Microbots for Large-Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration

Similar documents
Light-Lift Rocket II

Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

The Study of Locomotion of Small Wheeled Rovers: The MIDD Activity


From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

A HOPPING MOBILITY CONCEPT FOR A ROUGH TERRAIN SEARCH AND RESCUE ROBOT

Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, GMT

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Brief overview of lunar surface environment Examples of rover types and designs Steering systems Static and dynamic stability

Landing Targets and Technical Subjects for SELENE-2

RIMRES: A project summary

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

Edible Rovers Activity High School Edible Rover Worksheet Geometry Answers

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

Challenges of Designing the MarsNEXT Network

Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

Japanese Rover Test-bed for Lunar Exploration

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

3 DESIGN. 3.1 Chassis and Locomotion

Name: Space Exploration PBL

SOFT LANDING GET READY AHEAD OF TIME. MATERIALS (per lander) INTRODUCE THE CHALLENGE (10 minutes)

Lunar Architecture and LRO

Spinning-in of Terrestrial Microsystems and Technologies to Space Robotics: Results and Roadmaps

A New Facility for Lander Touchdown and Rover Mobility Testing at DLR

Abstract #1756. English. French. Author(s) and Co Author(s) ispace & Team Hakuto s 2017 Lunar Mission

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction

DESIGN, SIMULATION AND TESTING OF SHRIMP ROVER USING RECURDYN

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

The European Lunar Lander Mission

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Astro the Rover. Olympus Mons Rover Team

Sciences for Maneuver Campaign

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

Building an Economical and Sustainable Lunar Infrastructure To Enable Lunar Science and Space Commerce

Mars 2018 Mission Status and Sample Acquisition Issues

SMARTSat. Shape Memory Alloy Research Technology Satellite. Allison Barnard Alicia Broederdorf. Texas A&M University Space Engineering Institute

Silicon-Germanium Integrated Electronics for Extreme Environments Applied to the Design of a Lunar Hopper

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

Rocket Activity Advanced High- Power Paper Rockets

Canadian Lunar & Planetary Rover. Development

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Soviet Lunokhod 1 and 2 missions and things around

This is Ground Control... Professor Derek Long Department of Informatics King s College London

Space Robotics Planetary Exploration - a DLR Perspective

Sample Fetching Rover - Lightweight Rover Concepts for Mars Sample Return

Mobile Payload Element (MPE)

The Mobility System Wheel Design for NASA s Mars Science Laboratory Mission

The Mars Express Mission A Continuing Challenge. Erhard Rabenau, NOVA Space Associates Ltd Mars Express Senior Mission Planner

Phoenix Lander Implications on in situ resource utilization for robotic exploration of Mars

Jay Gundlach AIAA EDUCATION SERIES. Manassas, Virginia. Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief. Blacksburg, Virginia. Aurora Flight Sciences

Low Power Mobility System for Micro Planetary Rover Micro5

Investigative Technologies and Techniques

Innovative Mars exploration rover using inflatable or unfolding wheels

Some Thoughts on Simulations in Terramechanics

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

REU: Improving Straight Line Travel in a Miniature Wheeled Robot

ARIANEGROUP ORBITAL PROPULSION ROBERT-KOCH-STRASSE TAUFKIRCHEN GERMANY

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

Heat Shield Design Project

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

Critical Design Review

Pantheon Mission Profiles

A First Principles-based Li-Ion Battery Performance and Life Prediction Model Based on Single Particle Model Equations

White Paper: Pervasive Power: Integrated Energy Storage for POL Delivery

The Modular Martian MILLIPEDE

Travel: Detailed Flight Plan

THE MARS EXPLORATION ROVERS: HITTING THE ROAD ON MARS. Nagin Cox

Intelligent Mobility for Smart Cities

Design and Navigation of Flying Robots

John Klaus Robert Cooper Thilina Fernando Zoe Morozko

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

ASTRIUM. Lunar Lander Concept for LIFE. Hansjürgen Günther TOB 11. Bremen, 23/

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Power Systems Overview. Summer Programs

Using Microtechnologies to Build Micro-Robot Systems

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Martian In Situ Investigations

Distributed Compliance Controllers for Legged- Robot with Geared Brushless DC Joints

Robots from Junk. Vocabulary autonomous, center of mass, lander, robotics, rover

Study of Flexible Wheels for Lunar Exploration Rovers: Running Performance of Flexible Wheels with Various Amount of Deflection

Robots to Support a Human Mars Mission

Autonomous Sample Acquisition for the ExoMars Rover

INSPECTION TECHNIQUE FOR BWR CORE SPRAY THERMAL SLEEVE WELD

Analysis of Architectures for Long-Range Crewed Moon and Mars Surface Mobility

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

The Mobility System of the Multi-Tasking Rover (MTR)

