OVERVIEW OF STATE FERRY SYSTEM OPERATIONS

Similar documents
Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP)

Incentives for Green Fleets

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Diesel Emission Reduction Program

MARINE VESSEL REPOWER APPLICATION

January 8, ATTN: VW Settlement. Dear Mr. Phillips:

Reducing Workboat & Rail Emissions in Ports with Clean Diesel Technology

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

IAPH Tool Box for Port Clean Air Programs

Federal Funding Opportunities Northeast Drayage Workshop October 13, Reema Loutan Environmental Engineer EPA Region 2

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2704 SUMMARY

Volkswagen Settlement: Opportunities for States. Karen El Mann Senior Vice President

Evolution Of Tier 4 Regulations & Project Specific Diesel Engine Emissions Requirements

California s Emission Reduction Plan for Ports and International Goods Movement

DRAFT MEMORANDUM. Introduction. January 9, 2018

VOLKSWAGEN SETTLEMENT UPDATE

Regulatory Announcement

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

DRIVING TOWARDS A CLEANER FUTURE

Grant Funding for School Bus Replacements

DRAFT April 9, STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted [adoption date])

Grant Opportunities for Vehicle-based Projects in the Bay Area

Item No.: 5B-Supp Date of Meeting: July 17, Briefing on Air Quality Grant Funding

EPA TIER 4 AND THE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY. Tim Cresswell Tier 4 Product Definition Manager Electric Power Division

Metro and you, building together.

B. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of October 24, 2017.

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

EPA s National Clean Diesel Campaign and the North American ECA

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 12, 2016

CARL MOYER AIR STANDARDS ATTAINMENT PROGRAM MARINE VESSEL REPOWER PROJECT APPLICATION

March 11, Public Docket A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Room M-1500, Waterside Mall 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Update: VW Mitigation Fund Planning

Ohio Diesel Fleets: Applying for VW Funds 2018 Application Cycle

Department of Legislative Services

1

Calstart Ontario Diesel Vehicle Regulation Overview

South Coast AQMD Grant/Incentive Programs. Brian Choe Air Quality Specialist Technology Advancement Office

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program and Garbage Trucks

REQUEST FOR QUOTES Invitation to Bid

EPA Tier 4 and the Electric Power Industry

CALIFORNIA S COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM FOR REDUCING HEAVY- DUTY VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP)

Considerations for Reducing Emissions from the In-Use Diesel Fleet

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

2018 American Zero Emission Bus Conference INNOVATIVE CLEAN TRANSIT PROPOSED REGULATION

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

SENATE AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 1008

Questions & Answers. Vermont Clean Diesel Grant Program. Release Date: July 14, 2017 Proposals Due: August 14, 2017 at 4:00 pm

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Impact of Transportation Emissions on New Jersey s Air Quality

Appendix C SIP Creditable Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2018 CLEAN AIR GRANTS ON-ROAD VEHICLE PROGRAM

DATE: MAY 3, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

REQUEST FOR QUOTES Invitation to Bid. Purchase of Two (2) Class 8A Tandem Axle Tractors

CNG Discussion Senate Energy Policy Issues Committee. Jim Trogdon, COO, N.C. Department of Transportation March 21, 2012

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted June 20, 2013)

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution from Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicles. (Diesel Powered Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program)

Senate Bill 1008 Ordered by the Senate June 26 Including Senate Amendments dated April 24 and June 26

New Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel and new engines and vehicles with advanced emissions control systems offer significant air quality improvement.

Oklahoma Volkswagen Settlement

IC Fee; spinal cord and brain injury fund Sec (a) This section applies after December 31, 2008.

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

Dean Saito Manager, On-Road Mobile Source. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Office of House Republican Whip, Stan Saylor

2017 DieselWise Indiana Solicitation for Projects. Shawn Seals DieselWise Indiana Administrator

REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES FOR CLEAN DIESEL CONTRACTING

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

A Workshop On Reducing Emissions from Diesel Engines

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Department of Environmental Protection PROJECT SOLICITATION

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

Vehicle and Equipment Services (4760P)

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Zero Emissions Airport Vehicle and Infrastructure Pilot Program Webinar

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

Approaches to Address Emissions Associated with Freight. South Coast Air Quality Management District October 2018

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DISASTER RECOVERY (CDBG-DR) PROGRAM SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT NYS CDBG-DR 2013 ACTION PLAN

Bonnie Weinbach Environmental Scientist U.S. EPA Region 2. GLICCC'S ADVANCING THE CHOICE CONFERENCE October 14, 2011

