TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Straight to Recording for All. Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges

Similar documents
2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

NCHRP SYNTHESIS 490. Practice of Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes. A Synthesis of Highway Practice NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM

Expert System on Guidance for the Application of Shoulder & Centerline Rumble Strips/ Stripes

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

Overview. Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public Relations Considerations

Session 123 Rumble Stripes: Opportunity to Improve Safety and Retroreflectivity

Accommodation of Bicyclists and Nearby Residents in Rumble Strips/Stripes Policies

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

s Contact the Area Construction Engineer at for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10

Temporary Traffic Control Plans

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions

TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM. Highway Rumble Strips: Approaches to Balancing Public Safety and Community Noise. Tuesday, March 28, :00-3:30 PM ET

Synthesis On The Effectiveness Of Rumble Strips. Synthesis Report Research

Developing an Effective Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips/Stripes Policy to Accommodate All Roadway Users

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

US Experience with Centerline Rumble Strips on Two- Lane Roads: Pattern Research and North American Usage

WORK ZONE SAFETY TOOLBOX

.MAINTENANCE. Strategic Initiative Four:

High-production installation Rumble strip milling attachment W 60

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

RUMBLE STRIPS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

High Tension Cable Barrier

Support: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

Page 1 of KA

60 70 Guidelines. Managing Speeds. Work Zones

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

SHRP 2 RID. Roadway Information Database

Final Report Safety Impact of Street Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections

Conventional Approach

AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Review of Milled Rumble Strips on Alberta Roads

Unit 1 - Driving, Mobility and Laws. Chapter 1 - Driving and Mobility

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

U.S. Highway Attributes Relevant to Lane Tracking Raina Shah Christopher Nowakowski Paul Green

Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities;

AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013

Moving Operations. Introduction by. National Traffic Management & Work Zone Safety Conference March 2009

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

BARTON COUNTY GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP PREPARED BY THE KANSAS NE 120 RD NE 100 RD NE 80 RD NE 70 RD NE 50 RD NE 60 RD T18S T19S. County Ellsworth County

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Minnesota Local Agency Pavement Marking: Mining Existing Data

Roadway Contributing Factors in Traffic Crashes

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

DRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:

Work Zone Traffic Control

ANALYSIS OF CROSS-MEDIAN CRASHES ON ALABAMA DIVIDED PARTIAL CONTROL OF ACCESS ARTERIALS

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

STATE OF WASHINGTON. County of Jefferson

Effectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips

Kentucky Highway District 6

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

D-25 Speed Advisory System

2018 NDACE CONFERENCE

Silent Danger Zone for Highway Users

Transportation Research Forum

4 th IRTAD CONFERENCE Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

PART 8. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Roadway Shoulder Treatments - Rumble Strips

Motorcycle Safety Program Assessments

Purdue Road School West Lafayette IN

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

Evaluation of Retroreflectivity Measurement Techniques for Profiled and Rumble Stripe Pavement Markings

NTSB Recommendations to Reduce Speeding-Related Crashes

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Evaluation of Rumble Stripes on Low-Volume Rural Roads in Iowa Phase I

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM. Project 20-5, Synthesis Topic Dealing with Truck Parking Demands.

Night Driving. Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

Safety Evaluation of Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT or J-Turn) Projects in Louisiana

Effectiveness of Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips in Reducing Single- Vehicle Ran-Off-Roadway Crashes in Nevada

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

In Recognition of National Work Zone Safety Awareness Week April 11-15, 2016 Presentation Provided by Alabama Struck By Alliance

TRAFFIC-CALMING SOLUTIONS A SURVEY OF SAFETY PROFESSIONALS

Work Zone Safety Best Practices Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference October 18, Dean Mentjes Federal Highway Administration

Kentucky Highway District 1

TOWARD SAFE AND RELIABLE ROADWAYS. Jill Ryan, MPH Eagle County Commissioner

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Preliminary Analysis of LED Enhanced Signs at a Passive Rural Level Crossing

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

High Friction Surfaces and Other Innovative Pavement Surface Treatments for Reduced Highway Noise

s MEDIAN BARRIERS FOR TEXAS HIGHWAYS

I-95 Corridor-wide safety data analysis and identification of existing successful safety programs. Traffic Injury Research Foundation April 22, 2010

Target Zero: Underutilized Strategies in Traffic Safety That Work

Transcription:

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB Straight to Recording for All Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges

NCHRP Synthesis Report 490: Practice of Rumble Strips and Rumple Stripes NCHRP Project 20-05, Topic 46-13

NCHRP is a State-Driven Program Sponsored by individual state DOTs who Suggest research of national interest Serve on oversight panels that guide the research. Administered by TRB in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration.

