Addendum to TSAP report #13. Markus Amann, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Zig Klimont, June 13, 2014

Similar documents
Common Safety Indicators (CSIs) as reported by Member States Extracted on 18 October 2013 from ERAIL database (

December 2011 compared with November 2011 Industrial producer prices down by 0.2% in both euro area and EU27

September 2011 compared with August 2011 Industrial producer prices up by 0.3% in euro area Up by 0.4% in EU27

EUROPEAN FISHERIES IN FIGURES

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) February 2014: Economic Sentiment broadly unchanged in the euro area and the EU

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU)

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

Consumer confidence indicator

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. September 2018: Economic Sentiment decreases in both the euro area and the EU

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. August 2013: Economic Sentiment rises further in both the euro area and the EU

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU) September 2015: Economic Sentiment improves in the euro area and the EU

Adjusting and extending the LFS data used for the projections

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. August 2011

Adjusted historic emission data, projections, and optimized emission reduction targets for 2030 A comparison with COM data 2013

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU)

Next update will be this week as soon as possible. Thanks for your understanding

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. February 2019: Economic Sentiment broadly stable in the euro area, down in the EU

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. April 2011

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) June 2014: Economic Sentiment decreasing in the euro area, while stable in the EU

June 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.5% EU28 at 10.2%

March 2013 Euro area unemployment rate at 12.1% EU27 at 10.9%

Inflation Differentials in Europe. Balázs Égert Economics Department, OECD

May 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.6% EU28 at 10.3%

The 3 rd European Road Safety Action Programme

February 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.9% EU28 at 10.6%

Adding value to IRENA s REmap 2030 project using a European Electricity Model

Publication of data. This report is published on a weekly basis.

EU Market Situation for Poultry. Civil Dialogue Group. 25 October 2016

First Trends H2020 vs FP7: winners and losers

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. November 2013: Economic Sentiment improves in the euro area and the EU

THE BALTIC SEA POWER RING CONNECTED: A GLANCE AT NORDBALT AND LITPOL LINK TODAY AND OUTLOOK FOR TOMORROW

Spring forecasts : a tough 2009, but EU economy set to stabilise as support measures take effect

DRINK-DRIVING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Area Yield Production ha % TAV 100 kg/ha % TAV t % TAV

Publication of data ,

3. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2009

1 Background and definitions

The European pigmeat sector. "Single CMO" Management Committee 17 September 2009

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Belgique/ Bulgaria Česká Danmark Deutschland Eesti Éire/Ireland Elláda España France Italia Kýpros Latvija Lietuva Luxembourg Magyarország

CHARGING INSTALL THE BATTERIES INTO THE CONTROLLER

Internalisation of external costs

2009 Europe / US International Aviation Safety Conference

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2006/42

Road safety in Europe. Graziella Jost, ETSC, PIN Programme Manager

The SafeCulture project Results on safety culture in professional transport in Greece

CARS 2020 Working Group Clean Vehicles: Electromobility and alternative fuels. 27 May 2013

EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2012/42

Greening transport taxation

(51) Int Cl.: B61F 5/38 ( ) (54) Two- axle bogie for railway vehicle with radially adjustable wheelsets with cross coupling

Community-Led Local Development in the EU

Messages from BBI JU. Eleni Zika, Head of Programme, BBI JU Philippe Mengal, Executive Director, BBI JU

JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbh

THE ROAD SAFETY POLICY IN SPAIN. Rome, 9 th April 2009

Implications of Biofuel Support Policies in Europe - A Quantitative Analysis in an Open Economy

Sheep and goat numbers (preceding December)

TEPZZ Z Z 85A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1. (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art.

Single vehicle accidents

KEY DRIVERS AND SLOWERS OF PASSENGER CAR TRANSPORT (ENERGY) DEMAND IN THE EU-27

*EP A1* EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2005/41

Feed & Food Statistical Yearbook Statistical Yearbook 2016

New Challenges for the Transatlantic Cooperation N. LOHL, EASA

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Indirect taxes other than VAT

Alcohol Interlocks and the fight against Drink-Driving

Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Market Market Situation for Sheep & Goat Meats 21 Septembre 2017

LANGUAGE, COPYRIGHT AND GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTATION IN THE EU DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET: THE CASE OF APPLE ITUNES

EU Market Situation for Poultry. Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets 22 October 2015

TAXATION N 322 JC/ 49 /14 LC/ 39 /14 BARS/ 25 /14 WG-TX/ 2 /14 WG-CO2/ 23 /14 WG-EV/ 4 /14 WG-CSG/ 10 /14

TEPZZ 67_744A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: B60K 6/10 ( )

