Ex.-Applicants-Stevenson-22

Similar documents
Appendix B: Topographic Maps (1:24,000 Scale)

BEMIDJI GRAND RAPIDS 230-KV TRANSMISSION LINE

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

MUNICIPAL CLASS EA PROCESS 1

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

STATE OF MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD MEQB DOCKET NO. MP-HVTL-EA-1-99

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

STATE OF MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD

7.7 Southeast Zone. Transmission Projects Report Section 7: Needs

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

welcome to the BC Hydro community open house

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

State Regulatory Affairs and Local Relations Update. ATC Customer Meeting November 19, 2009

Appendix D Black Hills Project Summary

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

MERRILLAN MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AND WATER UTILITY Commitment to Community Program Rider

Taylor s Falls Business Park

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PUC DOCKET NO. E002/TL OAH DOCKET NO.

Outer Metro 115 kv Transmission Development Study. (Scott Co, Carver Co and Hennepin Co)

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PUC DOCKET NO. E002/TL OAH DOCKET NO.

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

I-20 East Transit Initiative

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Western NY Public Policy Transmission Planning Report

ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP

WOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES: MAP EXHIBITS: TABLES:

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Business Advisory Committee. November 3, 2015

Purpose and Need Report

Transportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate. November 23, 2015

Kake - Petersburg Intertie Update

City of Pacific Grove

Cost Summary O&M. Capital

Black Hills Project Summary

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #10

Minnesota Biennial Transmission. Zone Meeting 8

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Summary of Current Corridor Alternatives. January 4, 2012

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

STREET LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UNDERGROUNDING

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

RATE SCHEDULE CNG COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS SURCHARGE INCENTIVE MECHANISM

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map. July 17, 2018

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TERRACE TO KITIMAT TRANSMISSION PROJECT OPEN HOUSE 5 P.M. 8 P.M. GDS14-027

Tier II Group Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan

Appendix S: Airports and Airstrips

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Chapter 4. All-Terrain Vehicles and Off-Road Motor Vehicle Operation

Re: Application for Approval of Route Permit Amendment, Spans 89-93, 95-97, and

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions Leander-Round to Rock 138-kV Transmission Line Project Williamson County

Mobility Management: Caltrain

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Summit County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary, 2017

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L79. October 18, 2016

Appendix A. Community Workshop Results PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

HRTPO Strategic Campaign. Passenger Rail. Agenda Item #11. Presentation To. May 19, Presentation By

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L82

Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee

Federal Way Link Extension

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Lapeer County

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Beneficial Use Designations for Stream Reaches: Lower St. Croix River Watershed ( )

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

DART Priorities Overview

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Twin Cities Minnesota Zone Meeting Xcel Energy. May 11, 2005 Bloomington, MN

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

(2) Scope. 220 CMR applies to all Distribution Companies subject to the jurisdiction of the Department.

Case 13-M Edic to New Scotland 345 kv Transmission Line and Hurley Avenue PARs Project (ED-NS/HA) Article VII Filing ED-NS/HA

Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through Appendixes

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Sub-Regional RTEP Committee PJM South

Extending TRACKS. Preliminary design plan review underway. Public comment and approval process in May & June. Municipal Consent Process

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

FISCHER, FRANKLIN & FORD Attorneys and Counsellors GUARDIAN BUILDING, SUITE GRISWOLD STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN

Transcription:

