RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

Similar documents
Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

The Re:Queen and Sparks Traffic Brief - Addendum #2

370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Transportation Overview

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

RE: INNES / TRIM RETIREMENT RESIDENCE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

Re: Sainte-Geneviève Elementary School (2198 Arch Street) Transportation Overview

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Wellington Street West

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

2405 Mer Bleue Orleans, (Ottawa), ON Community Transportation Study Mattamy Homes. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Version 2

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Colston Budd Rogers & Kafes Pty Ltd as Trustee for C & B Unit Trust ABN

MEMO 1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING USE. 2.1 Vehicle Access. Table 1: Vehicle Parking Requirements and Proposed Supply

1354 Carling Avenue. Community Transportation Study/ Transportation Impact Study

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Construction Realty Co.

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study. Submitted by:

D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers

TIS / TB/ CTS Check List

CitiGate Retail Development

Lakeside Terrace Development

Chevy Chase Lake. Preliminary Plan # B TRAFFIC STATEMENT. Prepared for: Chevy Chase Land Company & Bozzuto Development Company

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Manotick Plaza, Manotick Main Street - Traffic Impact Brief

Prepared for: Ontario Inc. CHICKADEE GROVE COMMUNITY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION OPINION LETTER

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. for MILTON SQUARE

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

12 April Leakes Pty Ltd 211 Waverley Road EAST MALVERN VIC Attention: Joseph Nasr. Dear Joe,

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

APPENDIX TR-1 PARKING AND QUEUING ASSESSMENT

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOURTH STREET NEAR BEDFORD HIGHWAY SUBMITTED BY: LYDON LYNCH ARCHITECTS

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

ORIGINAL AND REVISED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

4 Circulation & Transportation

TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT PART OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KEBRAFIELD ROODEPOORT COLLIERY IN THE PULLEN S HOPE AREA

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

CTA Blue Line Study Area

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Secured Market Rental 100 Project at 3070 Kingsway, Vancouver, BC Letter Report

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

1133 Melville Street Office Building Development REZONING APPLICATION SUBMISSION

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale Proposed Residential / Commercial Development. Transportation Assessment Report. 30 April 2018

King Street & Wyman Road Transportation Impact Study & Transportation Demand Management. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Existing Traffic Conditions

Technical Memorandum

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Transcription:

1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, Ontario K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com July 9, 2014 OUR REF: TO3073TOK00 BY EMAIL: jparkes@taggart.ca/aturner@taggart.ca Taggart Commercial Developments Inc. 225 Metcalfe Street Suite 709 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P9 Attention: Jeff Parkes/Alex Turner RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2 Dear Jeff/Alex: 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK We are advised that Taggart is moving forward with Registration of Plan of Subdivision followed by Site Plan Application for the above-noted retail site (Kanata Commons) on Campeau Drive. The subject site is located at the existing west terminus of Campeau Drive and is bounded by Campeau Drive to the north, the Carp River to the west and the proposed Transitway to the south. Site Plan is provided as Figure 1. We have discussed the transportation report requirements of these two applications with Ed Blaszynski of the City. It was agreed that as Delcan s 06 March 2013 Traffic Impact Study Addendum #1 for the joint Loblaws/Taggart site addressed all the requirements for the Plan of Subdivision process for both sites, no further transportation analysis is required for Registration of Plan of Subdivision for the subject Taggart retail component. It was also agreed that for the subsequent Site Plan Application for Taggart s Kanata Commons, all that is required is an Addendum #2 to the afore-referenced report that reviews the on-site transportation components (cars, trucks and pedestrians) and the site driveway connection to Campeau Drive for the Taggart portion only. This addendum is provided herein. 2. TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE The following are extracts from the City s 2013 Transportation Master Plan relevant to Campeau Drive and the Western Transitway Extension, both of which are adjacent to the subject site.

Page 2 Figure 1: Site Plan

Page 3 The rapid transit corridor adjacent to the south of the site is identified as a bus rapid transit with grade-separated crossings, however, the relevant section west of March Road is not in the City s 2031 Affordable Network ; and The Campeau Drive extension west to Huntmar Drive is included in the Affordable Road Network and is identified as a Phase 1, 2014-2019 project. It will initially be provided as two lanes from Didsbury Road west to Huntmar Drive and will ultimately be widened to four lanes from Terry Fox Drive west to Palladium Drive as development proceeds/requires. 3. S TRAFFIC GENERATION UPDATE As shown in Figure 1 Site Plan, Taggart s Kanata Commons now includes 72,447 ft 2 (6731 m 2 ) of retail and 230 vehicle parking spaces. The retail is comprised of: The Brick 38,000 ft 2 Lazy-Boy 19,860 ft 2 General Retail 4900 ft 2 Bank 4025 ft 2 Drive-through Restaurant 5662 ft 2 The following Tables 1 to 7, show how the peak hour vehicle trips for this proposed land use is derived. Table 1 summarizes the appropriate vehicle trip generation rates for the proposed land uses, obtained from the 9 th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers () Trip Generation Manual. Table 1: Trip Generation Rates Land Use Data Trip Rates Source AM Peak Furniture Store 890 T = 0.17(X); T = 0.45(X); Bank w/drive-through 912 T = 12.08(X); T = 24.30(X); Fast-Food w/drive- Through 934 T = 45.42(X); T = 32.65(X); Specialty Retail Centre 1 826 T = 1.36(X); T = 1.20(X) + 10.74 T = 2.71(X); T = 2.40(X) + 21.48 Notes: T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends X = 1,000 ft 2 Gross Floor Area 1. Specialty Retail AM Peak rate is assumed to be 50% of the As trip generation surveys only record vehicle trips and typically reflect highly suburban locations (with little to no access by travel modes other than private automobiles), adjustment factors appropriate to the specific study area context were applied to attain estimates of person trips for the proposed development.