Denmark. Website. Contact points Flag State. Status of Conventions. EU Member State. Port State. Coastal State

TEPZZ A T EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: F16H 47/04 ( )

External and intra-european Union trade

Minutes. Meeting of the Member States Expert Group on AVAS for M & N category vehicles (E01295) 16 November 2016, Brussels

Sustainability Transport Innovation Energy efficiency the key to railway innovation

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization

MI-AA EN-C S T A T I S T I C A L P O C K E T B O O K in figures ISBN

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2008/04

AFTERMARKET OVERVIEW EUROPE G5 / TURKEY / RUSSIA / AFRICA

Air Quality in Arizona

(51) Int Cl.: B66C 13/14 ( ) B66C 3/00 ( ) A01G 23/08 ( ) E02F 9/22 ( ) E02F 3/36 ( )

Review of VOC and NOx Emissions Inventory Trends

EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY AND TRANSPORT IN FIGURES Part 3 : TRANSPORT

Single vehicle accidents

EU TRANSPORT in figures

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2009/04

TEPZZ _84894A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: F23N 5/12 ( ) F23N 5/24 (2006.

ABB LITHUANIA 25 YEARS Making Grids Smarter A Journey from a Vision to Reality. Dick Kronman, Head of Smart Grids Center of Excellence

transport Creating jobs Generating growth in figures Transport provides work for millions of Europeans Transport is the lifeblood of the EU economy

TEPZZ 5 59 A T EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER. Technical Annex. Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Emissions from the transport sector

Committing to the future. The digital manifold testo 550, ideal for all measurement work on refrigeration systems and heat pumps

Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Market Market Situation for Sheep & Goat Meats 22 March 2018

DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION FINAL REPORT

transport in figures Transport

EU Oilseed Complex Trade 2017/18 Marketing Year July - June. AGRI G 4 Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets 30 August 2018

Transcription:

Addendum to report #13 Markus Amann, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Zig Klimont, June 13,

Table 1: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for SO2. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in AT 24.6 24.6 S content of fuels used in residential/commercial sector 27.1 27.2 BE 139.9 139.9 Industrial combustion and processes - waste flaring and 145.2 143.9 non ferrous metals underestimated in BG 889.6 889.6 Recently installed FGD not fully included in 776.3 776.3 HR 67.7 67.7 Power sector - underestimates progress in 63.4 63.6 implementation of emission control measures CY 38.2 38.2 37.9 38.1 CZ 207.6 No submission. 215.8 DK 20.6 20.6 Industrial combustion and processes - underestimates 22.9 24.5 the emissions EE 66.0 66.0 underestimates the emissions from oil shale production 76.2 76.2 and use FI 89.6 89.6 Industrial combustion and processes - consistent with 69.2 69.2 national experts' estimates; compared with NAT emissions overestimated FR 443.7 443.7 Emissions from industrial processes overestimated in 467.3 459.9 DE 549.4 549.4 update of emissions from the power sector not (yet) 517.3 460.5 included in GR 505.3 505.3 underestimates emissions form liquid fuels combustion in 531.8 531.6 industry HU 128.5 No submission. 127.7 IE 71.0 71.0 71.1 71.6 IT 381.8 381.8 NAT - higher estimate of emissions from industry 402.5 405.3 LT 41.6 41.6 No submission. 43.1 LU 1.9 1.9 NAT - higher S content of fuels used in residential/commercial 2.6 2.6 sector MT 11.1 11.1 Power sector - NAT - higher S content of heavy fuel oil 11.4 11.4 NL 69.9 69.9 underestimates emissions from industrial combustion 64.5 64.5 PL 1255.5 1255.5 overestimates S content of coal used in residential/commercial sector 1223.9 1217.4

Table 1, ctd.: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for SO2. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in PT 111.3 111.3 Recent improvement of fuel quality (S content) not fully 89.3 176.5 included in RO 705.7 705.7 Recent improvement of fuel quality (S content) not fully 642.6 642.6 included in SK 91.5 91.5 89.0 89.0 SI 39.6 39.6 40.7 40.8 ES 1327.9 1327.9 1325.5 1278.1 SE 38.0 38.0 35.9 35.9 UK 849.5 849.5 Power sector - faster improvement in fuel quality than assumed in Emissions from fuel input to blast furnaces need correction in 706.0 708.6

