Air quality at Heathrow Airport

Similar documents
Reducing Aircraft Ground Emissions

Operational eco-efficiency in Refineries

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 April 2016 Update

Introduction to the ICAO Engine Emissions Databank

Maritime emissions IMO discussions

London Transport Policy, Planning and Strategies

Air Pollution Levels at Copenhagen Airport estimated by measurements and Nested Regional Eulerian, Local Gaussian Plume and CFD Models

LAQ and GHG Emissions Management

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

RHA NOx Emission Assessment 2018

The Low Emission Zone

First Half 2018 Resale Retail Transaction performance was better in Larger and Newer market groups and segments:

Pollution from ships in Copenhagen Port and the effect on city air quality

Innovation in London. Policy approaches to mobility management and sustainable travel. Transport for London

Low Emission Zones in Germany

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT

Local Air Quality and ICAO Engine Emissions Standards. Dr. Neil Dickson Environment Branch ICAO Air Transport Bureau

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 for Use with CURED V3A

The London Low Emission Zone. Nick Fairholme Head of the LEZ Transport for London

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

Taxing Petrol and Diesel

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update

ICAO/UN-Habitat Pilot Project on Synergy between Airports and Urban Development for Sustainable Development Experts Group Meeting

Applying Environment & Sustainability to Airport Charges. Matt Gorman, Rick Norman

Upgrading City Buses to Reduce NOx Emissions

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

Particulate Emissions from Typical Light-Duty Vehicles taken from the European Fleet, Equipped with a Variety of Emissions Control Technologies

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF LOCAL AIR QUALITY CHARGES. Roger Roy Director General, Economic Analysis Transport Canada

Vehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Preliminary results from Measurements on A472 Hafod Road

A comparison of the impacts of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars and zero-emission vehicles on urban air quality compliance

The Introduction of Euro 5 and Euro 6 Emissions Regulations for Light Passenger and Commercial Vehicles

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London s Consultation. Changes to the Ultra Low Emission Zone and Low Emission Zone.

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Introduction 3. Profit return 4. Return on investment Targets Self-registrations Incentives... 12

2016 Same old, same old?

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

Fine particle pollution

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the European Union

Figure 3.1: Annual Natural Gas Consumption. Figure 3.2: Monthly Massachusetts and U.S. Natural Gas Prices Figure 3.3: Annual Natural Gas Costs

Renewable Energy Deployment and other GHG-mitigation for Airports in Africa. Naomi Gitau ACI World Environment Standing Committee

Proportion of the vehicle fleet meeting certain emission standards

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

L O W E M I S S I O N CITY

Cost-benefit analysis of using 0.5% marine heavy fuel oil in European sea areas

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

REAL WORLD DRIVING. Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing. Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association

UK Voluntary Carrier Bag Monitoring Data. WRAP July 2014

Apparent fuel leak, Boeing , G-YMME

Accommodating freight in Clean Air Zones

Case Study 1 - Reducing Exhaust Particulates from Buses

Measures to Reduce Airport-Related Pollution

ELECTRICAL GENERATING STEAM BOILERS, REPLACEMENT UNITS AND NEW UNITS (Adopted 1/18/94; Rev. Adopted & Effective 12/12/95)

Real Driving Emissions

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011

California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) Update 2015 CRC LCA of Transportation Fuels Workshop

Atmosphere and Local Environment. Trends in NO X /NO 2 emissions and ambient measurements in the UK

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

Diesel engines on the pathway to low impact on local air quality in Europe

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

BP Target Neutral Online travel calculators: Method for calculating transport emissions

Looking ahead to tier 4

Low Emission Strategies Sussex-DEFRA Seminar, March 2011

The oil fields in the NCS are located in the North Sea, Norwegian Sea, and Barents Sea.