Page 4 To convert vehicle trip rates to person trips, an auto occupancy factor and a non-auto trip factor were applied to the vehicle trip rates. Our review of available literature suggests that a combined factor of approximately 1.3 is considered reasonable to account for typical North American auto occupancy values of approximately 1.15 and combined transit and non-motorized modal shares of less than 10%. As such, the person trip generation for the proposed site is summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Modified Person Trip Generation Data AM Peak (persons) (persons) Land Use Area Source Furniture Store (The Brick) Furniture Store (La-Z-Boy) Specialty Retail Bank w/drive-through Fast-Food w/drive-through 890 890 826 912 934 38,000 ft 2 5 3 8 10 12 22 18,000 ft 2 2 2 4 5 6 11 4,900 ft 2 12 10 22 18 25 43 4,025 ft 2 35 28 63 63 64 127 5,662 ft 2 170 164 334 124 116 240 Total Person Trips 224 207 431 220 223 443 Note: 1.3 factor to account for typical North American auto occupancy values of approximately 1.15 and combined transit and non-motorized modal shares of less than 10% To the person trips shown in Table 2 for the proposed site, modal share values and a reduction for pass-by trips based on the site s location and proximity to adjacent communities, employment, other shopping uses and transit availability, were then applied. Modal share and pass-by values for The Brick, the La-Z-Boy, the specialty retail, the Bank and the fast-food restaurant land uses within the proposed development are summarized in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 respectively, with the projected total site vehicle trip generation summarized in Table 8. Table 3: Furniture Store (The Brick) Modal Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak Auto Driver 65% 4 2 6 7 8 15 Auto Passenger 20% 1 0 1 2 2 4 Transit 10% 0 1 1 1 2 3 Non-motorized 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Person Trips 100% 5 3 8 10 12 22 Total 'New' Auto Trips 4 2 6 7 8 15

Page 5 Table 4: Furniture Store (La-Z-Boy) Modal Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak Auto Driver 65% 2 1 3 3 4 7 Auto Passenger 20% 0 0 0 1 1 2 Transit 10% 0 1 1 1 1 2 Non-motorized 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Person Trips 100% 2 2 4 5 6 11 Total 'New' Auto Trips 2 1 3 3 4 7 Table 5: Specialty Retail Modal Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak Auto Driver 65% 8 7 15 12 16 28 Auto Passenger 20% 2 2 4 3 5 8 Transit 10% 1 1 2 2 2 4 Non-motorized 5% 1 0 1 1 2 3 Total Person Trips 100% 12 10 22 18 25 43 Less Pass-by (30%) -2-2 -4-4 -4-8 Total 'New' Auto Trips 6 5 11 8 12 20 Table 6: Bank Modal Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak Auto Driver 60% 21 17 38 38 39 77 Auto Passenger 20% 7 5 12 12 12 24 Transit 10% 3 3 6 7 7 14 Non-motorized 10% 4 3 7 6 6 12 Total Person Trips 100% 35 28 63 63 64 127 Less Pass-by (60%) -11-11 -22-23 -23-46 Total 'New' Auto Trips 10 6 16 15 16 31 Table 7: Fast-Food Modal Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak Auto Driver 60% 102 99 201 75 70 145 Auto Passenger 20% 34 32 66 24 23 47 Transit 10% 17 17 34 12 12 24 Non-motorized 10% 17 16 33 13 11 24 Total Person Trips 100% 170 164 334 124 116 240 Less Pass-by (60%) -60-60 -120-44 -44-88 Total 'New' Auto Trips 42 39 81 31 26 57