Table 2: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for NO x. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in AT 230.3 Emissions from agricultural soils -5.6 235.9 236.2 237.3 BE 295.3 295.3 291.0 290.5 BG 166.8 166.8 Very high emission factor for industrial processes in national 153.9 153.9 inventory Road: Based on consultations in, assumes a higher share of old cars (without catalyst) HR 75.9 Emissions from agricultural soils -0.9 76.8 Road: HR assumes older car fleet compared with COPERT 81.2 81.0 CY 21.2 Emissions from agricultural soils -0.4 21.6 21.1 21.2 CZ 296.0 No submission 279.9 DK 182.3 182.3 Road: higher, assuming older fleet/higher shares of NOC. 181.1 186.0 FI 201.2 201.2 Power sector: consistent with national experts' estimates; 169.4 169.4 compared with NAT emissions overestimated FI Road: higher. Differences in details of control shares, but also activity data. FR 1351.4 1351.4 Power sector (emissions factors and implementation of control 1429.9 1403.6 measures) FR NAT: Different composition of fleet and age structure compared with COPERT DE 1396.8 Emissions from agricultural soils -112.5 1509.3 NAT - lower emissions from iron and steel industry 1578.1 1565.2 GR 406.8 406.8 Road: Different composition of fleet in NAT compared with 417.7 415.6 COPERT GR No emissions in NAT from off-road (or different allocation) HU 154.9 154.9 No submission. replaced with 154.9 199.1 IE 149.6 149.6 Road: higher. Differences in age structure and inventory 127.3 129.2 approach. IT 1305.8 1305.8 NAT - lower emission factors in power sector, different 1212.2 1214.0 classification of industrial CHP plants LV 36.1 36.1 37.3 41.6 LT 61.9 No submission 62.5 LU 47.4 Emissions from agricultural soils -0.3 47.7 Road: Different LDV - HDV allocation of diesel 62.1 61.8

Table 2, ctd.: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for NO x. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in MT 9.9 9.9 Road: higher, because based on fuel sold. NAT based on 9.3 9.3 fuel used. NL 379.7 Emissions from agricultural soils -6.2 385.9 Road: higher, because based on fuel sold. NAT based on 345.6 336.8 fuel used. PL 796.8 796.8 NAT - higher fuel use and emissions from agricultural tractors 865.8 851.8 PT 268.0 268.0 Road: lower, because based on fuel sold, different LDV- 252.6 256.1 HDV allocation of diesel, and less older cars. RO 310.5 Emissions from agricultural soils -0.8 311.3 Road: lower, but higher for NON-RD. Possibly issue of fuel 309.1 309.1 allocation SK 94.7 94.7 Road: lower, possibly because of age structure or LDV- 101.9 101.9 HDV diesel fuel allocation. SI 49.8 49.8 NAT: lower emissions from off-rd 46.7 48.3 ES 1513.4 Emissions from agricultural soils -13.5 1526.9 Road: higher, because based on fuel sold. NAT based on 1401.5 1421.1 fuel used. SE 215.7 215.7 Road; higher, because higher share of NOC cars, and 174.1 174.7 different allocation LDV-HDV diesel fuel. UK 1479.8 1479.8 Off-rd - higher activities and emissions in NAT 1580.1 1591.5

Table 3: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for PM2.5. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in AT 24.4 24.4 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) - differences in emission 22.3 22.2 factors BE 28.4 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 1.3 26.8 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) - activities in too 24.4 35.5 low (statistics do not include real consumption), Belgium uses Tier 1 methodology to estimate the emissions Open burning of agricultural waste 0.3 Road NAT estimate according to fuel used, not sold BG 34.5 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 1.0 27.7 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) - BG uses Tier 1 26.7 26.7 methodology Open burning of agricultural waste 5.4 Combustion and process emissions in industry Open burning of municipal waste 0.5 HR 15.0 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.6 11.6 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) - HR uses Tier 1 12.6 10.7 methodology Open burning of agricultural waste 2.5 Road: different assumptions about the age of car fleet and different emissions factors compared with COPERT HR assumes older car fleet compared with COPERT Open burning of municipal waste 0.4 CY 2.7 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.1 2.6 Combustion and process emissions in industry - emission factor 2.9 2.9 in cement industry needs modification CZ 42.9 No submission, Inventory incomplete. DK 28.0 27.9 Different emission factors for combustion and processes in 25.4 26.4 industry Open burning of municipal waste 0.1 EE 20.0 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.1 19.0 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) 19.7 19.7 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.8 Open burning of municipal waste 0.1 FI 28.5 28.5 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) 36.0 41.4 Road: Gains - lower non-exhaust, different mileage assumptions FR 271.0 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 6.6 264.4 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) 304.0 245.2 Road: lower. Differences in details of control shares, but also activity data.

