Thermal Unit Operation (ChEg3113)

Similar documents
Thermal Unit Operation (ChEg3113)

ENGINEERING STANDARD FOR PROCESS DESIGN OF DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGERS ORIGINAL EDITION JULY 1995

Heat Exchangers (Chapter 5)

Experiment No: 2. To determine the effectiveness of shell and tube, cross flow & plate heat exchangers. Heat Exchangers. Plate-type Extended surfaces

PV Newsletter Monthly Publication from CoDesign Engineering Skills Academy

Lecture 2: Thermal Design Considerations

HERCULES-2 Project. Deliverable: D8.8

Thermal Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Using Different Fin Cross Section

LESSON Transmission of Power Introduction

Lecture 1: Heat Exchangers Classifications

THERMAL TO MECHANICAL ENERGY CONVERSION: ENGINES AND REQUIREMENTS Vol. I - Thermal Protection of Power Plants - B.M.Galitseyskiy

Design and Fabrication of Shell and Tube Type Heat Exchanger and Performance Analysis

A Review on Experimental Investigation of U-Tube Heat Exchanger using Plain Tube and Corrugated Tube

Quality Improvement in Design Process of Shell & Tube Type Heat Exchanger by Computer Integrated 3D Modeling

Comparison of Heat transfer Enhancement in Tube in Tube heat exchanger using Different Turbulent Generator.

GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS BASED OPTIMIZATION OF HEAT TRANSFER RATE IN DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER USING TAGUCHI METHOD D.

Control System Instrumentation

CONJUGATE HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF HELICAL COIL HEAT EXCHANGE USING CFD

Module7:Advanced Combustion Systems and Alternative Powerplants Lecture 32:Stratified Charge Engines

CFD ANALYSIS ON LOUVERED FIN

TO STUDY OF PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHENGER

High Speed, Low Weight Momentum/reaction Wheels. Larry Wilhide, Valley Forge Composite Tech, Inc. P.O. Box 344 Carlisle, PA (717)

CFD Investigation of Influence of Tube Bundle Cross-Section over Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer Rate

White Paper Bearing Lubrication

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER WITH TRIANGULAR BAFFLES

Silencers. Transmission and Insertion Loss

Design and Performance Study of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger with Single Segmental Baffle Having Perpendicular & Parallel-Cut Orientation.

Control System Instrumentation

Cooldown Measurements in a Standing Wave Thermoacoustic Refrigerator

Design Factors for Steam Coils

Copyright Notice. Small Motor, Gearmotor and Control Handbook Copyright Bodine Electric Company. All rights reserved.

Pilan. Hydraulic Oil Coolers and Heat Exchangers

Thermal Stress Analysis of Diesel Engine Piston

Technical Information

A Recommended Approach to Pipe Stress Analysis to Avoid Compressor Piping Integrity Risk

Simulating Rotary Draw Bending and Tube Hydroforming

CFD ANALYSIS OF DOUBLE HELICAL PIPE PARALLEL& COUNTER FLOW HEAT EXCHANGER

MULTIPLE PASS AND CROSS FLOW HEAT EXCHANGERS

Optimization of Packed Tower Inlet Design by CFD Analysis. Dana Laird Koch-Glitsch, Inc.

Heat Exchanger Design

Design, Fabrication and Testing of helical tube in tube coil heat exachanger

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 98/P

Application of ABAQUS to Analyzing Shrink Fitting Process of Semi Built-up Type Marine Engine Crankshaft

Computer-Assisted Induction Aluminum

EEN-E2002, Gas exchange and supercharging, lecture 4a

Effects of Refrigerant Injection on the Scroll Compressor

Chapter 7: Thermal Study of Transmission Gearbox

The Use of Conduction Tracers Vs Bare Tracers Metric Version

I. Tire Heat Generation and Transfer:

Kul Internal Combustion Engine Technology

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 98/P

Piping Systems. J. David Bankston, Jr., and Fred Eugene Baker*

Enhanced Heat Transfer Surface Development for Exterior Tube Surfaces

Design and experimental analysis of pipe in pipe heat exchanger

Mohammad Faisal Haider. Department of Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

