Performance and Safety Enhancements using New Preservation Techniques

Similar documents
SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

2018 NACE Conference Wisconsin Dells, WI. Joseph Cheung P.E. FHWA Office of Safety

What Is and Is Not High Friction Surfacing

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

High Friction Surfaces In Missouri

Use of New High Performance Thin Overlays (HPTO)

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Curve Safety Treatments. Bryan Wilson, Brad Brimley Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

I.D.O.T. Update Version -

SPECIFICATION FOR SKID RESISTANCE INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT SELECTION

Pavement Management Program Report

SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Correcting Low Asphalt Pavement Friction. Brian L. Schleppi OH DOT Office of Technical Services

ASSESSMENT AND EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PAVEMENT SURFACE FRICTION. Shila Khanal, MASc.,P.Eng. Pavement Engineer

Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

NCAT Report EFFECT OF FRICTION AGGREGATE ON HOT MIX ASPHALT SURFACE FRICTION. By Pamela Turner Michael Heitzman

DMS-9202 Asphaltic Concrete Patching Material (Stockpile Storage or Bagged)

3-D Laser Data Collection and Analysis of Road Surface Texture

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

TEXTURE BRITISH PENDULUM

Developing Affordable GTR Asphalt Mixes for Local Roadways

Louisiana s Experience

MN Roads Low Volume Road Testing to Validate the Purdue TPTA Textures and Predicted Joint Effects

Innovative Warm Mix Asphalt Projects: The Contractor s Perspective

Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR): New Binder Grade Testing and Terminology

SULFUR EXTENDED ASPHALT INVESTIGATION - LABORATORY AND FIELD TRIAL

Update NCHRP Project 9-61 Short- and Long-Term Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Aging in Asphalt Mixtures

TIME TASK FORCE. Guidelines for the Mitigation of Motor Vehicle Fluid Spills at Crash Scenes (Non-Cargo)

Lateral skid resistance in bends

Influence of Hot Mix Asphalt Macrotexture on Skid Resistance

Caltrans Implementation of PG Specs. Caltrans. Presentation Overview. HMA in California. Why, When & How? How will if affect YOU?

High Friction Surfaces and Other Innovative Pavement Surface Treatments for Reduced Highway Noise

EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION Howell Ferry Road Duluth, Gwinnett County, Georgia. WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Willmer Project No

Gary Modi, PE(Stolen from Tim Peiples)

Pavement Performance Prediction Symposium July 17, 2008 University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming

Oregon Department of Transportation Standard Specifications For Asphalt Materials 2004

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

DIVISION III MATERIALS AGGREGATES SECTION 901 COARSE AGGREGATE

Ultra-thin Bonded Wearing Course Performance Update, Minnesota

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

DMS ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PATCHING MATERIAL (STOCKPILE STORAGE)

Pavement Management Plan

Ion Technologies SUMPRO Battery Back-Up

CHIP SEAL BEST PRACTICES

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Lapeer County

SUBJECT: Automatic Stability Control with Traction Control System (ASC+T)

Matching Speed to the Road Surface You can't steer or brake a vehicle unless you have traction. Traction is friction between the tires and the road.

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

2017 Local Roads Workshop Local Agency HMA Acceptance Specification

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in Water-Year 2008

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Chip Seal CAPA Presented by: Rick Peters, Manager Rocky Mountain Chipseal, LLC

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Network Level Friction and Texture in the US. Dr. Edgar de León Izeppi Research Scientist, VTTI

RANDO HDZ. Rando HDZ, our premium, zinc additized, anti-wear hydraulic oil that helps provide you with:

SAFER ROADS FOR TASMANIA GUNN S HILL PROJECT SKID RESISTANCE FIELD ASSESSMENT

Managing the Maintenance of the Runway at Baghdad International Airport

HDM-3. Transportation systems Engineering, IIT Bombay 72

High Risk Rural Road Program Road Safety Audit Report

TRB Webinar: Design and Production of High-Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixes. May 7, 2009, 2:00 PM EDT

Last date for sending comments : 30 November 2011

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

If it ain t broke, don t t fix it. HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

Insert the title of your. Recent research on surface texture

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Defensive Driving Training

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBJECT NAME: HIGHWAY ENGINEERING

SKID RESISTANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

2018 NDACE CONFERENCE

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Guidelines For the MITIGATION OF ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGES OF MOTOR VEHICLE FLUIDS (NON-CARGO) APPROVED 6/25/04

High speed friction measurement

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019

Traffic Engineering Study

LOADING AND UNLOADING SURVEY NATIONAL SCHOOL BUS. Kansas leads the world in the success of each student.

National Center for Asphalt Technology Pavement Test Track

Over-Dimensional Vehicle Restriction Study for US 129 in TN

WXGUARD WIND SEGMENTED LIGHTNING DIVERTER STRIPS INSTALLATION GUIDE.

9.03 Fact Sheet: Avoiding & Minimizing Impacts

Section 5 - Operations and Maintenance Program

DMS-9202, Asphaltic Concrete Patching Material (Stockpile Storage)

Median Barriers in North Carolina

LOW TEMPERATURE OPERABILITY STARTABILITY & CHARACTERISTICS

SCRIM Friction Testing in the USA. Edgar de León Izeppi, Research Scientist Virginia Tech Transportation Institute Nashville, October 13 th 2,016

DYNAMIC PILE TESTING 10/26/ General.

