F:\2city2005.sav Filter. Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used

Similar documents
Right dir - wrong track Number of cases

JSU FALL 2016 National

Certificate in a vocational program

JSU FALL 2016_ 11 Old Confederate States

Frequency Table. UDSAT Satisfaction with UD. Cumulative. 1 Very Dissatisfied. Valid. 2 Dissatisfied. 3 Satisfied. 4 Very Satisfied. Total.

Institutional Research and Planning 440 Day Hall Ithaca, New York PULSE Survey

INTERNET ACCESS GOALS AND PLANS

Frequencies. Frequency Table. Page 1. Notes. Output Created Comments Input 19-FEB :56:42

Food-Labeling Poll 2008

EV Owner Demographics & Diffusion Survey

EV Consumer Survey Dashboard Questions

1 Have you used Sun Trolley (which also includes Riverwalk Trolley)? Yes (Go to Question #2) No (Go to Question #10)

Party Recoded Republican Independent. ƒ % ƒ % ƒ %

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

RAB / GfK MRI FORMAT PROFILE: URBAN OLDIES. A B C D E F G H U.S. Women 18+ Adults Listen to Urban Oldies Format (Total Week Cume)

Director of Public Works. Administrative Assistant I

New Jersey s Clean Energy Program

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF HUDSON, MAINE

ORDINANCE NO

Intercity Travel in Northeastern Rural Regions of the U.S.

4. If the election for state senate were held today and the candidates were Democrat Jeff Van Drew and Republican David DeWeese,

MIFACE INVESTIGATION: #04MI108

NEXT. Powered by Qualtrics. 10/3/2018 Potholes & politics

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS NEW JERSEY

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES MISSISSIPPI

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES NEVADA

PSAT / NMSQT SUMMARY REPORT COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES MONTANA

FALL 2007 MBA EXIT SURVEY (Sample size of 29: 15 responses from the San Marcos location and 14 responses from the RRHEC location)

RAB / GfK MRI AUTO PROFILE: TOYOTA CARS. A B C D E F G H I J Own/Lease Toyota Avalon. Own/Lease Toyota Camry

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT SCHOOL PROFILE PUBLIC HEALTH FALL 2018

University of Alabama Faculty Climate Survey

DISTRIBUTION OF UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE DEGREES GRANTED BY COLLEGE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC YEAR

DISTRIBUTION OF UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE DEGREES GRANTED BY COLLEGE OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC YEAR

About Half View Tim s image as positive, overall

Notre Dame High School 26 Acts of Kindness Calendar

Survey of users of wheelchair seat elevators

USC Aiken 2004 Freshman Orientation Survey Results Selected questions have been made parallel to those on the CIRP Freshman Survey

HARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program

Barrie D. Fitzgerald Senior Research Analyst, Valdosta State University Sarah E. Hough Research Analyst, Valdosta State University Tiffany S.

CITY OF PITTSFIELD PURCHASING DEPARTMENT

Q1 I would classify myself as a... (you may choose only one)

Would you say you approve or disapprove of how Governor Charlie Baker is dealing with the transportation system in your area?

APPENDIX I LIST OF WARD-WISE HOUSEHOLD AND POPULATION IN MYSORE CITY CORPORATION, Page 213

Driver perceptions of the benefits of reducing their driving speed on safety, emissions, and stress and road rage

2018 Municipal Census RESULTS CENSUS2018

HOW REAL PEOPLE VIEW THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

2610 S Miracle Mile, Bullhead City

Q1 I have heard of driverless cars.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program

Public Works Committee Meeting AGENDA. June 5, 2018 City Hall

Understanding Traffic Data: How To Avoid Making the Wrong Turn

2009/10 NWT Aurora Visitor Survey Report. Industry, Tourism and Investment Government of the Northwest Territories

Enrollment Summary * * *USU & CEU have merged. Some USU-Eastern data for F2010 is not available* * * Fall Semester 2011

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

RECYCLING STUDY PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT

Seat Belt Survey. Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never?