Qualification of Lockheed Martin Micro Pulse Tube Cryocooler to TRL6

Design of Mobility System for Ground Model of Planetary Exploration Rover

Improved Traversal for Planetary Rovers through Forward Acquisition of Terrain Trafficability

FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY ICT REDOX-FLOW BATTERY

1 Evaluation of Power Control System for Micro and Nano Satellites by Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulator

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

Transcription:

Microbots for Large-Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration Steven Dubowsky, Principal Investigator Karl Iagnemma, Co-Investigator Field and Space Robotics Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Penelope Boston, Co-Investigator Director, Cave and Karst Research Program New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 1

The REMotes Concept Deploy thousands of small mobile microbots over a planet s surface and subsurface Allows the scientific study of very large-area surface areas in extremely difficult terrains Allows the scientific study caves other subsurface domains REMotes - Robotic Exploration Micromotes 2

Concept Overview QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 3

The Concept Small and Light Weight 100mm and 100 grams Highly Redundant 100s-1000s of units for a mission Individuals are sacrificial Largely constructed of highly durable and lightweight polymers Extremely simple and reliable Highly Agile in Rough Terrain Hopping, rolling, bouncing Autonomous On-board power, communications, sensing Teams with science-driven group intelligence 4

Scientific Motivation Caves: Windows into the subsurface (underlying geology, subsurface ices/water, etc.) Repositories for materials (biological traces, climate signals, unique minerals, etc.) Surface terrains Icy surfaces (e.g. permafrost, polygons, rocky deserts, etc.) Volcanic and rocky surfaces (e.g. lava flows, canyons, rock underhangs, etc.) 5

Scientific Motivation- Caves Lunar Lava tubes Mars Lava tubes Venus Lava tubes Io Lava tubes 6

Challenging VERY Large Surface Topographies Europan Surface Ganymede Tectonic Terrain Mars Paleoponds 7

Planetary Surfaces and Caves Present Challenging Terrain 8

Preliminary Field Testing - New Mexico Lava tubes Breakdown floors vs. sediment floors Wedging issues in different terrain Size optimization of microbot units 9

REMots - A New Paradigm for Exploration of the Bodies of the Solar System Future Planetary Missions will Need to Explore: Very Large Surface Areas Access complex subsurface topologies Traverse very rough terrain ReMotes provide: Strategy flexibility Multiple applications Multiple planet types Multiple terrain types at comparable volume and mass to existing linear sampling strategies! 1000 REMotes would have the same launch volume and weight as the Spirit 10

Deployment and Communication Concept Deployed by orbiter Airbag landing Deployed from a balloon or aerial vehicle Low altitude drop landings Microbots Communicate via: Trail of breadcrumbs ( LAN) to lander or to aerial vehicle or orbiting satellite 11

Deployment QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. Reference Missions A Mar surface exploration mission - 135 sq kilometers (50 sq miles) in 30 Sols A Cave exploration mission - 1 Km in 5 days (WEEBUBBIE CAVE-Australia) 12

Mobility Bi-Stable EPAM muscle actuators Directed or non-directed hopping Power Hyper-efficiency micro fuel cells Sensors Micro-scale imagers, environmental sensors, gas analysis sensors, spectrometers Communication and control Surface/subsurface LAN Collective group behavior Microbot Subsystems 13

Mobility and Power Mobility and Power All Polymer Bi-stable muscle actuators Directed or non-directed hopping, bouncing, rolling High-efficiency fuel cells Fuel Tank Mass (Total) 150 g Diameter 10 cm Hop height (Mars) 1.5 m Distance per hop 1.5 m (Mars) Avg. hop rate 6 hop/hr Max. hop rate 60 hops/hr Fuel use 1.5 mg/hop Peak power 1.5 W Bi-Stable EPAM actuator Power Leg Predicted System Parameters based on the reference missions 14

Mobility and Power Charge EPAM muscle actuators - Directed or non-directed hopping, bouncing, rolling Orient QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. Hop 15

Sensors and Communications Heterogeneous sensor suites Micro-scale imagers, environmental sensors, gas analysis sensors, spectrometer, etc. Communication and control Surface/subsurface LAN Panoramic Imager Antenna Indexing Sensor Disks Microprocess or and Electronics 16

Communication and control Surface/subsurface LAN Collective group behavior Sensors and Communications Microbot surface LAN 17

Key System Components 18

Actuator: Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscles (EPAMs) Simple Lightweight Compliant electrodes Basic Operating Principle Elastomeric film Actuation QuickTime and a Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 19

Actuation MIT actuator performance Large strains (up to 200%) Micro-amp currents 1000:1 force to weight ratio Dynamic response: 10 Hz Energy efficiency: > 70 % QuickTime and a Video QuickTime decompressor and a are needed Video to decompressor see this picture. are needed to see this picture. 20

