Critical Design Review

Similar documents
Flight Readiness Review

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Presentation Outline. # Title

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

Project NOVA

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

NASA SL Critical Design Review

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

The University of Toledo

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Critical Design Review Report

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

University Student Launch Initiative

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

University of Notre Dame

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

Critical Design Review

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

USLI Critical Design Report

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

The University of Toledo

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Critical Design Review

Madison West High School Green Team

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz

Preliminary Design Review

USLI Flight Readiness Review

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

University Student Launch Initiative

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry NASA Student Launch Proposal Project Arktos. 432 Eshleman Hall, MC 4500 Berkeley, CA

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

Post Launch Assessment Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

York College of Pennsylvania NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Report

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements

Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

Pre-Launch Procedures

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

University of South Florida

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET. Read And Follow All Instructions

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Transcription:

Critical Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1

Overview Illinois Space Society 2

Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois Space Society 3

Flight Profile Illinois Space Society 4

Current Launch Vehicle Design Nose cone 1) Ejection charge at apogee 3) Nose cone separation and parachute deployment at 1000 feet Upper body tube 2) Drogue deployment at apogee Coupler 4) Main parachute deployment at 800 feet Booster tube Illinois Space Society 5

Vehicle Major Dimensions Total Length: 130 Total Mass: 43.5 lb. Nosecone: 30 Upper Airframe: 48 Payload Bay: 14 Avionics Coupler: 16 Booster Frame: 48 Outer Diameter: 6 Root Chord (Fins): 12 Illinois Space Society 6

Launch Vehicle Materials Upper Airframe and Booster Frame: High Strength Proven benefits based on past usage Blue Tube Bulkheads: Adequate structure support 0.25 thick Aircraft Plywood Centering Rings: Desired additional support due to thrust considerations Aircraft Plywood Fins and Nosecone: High Strength Proven benefits based on past usage Fiberglass Illinois Space Society 7

Static Stability Margin Stability @ liftoff: 2.42 calibers Current CP location: 97.064 Static CG location: 82.331 Illinois Space Society 8

Motor Selection Motor: L1420R-P Diameter: 2.95 Max thrust: 374 lbf s Total impulse: 1038 lbf Burn time: 3.18s T/W ratio: 8.48 Off-rail speed: 60.1 ft/s Illinois Space Society 9

RMS 75/5120 Motor Casing Constructed from high strength aluminum Motor Mount Tube 24 Blue tube (Vulcanized, high density) Center rings permanently fixed Plywood centering rings Utilized 3 rings for assurance Aero pack 75 mm Retainer Motor Subsystem Illinois Space Society 10

Housing for the Motor Subsystem fiberglass fins 3 16 Booster Subsystem Slotted between centering rings and filleted for absolute support Integrated 1515 rail buttons (x2) Houses drogue parachute and tubular Kevlar shock cord deploys at apogee Rail button Illinois Space Society 11

Avionics Coupler Section Parachute connections via U-bolts 1 4 threaded rods to support sled Contains recovery electronics and ejection charges 3 Switch Band Rotary Switches (x2) Illinois Space Society 12

Avionics Bay Recovery Hardware Parachutes Main: Iris Ultra 96 Drogue: Fruity Chutes Elliptical 18 Nosecone: SkyAngle 36 Black powder ejection charges Ignited by e-matches 1 2 tubular Kevlar shock cord Redundant altimeters 1 Telemetrum altimeter for altitude and tracking 1 Stratologger altimeter for altitude Will be official competition altimeter Illinois Space Society 13

Upper Airframe Houses Payload Hardware and Electronics Contains main parachute Shock cord Illinois Space Society 14

Nosecone 6 Ogive 5:1 shape Material: Fiberglass Houses nosecone electronics and hardware Parachute and shock cord Redundant Altimeters (x2) Telemetrum Stratelogger Illinois Space Society 15

Custom MATLAB Flight Simulator User Interface OpenRocket simulation tools were also utilized and verified with MATLAB. Illinois Space Society 16

Flight Simulations Illinois Space Society 17

CFD Analysis Pressure analysis conducted on the launch vehicle Determine the reliability and safety of avionics in the nosecone Pressure variations subside very quickly as curvature decreases Illinois Space Society 18

Apogee: OpenRocket 5438 ft MATLAB 5010 ft Offrail Velocity: OpenRocket 60.1 ft/s MATLAB 63.7 ft/s Maximum velocity: OpenRocket 678 ft/s MATLAB 701 ft/s Vertical Velocity (Avg) 643 ft/s Simulation Results Future work will be conducted to narrow the discrepancies between the custom MATLAB simulator and OpenRocket, using higher fidelity models. Illinois Space Society 19

