CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Similar documents
Useful Information. Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) Emission Rate Look-up Tables (ERLT)

Useful Information. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Traffic Air Quality Analysis (TAQA) Emission Rate Lookup Tables (ERLT)

Appendix 17. Pre-Analysis Consensus Template

2013 Mobile Source Emissions Mecklenburg County, NC

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Texas Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Improvement Projects

Inspection and Maintenance Program Benefits Analysis

Emission Rate Approach for Evaluating the Differences in Emissions Between CNG and Diesel Busses

THE MOVES TRANSITION MADE EASY THE TDOT WAY. Introduction TDOT s Proposal Work Completed In Progress What s HOT Questions?

Using the MOVES Model to Do a Project Level PM Air Quality Analysis 2010 TRB Environment and Energy Research Conference Raleigh, North Carolina

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Southeastern State s Experience with MOVES

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Interoffice Memorandum

MAKING USE OF MOBILE6 S CAPABILITIES FOR MODELING START EMISSIONS

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

Review Draft Prepared by: Stan Payne December 14, 2012

Mobile Source Committee Update

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Richmond, Virginia 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area Transportation Conformity Analysis

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

ADVANTAGES OF USING SMARTWAY TECHNOLOGIES

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Making Use Of MOBILE6 s Capabilities For Modeling Start Emissions

Chapter 8. Local, State, and Federal Controls Ozone Plan

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2013 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

San Joaquin Valley APCD

RULE STATIONARY GAS TURBINES Adopted (Amended , ) INDEX

City of Fort Worth s Natural Gas Air Quality Study Follow-up on Report Recommendations. August 16, 2011

Facility Name: Chevron Products Company Doraville Terminal City: Doraville County: DeKalb AIRS #: Application #: 40411

1. Introduction and Summary

Appendix III Attachment Winter Carbon Monoxide Inventory Development

2016 Community Report De Baca County

Energy Technical Memorandum

Local and Voluntary Emission Reduction Quantification Report

Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 2015 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2014 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Development of the Idaho Statewide Travel Demand Model Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data and Origin Destination Matrix Estimation

TECHNICAL NOTE Transportation Air Quality Technical Support Interagency Contract with Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

2015 Community Report White Rock

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

Appendix C SIP Creditable Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard

E15 - E85 Labeling, Dispensing Regulations, Guidelines and Requirements

TIER 3 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL STANDARDS FOR DENATURED FUEL ETHANOL

2016 Community Report Portales

2014 Community Report Portales

Heavy-Highway Emission Inventory Update 2018

2015 Community Report Grants

2014 Community Report Luna County

2016 Community Report Torrance County

2015 Community Report Torrance County

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

2015 Community Report Las Vegas

CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region

2015 Community Report Tularosa

2016 Community Report Santa Fe County

Committee D02 on Petroleum Products and Lubricants Research Report D02: 1347 Research Report on Reformulated Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel

William Piel

2014 Community Report Las Vegas

2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences

2016 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report San Juan County

CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue

2015 Community Report Chaparral

2014 Community Report Tularosa

2016 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Doña Ana County

Metro and you, building together.

2015 Community Report Los Lunas

2014 Community Report Aztec

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

The Village at Playa Vista. Appendix E-6. Alternative Analysis

Appendix A. Anchorage Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventory and Projections

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

2014 Community Report Los Lunas

Impact of Transportation Emissions on New Jersey s Air Quality

Guidance on Quantifying NOx Benefits for Cetane Improvement Programs For Use In SIPs and Transportation Conformity

Act 229 Evaluation Report

2011 Air Emissions Inventory

Dallas Intermodal Terminal 2006 Baseline and Projected 2009 and 2012 Emissions Inventory DRAFT FINAL REPORT

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Wisconsin Vehicle Inspection Program Annual Report 2010