HEAT EXCHANGER OVERVIEW

ENGINE CYLINDER HEAD COOLING ENHANCEMENT BY MIST COOLING A SIMULATION STUDY

Improved roll pass design for long products with WICON

DY-LWGY Liquid turbine flow meter

Article on Sheath materials, Thermowells, Fittings, and Terminations

Heat Transfer Enhancement for Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Using Twisted Wire Brush Inserts

Investigation of converging slot-hole geometry for film cooling of gas turbine blades

Heat Transfer Modeling using ANSYS FLUENT

Development and Implementation of Interactive/Visual Software for Simple Aircraft Gas Turbine Design

RESOLUTION MEPC.198(62) Adopted on 15 July GUIDELINES ADDRESSING ADDITIONAL ASPECTS TO THE NOx TECHNICAL CODE 2008 WITH REGARD TO

Expansion & contraction

OT PEENING PROCESS AND ITS APPLICATIONS

THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF AIRCRAFT BRAKING SYSTEM

CHAPTER 5 PARAMETRIC STUDIES AND SQUEAL REDUCTION METHODS

Part C: Electronics Cooling Methods in Industry

Spiroid High Torque Skew Axis Gearing A TECHNICAL PRIMER F. EVERTZ, M. GANGIREDDY, B. MORK, T. PORTER & A. QUIST

Experimental Investigation of the Heat Transfer in a Feedwater Preheater for the Decarbonizing Steam Generator

The Practical Uses of Computational Fluid Dynamics Not Just a Pretty Picture

Parametric Study on Design of a Heat Exchanger for an Exhaust Gas Recirculation System

Performance Evaluation Of A Helical Baffle Heat Exchanger

Determination and improvement of bevel gear efficiency by means of loaded TCA

State of the art cooling system development for automotive applications

Single-phase Coolant Flow and Heat Transfer

Combustion characteristics of n-heptane droplets in a horizontal small quartz tube

IJESR/Oct 2012/ Volume-2/Issue-10/Article No-12/ ISSN International Journal of Engineering & Science Research

Essentials of Fire Fighting

Process 1-2: Reversible adiabatic compression process. Process 2-3: Reversible isothermal heat addition

Optimization of Heat Management of Vehicles Using Simulation Tools

Basic Thermal Energy Transfer with a Heat Exchanger

Factors Influencing the Performance of Ball and Rolling Bearings

Load Analysis and Multi Body Dynamics Analysis of Connecting Rod in Single Cylinder 4 Stroke Engine

EMaSM. Principles Of Sensors & transducers

Efficiency Improvement in Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Using CFD Tool

Learn How to Optimize Heat Exchanger Designs using Aspen Shell & Tube Exchanger. A self guided demo to get started with Aspen Shell & Tube Exchanger

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

Restructuring of an Air Classifier Rotor by Finite Element Analysis

Design and Analysis of Heat Exchanger

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER FOR OIL COOLER BY COMSOL MULTIPHYSIS

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 10, October ISSN

VENT SILENCER PRODUCT GUIDE

Model Question Papers

Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization System in IC Engine

2.61 Internal Combustion Engine Final Examination. Open book. Note that Problems 1 &2 carry 20 points each; Problems 3 &4 carry 10 points each.

CFD Analysis and Comparison of Fluid Flow Through A Single Hole And Multi Hole Orifice Plate

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION III. GEOMETRIC MODELING II. LITERATURE REVIW

Transcription:

Thermal Unit Operation (ChEg3113) Lecture 5- Heat Exchanger Design Instructor: Mr. Tedla Yeshitila (M.Sc.)