Drift Predictions Predictions determined using OpenRocket. Will be verified by MATLAB in future work. All predictions are well within the stipulated threshold of 2640 ft. Section Drift in 0 mph winds (ft) Drift in 5 mph winds (ft) Drift in 10 mph winds (ft) Drift in 15 mph winds (ft) Drift in 20 mph winds (ft) Booster and Upper Airframe 9.3 590 1041.4 1614.3 2335.32 Nosecone 9.3 349.1 791.1 1430 2117 Illinois Space Society 20

Predictions determined using OpenRocket. Terminal Velocities Nosecone 20.67 ft/s Upper Airframe and Booster Frame 1 st separation: Drogue 36.27 ft/s Main 11.95 ft/s Kinetic Energies Booster Frame 26.25 ft lbf Avionics Coupler 14.74 ft lbf Upper Airframe 21.55 ft lbf Nosecone 29.85 ft lbf All kinetic energies are with specified threshold of 75 ft lbf Kinetic Energy Illinois Space Society 21

Vehicle Verification Plan Detailed verification plan can be found in CDR report Focus on quantitative comparison Scrutinize and catalog launch vehicle components as they arrive Paramount milestones Incremental testing of all components during the build process Aerodynamics have been verified by subscale launch but other performance issues were observed and addressed as they occured. Full-scale model will be verified during test launch Illinois Space Society 22

~ 1/2 scale model of full-scale launch vehicle Material - Exact to that of the full-scale vehicle Stability margin 2.27 calibers Subscale Vehicle Data from test launch was used to address the possible performance issues that may arise in the full scale model Illinois Space Society 23

Subscale Launch Vehicle Test flight occurred on January 8 th, 2018 in Wisconsin Team members were able to practice proper launch preparation techniques Illinois Space Society 24

Subscale Flight Results Off rail launch procedure was precise and typical of any launch. All recovery systems worked without problems. There was some deviation from the flight profile, which may have been the result of stability issues manifesting in the vehicle. It is suspected that the fins were not suitable. Illinois Space Society 25

Comparison between Flight Data and Simulation Illinois Space Society 26

Deployable Rover Payload Destiny Fawley and Ryan Noe Illinois Space Society 27

Payload Requirements Design a remotely activated custom rover that deploys from the internal structure of the launch vehicle. - Must remain inside rocket until landed - On-board communication system - Correct orientation to exit after landing The rover will autonomously move at least 5 ft. (in any direction) from the launch vehicle. - On-board program facilitates movement - Traverse field terrain Once the rover has reached its final destination, it will deploy a set of foldable solar cells. - Solar panel deployment mechanism on rover Internal Requirements - 5 lb. or less - 6 or smaller diameter rocket Illinois Space Society 28

Payload Overview Two systems: - Lazy Susan Orientation Mechanism - Deployable Rover Deployable Rover Lazy Susan Orientation Mechanism Illinois Space Society 29

Lazy Susan Orientation Mechanism Screw bulkhead into body tube Axle gear bolted to bulkhead Servomotor rotates platform Rover secured with servo latches Illinois Space Society 30

Lazy Susan Orientation Mechanism Lazy Susan controlled by Arduino Micro Redundant Rotation Trigger Detect launch/landing with accelerometer/gyro Receive signal from Ground Station Rotate platform with gyroscope input Illinois Space Society 31

Wheel Orientation and Rover Mobility Segmented body provides mobility Similar to RHex robot Bio-inspired Six wheels provide redundancy Will be updated with grip pads Rhex Robot Image from makezine.com MORRTE Wheel Configuration Path of Travel Illinois Space Society 32

Rover Sensors and Power Systems Redundant Drive Trigger Time delay from ground station signal Lazy Susan Green signal Drive forward Deploy solar panel Record solar power data Middle Segment Illinois Space Society 33

Latching Mechanism Locking Mechanism Controlled by Lazy Susan Arduino Thicker hooks for strength 0.2 hook clearance 0.1 servo clearance Illinois Space Society 34

3D printed non-spring loaded hinges Shape to fit solar cells Facilitate solar panel deployment Hold cells together Servo controls movement Actively holds closed during launch Opens hinge when commanded by Arduino Solar Panel Deployment Servo Solar Cells 3D Printed Hinge Illinois Space Society 35

System Dimensions/Mass Rover 12.77 x 3.94 x 4.35 Platform 14.12 x 4.5 x 4.25 Total Mass: 3.75 lbm Illinois Space Society 36

Questions? Illinois Space Society 37