Mississippi River WAB AS HA W INONA City of Alma WABA SHA 61 Alma Lizzy Pauls Pond City of Buffalo BU FFALO Belvidere Village of Cochrane Lincoln Fountain City Bay 88 Bensel Pond Milton 35 Waumandee Waumandee Creek 95 Cross Glencoe BUFFA LO TRE MPEALEAU Trempealeau River City of Arcadia Arcadia 93 93 95 Preston Ettrick 53 53 Village of Ettrick 95 City of Blair Trempealeau River Legend PSCW Approved Route (05-10-12) Preliminary Route PSCW Approved Substation Siting Area Other Route Evaluated Route Transportation Jurisdiction Interstate Highway US Highway State Highway City or Village Town (BTS) (WDNR) W I NO NA Dark Slough Fountain City Betsy Slough Dodge Gale Crooked Slough Mississippi River Bartlet Lake Indian Channel Buffalo 35 Trempealeau River West Channel Marinuka Lake City of Galesville Black River New Channel L A 54 C R O S S E BUFFALO Trempealeau Beaver Creek 53 14 43 14 TREM PEALEAU 14 WINONA Village of Trempealeau 35 Third Lake Round Lake Caledonia TRE MP EA LE AU Long Lake Tank Creek Van Loon Lake Goose Lake Black River Holland 90 LA WINONA CROSSE Shingle Creek The Bullet Chute Mississippi River Lake Onalaska Onalaska Village of Holmen 53 [ 0 2 Miles Data Sources: WDNR, WisDOT, BTS, Census WI_Project_Overview_120510 P:\2007\07180025.00_CAPX\GIS\Layouts\WI_CPCN P:\2007\07180025.00_CAPX\GIS\Maps\WI_CPCN H a m p t o n R o c h e s t e r L a C r o s s e 3 4 5 k V T r a n s m i s s i o n P r o j e c t X c e l E n e r g y D a i r y l a n d P o w e r C o o p e r a t i v e R o c h e s t e r P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s W i s c o n s i n P u b l i c P o w e r, I n c o r p o r a t e d S o u t h e r n M i n n e s o t a M u n i c i p a l P o w e r A g e n c y Page 1 of 9 PSCW Approved Route May 2012

CapX2020 Hampton Rochester La Crosse 345 kv Transmission Project Table 1: Costs by Segment Segments revised by approved Wisconsin route, Modified Q1 Galesville Segment Capital (Install) Costs Removal Costs Comment 18A Revised $ 3,230,000 $ 95,200 Approved segment is shorter but had 90 angle added 19 $ 621,400 $ 12,500 Removal is a prorated share of removing Xcel 161 kv line in Holmen. 20 $ 395,500 $ 5,200 Removal is a prorated share of removing Xcel 161 kv line in Holmen. 9 Revised $ 3,716,000 $ 108,200 Removal is a prorated share of removing Xcel 161 kv line in Holmen. The costs shown are 2010 dollar direct costs (materials and installation labor, ROW clearing and preparation and distribution relocations) to allow segment to segment comparisons. Nodal costs are included in the capital costs. Other costs, including escalation to the year spent (2014 and 2015), overheads, allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) and all other costs that are common to all routes (such as engineering, project management and oversight, etc.) are presented in Table 2. All other segments are detailed in Table 2.1 16 of the CPCN application. Page 2 of 9

CapX2020 Hampton Rochester La Crosse 345 kv Transmission Project Table 2: Cost of approved Wisconsin route, Modified Q1 Galesville WI Approved Route Modified Project Cost Categories Q1 Galesville Material Poles $ 24,740,000 Wire $ 5,770,000 Other $ 13,780,000 Labor ROW prep $ 2,380,000 Foundations $ 19,230,000 Line $ 21,170,000 Other Real Estate $ 4,210,000 TSS $ 13,200,000 Environmental $ 1,440,000 Removal $ 1,890,000 Distribution relocations $ 1,820,000 Escalation $ 19,579,000 Overheads $ 7,380,000 AFUDC $ 20,410,000 Subtotal $ 156,999,000 Substations Substation Briggs Road 345/161 $ 27,285,000 Substation Briggs Road 69 $ 5,340,000 Substation North La Crosse 69 $ 1,040,000 161 and 69 kv lines at substation Material $ 646,000 Labor $ 998,000 Other $ 1,267,000 Subtotal $ 36,576,000 Other Costs Pre certification costs $ 7,476,000 One time environmental impact fee $ 8,973,000 Annual impact fees based on three years to construct the project $ 1,076,000 Subtotal $ 17,525,000 Total Cost $ 211,100,000 For comparison purposes, the revised cost of the original Q1 Galesville route is provided below. Q1 - Galesville CPCN application filing cost $ 202,065,000 Modifications through proceeding 69 kv addition Briggs to North La Crosse $ 6,760,000 Increase in EIF due to adding lower voltage substation costs to the EIF cost basis (commission decision point 15) $ 1,576,000 Total $ 210,400,000 5/18/2012 Notes A 69 kv connection was added between Briggs Road and North La Crosse during the proceeding. This includes adding 69 kv at Briggs Road, expanding the 69 kv at North La Crosse and adding a line between the substations. EIF increased due to commission decision to include low voltage costs at Briggs Road Substation to the cost basis for EIF calculation. This includes the 69 kv addition. Page 3 of 9