Today Review Heat exchanger design vs rating of heat exchanger Heat exchanger general design procedure Overall heat transfer coefficient Fouling Double pipe heat exchanger design

Radiator Review Most common heat exchanger types: Tubular heat exchanger (double pipe) Shell and tube heat exchanger Plate and frame (plate) HX Regenerative type Condenser Evaporator Vaporizer

The double pipe heat exchanger is the simplest type of heat exchanger, while the shell-and-tube is the most widely used type of exchanger in the chemical process industries. Heat-exchanger calculations can be divided into two distinct categories, namely, thermal and hydraulic calculations on the one hand and mechanical design calculations on the other. Thermal and hydraulic calculations are made to determine heat-transfer rates and pressure drops needed for equipment sizing. Mechanical design calculations are concerned with detailed equipment specifications, and include considerations such as stress and tube vibration analyses. First we will see thermal calculations, then hydraulic calculations, but we will not performs mechanical design calculations which mostly done using software.

Heat-exchanger problems may also be categorized as rating problems or design problems. Rating of heat exchanger In rating of heat exchanger, the objective is to determine the performance of heat exchanger when the heat transfer area and construction details are known. In a rating problem, one must determine whether a given, fully specified exchanger will perform a given heat-transfer duty satisfactorily. It is evaluation of thermodynamic performance of fully specified heat exchanger. It is immaterial whether the exchanger physically exists or whether it is specified only on paper.

Heat exchanger design: The principal objective in design of heat exchanger design is to determine the surface area required for specific duty (rate of heat exchanger) using temperature difference available. In a design problem, one must determine the specifications for a heat exchanger that will handle a given heat-transfer duty. A rating calculation is generally an integral part of a design calculation. However, a rating problem also arises when it is desired to use an existing exchanger in a new or modified application. Selection of heat exchanger: The objective of selection of heat exchanger is to choose the appropriate and suitable heat exchanger from a standard unit from manufacturer catalogue.

The basic steps in typical design procedures are: 1. Define duty (use heat and mass balance to define the rate of heat and mass transfer) 2. Collect physical properties data (μ,ρ ) 3. To decide on the type of heat exchanger to be used 4. Select a trial value for average heat transfer coefficient (U) 5. Calculate the mean temperature difference 6. Calculate the heat transfer area 7. Decide in heat exchanger layout 8. Calculate the individual heat transfer coefficients 9. Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficients, compare with trial and iterate 10. Calculate ΔP; if not good choose different layout. 11. Optimize the design, repeat steps 4-10 as necessary to determine the cheapest heat exchanger that will satisfy the duty.

Overall heat transfer coefficient An essential, and often the most uncertain, part of any heat exchanger analysis is determination of the overall heat transfer coefficient. Overall heat transfer coefficient is reciprocal of the overall resistance to heat transfer. This coefficient is defined in terms of the total thermal resistance to heat transfer between two fluids. The coefficient determined by accounting for conduction and convection resistances between fluids separated by composite plane and cylindrical walls, respectively. For a wall separating two fluid streams, the overall heat transfer coefficient may be expressed as: 1 UA = 1 = 1 = 1 + R U c A c U h A h (ha) w + 1 c (ha) h

If the surface is not known, U can be obtained independent of Fourier equation from the two film coefficient. => 1 U = 1 h c + R w + 1 h h where c and h refer to the cold and hot fluids, respectively. The wall conduction term in above equation may often be neglected i.e. the pipe wall resistance is neglected since a thin wall (small thickness )of large thermal conductivity is generally used. 1 U = 1 h c + 1 h h => U = h ch h h c +h h The magnitude of the individual coefficients will depend on the nature of heat transfer process, on the physical properties of the fluid, on the flowrates and on the physical arrangement of heat transfer surface.