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

REMOTE SENSING DEVICE HIGH EMITTER IDENTIFICATION WITH CONFIRMATORY ROADSIDE INSPECTION

Data Needs for Updating and Improving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NONROAD Model February 18, 2019

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

PA RACT 2. Reasonably Available Control Technology. Presented by Suzanne Dibert

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

Gross Domestic Product: Third Quarter 2016 (Advance Estimate)

OZARKS TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION

Transcription:

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL 7.1 Overview This chapter discusses development of the regional motor vehicle emissions analysis for the North Central Texas nonattainment area, including all key assumptions used in the process. A regional emissions analysis must be conducted for multiple analysis years to satisfy the requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 93.109 (40 CFR 93.109) of the conformity rule for ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically, the regional emissions analysis is used to conduct the emission budget test and to determine any contributions to emission reductions. The procedures for determining regional transportation-related emissions are described in 40 CFR Part 93.118 of the conformity rule. The following sections discuss the analysis years and a description of the modeling processes used to conduct the analysis. 7.2 Emissions Factor Estimation Model (MOVES 2014a) According to 40 CFR Part 93.111 of the conformity rule, the conformity determination must be based on the latest emission estimation model available. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released the new Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model in March of 2010. EPA released subsequent updates to the model as MOVES2010a in September 2010, MOVES2010b in April 2012, MOVES2014 in July 2014, an update to MOVES2014 in October 2014, MOVES2014a in November 2015, with an update in December 2016. EPA considers MOVES2014a as an enhancement to the MOVES2014 model, not as a new emissions model. In order to comply with the conformity rule, the applicable model for this conformity analysis was chosen to be MOVES2014a. As outlined in the Pre-analysis Consensus Plan, included in Appendix 12.12, the Interagency Consultation Partners approved the use of MOVES2014a to develop 2018, 2020, 2028, 2037, and 2045 vehicle emission factors. Emission factors are one component to determine volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NO X ) emissions from the region s on-road vehicles. MOVES2014a input parameters are listed below in Exhibits 7.2-1 through 7.2-6 with the appropriate data source and/or methodology applied. Information listed applies to all counties and analysis years unless otherwise specified. Referenced files identifying specific local data and MOVES2014a technical reports are included in Appendix 12.13. MOVES2014a input databases utilizing these parameters and data for each county are included in Appendix 12.14. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 45

Exhibit 7.2-1: MOVES Model Details and Model Parameter Selections Command Function/Description Input Parameter Values Description MOVES Model Version Identifies the Model Version to be utilized for the analysis. MOVES2014a MOVES was released in November 2016 and last updated in December 2017. Calendar Year Identifies calendar year for which emissions factors are to be calculated. (Required to run model). 2018, 2020, 2028, 2037, 2045 Attainment Demonstration Years and Plan Forecast Years Evaluation Month Provides option of calculating emissions factors for each month of the calendar year. 7 Representing summer ozone season NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 46