MIFACE INVESTIGATION: #01MI058

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

Drivers License Status Report for Milwaukee County

Smart Grid for Schools Condition Form

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

Contemporary Attitudes Toward Motorcycle Riding Safety and Riding Risk Factors Part 1

LAGUNA HONDA. Commercial Property For Sale SAN FRANCISCO, CA

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT COLLEGE PROFILE APPLIED HEALTH SCIENCES FALL 2017

Calendar 2010 Call Statistics Problems and Needs as Reported by Callers

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT COLLEGE PROFILE LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES FALL 2017

Regulation Motor Vehicles and Traffic

Enrollment Summary Fall Semester 2016

Cluster Analysis. Presented by: Lauren Franklin and Maria Bakarman COM 631. April 2017

2015 UNLV Climate Survey Frequency Table

Contemporary Attitudes Toward Motorcycle Riding Safety and Riding Risk Factors Part 2

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

ESTIMATION RESULTS: THE DESIGN OF A COMPREHENSIVE MICROSIMULATOR OF HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE FLEET COMPOSITION, UTILIZATION, AND EVOLUTION

2013 PLS Alumni/ae Survey: Overall Evaluation of the Program

Customer Preferences & Solar PV Adoption

TSI TRUCKING, LLC 1618 Fabricon Blvd. Jeffersonville, IN DRIVER'S APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT. Applicant name: Date of application

Biodiversity Awareness Understanding & Impact of its Loss

Owners & Installation Manual. READ INSTRUCTIONS - Failure to assemble cover properly will void warranty.

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT GRADUATE DIVISION PROFILE FINE ARTS AND HUMANITIES FALL 2017

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

Yale University Race/Ethnicity and International Student Enrollment by School to Race/Ethnicity Unknown.

MIFACE INVESTIGATION: #03MI066

SUMMER ENROLLMENT REPORT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI I AT MĀNOA SUMMER 1998

UNITEC New Zealand. Respondent Characteristics Report December 2012

South Carolina EMS Data System Electronic Data Submission Checklist

MIG DATA FILE. Table 1: Respondent Information by Community Community Number

Nebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report

Virtual City Deliverable: Sample Slideshow

The Episcopal Church Analysis Group Nat. Ave. Index Total Respondents , % Margin of Error for Profile 4.07% 0.64%

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Analysis Group Nat. Ave. Index Total Respondents ,546 0 Margin of Error for Profile 3.12% 0.

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Tennessee Soybean Producers Views on Biodiesel Marketing

THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON VEHICLE OPERATOR POLICY

Smart Grid OG&E

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH & SANITATION ARTICLE 3 - REFUSE - GENERAL PROVISIONS. Section Equipment for hauling refuse and yard waste - secured loads.

FAMU Completers Satisfaction Survey Results 2010

DOC / TRACTOR SAFETY COURSE WISCONSIN EBOOK

YouGovR. YouGov Survey Results YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved

Investment: BB&T Building

Zogby America Adults - 5/12/06 thru 5/16/06 MOE +/- 2.9 percentage points

Transcription:

Frequencies Notes Output Created 06-FEB-2006 15:31:19 Comments Input Data F:\2city2005.sav Filter <none> Weight weight Split File <none> N of Rows in Working Data File 429 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid data. Syntax FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Zip fullres utcust rankser citinfo police fire traflaw juve medser garbage recycle brush illdump animal vector street road sweep newst signals airport conswat tapwat pollute watser gasser sewer drain billut parks conpark recpro elderly youth library health art newemp helpemp weeds vacant litter propown quality victim report walkdy walknt busdy busnt parkdy parknt contact empknow empresp empcurt got impress satis fair vaule involve listens afford much little downtwn county schdis state othcity usedint access bought conduct connect hall newslet fam tele cctv newspap talkrad radnews cityweb other oth imphall implet impfam imptv impcctv imppap imptlk imprad impweb impoth impo age gender pepliv under over home own educate race income /ORDER= ANALYSIS. Resources Elapsed Time 0:00:00.08 Total Values Allowed 149796