2011 Air Emissions Inventory

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Summit County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary, 2017

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Transcription:

Texas operates two ferry routes that provide a shorter route than existing roads for travel from Port Aransas to Harbor Island and from Galveston to Port Bolivar. Ferries enable local residents and tourists to avoid traveling solely on state highways to reach their destination, which reduces travel time and fuel consumption. These routes also serve as primary means of evacuation during hurricane threats. The two routes operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, weather permitting, and more than 9.1 million passenger trips and 3.9 million vehicle trips were taken on the ferries during fiscal year 2017. This report provides an overview of ferry system operations, including funding sources, traffic and congestion, vessel maintenance and replacement, and opportunities for diesel emission reductions. FACTS AND FINDINGS During fiscal year 2017, 3.9 million vehicle trips were taken on the Port Aransas and Galveston Port Bolivar ferries. According to the Texas Department of Transportation, wait times to board a ferry are minimal during most of the year, and projected traffic growth for both ferry operations can be managed with existing vessel assets. The Texas Department of Transportation was appropriated approximately $96.2 million in Other Funds from the State Highway Fund for the 2018 19 biennium to support the operation of the ferry systems. In addition, the Port Aransas operation has received federal competitive grants for various infrastructure projects and vessel construction. Effective December 14, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determined that the Houston Galveston Brazoria ozone nonattainment area failed to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard by the applicable deadline. Diesel emission grant funding may be available to replace or upgrade ferry engines and help reduce ozone emissions. DISCUSSION The first ferry operated by the State of Texas left Port Bolivar on July 1, 1934. Texas operated the ferry service toll-free for approximately six months, but the service was so popular that Galveston County officials asked the state to impose a charge of $0.25 to reduce traffic congestion. The $0.25 toll continued, except for a brief experimental period in 1934, until 1949. Since then, the ferry operation has been operated as a toll-free service. As of February 2018, the Galveston Port Bolivar ferry fleet consists of six 60-car vessels that connect Galveston to Port Bolivar via a route across the Houston Ship Channel. According to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), travel time is 18 minutes to cross on the ferry compared to approximately 2 hours and 20 minutes to drive the 144.0 miles around Galveston Bay. Figure 1 shows the ferry route from Port Bolivar to Galveston and the alternative highway route. FIGURE 1 PORT BOLIVAR TO GALVESTON HIGHWAY ROUTE COMPARED TO FERRY ROUTE APRIL 2018 144.0 miles 4.1 miles Bolivar Peninsula Galveston Galveston Island Source: Legislative Budget Board. LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 1

FIGURE 2 ARANSAS PASS TO PORT ARANSAS HIGHWAY ROUTE COMPARED TO FERRY ROUTE APRIL 2018 80.0 miles Corpus Christi 1.8 miles Port Aransas Source: Legislative Budget Board. Ferry operations to Port Aransas date to 1911, first privately owned and later transferred to Nueces County. In 1968, TxDOT assumed ownership and operation of the ferries and removed the existing tolls. As of February 2018, the Port Aransas ferry fleet consists of five 20-car vessels and three 28-car vessels that connect Aransas Pass (Harbor Island) to Port Aransas (Mustang Island) via a route across the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. According to TxDOT, travel time is 15 minutes to cross on the ferry compared to approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes to drive the 80.0 miles around Corpus Christi Bay. Figure 2 shows the ferry route from Aransas Pass to Port Aransas and the alternative highway route. TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION During fiscal year 2017, more than 9.1 million passenger trips and 3.9 million vehicle trips were taken on the Port Aransas and Galveston-Port Bolivar ferries. Figure 3 shows the number of ferry passenger trips on the Galveston and Port Aransas operations from fiscal years 2014 to 2017. TxDOT ferry management staff studies traffic patterns and adjusts vessel schedules based on wait times at both ferry operations locations. TRAFFIC PATTERNS AND WAIT TIMES At the Galveston Port Bolivar ferry, traffic patterns consist of six months of the busy season (from March to August) due to FIGURE 3 FERRY PASSENGER TRIPS, FISCAL YEARS 2014 TO 2017 (IN MILLIONS) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 Galveston Ferry Port Aransas Ferry Note: For Galveston Port Bolivar Ferry Operations, passenger trip numbers are estimated as three people per vehicle plus any walk-on passengers. For Port Aransas Ferry Operations, actual vehicle, passenger, and pedestrian counts are logged, pursuant to requirements from the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Corpus Christi Sector. Source: Texas Department of Transportation. 2 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019