Exhibit 7.2-2: MOVES2014a Input Parameters and Source Input Parameter Name Source Type Population Source Type Age Distribution Vehicle Type VMT Average Speed Distribution Road Type Distribution (VMT Fractions) Ramp Fraction Meteorology I/M Coverage Fuel Supply Fuel Formulation Fuel Engine Fraction / Diesel Fraction (AVFT) Description Input the number of vehicles in the geographic area which is to be modeled for each vehicle. Texas A&M Transportation Institute s (TTI) MOVES population Build module is used to convert MOVES2014a based Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (TxDMV) registration data for each county into 13 MOVES vehicle Source Use Types. Input that provides the distribution of vehicle counts by age for each calendar year and vehicle type. TxDMV registration data is used to estimate the age distribution of vehicle types up to 30 years. The distribution of age fractions should sum up to 1.0 for all vehicle types for each analysis year. County specific vehicle miles of travel (VMT) is distributed to six Highway Performance Monitoring System Vehicle types. Input average speed data specific to vehicle type, road type, and time of day/type of day into 16 speed bins. The sum of speed distribution to all speed bins for each road type, vehicle type, and time/day type would be 1.0. Input County Specific VMT by road type. VMT fraction is distributed between the road type and must sum to 1.0 for each source type. Input county specific fraction of ramp driving time on rural and urban restricted roadway type. County specific data on temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. Input Inspection and Maintenance Program (I/M) coverage record for each combination of pollutants, process, county, fuel type, regulatory class and model year are specified using this input. Input to assign existing fuels to counties, months, and years, and to assign the associated market share for each fuel. Input county specific fuel properties in the MOVES database. Input fuel engine fractions (i.e. Gasoline vs. Diesel Engines types in the vehicle population) for all vehicle types. Source 2014 TxDMV registration data. 2014 TxDMV registration data. MOVES default used for buses. Travel Model Output. Travel Model Output. Travel Model Output. Travel Model Output. Regional data from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ); see Appendix 12.14. See Exhibit 7.2-3 for 10-county average hourly data. See Exhibit 7.2-4. TCEQ, EPA Fuel Surveys and default MOVES input where local data unavailable. See Exhibit 7.2-5. TCEQ, EPA Fuel Surveys and default MOVES input where local data unavailable. 2014 TxDMV registration data. MOVES default used for light duty vehicles and buses. 12 County regional data applied for heavy-duty vehicles. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 47

Exhibit 7.2-3: 2012 10-County Average Hourly Meteorological Data 23 Hours Temperature Relative Humidity 12:00 a.m. 80.02 65.12 1:00 a.m. 78.83 67.72 2:00 a.m. 77.83 70.23 3:00 a.m. 76.91 72.39 4:00 a.m. 76.02 74.71 5:00 a.m. 75.25 76.73 6:00 a.m. 74.63 78.75 7:00 a.m. 75.51 77.59 8:00 a.m. 78.38 71.59 9:00 a.m. 81.63 64.07 10:00 a.m. 84.68 57.19 11:00 a.m. 87.47 51.07 12:00 p.m. 89.76 46.37 1:00 p.m. 91.51 42.56 2:00 p.m. 92.60 39.96 3:00 p.m. 93.35 38.73 4:00 p.m. 93.51 38.26 5:00 p.m. 93.09 38.66 6:00 p.m. 92.03 40.13 7:00 p.m. 89.96 43.29 8:00 p.m. 86.83 49.33 9:00 p.m. 84.31 54.49 10:00 p.m. 82.65 58.42 11:00 p.m. 81.24 62.19 23 Data provided by the TCEQ based on combined data from LEADS, NWS, and U.S. Air Force. County-specific data located in Appendix 12.14 NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 48

Exhibit 7.2-4: MOVES2014a I/M Descriptive Inputs for Subject Counties 2018 Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant I/M Data 24 I/M Program ID 20 21 23 24 Pollutant Process ID 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 112 112 Source Use Type 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 Begin Model Year 1996 1994 1994 1996 End Model Year 2016 1995 1995 2016 Inspection Frequency Description ID I/M Compliance 1 1 1 1 Exhaust OBD Check ASM 25 2525/5015 Phase-in Cut points Evaporative Gas Cap Check Evaporative Gas Cap and OBD Check 51 23 41 45 93.12% for source type 21, 91.26% for source type 31 and 85.67% for source type 32 26 Differentiates I/M programs Identifies the pollutant and vehicle process Identifies the vehicle type Model year I/M Program begins Model year I/M Program ends Annual testing; program specifications Identifies test type Identifies test with MOVES2014a database test standards IDs Expected compliance (%) 24 Wise County does not have an I/M program 25 ASM Acceleration Simulation Mode 26 https://nepis.epa.gov/exe/zypdf.cgi?dockey=p100nn9l.txt NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 49