Practical, ready-to-use results Applied research aimed at state DOT practitioners Often become AASHTO standards, specifications, guides, syntheses Can be applied in planning, design, construction, operations, maintenance, safety, environment

Today s Speaker & Presentation Dr. Omar Smadi Director, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University Consultant for this Synthesis Study Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges

To help protect your privacy, PowerPoint has blocked automatic download of this picture. Practice of Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes (NCHRP Synthesis 46-13) (NCHRP Synthesis Report 490) Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges Omar Smadi CTRE/Iowa State University

Synthesis Objectives Rumble designs: patterns, locations, pavement types and widths Expected safety benefits: crash modification, whiteout/packed snow/fog driving, wet night driving Roadside noise Impacts on bicycle community Public affairs/outreach-education, public involvement, DOT/agency responses, etc. Maintenance/durability issues: winter, pavement preservation

Synthesis Panel DUANE F. BRAUTIGAM JAMES W. BRYANT, JR., TRB ERIC T. DONNELL, The Penn State PATRICK GALARZA, New York State DOT KENNETH E. JOHNSON, Minnesota DOT TRACIE J. LEIX, Michigan DOT ROBERT G. BOB PAPPE, Oregon DOT CATHERINE M. SATTERFIELD, FHWA ABDUL ZINEDDIN, FHWA

Key definitions: Shoulder Rumble Strip is a longitudinal safety feature installed on a paved roadway shoulder near the outside edge of the travel lane. It is made of a series of milled or raised elements intended to alert inattentive drivers (through vibration and sound) that their vehicles have left the travel lane. (FHWA definition). Shoulder Rumble Stripe is a special type of shoulder rumble strip placed directly at the edge of the travel lane with the edge line pavement marking placed through the line of rumble strips. Center Line Rumble Strip is a longitudinal safety feature installed at or near the center line of a paved roadway. It is made of a series of milled or raised elements intended to alert inattentive drivers (through vibration and sound) that their vehicles have left the travel lane. (FHWA definition). Centerline Rumble Stripe is a longitudinal safety features at or near the centerline and created when the center line pavement marking is placed over the center line rumble strip.

Key definitions: Bicycle Gap Pattern (gap plus cycle) consists of a gap clear of rumbles (typical between 10 to 12 feet) and then a cycle of rumbles (typical 40 to 60 feet). Intermittent Gap is a gap created between continuous application of the rumble line, for pre-determined situations such as intersections, major driveways, bridge decks, etc Tactile is the vibration induced in the motor vehicle by the rumble strips which can be referred to as the tactile warning. Audible is the noise generated as the motor vehicle tires pass over the rumble strip thus providing an audible warning to the motorist.

Key definitions: Rumble Strip and Stripe Dimensions Length: Dimension of the rumble strip measured lateral to the travel way. This dimension is sometimes referred to as the transverse width. Width: Dimension of the rumble strip measured parallel to the travel lane. Spacing: Distance measured between rumble strips patterns. Typical terms used to describe this dimension are on-center spacing, spacing on-center, center-to-center spacing, or simply spacing. Depth: Dimension is the vertical distance measured from the top of the pavement surface to the bottom of a rumble strip pattern. This distance refers to the maximum depth of the cut or groove.

Synthesis Survey Six Categories Investigated: State DOT general rumble practices Roadway selection criteria Design and installation Maintenance practices Benefits Issues

Results from the Survey (41 states responded)

Use of Rumble Strips Does your agency use rumble strips? Number of Agencies Percent 41 responding agencies Yes 41 100% No 0 0% Does your agency have a written policy/guidelines concerning the application of rumble strips? Number of Agencies Percent Yes 37 90% No 4 10% 41 responding agencies

Rumble Strip Installation Practices Type of Roadway None Left Shoulder Right Shoulder Center Line (median) (outside) Urban multilane divided highways 59% 37% 5% 41% Urban multilane undivided highways 73% 7% 12% 27% Urban two-lane roads 76% 5% 15% 22% Rural multilane divided highways 5% 88% 5% 95% Rural multilane undivided highways 5% 39% 59% 85% Rural two-lane roads 5% 39% 71% 85% 41 responding agencies

Factors Influencing Shoulder Rumble Strip Installation Influencing Factor Number of Agencies Percent Minimum Required Values/Explanation Shoulder Width: 37 93% Between 2 and 8 feet Speed Limit: 25 63% Between 40 and 55 mph with the most common answer at 45 mph Other (please specify): 19 48% Factors include: Lane width, bicycle presence, home locations, roadway type Pavement Condition: 18 45% Good condition Crash frequency/rate: 11 28% Pavement Type: 10 25% Mostly asphalt and no treated surfaces (microsurface, seal coat, and chip seal) ADT: 3 8% Alignment: 1 3% 40 responding agencies

Factors Influencing Center Line Rumble Strip Installation Influencing Factor Number of Agencies Percent Minimum Required Values/Explanation Lane Width: 22 58% Between 10 and 12 feet Other (please specify): 20 53% Factors include: Homes, noise, functional class, and rural Speed Limit: 18 47% Between 35 and 55 mph with the majority at 45 mph Pavement Condition: 17 45% Good condition Crash frequency/rate: 13 34% Locations with a crash history or above average head-on crashes Pavement Type: 9 24% Mostly asphalt ADT: 4 11% Alignment: 1 3% 38 responding agencies

Seal or Not Seal?