increased tourist traffic and six months of the nonbusy season (from September to February). The Port Aransas ferry traffic patterns are consistent throughout the year, because tourists and local residents use the ferry. TxDOT considers wait times to board a ferry to be minimal during most of the year. However, long lines occur during the busy season at peak times, such as summer weekends and holidays. During peak traffic times, the wait time to board a ferry can exceed two hours. TxDOT utilizes Bluetooth technology and cameras installed on roadways to provide motorists with wait time and travel time estimates at key decision-making points leading up to ferry landings. This information enables drivers to decide whether they would rather travel on an alternate route. TxDOT s lowest traffic times are from 11:00 pm to 5:30 am. PRIORITY BOARDING SYSTEM TxDOT has statutory authority to adopt rules to establish a priority boarding system for vehicles that show an annual, fee-based, priority boarding sticker. Pursuant to the Texas Transportation Code, Section 342.004, TxDOT may grant access to a new lane that would authorize priority boarding. TxDOT rule states that it will not issue priority boarding stickers for a ferry location until it has received approximately 500 applications for that location. Although the Galveston operation has not received enough applications, the Port Aransas operation has received the 500 applications required to proceed. The operation is planning a new lane for priority boarding vehicles on both sides of the landings. Work is expected to begin in early 2019. TxDOT rules establish that no more than 50.0 percent of the ferry capacity will be allocated to priority boarding by annual permit during high-demand periods. The rules also establish the following fees for an annual permit: $250 for a two-axle vehicle, including a motorcycle, car, pickup, or van; $500 for a bus, motor home, or a single-unit truck with up to three axles; and $1,000 for a multiunit truck or other vehicle with more than three axles. TxDOT must deposit each fee collected pursuant to the Texas Transportation Code, Section 342.004, to the credit of the State Highway Fund. FIGURE 4 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURES FROM STRATEGY B.1.3, FERRY OPERATIONS FISCAL YEARS 2008 TO 2018 (IN MILLIONS) $55.0 $50.0 $45.0 $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note: Totals include funding from the State Highway Fund, federal reimbursements, and the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Source: Legislative Budget Board. STATE FUNDING A priority boarding system enables passengers to avoid waiting in the ferry boarding line. However, passengers do not have to pay to ride the ferry. The Texas Transportation Code, Section 342.001, requires TxDOT to use money from the State Highway Fund for ferry operations. Texas is the only state with a ferry operation that does not charge a toll for vehicles and passengers. For the 2018 19 biennium, TxDOT was appropriated approximately $96.2 million to support the operation of the ferry systems. Figure 4 shows the amount of TxDOT expenditures from Strategy B.1.3, Ferry Operations for the ferry system from fiscal years 2008 to 2018. In addition to State Highway Funds, expenditures from fiscal years 2008 to 2010 include about $17.8 million in federal reimbursements and funds received through the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The major revenue sources deposited directly to the State Highway Fund include motor vehicle registration fees, Federal Funds (primarily federal-aid highway reimbursements), and sales tax on motor lubricants. Additional allocations to the fund include a significant portion of motor fuel tax revenue, and, beginning in fiscal years 2018 and 2020, respectively, revenue from the first $2.5 billion of state sales tax collected in excess of $28.0 billion during a fiscal year and 35.0 percent of motor vehicle sales and rental taxes collected in excess of $5.0 billion during a fiscal year. LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 3

