Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

2017 Mobility Report

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

Needs and Community Characteristics

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 630 620 615 610 619 Rank 65 66 66 66 66 Commuters (1000s) 333 323 320 312 315 Freeway 5,617 5,480 5,305 5,624 5,527 Arterial Streets 7,539 7,312 7,410 7,725 7,800 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.30 3.65 3.68 3.46 2.38 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.72 3.96 3.93 3.74 2.94 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 24 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 25 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.00 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 10,552 10,404 10,012 9,717 9,407 Rank 56 57 57 57 58 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 19 19 18 18 17 Rank 51 49 55 51 58 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 21,536 21,234 20,433 19,833 19,201 Rank 56 56 56 57 58 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 39 40 38 38 36 Rank 51 47 50 50 61 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.16 Rank 54 52 50 48 57 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 Rank 57 56 55 60 58 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 1.89 -- -- -- -- Rank 67 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 470 471 459 455 455 Rank 59 61 61 61 61 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 854 855 835 827 826 Rank 68 70 73 73 73

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 605 600 595 595 595 Rank 66 67 66 65 65 Commuters (1000s) 307 303 299 297 295 Freeway 5,300 5,100 5,090 4,945 4,885 Arterial Streets 8,201 8,455 8,560 8,585 8,150 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.23 3.51 3.06 2.64 2.33 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.55 4.22 3.42 2.85 2.51 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 9,061 9,610 9,297 8,921 8,697 Rank 58 57 58 58 57 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 17 17 16 16 Rank 61 61 57 60 55 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 18,493 19,613 18,975 18,208 17,751 Rank 59 57 58 58 58 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 36 39 38 36 36 Rank 59 52 55 61 58 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.16 Rank 56 56 58 63 61 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 Rank 62 57 63 59 68 Total Cost ($ millions) 445 470 473 466 469 Rank 62 60 61 61 60 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 809 855 859 847 853 Rank 74 75 74 74 72

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 590 585 570 555 540 Rank 65 65 64 64 65 Commuters (1000s) 291 287 277 266 255 Freeway 4,895 4,515 4,300 4,100 4,000 Arterial Streets 7,715 7,300 7,005 6,750 6,440 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.90 1.51 1.41 1.50 1.63 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.94 1.49 1.37 1.54 1.52 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 8,400 8,303 7,885 7,827 7,617 Rank 58 57 57 56 56 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 15 14 14 14 Rank 59 52 55 52 43 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 17,145 16,946 16,094 15,974 15,547 Rank 58 58 56 56 55 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 35 35 34 35 35 Rank 59 57 55 47 47 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.16 Rank 66 64 61 58 46 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 66 62 60 57 54 Total Cost ($ millions) 469 475 462 466 466 Rank 61 60 60 57 57 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 852 864 840 846 847 Rank 72 70 70 65 60

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 525 510 500 490 480 Rank 65 67 67 69 69 Commuters (1000s) 245 235 228 220 213 Freeway 3,900 3,800 3,550 3,345 3,270 Arterial Streets 6,280 6,165 5,880 5,840 5,810 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.13 1.11 1.12 1.29 1.12 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.10 1.13 1.22 1.39 1.20 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,141 6,626 6,113 5,576 5,215 Rank 57 56 56 58 58 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 13 12 11 10 9 Rank 44 47 49 50 53 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 14,575 13,523 12,476 11,381 10,644 Rank 55 56 56 58 57 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 34 33 31 29 28 Rank 47 47 50 56 53 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 Rank 52 45 47 50 59 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.15 Rank 53 53 55 53 55 Total Cost ($ millions) 452 428 401 374 361 Rank 58 59 59 64 64 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 821 779 730 681 655 Rank 60 60 63 63 62

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 470 460 450 445 440 Rank 69 69 69 69 68 Commuters (1000s) 206 199 192 188 183 Freeway 3,360 3,490 3,180 2,800 2,635 Arterial Streets 5,765 5,670 5,350 4,990 4,805 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.02 1.10 1.08 1.13 1.10 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.10 1.18 1.16 1.27 1.14 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,906 4,637 4,062 3,636 3,000 Rank 58 57 60 60 65 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 9 8 7 7 5 Rank 49 50 53 49 64 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 10,013 9,465 8,291 7,421 6,124 Rank 57 56 57 60 64 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 27 27 24 22 19 Rank 52 44 54 54 64 Travel Time Index 1.12 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.08 Rank 51 44 49 51 63 Commuter Stress Index 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 Rank 51 50 51 54 59 Total Cost ($ millions) 349 338 305 281 242 Rank 65 62 64 63 66 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 634 615 555 511 440 Rank 60 58 60 63 72

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 430 420 415 410 400 Rank 68 68 67 67 67 Commuters (1000s) 178 172 169 166 160 Freeway 2,530 2,370 2,115 2,060 1,955 Arterial Streets 4,670 4,590 4,485 4,405 3,875 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.12 1.03 1.04 1.01 1.32 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.06 0.97 0.98 0.95 1.25 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 2,491 2,371 2,300 2,079 1,742 Rank 67 65 63 64 68 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 4 4 4 3 Rank 57 66 55 48 63 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 5,084 4,839 4,695 4,244 3,556 Rank 65 66 64 66 66 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 16 16 15 14 12 Rank 69 62 61 58 63 Travel Time Index 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.05 Rank 66 60 55 57 64 Commuter Stress Index 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.08 Rank 69 66 59 56 58 Total Cost ($ millions) 212 211 213 200 171 Rank 68 66 66 66 67 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 385 384 388 363 310 Rank 76 74 69 69 72

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 390 380 370 Rank 66 66 66 Commuters (1000s) 155 150 144 Freeway 1,785 1,700 1,625 Arterial Streets 3,575 3,315 3,160 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.34 1.37 1.43 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.26 1.29 1.35 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 1,393 1,041 985 Rank 70 73 73 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 3 2 2 Rank 54 68 62 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 2,843 2,124 2,010 Rank 69 73 74 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 10 8 8 Rank 70 76 73 Travel Time Index 1.04 1.03 1.03 Rank 75 80 76 Commuter Stress Index 1.07 1.06 1.06 Rank 62 67 66 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 141 110 108 Rank 70 74 74 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 257 200 195 Rank 81 85 84