Exhibit 7.2-4: MOVES2014a I/M Descriptive Inputs for Subject Counties (continued) 2020 (Year based on EPA nonattainment classification under 2015 ozone NAAQS) Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant I/M Data I/M Program ID 20 24 Differentiates I/M programs Pollutant Process ID Source Use Type Begin Model Year 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 112 Identifies the pollutant and vehicle process 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 Identifies the vehicle type 1996 1996 End Model Year 2018 2018 Inspection Frequency 1 1 begins ends Annual testing; program specifications Description Exhaust OBD Check Evaporative Gas Cap and OBD Check Identifies test type ID 51 45 Identifies test with MOVES2014a database test standards IDs I/M Compliance 93.12% for source type 21, 91.26% for source type 31 and 85.67% for source type 32 Expected compliance (%) NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 50

Exhibit 7.2-4: MOVES2014a I/M Descriptive Inputs for Subject Counties (continued) 2028 Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant I/M Data I/M Program ID 20 24 Differentiates I/M programs Pollutant Process ID Source Use Type Begin Model Year 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 112 Identifies the pollutant and vehicle process 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 Identifies the vehicle type 2004 2004 End Model Year 2026 2026 Inspection Frequency 1 1 begins ends Annual testing; program specifications Description Exhaust OBD Check Evaporative Gas Cap and OBD Check Identifies test type ID 51 45 Identifies test with MOVES2014a database test standards IDs I/M Compliance 93.12% for source type 21, 91.26% for source type 31 and 85.67% for source type 32 Expected compliance (%) NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 51

Exhibit 7.2-4: MOVES2014a I/M Descriptive Inputs for Subject Counties (continued) 2037 Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant I/M Data I/M Program ID 20 24 Differentiates I/M programs Pollutant Process ID Source Use Type Begin Model Year End Model Year Inspection Frequency 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 112 Identifies the pollutant and vehicle process 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 Identifies the vehicle type 2013 2013 2035 2035 1 1 begins ends Annual testing; program specifications Description Exhaust OBD Check Evaporative Gas Cap and OBD Check Identifies test type ID I/M Compliance 51 45 93.12% for source use type 21, 91.26% for source use type 31 and 86.6% for source use type 32 Identifies test with MOVES2014a database test standards IDs Expected compliance (%) NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 52

Exhibit 7.2-4: MOVES2014a I/M Descriptive Inputs for Subject Counties (continued) 2045 Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant I/M Data I/M Program ID 20 24 Differentiates I/M programs Pollutant Process ID Source Use Type Begin Model Year End Model Year Inspection Frequency 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302 112 Identifies the pollutant and vehicle process 21, 31, 32 21, 31, 32 Identifies the vehicle type 2021 2021 2043 2043 1 1 begins ends Annual testing; program specifications Description Exhaust OBD Check Evaporative Gas Cap and OBD Check Identifies test type ID I/M Compliance 51 45 93.12% for source use type 21, 91.26% for source use type 31 and 86.6% for source use type 32 Identifies test with MOVES2014a database test standards IDs Expected compliance (%) Exhibit 7.2-5: MOVES2014a Fuel Supply Fuel Formulation ID Market Share Market Share CV 27 18724/18734 1 0 30011 1 0 27 Coefficient of Variation NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 53