Actuation 10 cm Indexing Actuator Concept Simple All polymers - light weight and inexpensive Experimental Prototype: 110 x 50 x 15 mm Mass: 30 g Jump height ~ 100 mm (1g) QuickTime and a MPEG-4 Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 21

Power Fuel cells result in long system range Surface mission: 30 days*6 hops/hr 5000 hops Cave mission: 1 km penetration 1000 hops Fuel consumption (H 2 +O 2 ): 1.5 mg / hops Peak power: 1.5 W Embedded in structure 10.0-0.15 kg hopper - Jumps of 1.5 m (high) x 1 m (long) Fuel Cell Sys. Mass Battery Sys. Mass 1.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Battery Fuel Cell 0.1 Number of Hopping Cycles PCB Fuel Cell power (Fritz B. Prinz, Stanford) 22

Sensors and Computation Key Exploit - Micro-sensors and microcomputational components (currently under development) Micro-sensors have very small power consumption (25 to 100mW) Proposed sensors suites include: Image sensors Environmental sensors Gas analysis sensors Spectrometers On-board processing reduces data transmission requirements 4 Gig Disk Drive - 2004 (Toshiba) On-board-data processing Technical University of Braunschweig 23

Sensors Image sensors Panoramic camera to identify science sites, localize and navigate microbot Microscopy for close up and high resolution analysis Environmental sensors Pressure, temperature and dust sensors Accelerometers and gyroscopes system mobility Gaussmeters, Magnetoscops for field measurements Fujitsu: CMOS Micro- Camera Micro-scale prototypes are underdevelopment. Miniaturized gyro by JPL. 24

Sensors Gas analysis Primarily for detection of carbon compounds Detection of methane to study biological activity Micro-scale laboratory-on-chip type sensors are under development X-Ray, Raman and Mössbauer spectrometers Play key roles in planetary geo-chemical characterization Greatest limitations for miniaturization and largest power consumption Spectrobots to carry only spectrometers Specific measurement and limited spectra resolution could be key for data reduction Miniaturized mass spectrometer- Draper Laboratories 25

Communication-Surface Surface exploration Microbots communicate with a central unit (lander) and each other via LAN. Maximum distance to cover in reference surface mission 6.5 km without LAN. RF frequency between 1 and 25 GHz would meet the requirement ( 100mW) X-band antenna-department of engineering science, Oxford, UK 26

Communications- Subsurface Microbots communicate with lander by a trail of breadcrumbs Reference Mission (1km) WEEBUBBIE CAVE-Australia Reference Cave Mission: QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 50 Microbots Field Measurements show Range in caves at 25 GHz is greater than 20 meters- (non-line-of-sight) *Boston, P.J., et al, S.L.. Extraterrestrial subsurface technology test bed: Human use and scientific value of Martian caves. STAIF (Space Tech. & Applic. Forum 2003) Proc.. AIP #654. Amer. Inst. of Physics, College Park, MD, 2004 27

Surface Mobility--Simulations Study Results Analysis of microbot surface mobility 100 Microbots 1.5 m per jump 4320 jumps 6 jumps / hour 30 days 133 square km or 50 square mi covered Result for one team Mission might have multiple teams with various starting on planet QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 28

Cave Mobility The Hibashi Cave, Saudi Arabia Hibashi by candlelight: Show that the cave has a relatively uniform cross-section. 29

Cave Mobility -- Simulations Study Results Microbot enters cave Microbot movement inside a representative cave Simulation of Hanns Cave, Australia 5m 3 jumps 30

Cave Mobility QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. Profile: WEEBUBBIE CAVE-Australia 31

QuickTime and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. 32

Cave Mobility Studies Effect of slope on microbot travel - Sandy cave floor Distance traveled in 100 jumps 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 Downhill, rough floor Downhill, smooth floor Uphill, rough floor Uphill, smooth floor 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Floor slope, % rise/run 33

REMots - A New Paradigm for Exploration of the Bodies of the Solar System ReMotes could provide the ability to: Explore Very Large Surface Areas Access complex subsurface topologies Traverse very rough terrain at comparable launch volume and mass to existing linear single point sampling strategies! and they could go where no robot has gone before. 34

Important Feasibility Questions Remain Issues would be addressed in a Phase II Study The fundamental limitations of component technologies in extreme environments Design and control concepts for mobility in rough terrain -- resistance to entrapment. The selection of heterogeneous sensor team for maximum science return. Decentralized command, control and communications methods for microbot teams The fundamental limitations of microbot scaling - the performance of very small sensors, actuators, fuel cells, etc. Comparison projected performance of microbot mission to conventional rovers (MSL 2009 mission baseline) Laboratory and field demonstrations of key technologies 35

REMots: A new design paradigm for the exploration of the planets, the moons and other bodies of the Solar System! Our Team 36