Frequency Table Zip Frequency 0 2.5.5.5 1 6 1.5 1.5 2.0 4 26 6.2 6.2 8.1 5 32 7.4 7.4 15.5 7 1.3.3 15.9 8 1.3.3 16.2 9 8 1.8 1.8 18.0 10 51 11.8 11.8 29.8 11 43 9.9 9.9 39.7 12 57 13.3 13.3 53.0 13 53 12.3 12.3 65.3 14 28 6.5 6.5 71.8 15 60 13.9 13.9 85.7 16 8 1.9 1.9 87.6 17 3.7.7 88.2 18 44 10.3 10.3 98.5 40 1.2.2 98.7 60 1.3.3 99.0 80 4 1.0 1.0 100.0 fullres Frequency No 1.3.3.3 Yes 428 99.7 99.7 100.0 utcust Frequency No 13 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yes 417 97.0 97.0 100.0

rankser Frequency 0 2.5.5.5 Very poor 34 7.8 7.8 8.3 Fair 67 15.6 15.6 23.9 Good 273 63.6 63.6 87.5 Excellent 54 12.5 12.5 100.0 citinfo Frequency Very poor 36 8.4 8.4 8.4 Fair 76 17.8 17.8 26.2 Good 247 57.5 57.5 83.7 Excellent 52 12.1 12.1 95.8 Not sure 18 4.2 4.2 100.0 police Frequency Very poor 14 3.4 3.4 3.4 Fair 83 19.3 19.3 22.7 Good 209 48.8 48.8 71.5 Excellent 117 27.2 27.2 98.7 Not sure 6 1.3 1.3 100.0 fire Frequency Very poor 5 1.1 1.1 1.1 Fair 28 6.6 6.6 7.7 Good 217 50.6 50.6 58.3 Excellent 162 37.7 37.7 96.0 Not sure 17 4.0 4.0 100.0

traflaw Frequency Very poor 48 11.1 11.1 11.1 Fair 97 22.5 22.5 33.6 Good 208 48.3 48.3 82.0 Excellent 70 16.4 16.4 98.3 Not sure 7 1.7 1.7 100.0 juve Frequency Very poor 39 9.0 9.0 9.0 Fair 78 18.1 18.1 27.1 Good 183 42.5 42.5 69.6 Excellent 48 11.2 11.2 80.8 Not sure 82 19.2 19.2 100.0 medser Frequency Very poor 5 1.1 1.1 1.1 Fair 26 6.1 6.1 7.2 Good 176 41.0 41.0 48.1 Excellent 187 43.6 43.6 91.7 Not sure 36 8.3 8.3 100.0 garbage Frequency Very poor 21 4.8 4.8 4.8 Fair 44 10.1 10.1 14.9 Good 218 50.6 50.6 65.6 Excellent 145 33.8 33.8 99.3 Not sure 3.7.7 100.0

recycle Frequency Very poor 31 7.3 7.3 7.3 Fair 50 11.7 11.7 19.0 Good 195 45.4 45.4 64.3 Excellent 102 23.7 23.7 88.0 Not sure 51 12.0 12.0 100.0 brush Frequency Very poor 54 12.6 12.6 12.6 Fair 97 22.5 22.5 35.1 Good 178 41.5 41.5 76.6 Excellent 70 16.4 16.4 92.9 Not sure 30 7.1 7.1 100.0 illdump Frequency Very poor 53 12.3 12.3 12.3 Fair 82 19.2 19.2 31.5 Good 177 41.3 41.3 72.7 Excellent 54 12.7 12.7 85.4 Not sure 63 14.6 14.6 100.0 animal Frequency Very poor 72 16.8 16.8 16.8 Fair 115 26.8 26.8 43.6 Good 157 36.4 36.4 80.0 Excellent 67 15.6 15.6 95.6 Not sure 19 4.4 4.4 100.0

vector Frequency Very poor 63 14.6 14.6 14.6 Fair 102 23.8 23.8 38.4 Good 201 46.7 46.7 85.1 Excellent 55 12.7 12.7 97.9 Not sure 9 2.1 2.1 100.0 street Frequency Very poor 123 28.7 28.7 28.7 Fair 116 26.9 26.9 55.6 Good 160 37.2 37.2 92.9 Excellent 29 6.7 6.7 99.6 Not sure 2.4.4 100.0 road Frequency Very poor 116 27.1 27.1 27.1 Fair 150 34.9 34.9 62.0 Good 152 35.4 35.4 97.4 Excellent 11 2.6 2.6 100.0 sweep Frequency Very poor 87 20.2 20.2 20.2 Fair 72 16.8 16.8 37.1 Good 141 32.8 32.8 69.9 Excellent 37 8.6 8.6 78.5 Not sure 93 21.5 21.5 100.0