EXHIBIT 7.2-6: MOVES2014a Fuel Properties Fuel Type Gasoline 28 Diesel 29 County Group Core 30 Perimeter 31 All Counties 32 Fuel Formulation ID 18724 18734 30011 Fuel Subtype ID 12 12 20 RVP 7.00 7.80 0.00 Sulfur Level 10.00 10.00 11.00 ETOH Volume 9.67 9.66 0.00 MTBE Volume 0.00 0.00 0.00 ETBE Volume 0.00 0.00 0.00 TAME Volume 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aromatic Content 14.74 25.35 0.00 Olefin Content 10.74 8.33 0.00 Benzene Content 0.46 0.61 0.00 e200 49.21 49.45 0.00 e300 85.13 82.68 0.00 Vol to Wt Percent Oxy 0.3653 0.3653 N/A BioDieselEster Volume 0.00 0.00 N/A Cetane Index 0.00 0.00 N/A PAH Content 0.00 0.00 N/A T50 202.52 203.73 0.00 T90 325.77 327.68 0.00 28 TTI produced these fuel formulation estimates using local summer 2017 fuel survey sample data (TCEQ survey by ERG for non-rfg counties and EPA Texas RFG survey data). The overall average fuel properties for each region were calculated using the standard procedure of aggregating and averaging by fuel grade (regular [RU], mid-grade [MU], and premium [PU]), and combining them into the final overall averages using latest available statewide gasoline relative sales volumes by grade (U.S. Energy Information Administration: RU 0.88; MU 0.062; PU 0.058). 29 TTI produced diesel average sulfur estimates using the summer 2014 TCEQ fuel survey diesel sample data by aggregating and averaging sulfur content values for Texas Low-Emission Diesel (TxLED) counties. 30 EPA Texas RFG survey data, sulfur level set to Tire 3 Rule regulated value. 31 RVP modified to the TCEQ low RVP regulated value of 7.8 for 95 east Texas counties, and no RVP buffer for ethanol applied because the one pound waiver is only for counties with a federally regulated RVP level, sulfur level set to Tire 3 Rule regulated value. 32 Future year diesel fuel parameters are the MOVES defaults modified to reflect consistency with the federal low sulfur diesel rule, fuel survey data, and diesel fuel properties used in SIP emission inventory development. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 54

7.2.1 Vehicle Registration Distribution Vehicle age distributions are calculated from TxDMV vehicle registration data. July 2014 data sets are utilized for light- and heavy-duty vehicle classes. MOVES default values are used for bus categories. Light-duty registration data for Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise Counties are weighted for commute patterns with County-to-County Worker Flow data from the 2000 Census. Exhibit 7.2.1-1 identifies percentages applied for this weighted adjustment. The 12-county summed heavy-duty vehicle data is used for developing the heavy-duty registration portion for heavy-duty vehicles. Exhibit 7.2.1-1: County-to-County Worker Flow County of Employment Resident County Collin Dallas Denton Ellis Johnson Kaufman Parker Rockwall Tarrant Wise Collin 65.38% 10.25% 5.08% 0.28% 0.20% 0.97% 0.05% 7.63% 0.87% 0.00% Dallas 19.09% 65.97% 10.19% 10.73% 1.32% 15.83% 0.98% 23.65% 7.69% 0.69% Denton 11.45% 7.85% 75.56% 0.37% 0.17% 0.66% 0.94% 0.58% 3.30% 3.12% Ellis 0.16% 1.79% 0.17% 79.39% 1.43% 0.74% 0.10% 0.00% 0.55% 0.21% Hood 0.03% 0.06% 0.05% 0.10% 2.27% 0.00% 2.39% 0.00% 0.53% 0.37% Hunt 0.76% 0.42% 0.13% 0.12% 0.00% 4.37% 0.03% 9.42% 0.03% 0.00% Johnson 0.05% 0.32% 0.32% 3.46% 76.23% 0.00% 1.45% 0.16% 3.21% 0.69% Kaufman 0.29% 1.57% 0.14% 0.74% 0.02% 72.64% 0.00% 3.59% 0.11% 0.02% Parker 0.02% 0.14% 0.09% 0.06% 0.52% 0.02% 77.41% 0.00% 2.57% 5.86% Rockwall 0.68% 1.23% 0.14% 0.12% 0.06% 3.70% 0.00% 53.95% 0.06% 0.13% Tarrant 2.02% 10.29% 7.36% 4.63% 17.47% 1.06% 14.11% 1.02% 80.26% 10.75% Wise 0.07% 0.11% 0.76% 0.01% 0.31% 0.02% 2.55% 0.00% 0.82% 78.15% Source: American Community Survey for the five-year period between 2006 and 2010. 7.3 Adjustments to Emission Factors Adjustments are applied to emission factors as a post-process step. The Low Emission Diesel (LED) NO X Adjustment is applied to the emission factors. VMT mix is applied simultaneously with the emission calculation. 7.3.1 Low Emission Diesel NO X Adjustment NO X emission factors for diesel vehicle classes are adjusted by adjustment factors developed by NCTCOG using the spreadsheet TCEQ provided, to apply the Texas Low Emission Diesel (TxLED) Program. Exhibit 7.3.1-1 lists the appropriate adjustment for each vehicle class. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 55

