DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

Similar documents
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL STEVEN N. ANNIBALI, CHIEF OF POLICE

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE

Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM: URSULA LUNA-REYNOSA, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; JACK HOLDEN, BUILDING OFFICIAL

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

~ u..v Q- c./ Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer/Public Works Director to install parking lot speed bumps on Hall Park Drive.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1620

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Repo_rt

ERIC S. CASHER, CITY ATTORNEY WINSTON RHODES, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, California

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

WHEREAS, Fees for parking meters, devices or timed parking systems have been historically approved by the City using the Ordinance process; and

AGENDA STAFF REPORT FISCAL YEAR FLEET REPLACEMENT

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AMENDING WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEARS THROUGH

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 th day of November, Caretto, Jackowski, Putz, Herrick, Jahn. W.E. Jahn, Mayor ATTEST:

ITEM 10. ct-/ C.~~ STAFF REPORT. Mayor and City Council. Chief Angel Bernal, Police Department

4/15/2015 Item #10D Page 1

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to advance the use of electric vehicles; and

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 11

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

TOWN OF WINDSOR AGENDA REPORT

Agenda Cover Memorandum

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE AN AWARD OF BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF A TRUCK AND DECLARING EXISTING VEHICLES AS SURPLUS PROPERTY

WASTE COLLECTION RATES FOR FY

1. SUBJECT: Truck Route Update RECOMMENDATION: That the TPC receive an update on the City s truck routes.

ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE NOVATO MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF RV S ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHOUT A PERMIT

ITEM 8 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

City Council Staff Report Regarding Interim Urgency Ordinance January 14, 2013 Page 2 of 4 issuance of new business licenses for mobile food trucks, b

Ordinance Fact Sheet. TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 23,2009 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:

Assistant General Manager

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

SUMMARY REPORT City Council

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

SALE OF DUAL PURPOSE POLICE MOTORCYCLES

Engineering and Traffic Survey

AGENDA REPORT. TO: Office ofthe City Administrator ATTN: Deborah Edgerly FROM: Community and Economic Development Agency DATE: June 24, 2008

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONOENCE

The City Council will consider revising the City' s parking code to distinguish between enforcement of on- street and off-street parking meter spaces.

forwarddallas! Implementation Proposed Chapter 43 Code Amendment On-Street Parking Transportation and Environment Committee Briefing January 14, 2008

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. Honorable Bill Rosendahl, Chair Transportation Committee

THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology

ORDINANCE NO The City finds and declares the following:

MSRC CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP

o or Violating What They Capture?

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO STAFF REPORT. January 5, 2016

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

RESOLUTION NO Mobilehome or trailer parking Parking not to obstruct traffic

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Continued Review and Discussion on the City-Wide Parking Committee Recommendations. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Agenda Item: NB-4 Meeting Date:

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL

c/ a-\1\ Y\ \'-'~ e_"'cvvw1 Ct. 1

Ordinance No. 1624(16) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lompoc, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, Regulating Shopping Carts

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

for Fiscal Year Lathrop Municipal Code Section and Section 26 of the original Agreement

OFF ROAD VEHICLE OPERATION VILLAGE OF CHESANING, SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO PREAMBLE

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Staff Report. (925)

CITY OF STEVENS POINT AGENDA

ORDINANCE NO O-015 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS

85th. HB 87 vs 85 Percentile Speed

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

ORDINANCE NO

. S RESOLUTION NO. 1645

RALEIGH COUNTY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES (ATV) ORDINANCE

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

County of Sonoma State of California

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

Agenda Item TBD DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: December 4, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: July 18, 2012

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

P.L. 2007, c.348 Approved January 13, 2008

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

MEMORANDUM. PH-1c 09/22/16. Agenda Item: Meeting Date: Financial: City Commission TO: THROUGH: Douglas Hutchens, Interim City Manag9

Review, Discuss, and Recommend Approval to City Council for Three New Two-Way Stop Intersections on Country Club Drive

RESOLUTION NO. RD:MJV:KML 07/27/2017

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CITY OF BELVEDERE RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF PLACENTIA RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 2017