newst Frequency Very poor 109 25.3 25.3 25.3 Fair 116 26.9 26.9 52.2 Good 156 36.4 36.4 88.6 Excellent 31 7.2 7.2 95.8 Not sure 18 4.2 4.2 100.0 signals Frequency Very poor 53 12.3 12.3 12.3 Fair 121 28.1 28.1 40.4 Good 198 46.2 46.2 86.6 Excellent 58 13.4 13.4 100.0 airport Frequency Very poor 6 1.3 1.3 1.3 Fair 28 6.5 6.5 7.9 Good 233 54.3 54.3 62.2 Excellent 94 21.8 21.8 84.0 Not sure 69 16.0 16.0 100.0 conswat Frequency Very poor 28 6.5 6.5 6.5 Fair 87 20.3 20.3 26.8 Good 212 49.4 49.4 76.2 Excellent 62 14.5 14.5 90.7 Not sure 40 9.3 9.3 100.0

tapwat Frequency Very poor 63 14.7 14.7 14.7 Fair 101 23.6 23.6 38.3 Good 192 44.7 44.7 83.0 Excellent 51 11.8 11.8 94.8 Not sure 22 5.2 5.2 100.0 pollute Frequency Very poor 46 10.7 10.7 10.7 Fair 68 15.8 15.8 26.5 Good 204 47.4 47.4 73.9 Excellent 39 9.0 9.0 83.0 Not sure 73 17.0 17.0 100.0 watser Frequency Very poor 21 5.0 5.0 5.0 Fair 50 11.7 11.7 16.6 Good 259 60.3 60.3 76.9 Excellent 89 20.8 20.8 97.7 Not sure 10 2.3 2.3 100.0 gasser Frequency Very poor 6 1.5 1.5 1.5 Fair 30 7.0 7.0 8.5 Good 173 40.2 40.2 48.8 Excellent 59 13.7 13.7 62.5 Not sure 161 37.5 37.5 100.0

sewer Frequency Very poor 23 5.3 5.3 5.3 Fair 57 13.3 13.3 18.6 Good 267 62.1 62.1 80.7 Excellent 66 15.4 15.4 96.1 Not sure 17 3.9 3.9 100.0 drain Frequency Very poor 73 16.9 16.9 16.9 Fair 107 24.9 24.9 41.8 Good 173 40.4 40.4 82.2 Excellent 73 17.0 17.0 99.2 Not sure 4.8.8 100.0 billut Frequency Very poor 49 11.5 11.5 11.5 Fair 49 11.5 11.5 23.0 Good 212 49.3 49.3 72.3 Excellent 105 24.6 24.6 96.9 Not sure 13 3.1 3.1 100.0 parks Frequency Very poor 56 13.1 13.1 13.1 Fair 84 19.5 19.5 32.6 Good 195 45.5 45.5 78.1 Excellent 88 20.5 20.5 98.5 Not sure 6 1.5 1.5 100.0

conpark Frequency Very poor 54 12.6 12.6 12.6 Fair 96 22.4 22.4 35.0 Good 182 42.4 42.4 77.4 Excellent 90 21.0 21.0 98.5 Not sure 7 1.5 1.5 100.0 recpro Frequency Very poor 53 12.3 12.3 12.3 Fair 106 24.7 24.7 37.0 Good 167 39.0 39.0 76.0 Excellent 50 11.7 11.7 87.8 Not sure 53 12.2 12.2 100.0 elderly Frequency Very poor 46 10.8 10.8 10.8 Fair 69 16.0 16.0 26.8 Good 136 31.7 31.7 58.5 Excellent 59 13.6 13.6 72.1 Not sure 120 27.9 27.9 100.0 youth Frequency Very poor 35 8.1 8.1 8.1 Fair 116 27.1 27.1 35.1 Good 150 35.0 35.0 70.1 Excellent 53 12.3 12.3 82.4 Not sure 75 17.6 17.6 100.0

library Frequency Very poor 36 8.3 8.3 8.3 Fair 56 13.0 13.0 21.3 Good 197 45.9 45.9 67.3 Excellent 110 25.5 25.5 92.8 Not sure 31 7.2 7.2 100.0 health Frequency Very poor 24 5.6 5.6 5.6 Fair 72 16.7 16.7 22.3 Good 220 51.3 51.3 73.6 Excellent 46 10.8 10.8 84.4 Not sure 67 15.6 15.6 100.0 art Frequency Very poor 31 7.2 7.2 7.2 Fair 131 30.6 30.6 37.8 Good 170 39.6 39.6 77.4 Excellent 43 10.0 10.0 87.4 Not sure 54 12.6 12.6 100.0 newemp Frequency Very poor 92 21.4 21.4 21.4 Fair 140 32.6 32.6 54.0 Good 120 28.0 28.0 82.0 Excellent 18 4.2 4.2 86.2 Not sure 59 13.8 13.8 100.0

