an energy-efficient mean of transportation compared to other means (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Emissions of CO 2 from shipping compared with global total emissions, IMO, MEPC 59/INF.10, (2009) According to the Second IMO GHG study (IMO, MEPC 59/INF.10, 2009), international shipping is estimated to have emitted 870 million tons, or about 2.7% of the global emissions of CO 2 in 2007. Efficiency is expressed as mass of CO 2 per tonne-kilometer, where the mass of CO 2 expresses the total emissions for the activity and tonnekilometer expresses the total transport work that is done. The EEOI and it is calculated for a voyage by the equation (1), in which a smaller EEOI value means a more energy efficient ship: j FC j CFj EEOI (1) m D carg o For a number of voyages or voyage legs, the indicator is expressed as presented below, equation (2): i i j FCij CFj AverageEEOI (2) m xd c arg o, i Where: j is the fuel type; i is the voyage number; FC ij is the mass of consumed fuel j at voyage i; CFj is the fuel mass to CO 2 mass conversion factor for fuel j; m cargo is cargo carried (tonnes) or work done (number of TEU or passengers) D is the distance in nautical miles corresponding to the cargo carried or work done. The relationship between the fuel consumption and the mass of CO 2, comes from the chemical composition of the fuel having different carbon content and also different correction factors according to IMO, MEPC.1/Circ.684 (2009), presented in Table 1, which differ for various types of vessels engines. In addition, there are also international requirements regarding the content of the fuel, depending on the area where the vessel sails. In order to establish the EEOI, the company should set the procedure to be in force and the type of voyages to which the procedure would be applied. Ballast voyages as well as the voyages performed for transport of cargo will also be included. Voyages for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea, as well as voyages i
Nicoleta Acomi and Ovidiu Cristian Acomi / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 533 which are not used for transport of cargo, such as voyage for docking service will be excluded. The following steps are to be completed for every ship: Define the period for which the EEOI is calculated; Define data sources for data collection; Collect data; Convert data to appropriate format; and Calculate EEOI. Table 1. The Carbon content per fuel type, (IMO, MEPC.1/Circ.684, 2009) Type of fuel Reference Carbon Content C F (t-co 2/t-Fuel) Diesel / Gas Oil ISO8217Grades DMX through DMC 0.875 3.206000 Light Fuel Oil (LFO) ISO8217Grades RMA through RMD 0.86 3.151040 Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) ISO8217Grades RME through RMK 0.85 3.114400 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Propane; Butane 0.819 0.827 3.000000 3.030000 Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) 0.75 2.750000 2. Calculation of the Energy Efficiency Operational Index The Energy Efficiency Operational Index is calculated per performed voyage and also as an average EEOI for consecutive voyages of the same vessel. This study is based on the characteristics of a handy size Chemical/Product Tanker of 38000 DWT, equipped with a MAN B&W 6S50MC-C Main Engine (ME) of 9480KW at 127RPM, three Wartsila Auxpac975W6L20 Diesel Generator (DG) Sets of 975KW and 900RPM and Saacke KLN/VIC 16/10 / 16t/h Auxiliary Boiler (AB). The commercial software calculates both the EEOI and the average EEOI based on the following entries: type of fuel, distances when loaded/ballast, and number of days. A free software calculator developed by Totem Plus Company is used for this case study (Fig. 2). Fig. 2. The interface of the EEOI Software calculator, (Produced by TotemPlus, 2013) The authors developed an.xls programme that calculates the same efficiency indicators, the EEOI and the average EEOI, but the source of entry data involves the on board unpredictable parameters such as: days in port, varying the speed, days on anchor, days on maneuvering, loading, discharging or waiting for orders period (Acomi and Acomi, 2013). The programme also considers the running hours of the fuel consumers: Diesel Generator, Auxiliary Boiler and Main Engine. These parameters are extracted from the on board documents as follows:
534 Nicoleta Acomi and Ovidiu Cristian Acomi / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 Distance Sailed the actual distance sailed in nautical miles for the respective voyage, as recorded in the ship s Bridge Log Book Cargo mass in this case expressed in tonnes, quantity as per Bill of Lading and Deck Log Book; for other types of vessels the work done will be expressed in a different manner: for passenger ships number of passengers, for car ferries number of cars Fuel consumption represents all the fuel consumed at sea and in port by main and auxiliary engines, boilers and others, as recorded in Engine Log Book Fig. 3. The program interface 3. The voyage energy efficiency 3.1. The results The total emissions of CO 2 per 1000000 tonnes of fuel, as resulted from the above mentioned analyses is obtained for the situation when the distance increased for the vessel carrying the same quantity of cargo. The EEOI value decreased from 15.07 for an average speed of 15 knots to 13.55, for 10 knots.