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE: DRAFT ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF MOBILE BILLBOARD ADVERTISING DISPLAYS

Ordinance /11/2017

Transcription:

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Council Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager Speed zone survey RECOMMENDATION: A. Adopt Resolution No. 2013-27, approving Engineering and Traffic Surveys at 42 street segments in Los Altos B. Direct staff to draft an ordinance amending Municipal Code Section 8.08.020 to reflect revised speed limits in accordance with the Engineering and Traffic Survey SUMMARY: Estimated Fiscal Impact: Amount: $66,000 Budgeted: Yes, Capital Improvement Program Project #13-15 Public Hearing Notice: Not applicable Previous Council Consideration: August 16, 2007 and October 5, 2007 CEQA Status: Exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15321 Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2013-27 2. Speed Zone Survey Summary Table

BACKGROUND The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) requires that local agencies re-evaluate non-statutory speed limits every five, seven or ten years, using an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). On August 16, 2007 and October 5, 2007, City Council adopted the current E&TS which defined the current speed limits in the City. DISCUSSION A total of 42 street segments were evaluated in 2007 based on the provisions set forth by the CVC and CA MUTCD. The E&TS supported the posted speed limit on 19 of these road segments. A summary table of these road segments is provided in Attachment 2. A copy of the speed zone surveys is available for review in the City Clerk s office. The E&TS for these road segments was re-evaluated in conformance with the CVC and CA MUTCD, and it is recommended that the City Council re-certify the Engineering and Traffic Surveys for these 19 road segments. A letter will be sent to Traffic Court regarding the re-certification following Council approval. Also in 2007, the posted speed limits on 23 road segments were maintained, although the E&TS of 2007 recommended that those speed limits be raised. The posted speed limits on those 23 road segments do not conform to the requirements of setting speed limits by the CVC and CA MUTCD and therefore are not enforceable by radar. The alternative method for the Police Department to enforce speed limits is by the pacing method. This method requires that a Police vehicle position itself behind the violator to measure speed by following at a fixed distance away. This can require maneuvering in and out of traffic and cutting off motorists to maintain pace. This is not practical for the City of Los Altos as a majority of City streets are two lanes and not enough space is available for such an enforcement method. Therefore, many speed violators on these 23 road segments cannot be cited. Radar enforcement is generally considered the safest and most effective method to detect and cite speed violators. New Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the radar-unenforceable 23 road segments were conducted. The requirements set forth by the CVC and CA MUTCD establishes speed limits at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85 th percentile speed of the free-flowing traffic. However, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th percentile speed, where an Engineering and Traffic Survey indicates the need for a reduction in speed to match existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, considering such factors as accident rates, other modes of travel and characteristics of the road not apparent to the motorists. Based on this, 19 road segments are being recommended for raised speed limits, while four road segments are proposed to maintain their current posted speeds. Fourteen segments are recommended to be raised from 25 mph to 30 mph, one segment is recommended to be raised from 25 mph to 35 mph, and four segments are recommended to be raised from 30 mph to 35 mph. Table 2 in Attachment 2 reflects the above recommendations. The adoption of an ordinance to raise these speed limits will allow legal and safe speed enforcement for all the designated speed zones in Los Altos. August 13, 2013 Speed zone survey Page 2

Lastly, the Council approved an E&TS for University Avenue in 2007. However, the California Road System Map classifies University Avenue as a local road. Subdivision (b) of Section 40802 of the CVC exempts an E&TS for local roads. Section 22352 subdivision (a)(2) of the CVC governs University Avenue. Therefore, it is recommended the two E&TS for University Avenue be eliminated. Other Impacts The posted speed limit also affects the yellow timing interval in a traffic signal timing cycle. The CA MUTCD requires minimum yellow timing intervals based on the posted speed limit or Prima Facie Speed. By artificially setting the speed limit below the recommendations of the E&TS, the yellow interval timing will also be set artificially low. The development of the yellow interval timing is largely based on the posted speed limit. The faster a motorist is traveling requires a greater distance to stop. Adoption of the new ordinance will allow proper adjustment of the yellow interval based on current E&TS and also require adjusting the yellow signal interval at 10 City operated traffic signals and four County operated traffic signals. Additionally, CVC Section 22357 states that The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. It is estimated that 60 signs and 50 speed limit pavement legends will need to be replaced. FISCAL IMPACT The estimated total cost to implement the above recommendations is noted below: Project #13-15 Budget Expenditures Data Collection $7,800 Re-time Signals $1,400 Sign Replacement $13,500 Pavement Legend $20,100 Replacement TOTAL $66,000 $42,800 The data collection activity is complete; the costs related to implementing the proposed speed limits are estimated to be approximately $35,000. August 13, 2013 Speed zone survey Page 3