helpemp Frequency Very poor 63 14.8 14.8 14.8 Fair 133 31.0 31.0 45.7 Good 135 31.5 31.5 77.2 Excellent 29 6.8 6.8 84.0 Not sure 69 16.0 16.0 100.0 weeds Frequency Very poor 129 30.0 30.0 30.0 Fair 135 31.3 31.3 61.3 Good 129 30.0 30.0 91.3 Excellent 28 6.6 6.6 97.8 Not sure 9 2.2 2.2 100.0 vacant Frequency 0 1.3.3.3 Very poor 168 39.2 39.2 39.5 Fair 129 30.0 30.0 69.6 Good 81 18.8 18.8 88.4 Excellent 27 6.2 6.2 94.6 Not sure 23 5.4 5.4 100.0 litter Frequency Very poor 106 24.7 24.7 24.7 Fair 152 35.3 35.3 60.0 Good 129 30.1 30.1 90.1 Excellent 39 9.1 9.1 99.2 Not sure 4.8.8 100.0

propown Frequency Very poor 63 14.8 14.8 14.8 Fair 119 27.6 27.6 42.4 Good 187 43.6 43.6 86.0 Excellent 44 10.1 10.1 96.1 Not sure 17 3.9 3.9 100.0 quality Frequency Very poor 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 Fair 72 16.8 16.8 20.3 Good 244 56.7 56.7 77.0 Excellent 93 21.7 21.7 98.7 Not sure 6 1.3 1.3 100.0 victim Frequency No 344 80.0 80.0 80.0 Yes 86 20.0 20.0 100.0 report Frequency No 8 2.0 9.8 9.8 Yes 77 18.0 90.2 100.0 Total 86 20.0 100.0 Missing System 344 80.0 Total 430 100.0

walkdy Frequency Very unsafe 7 1.6 1.6 1.6 Unsafe 9 2.0 2.0 3.6 Moderate 54 12.7 12.7 16.3 Safe 85 19.7 19.7 36.0 Very safe 275 64.0 64.0 100.0 walknt Frequency Very unsafe 55 12.8 12.8 12.8 Unsafe 52 12.0 12.0 24.9 Moderate 121 28.3 28.3 53.1 Safe 127 29.5 29.5 82.7 Very safe 74 17.3 17.3 100.0 busdy Frequency Very unsafe 5 1.2 1.2 1.2 Unsafe 21 4.9 4.9 6.1 Moderate 103 24.0 24.0 30.2 Safe 130 30.2 30.2 60.3 Very safe 170 39.7 39.7 100.0 busnt Frequency 0 3.7.7.7 Very unsafe 111 25.8 25.8 26.4 Unsafe 80 18.6 18.6 45.0 Moderate 139 32.4 32.4 77.5 Safe 86 20.0 20.0 97.5 Very safe 11 2.5 2.5 100.0

parkdy Frequency 0 1.2.2.2 Very unsafe 13 3.0 3.0 3.2 Unsafe 16 3.8 3.8 7.0 Moderate 115 26.9 26.9 33.9 Safe 109 25.4 25.4 59.3 Very safe 175 40.7 40.7 100.0 parknt Frequency 0 1.2.2.2 Very unsafe 126 29.4 29.4 29.6 Unsafe 92 21.4 21.4 50.9 Moderate 131 30.5 30.5 81.4 Safe 72 16.8 16.8 98.2 Very safe 8 1.8 1.8 100.0 contact Frequency No 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Yes 162 37.6 37.6 100.0 empknow Frequency 0 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Strongly disagree 16 3.8 3.8 66.2 Disagree 3.7.7 66.9 Moderate 25 5.8 5.8 72.6 Agree 41 9.6 9.6 82.2 Strongly agree 76 17.8 17.8 100.0