Page 6 Table 8: Total Site Vehicle Trip Generation Land Use AM Peak (veh/h) (veh/h) Furniture Store (The Brick) 4 2 6 7 8 15 Furniture Store (La-Z-Boy) 2 1 3 3 4 7 Specialty Retail 8 7 15 12 16 28 Bank w/drive-through 21 17 38 38 39 77 Fast-Food w/drive-through 102 99 201 75 70 145 Less Retail Pass-by (30%) -2-2 -4-4 -4-8 Less Bank Pass-by (60%) -11-11 -22-23 -23-46 Less Fast-Food Pass-by (60%) -60-60 -120-44 -44-88 Total New Auto Trips 64 53 117 64 66 130 As shown in Table 8, the resulting number of potential new two-way vehicle trips for the proposed development is approximately 115 and 130 veh/h during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. This is when Campeau Drive is extended west to Huntmar Drive and the traffic volume on Campeau Drive is meaningful. As the new traffic for the Taggart retail site in the aforementioned Addendum #1 was 90 vph and 124 vph respectively, while a bit lower than the Table 8 volumes, they are considered to be sufficiently similar for analysis and road network requirement purposes. For the current proposal, the total peak hour traffic into and out of the site, including passby traffic, is estimated to be approaching 265 veh/h and 275 veh/h during the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. As assessed in previous analysis used to confirm/develop the design for Campeau Drive and its Campeau/Site intersection, this volume can be adequately accommodated by the proposed intersection design and its signalization. With regard to transit patrons, the site is projected to generate 40 to 50 transit passengers per peak hour. When Campeau Drive is extended, this volume of transit passengers will be easily accommodated by the area s on-street bus service. 4. S PLAN REVIEW As noted in Section 1, Introduction and Scope of Work, the focus of this Addendum is a review of the on-site layout and the site driveway connection to Campeau Drive. With regard to on-site layout, the following comments can be made from a transportation perspective. The site driveway connections to Kanata Commons Private align appropriately with the site driveway connections to the proposed Loblaws development located on the east site of Kanata Commons Private;

Page 7 The 40 m long throat length between the northern-most site driveway connection to Kanata Commons Private and Campeau Drive meets By-Law requirements and is considered acceptable; The 20 m long throat length on the northernmost site driveway connection to Kanata Commons Private is a good feature at this primary site entrance; All parking spaces at 2.6 m wide and 5.2 m long, meet By-Law requirements; All on-site circulation aisles at 6.7 m or wider, meet By-Law requirements; As shown on Attachment #1, truck turn templates have been provided to the architect, and they have modified the Site Plan to accommodate these requirements. Where necessary, at the west end of the site, painted islands have replaced raised concrete islands to better accommodate the larger truck turning requirements during the store s off-hours; As cars driving through the Bank drive-through cannot make their exit movement within the provided 6.7 m wide aisle, further refinements are required in this area of the Site Plan; A minimum 2.0 m wide sidewalks are proposed on both of the Campeau Drive and Kanata Commons Private site frontages. As well, sidewalks are provided along the frontage of all building pads, and these are linked to each other by delineated pedestrian crosswalks across the vehicle circulation aisles where necessary; and With regard to bicycle parking, the By-Law requires 27 spaces and 28 spaces are proposed. The proposed bike rack locations are shown on the Site Plan. With regard to the interim and ultimate connection of Kanata Commons Private to Campeau Drive, the following comments can be made from a transportation perspective. In the short-term, prior to the westerly extension of Campeau Drive, two inbound lanes and one outbound lane are proposed. This is considered appropriate as outbound traffic can only turn right onto Campeau Drive, and this cross-section, as shown on the Site Plan, is compatible with the ultimate access/egress requirements; and Once Campeau Drive is extended west to Huntmar Drive and widened to four lanes, a five-lane cross-section is proposed on the Kanata Commons Private connection to Campeau Drive. As shown on the Site Plan, this is comprised of the same two inbound lanes and three outbound lanes separated by a 1.5 m wide median. This cross-section is consistent with the City s ultimate design for this intersection undertaken by Stantec as part of the Campeau Drive Extension Detailed Design assignment. All required traffic analysis and design related to this intersection has

Page 8 been previously undertaken and approved by the City and the site traffic operation provided herein is both consistent and acceptable with this previous analysis. 5. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The findings, conclusions and recommendations of the foregoing analysis are as follows: The proposed 72,447 ft 2 (6731 m 2 ) retail development on the subject site, and its related peak hour traffic generation (115 vph to 130 vph of new trips) are consistent with what was assumed/identified in previous studies used to determine the design/lane configuration of the Campeau Drive extension and the intersections along it; All on-site dimensions related to parking spaces, aisle widths, driveway widths and throat lengths meet By-Law requirements; With the exception of the Bank drive through, all on-site truck and vehicle turn requirements are adequately accommodated by the proposed Site Plan; The initial three-lane cross-section of the Kanata Commons Private on its approach to Campeau Drive is both sufficient for initial site access/egress needs while Campeau Drive ends at this location, and compatible with the ultimate five-lane cross-section of the Kanata Commons Private approach once Campeau Drive is extended west, widened to four lanes and has a signalized intersection at Kanata Commons Private; and The proposed ultimate cross-section of Kanata Commons Private approach and identified turn lanes at its signalized intersection with Campeau Drive are consistent with the Stantec design for the Campeau Drive extension. Based on the foregoing, subject to resolution of the turn requirements for the Bank drivethrough lane, the proposed Site Plan is recommended from a transportation perspective. Any questions, please call. Sincerely, Ronald M. Jack, P.Eng. Vice President Transportation Manager Ottawa Operations Attachment

Attachment #1 Vehicle Turn Templates Superimposed onto the Site Plan