London Buses Emissions Reduction. Finn Coyle Environmental Manager, Transport Emissions

THE DRIVING EMISSIONS TEST

Environmental Fact Sheet

Executive Summary. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through EPA420-S and Air Quality July 2006

Low Emissions Towns and Cities Programme

Capabilities of Emission Control Technologies and their Impact on Air Quality. Expert Meeting of the EU Refining Forum Brussels 1 December 2017

VEPM 5.3. Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Technical report. Prepared for NZ Transport Agency. April 2017

Where do Euro 6 cars stand? Nick Molden 29 April 2015

LAEI 2013 Non-road transport emission estimates

Seminar Β: Pollution Prevention

The Carbon Footprint of Daily Travel

1. Procedure Composition of Kerosene Atmospheric processes Incidents Emergency procedure 6. 6.

TRANSPORTATION AIR QUALITY SUBCOMMITTEE. Port of Houston Authority Air Quality and Sustainability Initiatives December 8, 2015

Research Coverage Report by Shared Research Inc.

Impact of Delhi s CNG Program on Air Quality

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

AIR DISPERSION MODELLING FOR INTEL IRELAND LTD OF AMMONIA EMISSIONS

City of Pacific Grove

AERO2K. Aviation Emissions Inventory for 2002 and Chris Eyers EC-AERODAYS, Vienna June Emissions from Aviation


Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Regulatory opportunities, design challenges and policy- relevant research. Fanta Kamakaté. July 30, 2009

TERM EU Emissions per passenger-kilometre and per tonnekilometre

Evaluating opportunities for soot-free, low-carbon bus fleets in Brazil: São Paulo case study

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS

Criterias for August 2014 Procurement of small vehicles for municipal cleaning

Siemens in Norway 2003 HSE Report, English summary

CANADA / US EMISSION CONTROL AREA (ECA) FOR SHIPS. Consultation Presentation Vancouver, Ottawa, Halifax Environment and Transport Canada January 2009

BP TARGET NEUTRAL ONLINE TRAVEL CALCULATORS: METHOD FOR CALCULATING TRANSPORT EMISSIONS

Type Acceptance Report

2017 Not too bad a year but

Aviation Policy and Strategy International Engine nvpm Standard Update

Transcription:

Air quality at Heathrow Airport Q2 2013 Headlines Key information for air quality monitoring data is: Annual average NO 2 concentrations in 2012 were below the EU limit value except for Oxford Avenue and the Hillingdon M4 sites (see Fig. 1). Running annual mean for NO 2 fell at most monitoring sites in Q2 2013 (see Fig. 2). Annual average PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations were below the EU limit and target values respectively in 2012. There were three breaches of the daily average PM 10 limit value in Q1 and Q2 2013 (see Fig 3). 35 exceedances are allowed per year before the limit value is breached. Highest ever number aircraft movements were made by more modern CAEP4 or CAEP6 models to Q2 2012 - over 91% (see Fig. 5). Heathrow finalising plans to replace all of its air quality monitors in 2013. Heathrow finalising its update of the AirWatch website in 2013. Background Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL) has monitored air quality since the 1990s at its site located near the northern runway (LHR2). It now monitors air quality at three other sites around the airport Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road (see Fig. 4 for locations of these and other air quality monitoring sites within 2km of Heathrow Airport). We are aiming to replace all thirteen air quality monitors in 2013. Large areas of London exceed the health-based air quality limit values set by the EU, due primarily to emissions from road traffic and from buildings. Every London borough has declared at least one Air Quality Management Area (AQMA). Air quality management is a key priority for HAL and we will continue to work in partnership with our key stakeholders especially local authorities and national government - to reduce emissions from all sources in the area in order to meet the EU limit values. The main pollutants of concern at Heathrow are measured at all these sites oxides of nitrogen (NO X made up of nitrogen dioxide and nitrous oxide) and particles (measured as PM 10 and PM 2.5 ). In addition, ozone (O 3 ) is measured at Harlington. Measured concentrations Local air quality Located on the western edge of London and close to two busy motorways, the Great Western mainline and local industries, Heathrow Airport is within an area of high air pollution. Of the two pollutants of concern - nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and particles (measured as PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) - NO 2 has the greatest extent of exceedence and large areas of London (and the rest of the UK) exceed the annual average EU limit value, due mainly to emissions