empresp Frequency 0 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Strongly disagree 14 3.3 3.3 65.7 Disagree 6 1.3 1.3 67.0 Moderate 22 5.0 5.0 72.0 Agree 50 11.7 11.7 83.8 Strongly agree 70 16.2 16.2 100.0 empcurt Frequency 0 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Strongly disagree 9 2.0 2.0 64.4 Disagree 11 2.5 2.5 66.9 Moderate 18 4.3 4.3 71.2 Agree 39 9.0 9.0 80.2 Strongly agree 85 19.8 19.8 100.0 got Frequency 0 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Strongly disagree 23 5.3 5.3 67.7 Disagree 9 2.0 2.0 69.7 Moderate 15 3.5 3.5 73.2 Agree 40 9.2 9.2 82.4 Strongly agree 76 17.6 17.6 100.0 impress Frequency 0 268 62.4 62.4 62.4 Very poor 24 5.5 5.5 67.9 Fair 16 3.8 3.8 71.7 Good 57 13.3 13.3 85.0 Excellent 64 15.0 15.0 100.0

satis Frequency 0 1.2.2.2 Strongly disagree 29 6.7 6.7 6.8 Disagree 32 7.5 7.5 14.3 Moderate 131 30.5 30.5 44.9 Agree 113 26.3 26.3 71.2 Strongly agree 124 28.8 28.8 100.0 fair Frequency Strongly disagree 44 10.3 10.3 10.3 Disagree 45 10.4 10.4 20.8 Moderate 133 31.0 31.0 51.8 Agree 109 25.4 25.4 77.2 Strongly agree 98 22.8 22.8 100.0 vaule Frequency 0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Strongly disagree 69 16.2 16.2 17.1 Disagree 59 13.8 13.8 30.9 Moderate 138 32.2 32.2 63.1 Agree 88 20.4 20.4 83.5 Strongly agree 71 16.5 16.5 100.0 involve Frequency 0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Strongly disagree 33 7.6 7.6 8.6 Disagree 53 12.4 12.4 21.0 Moderate 151 35.2 35.2 56.2 Agree 101 23.4 23.4 79.7 Strongly agree 87 20.3 20.3 100.0

listens Frequency Strongly disagree 73 16.9 16.9 16.9 Disagree 66 15.4 15.4 32.4 Moderate 133 30.9 30.9 63.3 Agree 70 16.2 16.2 79.5 Strongly agree 88 20.5 20.5 100.0 afford Frequency 0 1.3.3.3 Not a problem 136 31.7 31.7 32.0 2 73 16.9 16.9 48.9 Moderate 119 27.7 27.7 76.6 4 53 12.4 12.4 89.0 Major problem 47 11.0 11.0 100.0 much Frequency Not a problem 202 47.0 47.0 47.0 2 86 20.0 20.0 67.0 Moderate 69 16.1 16.1 83.0 4 50 11.6 11.6 94.6 Major problem 23 5.4 5.4 100.0 little Frequency Not a problem 66 15.3 15.3 15.3 2 68 15.8 15.8 31.1 Moderate 148 34.5 34.5 65.6 4 70 16.2 16.2 81.8 Major problem 78 18.2 18.2 100.0

downtwn Frequency 0 1.3.3.3 Not a problem 19 4.4 4.4 4.7 2 22 5.1 5.1 9.8 Moderate 62 14.5 14.5 24.3 4 61 14.3 14.3 38.6 Major problem 264 61.4 61.4 100.0 county Frequency 0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Not a problem 50 11.7 11.7 12.7 2 47 10.9 10.9 23.6 Moderate 175 40.8 40.8 64.3 4 73 17.0 17.0 81.4 Major problem 80 18.6 18.6 100.0 schdis Frequency 0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Not a problem 63 14.7 14.7 15.7 2 79 18.5 18.5 34.2 Moderate 181 42.2 42.2 76.4 4 63 14.6 14.6 91.0 Major problem 38 9.0 9.0 100.0 state Frequency Not a problem 47 11.0 11.0 11.0 2 72 16.6 16.6 27.6 Moderate 227 52.8 52.8 80.4 4 62 14.4 14.4 94.8 Major problem 22 5.2 5.2 100.0

othcity Frequency Not a problem 60 14.1 14.1 14.1 2 78 18.2 18.2 32.3 Moderate 214 49.7 49.7 82.0 4 53 12.4 12.4 94.4 Major problem 24 5.6 5.6 100.0 usedint Frequency No 105 24.4 24.4 24.4 Yes 325 75.6 75.6 100.0 access Frequency No 110 25.6 25.6 25.6 Yes 320 74.4 74.4 100.0 bought Frequency No 225 52.5 52.5 52.5 Yes 204 47.5 47.5 100.0 conduct Frequency No 339 79.0 79.0 79.0 Yes 90 21.0 21.0 100.0