Horizontal Alignment

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

Shunsuke TANAKA and Kimio MARUYAMA

FINAL REPORT CATHODIC PROTECTION EVALUATION. 42-Inch Water Transmission Pipeline Contract 1 Station 0+00 to South Texas Water Authority

SKID RESISTANCE OF ROADS CONTAMINATED WITH GRAVEL

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

NCHRP Project Short- and Long-Term Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Aging in Asphalt Mixtures

2012 Michigan Winter Operations Conference

Transcription:

Performance and Safety Enhancements using New Preservation Techniques NPPC16 Nashville, Tennessee Cecil Jones Diversified Engineering Services, Inc. October 13, 2016

Project History Issues Faced Project Design Initial Results Three Year Follow Up Summary 2

Project History I-40 near Wilmington, NC OGFC placed in 2001 Other sections failing Severe raveling Poor surface friction Increased wet weather accidents Similar pattern emerging Funding a critical issue

Issues Faced Pavement was not performing Safety concerns elevating Traditional solutions not possible lack of funds Pavement needed attention DOT searching for options

Issues Faced When will it fail? Can failure be delayed? Well past the top of the curve What options exist? How to fund? Prompt action was required to restore friction

Solution How can these issues be addressed? Texturing solves friction, but not raveling Rejuvenation may retard raveling, but decreases friction (at least temporarily) Combination of technologies may solve both issues

Performance Based Design Outflow Meter (ASTM E2380) Average 10 seconds or less per lot Recovered Binder Viscosity (AASHTO T 316) 20% improvement 2 weeks after treatment Friction Testing (ASTM E274) No limits set

Project Design Concerns Texturing May break aggregate bond Will not prevent future polishing Rejuvenation First use on OGFC in NC Net friction improvement should be positive Highly oxidized modified binder

Pavement Abrasion Project Evaluation of NCDOT Crash Data

Project Design Six segments Four OGFC on I-40 Two dense graded mix on secondary road Pavement Markings retained Texturing between markings Rejuvenator does not discolor markings Testing by contractor Outflow Meter by contractor Viscosity by independent laboratory Friction testing by independent firm (and DOT) 10

Texturing Before Texturing AFTER Post Texturing

Initial Results Performance Requirements Exceeded OGFC Outflow improved 39% Dense graded Outflow improved 73% Viscosity improved 32.4% Skid numbers improved ~30% 12

1.5 Year Safety Data Skid numbers back to near initial levels Accident Data (as of Feb. 20, 2014) 14% Decrease in total crashes 72% Decrease in wet crashes 16% Decrease in lane departure crashes 75% Decrease in lane departure wet crashes 13

3 Year Safety Data Analysis Analyzed crash data for 3 years prior to work Analyzed same data for 3 years after completion Before After Weather Data (Greater than 0.01in) 3.0 Yrs 3.0 Yrs Total Calendar Days 1,096 1,095 Total Precipitation (inches) 163.88 in 166.55 in Total Wet Days 439 405 Average Rain Total Per Event (inches) 0.37 in 0.41 in Percentage of Rain Days 40.1 % 37.0 % 14

3 Year Safety Data Analysis Segment 1 Longest Segment Seg-1 I-40 Pender County Eastbound: MP 18.33-25.83 Before 3.0 Yrs After 3.0 Yrs Percent Reduction (-) Percent Increase (+) Total Crashes 81 70-13.6 % Total WET Crashes 26 9-65.4 % Lane Departure Crashes 46 39-15.2 % LD-Wet Crashes (Codes 1-3) 22 4-81.8 % 15

Total Crashes Segment # Prior 3 Years After 3 Years Percent Change 1 81 70-13.6% 2 24 2-91.7% 3 9 8-11.1% 4 10 6-40.0% 5a 5 2-60.0% 5b 8 5-37.5% 6 7 5-28.6% 16

Total Wet Crashes Segment # Prior 3 Years After 3 Years Percent Change 1 26 9-65.4% 2 14 1-92.9% 3 6 2-66.7% 4 4 0-100% 5a 1 0-100% 5b 0 1 +100% 6 1 0-100% 17

Total Lane Departure Crashes Segment # Prior 3 Years After 3 Years Percent Change 1 46 39-15.2% 2 18 2-88.9% 3 9 6-33.3% 4 6 4-33.3% 5a 1 0-100% 5b 1 0-100% 6 2 0-100% 18

Total LD Wet Crashes Segment # Prior 3 Years After 3 Years Percent Change 1 22 4-81.8% 2 14 1-92.9% 3 6 2-66.7% 4 3 0-100% 5a 1 0-100% 5b 0 0 0.0% 6 1 0-100% 19

Summary Project was a success! Consistent reduction in accidents Rate of pavement distress slowed Skid numbers reverted back but wet weather accidents lessened 20

Summary Current status Being rehabilitated now (4 years later after concerns of imminent failure in 2011) Agency pleased with extended life 21

Questions?