CapX2020 Hampton Rochester La Crosse 345 kv Transmission Project Table 3: Environmental Impact Fees Approved Wisconsin Route, Modified Q1 Galesville Percent of total miles / total miles / 2 (1/2 to county, 1/2 to local unit) # miles in local government unit / total miles 0.05 x 345 kv project costs x one-time distribution factor 0.003 x 345 kv project costs x annual distribution factor Units of Government within County 345 kv Route Length (Miles) Percent of Total Project Miles One-Time Fee Distribution Factor Annual Fee Distribution Factor One-Time Fee Annual Fee City of Alma 1.89 3.89% 0.0194 0.0389 $ 174,418 $ 20,930 City of Buffalo 0.27 0.56% 0.0028 0.0056 $ 24,917 $ 2,990 Belvidere 6.54 13.45% 0.0673 0.1345 $ 603,543 $ 72,425 Buffalo 6.49 13.35% 0.0667 0.1335 $ 598,929 $ 71,871 Cross 3.11 6.40% 0.0320 0.0640 $ 287,006 $ 34,441 Milton 6.59 13.56% 0.0678 0.1356 $ 608,158 $ 72,979 Village of Cochrane 0.59 1.21% 0.0061 0.0121 $ 54,448 $ 6,534 Buffalo County 25.48 52.41% 0.2621 $ 2,351,419 $ - Village of Holmen 1.06 2.18% 0.0109 0.0218 $ 97,822 $ 11,739 Holland 6.67 13.72% 0.0686 0.1372 $ 615,540 $ 73,865 Onalaska 0.15 0.30% 0.0015 0.0030 $ 13,476 $ 1,617 La Crosse County 7.88 16.20% 0.0810 $ 726,838 City of Galesville 0.27 0.56% 0.0028 0.0056 $ 24,917 $ 2,990 Caledonia 1.26 2.59% 0.0130 0.0259 $ 116,279 $ 13,953 Gale 5.91 12.16% 0.0608 0.1216 $ 545,404 $ 65,448 Trempealeau 7.82 16.09% 0.0804 0.1609 $ 721,668 $ 86,600 Trempealeau County 15.26 31.39% 0.1569 $ 1,408,268 Total 48.62 $ 8,973,050 $ 538,383 Total Fee Basis $ 179,461,000 5-18-2012: - Modified for PSC approved route which changed lengths in Village of Holmen, Holland and La Crosse County. - Approved route is comprised of segments 1, 2A2, 2A3R, 2A4R, 2BR, 2CR, 2DR, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2H, 2I, 6, 12, 13B2, 13C, 13D, 13E, 17A, 17B, 18A, 19, 20, 9, 18H - Modified for PSC decision on cost basis for EIF. Low voltage substation costs at Briggs Road added to cost basis. - Costs updated for the revised route and to include lower voltage substation costs in the EIF cost basis as directed by the commission. Page 4 of 9