connect Frequency No 405 94.4 94.4 94.4 Yes 24 5.6 5.6 100.0 hall Frequency 0 374 87.0 87.0 87.0 1 52 12.0 12.0 99.0 2 4 1.0 1.0 100.0 newslet Frequency 0 192 44.8 44.8 44.8 1 237 55.2 55.2 100.0 fam Frequency 0 134 31.2 31.2 31.2 1 296 68.8 68.8 100.0 tele Frequency 0 35 8.1 8.1 8.1 1 395 91.9 91.9 100.0

cctv Frequency 0 298 69.5 69.5 69.5 1 131 30.5 30.5 100.0 newspap Frequency 0 71 16.5 16.5 16.5 1 359 83.5 83.5 100.0 talkrad Frequency 0 305 71.1 71.1 71.1 1 124 28.9 28.9 100.0 radnews Frequency 0 214 49.8 49.8 49.8 1 216 50.2 50.2 100.0 cityweb Frequency 0 338 78.8 78.8 78.8 1 91 21.2 21.2 100.0

other Frequency 0 405 94.3 94.3 94.3 1 25 5.7 5.7 100.0 oth Frequency 406 94.6 94.6 94.6 Books 1.2.2 94.8 Caller Times Online 1.2.2 94.9 E-mails 1.2.2 95.1 E-Mails 1.3.3 95.4 email from superintendent 1.3.3 95.7 Internet 3.7.7 96.4 Mail 3.7.7 97.1 Message Boards and Internet 1.2.2 97.2 NBC Site 1.2.2 97.4 NOWP 1.3.3 97.7 Staff and department directors 1.2.2 97.9 television 6 1.3 1.3 99.2 Welfare Center 2.5.5 99.7 work 1.3.3 100.0 imphall Frequency 0 8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1 179 41.7 41.7 43.6 2 36 8.4 8.4 52.0 3 112 26.1 26.1 78.1 4 39 9.1 9.1 87.2 5 55 12.8 12.8 100.0

implet Frequency 0 7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 59 13.6 13.6 15.2 2 50 11.7 11.7 26.9 3 118 27.5 27.5 54.4 4 84 19.6 19.6 74.0 5 112 26.0 26.0 100.0 impfam Frequency 0 8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1 50 11.6 11.6 13.4 2 30 7.1 7.1 20.5 3 87 20.2 20.2 40.7 4 132 30.7 30.7 71.4 5 123 28.6 28.6 100.0 imptv Frequency 0 7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 4 1.0 1.0 2.5 2 17 4.0 4.0 6.5 3 32 7.5 7.5 14.0 4 72 16.8 16.8 30.8 5 297 69.2 69.2 100.0 impcctv Frequency 0 9 2.2 2.2 2.2 1 160 37.3 37.3 39.5 2 51 11.9 11.9 51.4 3 79 18.4 18.4 69.8 4 51 11.9 11.9 81.7 5 79 18.3 18.3 100.0

imppap Frequency 0 7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 28 6.5 6.5 8.1 2 15 3.4 3.4 11.5 3 60 13.9 13.9 25.4 4 58 13.6 13.6 39.0 5 262 61.0 61.0 100.0 imptlk Frequency 0 9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 131 30.4 30.4 32.4 2 73 17.0 17.0 49.4 3 101 23.5 23.5 72.9 4 44 10.2 10.2 83.0 5 73 17.0 17.0 100.0 imprad Frequency 0 7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1 96 22.3 22.3 24.0 2 42 9.8 9.8 33.8 3 88 20.6 20.6 54.4 4 74 17.3 17.3 71.7 5 122 28.3 28.3 100.0

impweb Frequency 0 12 2.7 2.7 2.7 1 177 41.3 41.3 44.0 2 50 11.6 11.6 55.6 3 85 19.8 19.8 75.4 4 38 9.0 9.0 84.4 5 67 15.6 15.6 100.0 impoth Frequency 0 329 76.5 76.5 76.5 1 89 20.8 20.8 97.4 3 2.5.5 97.9 4 2.5.5 98.4 5 7 1.6 1.6 100.0 impo Frequency 418 97.4 97.4 97.4 Books 1.2.2 97.6 Caller Times Online 1.2.2 97.7 E-mails 1.2.2 97.9 E-Mails 1.3.3 98.2 email 1.2.2 98.4 Internet 3.7.7 99.0 Message Boards and Internet 1.2.2 99.2 neighbors on watch 1.3.3 99.5 Welfare Center 2.5.5 100.0