Fouling factor During normal heat exchanger operation, surfaces are often subject to fouling by fluid impurities, rust formation, or other reactions between the fluid and the wall material. The subsequent deposition of a film or scale on the surface can greatly increase the resistance to heat transfer between the fluids. This effect can be treated by introducing an additional thermal resistance in the above equation, termed the fouling factor, R f. Most process and service fluids will foul the heat transfer surface in an exchanger to a greater or lesser extent. Fouling impairs or weaken heat exchanger. Its value depends on the operating temperature, fluid velocity, and length of service of the heat exchanger.

It is very difficult to predict value of fouling factors. In addition, we know that fins are often added to surfaces exposed to either or both fluids and that, by increasing the surface area, they reduce the overall resistance to heat transfer. Accordingly, with inclusion of surface fouling and fin (extended surface) effects, the overall heat transfer coefficient is modified as follows: 1 UA = 1 + R f,c + R (η o ha) c (η o A) w + R f,h 1 + c (η o A) h (η o ha) h The quantity η o in the above equation is called the overall surface efficiency or temperature effectiveness of a finned surface.

Although representative fouling factors are listed in Table below, the factor is a variable during heat exchanger operation (increasing from zero for a clean surface, as deposits accumulate on the surface).

Overall surface efficiency defined such that, for the hot or cold surface without fouling, the heat transfer rate is: q = η o ha(t w T ) where Tw is the base surface temperature and A is the total (fin plus exposed base) surface area. η o = 1 A f A (1 η f) where A f is the entire fin surface area and η f is the efficiency of a single fin. Also, one of the convection coefficients is often much smaller than the other and hence dominates determination of the overall coefficient. For example, if one of the fluids is a gas and the other is a liquid or a liquid vapor mixture experiencing boiling or condensation, the gasside convection coefficient is much smaller. It is in such situations that fins are used to enhance gas-side convection.

For the unfinned, tubular heat exchangers 1 UA = 1 + R f,c + ln (D 2/D 1) (ha) c (A) c 2ΠkL + R f,h (A) h + 1 (ha) h Where D 1 is inner diameter and D 2 is outer diameter Therefore, overall heat transfer coefficient can be determined from knowledge of the hot and cold fluid convection coefficients and fouling factors and from appropriate geometric parameters.

Chapter 4 Design of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger A simple double-pipe exchanger consists of two pairs of concentric pipes arranged as shown in below. Such a configuration is called a hairpin (U-shaped) because it is arranged in two legs. The principal parts are two sets of concentric pipes, two connecting Tees, and a return head and a return bend. The inner pipe is supported within the outer pipe by packing glands. And the fluid enters the inner pipe through threaded connection located outside the exchanger.

Chapter 4 Design of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Also, nozzles may be provided on the inner-pipe (tube) side as well as on the annulus side to facilitate connection to process piping. The Tees have nozzle or screwed connections attached to them to permit the entry and exit of annulus fluid which crosses from one leg to other through the return head. The two length of the inner pipe are connected by a return bend which is usually exposed and does not provide effective heat transfer surface. The maximum nozzle size is generally equal to the size of the outer heat-exchanger pipe. The two fluids that are transferring heat flow in the inner and outer pipes, respectively. The outer pipe may be insulated to minimize heat transfer to or from the environment.

Chapter 4 Design of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Batteries of hairpins connected in series or in series-parallel arrangements are commonly employed to provide adequate surface area for heat transfer. Simple double-pipe exchangers are commercially available with outer-pipe sizes ranging from 2 to 8 in. and inner pipes from 3/4 to 6 in. Double-pipe exchangers are commonly used in applications involving relatively low flow rates and high temperatures or pressures, for which they are well suited. Other advantages include low installation cost, ease of maintenance, and flexibility. The double pipe heat exchanger is extremely useful because it can be assembled in any pipe-fitting shop from standard parts and provides inexpensive heat transfer surface.

At the end of this class: You will be able to understand the difference between designing, rating and selection of rating You will be able to use know the basic procedure in designing of heat exchanger You will be familiarize with overall heat transfer coefficient and fouling considerations during calculations

End of lecture -5