The Future of TDM History can help us understand the present, and predict the future!

Similar documents
Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Transportation Demand Management Element

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

The TDM Plan for Fort Washington Office Park NOVEMBER 1 6, 2017 FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE PARK STAKEHOLDERS

MOBILITY AND THE SHARED ECONOMY

Getting Parking Right in Emerging Mixed Use Environments

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

Emergency Ride Home Program Survey

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

It s easy to understand why ridesharing is increasing in

Public Transportation. Economics 312 Martin Farnham

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Parking Management Element

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Incentives for Green Fleets

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Parking Management Strategies

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Redefining Mobility. Randy Iwasaki. Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority January 18, 2018

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

WELCOME TO TECH. talks TECHNOLOGY ENERGIZES

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

USF Tampa Campus Percent Mode Share 2010

When Do We Talk About the Future?

Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

Our Shared Autonomous Future. Thomas Fisher Director, Minnesota Design Center University of Minnesota

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Transit Oriented and City Center Development

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning and Alternative Services Program 2016 APTA Annual Meeting. City of Seattle

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

EVALUATION OF MTC S CLIMATE PROGRAM. May 7, 2015 TRB Sustainability for Transportation

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Rui Wang Assistant Professor, UCLA School of Public Affairs. IACP 2010, Shanghai June 20, 2010

NEW YORK CITY CARSHARE PILOT

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Implementing Transport Demand Management Measures

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

New Mobility Business Models

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

Shared Mobility and Automated Vehicles: Policy and Data Sharing

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

Rex Hughes, Madrona Venture Group Bruce Agnew, Cascadia Center Scott O. Kuznicki, Transpo Group

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

Transportation Demand Management. Overview of Tools and Strategies

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Role of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Planning for Sustainable Urban Transport Systems in India - Strengths and Weaknesses

Bus The Case for the Bus

Planning for AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. Presentation on the planning implications of self-driving vehicles. by Ryan Snyder Transportation Planning Expert

Green Fleet Conference Hyatt Regency Chicago October 19-20, 2009

SANDAG Vanpool Program Guidelines as of February 2018

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

TNC s and Everything Else: The New Wave in (Public) Transportation

Evolution in Multi-Modal Transportation

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

building liveable cities

Organization. SDOT Date and Commute Seattle. Dave Sowers, Deputy Program Administrator

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

Autonomous Vehicles and Land Use

Shared Mobility and Technologies Impact on Parking Design and Curbside Management

Alamo Natural Gas Vehicle Consortium

The RoadMAP to ELectric Vehicle Adoption. Model policies and programs to accelerate EV adoption at the state and local level.

CTR Employer Survey Report

Federal Funding Opportunities Northeast Drayage Workshop October 13, Reema Loutan Environmental Engineer EPA Region 2

Shared Mobility: Past, Present, and Future. Susan Shaheen, PhD Twitter: SusanShaheen1 LinkedIn: Susan Shaheen

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

AVs and Transit. Stephen Buckley, P.E., AICP NACV Summit June 12, 2018

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

Transcription:

The Future of TDM History can help us understand the present, and predict the future! Jon Martz Director, Government Sales February 9, 2017

Historically, TDM was a response to crisis OPEC Oil Embargo (1973) and Oil Crisis (1979) Public Sector response 55 mph speed limits on public highways Highway funds allowed for ridesharing demo programs (In 1978, this allowance was made permanent.) Metropolitan ridesharing encouragement initiatives FHWA Carpool Matching Program (Cobol) Carpool information roadway signs Public service announcements, e.g. Kalaka carpool Creation of HOV Lanes (e.g. Shirley Hwy in NoVA)

Historically, TDM was a response to crisis OPEC Oil Embargo (1973) and Oil Crisis (1979) Private Sector response Creation of employer vanpooling (Bob Owens of 3M, Bill Fortune of Conoco) National Task Force on Ridesharing (Carter, 1979) Asked large private employers to get involved By 1981, ~24,000 corporate-owned vanpools for their commuting employees National Association of Van Pool Operators (NAVPO) Forerunner of ACT Three Types of Vanpooling Employer-owned/-operated (Today, few programs remain.) Owner-operators (Remain in one market with significant public assistance) Third-Party Vanpooling Today, 12K of 17.5K (est.) by private providers of public transportation by vanpool