age Frequency Under 25 21 4.8 4.8 4.8 25-34 85 19.7 19.7 24.5 35-49 147 34.1 34.1 58.6 50-64 103 23.9 23.9 82.5 65 or over 75 17.5 17.5 100.0 gender Frequency Female 261 60.7 60.7 60.7 Male 169 39.3 39.3 100.0 pepliv Frequency 0 1.3.3.3 1 55 12.7 12.7 13.0 2 118 27.6 27.6 40.6 3 115 26.8 26.8 67.4 4 90 20.8 20.8 88.3 5 39 9.1 9.1 97.4 6 6 1.3 1.3 98.7 7 4.8.8 99.5 8 2.5.5 100.0 under Frequency 0 230 53.5 53.5 53.5 1 106 24.6 24.6 78.1 2 59 13.8 13.8 91.9 3 32 7.4 7.4 99.3 4 1.3.3 99.7 6 1.3.3 100.0

over Frequency 0 321 74.8 74.8 74.8 1 61 14.2 14.2 88.9 2 40 9.2 9.2 98.1 4 8 1.9 1.9 100.0 home Frequency Rent 135 31.4 31.4 31.4 Own 294 68.6 68.6 100.0 own Frequency 0 286 66.6 66.6 66.6 34 1.3.3 67.0 58 3.7.7 67.6 109 2.5.5 68.1 150 4 1.0 1.0 69.1 200 5 1.2 1.2 70.3 400 1.2.2 70.4 420 1.3.3 70.8 444 1.2.2 70.9 500 4 1.0 1.0 71.9 700 1.2.2 72.1 800 4 1.0 1.0 73.1 900 1.3.3 73.4 1000 6 1.3 1.3 74.7 1200 1.3.3 75.0 1400 5 1.2 1.2 76.2 1500 1.3.3 76.5 1588 1.3.3 76.9 1600 1.2.2 77.0 1700 1.2.2 77.2 1800 5 1.1 1.1 78.2 2000 17 4.0 4.0 82.3 2100 1.3.3 82.6 2200 2.5.5 83.1 2300 3.7.7 83.7 2400 4.8.8 84.6

2500 3.7.7 85.2 2600 4 1.0 1.0 86.2 2700 6 1.3 1.3 87.5 2800 2.5.5 88.0 3000 9 2.0 2.0 90.1 3200 3.7.7 90.7 3300 1.2.2 90.9 3400 1.2.2 91.1 3500 1.3.3 91.4 3600 1.3.3 91.7 3700 1.2.2 92.0 3800 1.2.2 92.1 4000 8 2.0 2.0 94.1 4300 1.3.3 94.4 5000 8 1.9 1.9 96.3 5500 1.3.3 96.6 6000 6 1.3 1.3 98.0 6600 1.2.2 98.1 6800 1.3.3 98.5 7000 3.7.7 99.1 7800 1.2.2 99.3 7900 1.2.2 99.5 9000 1.2.2 99.7 19000 1.2.2 99.8 345000 1.2.2 100.0 educate Frequency K - 6th 10 2.3 2.3 2.3 Some high school 30 6.9 6.9 9.2 High school diploma 101 23.5 23.5 32.7 Some college or post high school training 124 28.8 28.8 61.5 Bachelors degree 123 28.6 28.6 90.1 Graduate degree 43 9.9 9.9 100.0

race Frequency 1 7 1.6 1.6 1.6 2 10 2.3 2.3 4.0 3 231 53.9 53.9 57.8 4 10 2.3 2.3 60.2 5 163 38.0 38.0 98.1 6 2.5.5 98.6 7 6 1.4 1.4 100.0 income Frequency Refused 39 9.1 9.1 9.1 Less than $20,000 71 16.6 16.6 25.7 20,000-40,000 123 28.5 28.5 54.2 40,001-60,000 83 19.3 19.3 73.5 60,001-80,000 50 11.6 11.6 85.0 Over 80,000 64 15.0 15.0 100.0