PUBLIC CONTACT Information regarding proposed speed limit changes was released to the media which include the Town Crier, Los Altos Patch, and the Los Altos Neighborhood Network. A summary of the proposed speed limit changes is posted on the City website. A news release was also sent to City Commissions and relevant Commission list-serves. Posting of the meeting agenda serves as notice to the general public. August 13, 2013 Speed zone survey Page 4

RESOLUTION NO. 2013-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS APPROVING ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS AT 42 STREET SEGEMENTS IN LOS ALTOS WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code Sections 627, 22357 and 22358 and the California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices allows local agencies, based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey, to increase or decrease speed limits; and WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices requires that local agencies re-evaluate non-statutory speed limits every five (5), seven (7) or ten (10) years, using an Engineering and Traffic Survey; and WHEREAS, on August 16, 2007 and October 5, 2007, City Council adopted the current Engineering and Traffic Survey which defined the current speed limits in the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Los Altos hereby approves Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the following street segments: Street Limits Speed Limits Almond Ave Entire Length 25 Clark Ave (N) Entire Length 25 Covington Rd Miramonte to Grant 25 Cuesta Dr San Antonio and El Monte 25 Fallen Leaf Ln. Homestead to Fremont 25 Jardin Dr Entire Length 25 Los Altos Ave Entire Length 25 Main St San Antonio to Foothill Expwy 25 Oakhurst Ave Entire Length 25 St. Joseph Ave. Foothill Expwy to Stonehaven 25 Covington Rd Fremont/El Monte to Springer 30 Covington Rd Springer to Miramonte 30 Cuesta Dr. El Monte to E. City Limits 30 W. Edith Ave. Entire Length 30 El Monte Ave. Foothill Expwy to Springer/City Limits 30 Fremont Ave. El Monte to Riverside 30 Fremont Ave. Springer to Miramonte 30 Fremont Ave. Miramonte to Grant 30 Grant Rd. Foothill Expwy to Fremont 30 Grant Rd Fremont to N. City Limits 30 Miramonte Ave. Portland to N. City Limits 30 Miramonte Ave. Foothill Expwy to Portland 30 Resolution No. 2013-27 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 1

Portland Ave. Entire Length 30 Springer Rd Cuesta to El Monte/N. City Limits 30 Springer Rd Foothill Expwy to Covington 30 Cristo Rey Dr. Foothill Expy to West City Limits 35 El Camino Real N. City Limits to San Antonio 35 El Camino Real S. City Limits to San Antonio 35 El Monte Ave. S. City Limits to Foothill Expwy 35 Fremont Ave. Grant to E. City Limits 35 Granger Ave. Entire Length 30 Grant Rd. Homestead to Grant 35 Homestead Rd. Grant to E. City Limits 35 Springer Rd Covington to Cuesta 35 San Antonio Rd Foothill Expwy to Main/Edith 35 San Antonio Rd Main/Edith to Almond 35 San Antonio Rd Almond to El Camino Real 35 Foothill Expwy N. City Limits to Main 45 Foothill Expwy Main to El Monte 45 Foothill Expwy El Monte to Springer 45 Foothill Expwy Springer to Miramonte 45 Foothill Expwy Miramonte to S. City Limits 45 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Los Altos at a meeting thereof on the day of, 2013 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Jarrett Fishpaw, MAYOR Attest: Jon Maginot, CMC, CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2013-27 Page 2 ATTACHMENT 1