Table 5: Summary of Impacts for the Modified / Approved Q1-Galesville Route Resource Category PSCW Approved Route General Route Impacts (Table 1A) Length sharing transmission line ROW (miles) 27.3 Percent sharing transmission line ROW 56% Length sharing railroad ROW (miles) 3.1 Percent sharing railroad ROW 6% Length sharing road ROW (miles) 8.3 Percent sharing road ROW 17% Length not following transmission line, roads or railroads (miles) 10.0 Percent not following transmission line, roads, or railroad 21% Total length (miles) 48.7 Distance to Potentially Sensitive Buildings (Table 1B) Number of residences 0-25 feet from route 0 Number of residences 26-50 feet from route 0 Number of residences 51-100 feet from route 15 Number of residences 101-150 feet from route 13 Number of residences 151-300 feet from route 86 Total residences 300 feet from route 114 Commercial/industrial 0-100 feet from route 3 Natural Resource, Residential, and Commercial Impacts (Table 2) Agricultural-existing ROW area shared 105.10 Agricultural-new ROW area required 270.20 Non-Agricultural Upland-existing ROW Area shared 123.90 Non-Agricultural Upland-new ROW area required 129.60 Non-Forested Wetland-existing ROW area shared 13.80 Non-Forested Wetland-new ROW area required 15.20 Forested Wetland-existing ROW area shared 16.10 Page 5 of 9

Table 5: Summary of Impacts for the Modified / Approved Q1-Galesville Route Resource Category PSCW Approved Route Forested Wetland-new ROW area required 20.50 Developed-existing ROW area shared 26.10 Developed-new ROW area required 24.70 Public and Tribal Land Impacts (Table 3) Federal land 1.7 State land 0 County land 0 Village/city land 0 Page 6 of 9

CapX2020 Hampton Rochester La Crosse 345 kv Transmission Project Table 4: Environmental Impact Fee Calculation Approved Wisconsin route, Modified Q1 Galesville Total Cost Before EIF $ 201,060,000 Costs Excluded from Fee Calculation Pre certification costs $7,476,000 O&M costs $0 Distribution relocations $1,820,000 161 kv and 69 kv costs when attached to 345 kv line $9,771,000 161 kv and 69 kv reroutes to substation $2,532,000 Subtotal costs NOT included in EIF calculation $21,599,000 Cost basis for EIF $179,461,000 One time fee at 5% $ 8,973,050 Annual fee at 0.3% $ 538,383 5/18/2012 Page 7 of 9

Table 5: Summary of Impacts for the Modified / Approved Q1-Galesville Route Resource Category PSCW Approved Route General Route Impacts (Table 1A) Length sharing transmission line ROW (miles) 27.3 Percent sharing transmission line ROW 56% Length sharing railroad ROW (miles) 3.1 Percent sharing railroad ROW 6% Length sharing road ROW (miles) 8.3 Percent sharing road ROW 17% Length not following transmission line, roads or railroads (miles) 10.0 Percent not following transmission line, roads, or railroad 21% Total length (miles) 48.7 Distance to Potentially Sensitive Buildings (Table 1B) Number of residences 0-25 feet from route 0 Number of residences 26-50 feet from route 0 Number of residences 51-100 feet from route 15 Number of residences 101-150 feet from route 13 Number of residences 151-300 feet from route 86 Total residences 300 feet from route 114 Commercial/industrial 0-100 feet from route 3 Natural Resource, Residential, and Commercial Impacts (Table 2) Agricultural-existing ROW area shared 105.10 Agricultural-new ROW area required 270.20 Non-Agricultural Upland-existing ROW Area shared 123.90 Non-Agricultural Upland-new ROW area required 129.60 Non-Forested Wetland-existing ROW area shared 13.80 Non-Forested Wetland-new ROW area required 15.20 Forested Wetland-existing ROW area shared 16.10 Page 8 of 9

Table 5: Summary of Impacts for the Modified / Approved Q1-Galesville Route Resource Category PSCW Approved Route Forested Wetland-new ROW area required 20.50 Developed-existing ROW area shared 26.10 Developed-new ROW area required 24.70 Public and Tribal Land Impacts (Table 3) Federal land 1.7 State land 0 County land 0 Village/city land 0 Page 9 of 9