AVAILABLE FEDERAL GRANT FUNDING In addition to State Highway Fund appropriations, TxDOT has received approximately $29 million in federal grant money for certain projects at the Port Aransas operation as shown in Figure 5. One federal grant program, the federal Ferry Boat Discretionary (FBD) program provided funding for certain vehicular or passenger ferry facilities. The program funded facilities that are on a non- Interstate public road and are publicly owned, publicly operated, or majority publicly owned, providing substantial public benefits. Projects selected for funding from this program were funded at an 80 percent federal share. The FBD program was discontinued by the federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) in 2012, and the last FBD project solicitation was for federal fiscal year 2011. MAP-21 established the Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities Formula Program (FBP). In accordance with this program, federal-aid highway funds are available, through state transportation agencies, for designing and constructing ferry boats and for designing, acquiring right-of-way, and constructing ferry terminal facilities. Ferry boats and terminal facilities that serve vehicular travel as links on public highways (other than Interstate highways), and ferry boats and terminals only serving passengers as fixed-route transit facilities may be eligible for certain types of federal-aid highway funding. Both Galveston and Port Aransas operations have applied for these federal grants, but only Port Aransas has been awarded funding. Figure 5 shows the grant awards that TxDOT has received in accordance with the FBD and FBP programs for the Port Aransas operation. VESSEL MAINTENANCE Each vessel is subject to all United States Coast Guard (USCG) regulations and is inspected four times per year by the USCG. Regular vessel maintenance is performed daily by vessel crew members and TxDOT ferry maintenance crews ashore year-round. Each year, some vessels also are sent to a shipyard for scheduled maintenance and repairs. In addition to scheduled maintenance and repairs in the shipyard, the American Bureau of Shipping inspects the hull and machinery of each vessel during the shipyard cycle. The operations coordinate repairs and endeavor to maintain ferry service. The combination of USCG oversight and regular maintenance and repairs are intended to ensure a safe ferry fleet. According to TxDOT, a competitive market exists for vessel maintenance, and all ferry maintenance contracts are bid FIGURE 5 FEDERAL FERRY BOAT DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION OF FERRY BOATS AND FERRY TERMINAL FACILITIES FORMULA PROGRAM AWARDS FOR THE PORT ARANSAS OPERATION FISCAL YEARS 2006 TO 2016 YEAR PROJECT AWARD 2006 Design and construction of new ferry $393,879 boat 2007 Removal and replacement of wooden $2,404,664 ramp fender systems with compositematerial fender system 2008 Design and construction of new ferry $750,000 boat 2009 2009 Recovery Act: Construction and $7,200,000 Inspection 2009 Ferry boat expansion Clusters $475,000 2010 Replacement of fender system on $2,745,802 Port Aransas landings 2010 Replacement of fender system on $738,039 Harbor Island landings 2011 Bulkhead repairs to Harbor Island $790,000 2011 Installation of lead pilings for new $730,000 28-car ferry boat on Port Aransas side 2012 Installation of lead pilings $1,772,237 2015 Design and construction of new $5,080,745 28-car ferry boat 2016 Design and construction of new 28-car ferry boat $5,913,261 Source: Texas Department of Transportation. competitively. The Port Aransas operation has noted limited shipyard capabilities in its area due to the size of the vessels. A shipyard in Palacios is used for the 20-car ferryboats, and a shipyard in Houston is used for the 28-car ferryboats. In addition to ferry vessels, other marine operations also affect the market for vessel maintenance. When the price of oil is relatively high, offshore companies operate more vessels, thereby increasing the cost of repairs and limiting available dry-dock space. During recent years when the price of oil has been relatively lower, competition for access to shipyards decreased. However, as the price of oil rises, the ferry operations expect that competition for marine services and crew members will increase, which will increase maintenance costs. VESSEL REPLACEMENT The ferry fleets range in age from newly operational to 40 years old. As vessels near the end of their service life, TxDOT 4 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019

FIGURE 6 COST OF OPTIONS TO REDUCE FERRY VESSEL EMISSIONS OF NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) APRIL 2018 VESSELS ANNUAL NOx EMISSIONS (IN METRIC TONS) ANNUAL NOx EMISSIONS WITH ENGINE REPLACEMENT (IN METRIC TONS) COST PER VESSEL Galveston ferries (pre-tier diesel engines) 103.3 9.6 to 19.2 $3.2 million to $12.0 million Port Aransas 20-car ferries (pre-tier diesel engines) Port Aransas 28-car ferries (Tier 2 diesel engines) Sources: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Department of Transportation. COST PER TON OF NOx REDUCED $34,151 to $142,687 8.0 3.7 $450,000 $104,651 9.2 7.2 $1.4 million $700,000 considers the following factors to determine when replacement is necessary or cost-effective: the frequency of repairs resulting in time the vessels are unavailable for use; fuel economy of the vessels; the availability of new technology and engine efficiency; the age of the vessels; availability of replacement parts; traffic volumes; cost to modify equipment; market pricing for materials; and newer regulations, which may increase cost. The service life of a vessel ranges from 30 years to 40 years. A recent cost estimate for the replacement of a Galveston Port Bolivar 60-car vessel is about $26.3 million; replacement of the smaller Port Aransas 28-car vessels are estimated at about $9.0 million. TxDOT has explored the market for used ferry vessels, but multiple factors make it impractical to pursue this option. The majority of vessels on the used market are older vessels and would not be an improvement from a current vessel. A vessel also must be designed to fit the existing infrastructure at the ferry landings. These factors make it more effective to design and build a new vessel when adding to the fleet. Each vessel requires about 18 months to build. Before a vessel is placed into service, maintenance crew and vessel crew members also must complete training. REDUCTION OF DIESEL EMISSIONS All Texas ferry vessels are powered by diesel engines, which emit certain exhaust pollutants that affect air quality. As of December 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area failed to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. The EPA regulates certain exhaust pollutants, but the agency s established limits apply only to newly constructed engines. The EPA regulates the following marine dieselexhaust pollutants: oxides of nitrogen (NOx), particulate matter (PM), total hydrocarbons (THC), and carbon monoxide (CO). The EPA has phased in increasingly stringent regulatory limits on these pollutants since the late 1990s and has divided the phased regulatory limits into tiers. Tiers are numbered 1 through 4 with higher numbers corresponding to more stringent limits on these pollutants. The timeline of which tier is in effect depends on engine characteristics such as cylinder displacement and overall engine power. The majority of ferry vessels in the Texas operations are powered by diesel engines that predate the EPA s tiered regulations. The state has several options to reduce diesel exhaust emissions produced by these vessels. These options include an engine rebuild, a full engine replacement, and retrofitting the existing diesel engines with after-treatment devices. All vessels engines are overhauled or rebuilt every five years to 10 years, depending on running hours and preventive-maintenance needs. Figure 6 shows the annual NOx emissions for ferry vessels and the estimated annual NOx emissions if the engines were replaced with Tier 3 engines. LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 5