Table 3, ctd.: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for PM2.5. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in DE 122.6 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.2 120.5 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) 121.2 124.4 Open burning of municipal waste 1.9 GR 61.9 No and submissions HU 29.4 No submission. IE 13.3 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.5 12.5 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) higher in 10.9 10.8 IE Open burning of municipal waste 0.3 Combustion and process emissions in industry higher in NAT IT 146.7 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 7.4 139.3 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) higher in NAT 165.8 142.1 Different assessment of emissions from waste burning (agricultural and municipal) LV 18.6 No submission. 29.5 LT 15.0 No submission. 15.0 LU 3.3 No submission. 3.3 MT 0.7 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.1 0.7 Road: NAT higher, older structure of vehicles assumed 1.3 1.3 NL 24.2 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.1 24.1 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) NAT - tier 1 methodology 19.5 19.1 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks; higher 1.7 Road: higher, because based on fuel sold. PL 224.7 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 4.8 219.9 Small combustion (stoves and boilers): hifgher, includes 132.8 140.6 combustion of coal of poor quality Different assessment of emissions from waste burning (agricultural and municipal) - NAT higher PT 62.7 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 1.3 60.3 59.4 68.2 Open burning of municipal waste 1.1 RO 112.5 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 2.7 86.7 Small combustion (stoves and boilers) - NAT higher, Tier 1 methodology 105.7 105.7

Table 3, ctd.: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for PM2.5. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) Sectors systematically included (+) or missing (-) in SK 32.1 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.7 30.6 Small combustion (stoves and boilers); NAT higher, Tier 1 methodology 36.7 36.7 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.4 Open burning of municipal waste 0.4 SI 9.3 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 0.3 8.4 Small combustion (stoves and boilers); NAT higher, Tier 1 methodology 15.2 15.7 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.5 Open burning of municipal waste 0.2 ES 156.1 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks 5.4 124.0 Small combustion (stoves and boilers); NAT lower, Tier 1 methodology 98.2 93.6 Open burning of agricultural waste 26.7 Road: higher, because based on fuel sold. SE 31.2 Open burning of agricultural waste 0.1 31.2 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks (different assessment); higher 29.3 29.9 Combustion and process emissions in industry higher in UK 87.0 Open burning of agricultural waste 1.0 86.0 Smoking, barbecues, fireworks (different assessment); higher 81.3 92.6 Off-road - higher activities and emissions in NAT

Table 4: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for NH 3. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in AT 63.0 Pets and humans 1.1 61.9 62.7 62.7 BE 74.2 Pets and humans 1.3 72.8 Difference in estimates from 71.3 72.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.1 waste disposal BG 65.2 Pets and humans 1.0 64.2 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 58.1 48.3 Tier 1 for livestock in national inventory gives higher estimate HR 29.3 Pets and humans 0.6 28.3 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 40.4 44.3 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.5 Tier 1 for livestock in national inventory gives higher estimate Industrial combustion and process sources CY 6.2 Pets and humans 0.1 6.1 Tier 1 for livestock in inventory gives higher estimate 5.8 5.9 CZ 79.9 Missing submission, report incomplete DK 73.4 Pets and humans 0.7 78.1 Difference in assumptions on 82.7 87.5 Emissions from crops -5.3 livestock mitigation measures EE 11.8 Pets and humans 0.2 11.4 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 9.5 9.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.2 Differences in estimates for livestock and mineral fertilizers FI 33.9 Pets and humans 0.7 33.3 Differences in estimates for livestock 38.8 37.8 FR 674.8 Pets and humans 8.0 666.9 660.9 686.3 DE 593.1 Pets and humans 10.9 582.3 Differences in estimates for 573.2 572.2 livestock and mineral fertilizers GR 56.8 Missing submission HU 77.6 Missing submission, report incomplete IE 104.2 Pets and humans 0.5 103.7 Differences in estimates for 109.1 110.0 livestock and mineral fertilizers IT 422.2 Pets and humans 7.6 414.7 415.9 416.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 1.1 LV 13.0 Pets and humans 0.3 12.6 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 15.6 17.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.2 inventory uses Tier 1 IPCC method for mineral fertilizers LT 44.2 Missing submission 39.1 LU 6.2 Pets and humans 0.1 6.2 Differences in estimates for livestock 5.0 4.9 includes emissions from chemical industry