Nicoleta Acomi and Ovidiu Cristian Acomi / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 535 Fig. 4. The amount of CO 2 emissions in tonnes per 1000000 tonnes fuel (a), Fuel consumption variation while changing voyage operational parameters (b) 3.2. The comparison between EEOI values Including separate voyage legs in the Free Software Calculator we obtained for a complete voyage: loading cargo, sea-passage, discharging, and ballast condition sea-passage, an average EEOI of 12.7. The involved voyage legs were: loaded condition sea-passage, with an average speed of 14kts, as per Charter Party Contract, distance 6300Nm, and voyage in ballast condition from discharging to loading port with an average speed of 14kts, as per Charter Party Contract, distance 950Nm. Beside these legs, there were others operations that influenced the on-board calculated EEOI during the voyage, such as: waiting for loading orders, maneuvering to the Ship-To-Shore position, loading, remaining at anchor from various reasons in our case it was a port congestion, discharging. These cumulated about 25 days from the total voyage period of 46.7 days, and all the consumers were considered in our study on B column of our.xls programme. The result for the EEOI as per the developed software was 15.07. The following table presents the difference between the two modes available for achieving the EEOI value: the Calculator and the On-Board solution. Table 2. The variation of the EEOI Speed (kts) Fuel consumption (metric tonnes) EEOI (mass of CO2 per tonne km) Loaded voyage Ballast voyage Calculator On board 14 684.4 86.7 12.7 15.07 13 656.3 83 12.2 14.44 12 651.9 82.9 12.1 14.24 11 637.2 81.3 11.8 13.38 10 643.1 69.1 11.7 13.55 4. Conclusions Comparing the values obtained by applying the free commercial software for the same vessel, the same cargo and the same route, with the results of our research, obtained by applying the developed.xls programme, it is noticed a difference of the EEOI values per voyage, of about 18-20%. This difference between the two values of the EEOI is gradually increased with decreasing the speed and also the amount of fuel consumption. The results show that the on board unpredictable parameters could influence in a grate percent the value of the EEOI estimated before performing the voyage.
536 Nicoleta Acomi and Ovidiu Cristian Acomi / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 ( 2014 ) 531 536 Acknowledgements The acknowledgement for the Totem Plus Company for their kindness in allowing us to use the EEOI Calculator Free Software. References Acomi, N. & Acomi, O.C. (2013). The influence of the voyage parameters over the Energy Efficiency Operational Index, The 18th Conference of the Hong-Kong Society for Transportation Studies Hong Kong, CHINA, HKSTS 2013. Anechitoae, C. (2009). The protection of community design right (drawing and design) within the domain of naval activities, Towards the sustainable marine technology and transportation, IMAM 2009, (pp. 1043-1048), 12 15 October, 2009, İstanbul, Turkey., Editors: Ömer Gören, Barbaros Okan, Şafak Karakaş İstanbul: ITU Faculty of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2009. ISBN (Set) 978-975-561-355-0, ISBN: Vol. III 978-975-561-358- 1(http://www.imam2009.itu.edu.tr/files/IMAM_2009.pdf) Ghiţă, S. (2007). Ecology Course, Editor: Nautica, Romania, ISBN 973-973-7872-57-6 Ghiţă, S. & Ardelean, I. (2010). Dynamics of marine bacterioplankton density in filtered (0.45 μm) microcosms supplemented with gasoline. The 3 th International Conference on Environmental and Geological Science and Engineering EG 2010, (93-98). ISBN: 978-960-474-221-9 IMO, MEPC.1/Circ.684 (2009) Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship energy efficiency operational indicator, EEOI IMO, MEPC.1/Circ.471.CO 2 (2005) Interim guidelines for voluntary ship CO 2 emission indexing for use in trials, July 2005 IMO, MEPC 59/24/Add.1, ANNEX 19 (2012) Guidance for the development of a ship energy efficiency management plan, SEEMP IMO, MEPC 59/INF.10, (2009) Second IMO GHG Study www.totemplus.com EEOI free calculator