GRANT FUNDING AVAILABLE TO REDUCE DIESEL ENGINE EMISSIONS Instead of using State Highway Fund appropriations to update engines to reduce emissions, TxDOT could apply for two grant programs that fund diesel-emission-reduction efforts. Although ferry operations would be eligible, it is unclear whether the operations would be competitive against other grantees. CLEAN DIESEL PROGRAM The EPA s Clean Diesel Program provides support for projects that protect human health and improve air quality by reducing harmful emissions from diesel engines. This program includes grants and rebates funded in accordance with the federal Diesel Emissions Reduction Act. The following diesel vehicles, engines, and equipment are included as eligible uses for Clean Diesel Program funding: school buses; Class 5 to Class 8 heavy-duty highway vehicles; locomotive engines; marine engines; and nonroad engines, equipment, or vehicles used in construction, handling of cargo (including at ports or airports), agriculture, mining, or energy production (including stationary generators and pumps). A number of entities in Texas have received grant money from the Clean Diesel Program. Though TxDOT s ferry operations are eligible for grant funding through Clean Diesel Program, TxDOT has not applied for any Clean Diesel Program grants to date. TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PROGRAM The Texas Emissions Reduction Program (TERP), administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), was established by the Seventy-seventh Legislature, 2001. The statutory objectives of TERP include the following: achieving maximum reductions in nitrogen oxides to demonstrate compliance with the Texas State Implementation Plan; achieving cost-saving and other benefits by reducing emissions of other pollutants; achieving reductions of emissions of diesel exhaust from school buses; and advancing technologies that reduce NOx and other emissions from facilities and other stationary sources. TERP is funded from fees and surcharges on obtaining a certificate of vehicle title for all vehicles, purchase or lease of heavy-duty vehicles and equipment, and registration and inspection of commercial vehicles. Revenue into the TERP Fund for the 2016 17 biennium is projected to be $427.0 million. Biennial appropriations and statutorily required transfers and deductions from the TERP Fund are expected to be $241.1 million. This amount includes $236.3 million appropriated to TCEQ to fund TERP grant programs and to administer those programs. The balance at the end of the 2016 17 biennium is projected to be $1.2 billion. TERP includes incentive funding for a variety of programs. The primary TERP grant program provides grants to reduce NOx emissions from mobile sources in the state s nonattainment areas and areas of concern. Areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards are designated nonattainment areas, one of which is the Houston Galveston Brazoria area. TxDOT previously has not applied for any TERP grants. If TxDOT explored the replacement of diesel ferry engines or retrofitting diesel ferry engines with after-treatment devices, TxDOT would be eligible for funding from TERP s Diesel Emissions Reduction Incentive (DERI) program. Since 2001, the DERI program has awarded more than $1.0 billion in grant funding to more than 10,000 projects. The average cost per ton of NOx reduced for a DERI grant project is about $6,000 per ton of NOx reduced. As shown in Figure 6, the cost per ton of NOx reduced by replacing a diesel ferry engine would range from about $34,000 to $700,000. Although costs per ton of NOx reduced from ferry engines may not be competitive compared to other grantees, they may become competitive. The Legislature also could directly appropriate TERP funds to purchase new engines. preventing areas of the state from being in violation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards established by EPA as authorized by the federal Clean Air Act; 6 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF REPORTS ID: 4830 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2019