Table 4, ctd: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for NH 3. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) MT 1.7 Pets and humans 0.1 1.7 1.6 1.6 NL 146.0 Pets and humans 2.1 143.9 Difference in estimates from 140.5 142.9 waste disposal PL 343.6 Pets and humans 5.2 338.4 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 269.5 271.7 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 1.3 Differences in estimates for livestock ( cattle emissions very low) PT 70.9 Pets and humans 1.2 69.6 Difference in estimates from waste disposal 51.3 50.3 RO 161.4 Pets and humans 2.9 158.5 Tier 1 for livestock in inventory gives higher estimate 198.5 198.5 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 4.8 Difference in estimates from waste disposal SK 28.3 Pets and humans 0.7 27.6 Differences in estimates for 28.6 28.6 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.1 livestock and mineral fertilizers SI 19.0 Pets and humans 0.3 18.7 18.7 19.1 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.1 ES 365.9 Pets and humans 5.7 360.2 365.6 379.3 SE 53.5 Pets and humans 1.2 52.4 Differences in estimates for livestock and mineral fertilizers 55.2 55.6 UK 308.4 308.4 307.5 302.2

Table 5: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for VOC. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) missing (-) in AT 170.8 Emissions from livestock manures -1.7 172.6 Vehicle structure and emission factors for road transport 162.0 165.3 Assumptions for paint use activities BE 157.5 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.2 157.3 142.7 145.8 Activities and emission factors for solvent use BG 138.9 Emissions from livestock manures -18.2 157.2 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 86.1 67.2 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) -1.4 High share of old gasoline cars and missing non-road Tier 1 for residential combustion HR 79.1 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 3.4 75.7 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 101.2 101.0 Tier 1 for residential combustion CY 8.8 Emissions from livestock manures -2.5 11.3 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 13.9 11.8 CZ 251.3 251.3 Missing submission, report incomplete DK 129.9 Emissions from livestock manures -1.8 131.6 110.3 112.6 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.1 Activities and emission factors for solvent use EE 38.4 Emissions from livestock manures -3.8 42.2 Tier 1 for residential combustion 35.3 30.5 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 1.1 FI 172.6 172.6 Emission factors for small combustion 136.5 136.4 Activities and emission factors for solvent use FR 1117.0 1117.0 Emission factors for small combustion 1232.3 1261.4 FR Activities and emission factors for solvent use

Table 5: Comparison of 2005 total national emission inventories for VOC. submission of as of March 1, (kilotons) DE 1235.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.3 1235.2 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 1143.9 1123.7 Emission factors for small combustion Tier 1 for residential combustion GR 282.7 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 8.6 274.2 Inventory incomplete - no emissions from solvents 134.3 134.5 High share of old gasoline cars and missing non-road Tier 1 for residential combustion HU 144.4 0.0 Missing submission 113.9 IE 63.4 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) -0.2 63.6 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 56.5 56.8 IT 1237.0 Emissions from livestock manures -0.6 1237.6 Emission factors for small combustion 1316.6 1203.8 IT Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) -13.3 LV 69.0 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 1.5 67.5 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 73.3 54.8 Tier 1 for residential combustion LT 84.5 Missing submission 68.0 LU 12.6 Emissions from livestock manures -0.2 12.7 11.7 7.6 Activities and emission factors for solvent use MT 4.0 4.0 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 2.5 2.5 NL 205.0 Emissions from livestock manures -0.2 205.1 (fuel sold 177.5 172.0 basis in ) Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.2 PL 614.7 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 3.9 610.8 Tier 1 for residential combustion 593.2 574.6 PT 227.2 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) -1.7 228.9 Emission factors for small combustion 206.0 207.0 RO 459.8 Emissions from livestock manures -84.5 544.3 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 424.8 340.3 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 30.5 Tier 1 for residential combustion SK 77.1 Emissions from livestock manures -0.4 77.5 High share of old gasoline cars and missing non-road 73.1 72.7 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.4 Tier 1 for residential combustion SI 41.2 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.6 40.6 Emission factors for small combustion 39.3 42.5 Activities and emission factors for solvent use ES 934.0 934.0 High share of old gasoline cars and non-road differences 817.5 829.9 SE 209.6 Open burning of waste (agri. and municipal) 0.1 209.5 196.7 197.7 UK 1092.9 1092.9 Activities and emission factors for solvent use 1088.2 1082.4