Rumble Strip Location Inches from Edge Line Number of Agencies Percent 0 7 17% 4 7 17% 6 12 29% 12 3 7% 16 2 5% 18 1 2% Varies 9 22% 41 responding agencies

Why Create Gaps in Rumble Strips? Gaps Created For: Number of Agencies Percent Bridge Decks 30 79% Other 29 76% Noise 22 58% Bicycles 17 45% Special Users 6 16% 38 responding agencies

Shoulder Rumble Strip Installed Length in Inches Dimensions Inches Number of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Agencies 6 to 16 1 7 3 8 to 12 1 8 to 16 2 12 to 16 2 12 14 16 15 18 1 30 1 40 responding agencies Width in Inches 4 5 Inches 6 7 8 Number of Agencies 4 1 5 5 6 1 7 29 36 responding agencies

Length in Inches Center Line Rumble Strip Installed Dimensions Inches Number of 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Agencies 4 1 7 2 8 2 10 1 12 18 14 1 16 11 36 responding agencies Width in Inches 4 5 Inches 6 7 8 Number of Agencies 4 1 5 6 6 2 7 22 7.5 2 33 responding agencies

Pavement Marking Materials Used for Rumble Stripes Pavement Marking Material Used Number of Agencies Percent Standard Acrylic Waterborne Paint 17 46% Epoxy 16 43% Other (required) 15 41% High Build Acrylic Waterborne Paint 11 30% Sprayed Thermoplastic 11 30% Polyurea 6 16% Urethane 1 3% 37 responding agencies

Rumble Strip Benefits Reducing crashes: crash modification factors Cost effective countermeasure: range is 7:1 to 75:1. Seven agencies reported and several are working on developing. Extending pavement marking longevity (rumble stripes): anecdotal Added visibility Winter operations

Issues With Rumble Strips Ranking 5=Most Important Issue Faced Issue 5 4 3 2 1 Average Bicycle complaints 12 9 10 9 1 3.5 Noise complaints 9 15 4 10 3 3.4 Pavement deterioration (center line joint) 10 7 6 8 10 3.0 Rumbles on challenging surfaces 4 10 8 10 9 2.8 Pavement deterioration (edge line) 4 7 9 10 11 2.6 Pavement Marking Performance 4 2 12 8 15 2.3 Motorcycle complaints 0 5 12 13 11 2.3 Winter maintenance issues 0 1 6 15 19 1.7 41 responding agencies

Public Complaints Against Rumble Strips Level Of Public Complaints Complaints Regarding: Low Medium High Noise 18 16 7 Bicycle related 17 11 13 Motorcycle related 33 6 1 Pavement deterioration (center line joint) 36 3 2 Pavement deterioration (edge line) 35 5 1 Winter maintenance issues 38 3 0 Pavement Marking Performance 35 6 0 Rumbles on challenging surfaces 34 5 2 41 responding agencies

Public Campaigns

Future Research Suggestions Dealing with noise (new design standards): state DOTs could further investigate alternative rumble designs to reduce noise. As the literature showed, the sinusoidal pattern is promising, but further research is needed. The reduction of the rumble length from 16 inches to 8 inches, in the MnDOT study, resulted in reduce audible and tactile warning when the whole tires was not in contact with the rumble. Specifications (audible and tactile): rumble strips and stripes provide feedback to the drivers by producing audible and tactile warnings. From the survey, only two agencies have developed specifications for these two items. Additional research could assess how much audible and tactile warning are needed and how do we measure it.

Future Research Suggestions Rumble stripes: when the pavement marking and the rumble strip are combined, a rumble stripe is born. The survey showed the lack of information on the impact of the rumble on the performance of the pavement marking. Another aspect of rumble stripe is the wet night visibility advantage. Very few states measured wet retroreflectivity of rumble stripes to determine that. Pavement deterioration: additional research could assess the impact of the rumble on the pavement deterioration. A number of states said they have an electronic database with all locations of their rumbles that is tied to a location referencing system.

Future Research Suggestions Rumble Strip Design (Impact on Safety Benefits): the results from the survey showed how the DOT practices vary from size, to design, to installation and also the resulting crash modification factors from one state to another vary. This suggested research topic would address the potential differences in safety benefits due to different rumble strip and stripe designs.

To help protect your privacy, PowerPoint has blocked automatic download of this picture. Thank You! Omar Smadi smadi@iastate.edu