from road traffic and from buildings. This pattern is repeated locally, where the activities that take place at Heathrow Airport are just one source of air emissions in the local area. Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 - annual average limit value 40µg/m3 by 2010) The annual average EU limit value for NO 2 was met at the majority of monitoring sites close to Heathrow Airport in 2012 presented in Fig. 1. Key information is: Oxford Avenue (red) is approximately 200m northeast of the airport boundary. Concentrations have exceeded the limit value since installation in 2005. Although concentrations fell to their lowest value in 2010, they remained at 43µg/m 3 in 2012. Direct airport emissions are approximately 19% of measured NO X concentrations, 6% is from airport-related road traffic, 18% from non-airport traffic and 57% from background sources. Two other sites exceeded the limit value: - London Hillingdon (light green) is mainly affected by emissions from traffic on the M4. Concentrations increased slightly in 2012 to 57µg/m 3 (from 55µg/m 3 in 2011). Direct airport emissions are approximately 4% of measured NO X concentrations, 13% is from airport-related road traffic, 38% from non-airport traffic and 45% from background sources. - LHR2 (blue dotted line), located near the northern runway, has shown a gradual decreasing trend in concentrations, though it is in an area of high emissions. Concentrations were 48µg/m 3 in 2012 (from 50µg/m 3 in 2011). Direct airport emissions are approximately 30% of measured NO X concentrations, 19% is from airport-related road traffic, 14% from non-airport traffic and 37% from background sources. Fig. 1. NO 2 annual average concentrations measured at selected sites around Heathrow Airport since 1995 Page 2 of 9

Fig. 2. NO 2 running annual average concentrations at selected sites since 1995 Fig. 2 shows the NO 2 monitoring data expressed as running annual means, which allows us to track changes throughout the year. In general, concentrations of NO 2 have fallen in Q1 and Q2 2013. The principal site where an increasing trend has been recorded is the site near the M4 (London Hillingdon). Page 3 of 9

Particles (2005 PM10 EU limit value of 50µg/m3 (35 breaches allowed)) (2020 PM2.5 EU target of 25µg/m3) PM 10 is measured at all four of HAL s monitoring sites and concentrations measured at LHR2 are generally the highest. Results are presented in Fig. 3. Fourteen exceedances were recorded at LHR2 in 2011, and three have occurred in Q1 and Q2 2013. The EU limit value for PM 10 has been met at the LHR2 site since 2003, when unfavourable weather conditions produced 38 breaches at LHR2 and affected sites throughout the UK. It is not unusual for daily mean PM 10 levels to exceed 50µg/m 3, though the EU limit value allows 35 exceedances (equal to 35 days) per year before the limit value is breached. Fig. 3. PM 10 at LHR2 since 1995 Comparison with the 2005 EU limit value (number of days above 50µg/m 3 ) Page 4 of 9

Locations of the air quality monitoring sites at Heathrow and their individual NO 2 monitoring history. The locations of relevant air quality monitoring sites are shown in Fig. 4, which also shows the trend in NO 2 concentrations measured at each site since 2001. Previous Air Quality Briefings described the proportions of emissions calculated for each monitoring site when the HAL Emissions Inventory 2008/9 was compiled. Fig. 4 shows the trend in measured NO 2 concentration at each site as well as providing the geographical context for the data presented in Fig.1. The only site not previously mentioned is Hayes, to the northeast of Heathrow. Direct airport emissions are approximately 4% of measured NO X concentrations, 2% is from airport-related road traffic, 33% from non-airport traffic and 61% from background sources. Fig. 4. Nitrogen dioxide monitoring sites and annual mean measurements since 2001 Page 5 of 9

CAEP value of air transport movements Through its Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) sets new emissions standards for aircraft engines including for NO X. CAEP6 is the latest standard and came into force in 2008. Fig. 5 shows the proportion air transport movements (ATMs) based on their relationship to the CAEP NO X emissions standards. The number of ATMs each year is presented below each bar as well as on the chart itself. The relative proportion of flights made by newer, cleaner aircraft (those defined as CAEP4 or better) has risen to its highest ever point. Over 91% of flights were made by aircraft of CAEP4 standard or better in 2012 a 0.9% increase over 2011. This pattern has continued into the first quarter of 2012. ATMs have been reasonably stable, though 2009 and 2010 showed a fall of 2.7% and 5% respectively when compared to 2008. Fig. 5. - CAEP4 compliance of ATMs (air transport movements) since 2005 Page 6 of 9