Exhibit 7.3.1-1: TxLED NO X Adjustments Vehicle Classification 2018 2020 2028 2037 2045 Passenger Car 0.95008 0.95081 0.95163 0.95200 0.95200 Passenger Truck 0.94980 0.95014 0.95130 0.95200 0.95200 Light Commercial Truck 0.94693 0.94806 0.95021 0.95200 0.95200 Intercity Bus 0.94296 0.94387 0.94817 0.95200 0.95200 Transit Bus 0.94317 0.94407 0.94891 0.95200 0.95200 School Bus 0.94314 0.94393 0.94862 0.95200 0.95200 Refuse Truck 0.94628 0.94738 0.95154 0.95200 0.95200 Single Unit Short-Haul Truck 0.95120 0.95154 0.95198 0.95200 0.95200 Single Unit Long-Haul Truck 0.95131 0.95156 0.95196 0.95200 0.95200 Motor Home 0.94579 0.94675 0.95040 0.95200 0.95200 Combination Short-Haul Truck 0.94913 0.94985 0.95177 0.95200 0.95200 Combination Long-Haul Truck 0.94739 0.94821 0.95130 0.95200 0.95200 Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and NCTCOG 7.3.2 Vehicle Miles of Travel Mix (or Fractions) VMT mix is applied to the emission factors in a post-process methodology using the EmisCalc software utility of the MOVESUTL developed by TTI. The VMT mix enables the assignment of emission factors by vehicle type to VMT in order to calculate emissions on a specified roadway facility or functional class. VMT mix is estimated for four MOVES roadway types, Rural Restricted (rural freeways), Rural Unrestricted (rural arterials and collectors), Urban Restricted (urban freeways) and Urban Unrestricted (urban arterials and collectors) for daily time periods for each of the modeling counties. Each county s roadway sections are classified as rural or urban by the vehicle activity behavior and the demographics of the counties. The VMT mix methodology utilizes data, assumptions, and procedures from the Texas Department of Transportation, TTI, and the Dallas-Fort Worth Travel Model for the Expanded Area model. Once all adjustments are accounted for, final emission factors can be developed. Appendix 12.16 includes MOVES2014a emission factors for all counties in the nonattainment area. 7.4 Modeled Emission Estimation Modeled emission estimates are calculated using TTI emission inventory estimation utilities using moves: movesutl, developed by TTI for MOVES. This utility combines vehicle activity and emissions factors to create emission estimates at the link level. Exhibit 7.4-1 outlines the emission calculation modeling process. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 56

Exhibit 7.4-1: MOVES2014a Emission Modeling Process Travel Demand Model for the Expanded Area (DFX) MOVES Population Build MOVES2014a EPA Model Population by Source Use Type Link Level VMT & Speed Emission Rates MOVES Off-Network Activity Calculation LED NO X Adjustment Factors MOVES Rate Adjust Starts, SHP, SHI and APU Hours Adjusted Emission Rates MOVES Emission Calculations LEGEND Link Level Emissions Emissions Summary Tab Files By Pollutant, By Facility Type, By Times of Day MODEL INPUT/ OUTPUT NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 57

This page intentionally left blank. NCTCOG 2018 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY 58