Next, TDM was a response to air pollution Clean Air Act Amendments (1990) Provisions for Attainment/Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards Non-Attainment Categories: Moderate, Serious and Severe California Regulation XV Required TDM-trained Employee Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) WA Commute Trip Reduction Act (1991), CTR Efficiency Act (2006), State Agency CTR (2009) Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA, 1991) Newly-authorized Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program Through FY15, CMAQ program provided $30 billion to fund 30,000+ transportation-related environmental projects for State DOTs, metropolitan planning organizations, and other sponsors throughout the US. Today, the primary TDM strategies include riding the bus or train, HOV/HOT lanes, vanpooling, carpooling, carsharing, bicycling, bikesharing, walking, compressed work weeks or teleworking and the many ways to incentivize the expansion of their use!

Public Policy OPPORTUNITIES for TDM DOT s Final Rule on Performance Metrics re: CMAQ and System Performance Focus on per-person Through-put (PPT) rather than Vehicle Through-put Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita (PHED) New measure to assess modal share, specifically the percent of Non-SOV Travel Changes the weighting of the travel time measures from system-miles to person-miles traveled (AVO) New greenhouse gas emissions metric (% change in CO 2 emissions from CY17) Metropolitan Planning Private Sector afforded a seat at the table, FHWA/FTA guidance forthcoming Local Transit Benefit Ordinances San Francisco Bay Area, New York City and Washington DC 25x20 Campaign: Nearly ten cities in some stage of development Infrastructure Package Where will the trillion dollars come from?

Public Policy THREATS to TDM Congress Could remove transit from Highway Trust Fund ( It s a local issue. ) Could eliminate/reduce the Qualified Transportation Fringe Benefit Tax reform in First 200 days, TNCs w/ 1 psnger could draw negative attention The White House Could eliminate/reduce Federal TIP program (Executive Order) Federal budget pressures, TNCs w/ 1 psnger could draw negative attention Administration FTA: Funding pressures could focus all resources on SOGR maintenance FHWA: Funding pressures could focus all resources on highway maintenance EPA: Reclassification of non-attainment criteria could eliminate CMAQ eligibility

On-going issues for TDM Generalizations (there are always exceptions): Public transit agencies have ignored suburban employers Few offer tailored TDM services, or worse - they view TDM, as competition Most employers don t want to foot-the-entire-bill for TDM services (Yet Google, Apple, Facebook, Yahoo, etc. are sometimes criticized for doing so!) Gain: Pooling of resources funded TMAs Loss: Lack of direct corporate commitment Challenge: Employers reluctant to release employee commute info to aggregators Technology will solve our problems apps could replace community-based rideshare matching Difficult to monetize true carpool matching apps Why should passengers continue to pay for something they can continue to do without paying?

TDM: Autonomous Cars (Opportunity) Flexibility to order (via app), pickup and deliver Increased safety (fewer fatalities and injuries) Decreased insurance costs Reduction in need for car ownership Reduced need for parking space in urban areas Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions Increased mobility for the young, old and infirmed Behavioral effect: Surge and/or peak pricing will send strong signals to consumers about the prices they pay for their travel choices TDM?

TDM: Autonomous Cars (Issues) Mass unemployment? Population decentralization and continued sprawl? Reduction in gas tax collection for roadway maintenance? Increased peak period utilization? Reduction in use of public transportation? Who is planning/regulating? Private operators or elected officials? How much will it cost? Price is not the same thing as cost Much depends upon utilization Fleet operators likely won t own enough cars/vans to meet peak demand Uneven demand Surge pricing

TDM: Autonomous Transit (Opportunity) Would remove an important cost and several constraints With driver on every vehicle, labor is dominant cost of operations Allow efficient/economical service on low-demand routes Frequency can be increased, attracting off-peak choice riders (SkyTrain) Allow higher avg speeds and reliability (mostly grade-separated) Allow manned buses on high-demand routes at little added cost

TDM: Autonomous Transit (Issues) Expensive to convert existing systems into driverless Higher capital costs may not offset lower operating expenses Backlash from organized labor Loss of jobs, labor protections, retraining Look to experiences in other countries Paris, Stockholm, Vancouver SkyTrain Veolia is bringing electric shuttles to U.S. Private sector settings only for Last-mile applications

In Summation Predicting the future is extremely difficult Change is inevitable and always painful for some Congress will have a LOT to say about Future of TDM Authorizations and Appropriations Labor protections Financing mechanisms Performance incentives Private sector WILL play an ever increasing role Employers and service providers