2012 aircraft emissions Since 2009 HAL has commissioned an annual inventory of aircraft emissions to assess how they change over time. The results of the latest NO X assessment, for 2012, are shown in Fig 6. Emissions from aircraft have declined for three reasons: the opening of Terminal 5 in 2008 enabled more efficient aircraft movements on the airport - cutting NO X emissions by approximately 75 tonnes in 2008/9 the use of cleaner aircraft, partly encouraged by NO X landing charges, has reduced emissions from main engines by approximately 30 tonnes since 2008/9. limiting the use of auxiliary power units (APUs) on the airport. Manual survey data indicates APU emissions have fallen by approximately 120 tonnes (35%) since 2008/9. There were slightly fewer aircraft movements in 2012 than 2011 (471,341 compared to 476,187). However, NO X emissions remained relatively unchanged, being 0.1% lower in 2012, which equates to a fall of 8% compared to 2008/9. In comparison, PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions fell by 0.9% and 1.3% respectively in 2012 which equates to a corresponding fall of 6.7% and 8.6% from 2008/9 levels. Fig. 6. Calculated Ground level aircraft emissions since 2008/09 Page 7 of 9

Further trends can be observed by looking at the relationship between emissions and aircraft and between emissions and passenger numbers. Table 1 summarises these normalised data and shows: Air transport movements (ATMs) were 1% lower in 2012 than in 2011 (or within 1.8% of the ATM cap of 480,000). The proportion of flights by narrow bodied aircraft fell slightly below 66% of the total, but produced approximately 27% of total ground level NO X. Passenger loading increased by 0.9% equating to an average of approximately 148 passengers per flight. This is an increasing trend at the airport. NO X emission per passenger fell again and was approximately 61 grams, whilst NOx emission per aircraft movement increased slightly to 2.69kg; reflecting subtle changes to the aircraft fleet mix. The proportion of movements of wide bodied aircraft is increasing slowly at Heathrow, particularly of the A380. Table. 1 - Assessment of normalised annual NO X emissions Year 2002 2008/9 2009 2010 2011 2012 ATMs 466,554 470,029 466,393 460,546 476,197 471,341 Proportion of movements by 72.8 65.0 65.1 65.7 65.9 65.3 narrow bodied aircraft (%) Proportion of movements by 27.2 35.0 34.9 34.3 34.1 34.7 wide bodied aircraft (%) Ground level aircraft NOx 1,662 1,652 1,618 1,536 1,518 1,520 emissions (tonnes) Proportion of NOx emissions by 33.9 28.1 27.9 28.1 29.0 27.5 narrow bodied aircraft (%) Proportion of NOx emissions by 66.1 71.9 72.1 71.9 71.0 72.5 wide bodied aircraft (%) passengers (mppa) 63.01 65.93 66.04 65.88 69.43 70.05 passengers per movement 135.1 140.3 141.6 143.0 145.8 148.6 Ground level NOx emission per 65.78 68.00 66.88 64.75 62.43 61.22 passenger (g/passenger) 1 Ground level NOx emission per 2.70 2.73 2.69 2.64 2.66 2.69 movement (kg/atm) 1 Note: 1. Excludes APU and engine testing emissions Page 8 of 9

AirWatch website We have contracted Ricardo-AEA to give the website a new fresh, modern graphical design. It will be built using the most modern techniques; ensuring best practice is adhered to at all times for accessibility and usability. The current website can be viewed at: www.heathrowairwatch.org.uk In addition, its design will meet all modern web standards and will be tested in all major browsers during the development period by comparison, the current site comes across as clunky. As the gateway to the website that most visitors will see, the homepage will continue to provide introduction information as currently used on the website, and will also show a summary of the latest levels to help make the latest automatic data more visible, and engaging to more visitors. All the partners involved in Heathrow Airwatch (LB Hillingdon, LB Hounslow, Slough BC, Spelthorne BC, BA and the Environment Agency) will also be visible, each with clickable links to their respective websites. We are in the final stages of the website update, and expect the changes to be finished in summer 2013. Page 9 of 9