Climate Change and the Electric Grid Ward Jewell Wichita State University Power Systems Engineering Research Center 2013 Ward Jewell, Wichita State University
Electric Power Generation
Electric Power Generation
Electric Power Generation
Electric Power Generation
Electric Power Generation
Electric Generation Bowersock Mills and Power Company Lawrence, Kansas 1874, 2.5 MW www.bowersockpower.com
Electric generation in Kansas Energy Information Administration www.eia.gov/state/?sid=ks
Energy vs. Power (2012) (2010) kwh Electric Power Monthly, Energy Information Administration www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/index.cfm (Energy) www.eia.gov/electricity/state/kansas/index.cfm (Power) kw
Transmission
Kansas Electric Transmission Grid Kansas Corporation Commission, www.kcc.state.ks.us/energy/chart.htm
US Electric Transmission Grid Global Energy Network Institute, www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/nati onal_energy_grid/united-states-ofamerica/americannationalelectricitygrid.s html
Electric Power Electric Load California, Oct. 20, 2008 Reserve margin Generation available Electricity used Time of day California Independent System Operator, caiso.com
Environmental Challenges for the Electric Energy Industry 1. Mitigation of greenhouse gases 2. Adapting to changing climate 3. Availability of water
US CO 2 emissions Coal: 205-225 lb CO 2 / MMBtu Oil: 156-174 lb CO 2 / MMBtu Gas : 117-139 lb CO 2 / MMBtu Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, www.eia.doe.gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/ghg_overview.cfm
Technologies to limit greenhouse gas emissions fuel switching: coal to natural gas Miaolei Shao, The Effects of Greenhouse Gas Limits on Electric Power System Dispatch And Operations, Ph.D. Dissertation, Wichita State University, 2008.
Questions about hydraulic fracturing for natural gas production. Shawnee, Oklahoma, earthquake 2011 St. Gregory's University
Nuclear Generation
Renewable Generators Geothermal Small Hydro Biomass
Load (MW) Wind Output (MW) Load (MW) Wind Output (MW) Load (MW) Wind Output (MW) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 wind load 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 Time Period (hour) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Wind and electricity use 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 load wind 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 Time Period (hour) 100 80 60 40 20 0 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 load wind 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 Time Period (hour) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Piyasak Poonpun, Effects of New Low Carbon Emission Generators and Energy Storage on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Electric Power Systems, PhD Dissertation, Wichita State University, 2009.
Load (MW) Solar (MW) Solar energy and electricity use 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Full sun load solar 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 Time Period (hour) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Piyasak Poonpun, Effects of New Low Carbon Emission Generators and Energy Storage on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Electric Power Systems, PhD Dissertation, Wichita State University, 2009.
20-year planning for western grid o Cost estimates from DOE EIA o Load price elasticity -0.8 1% price increase causes 0.8% drop in use o Average load growth 1.3% Varies significantly by state o Generation types considered: dual unit advanced pulverized coal advanced natural gas combined cycle dual unit nuclear onshore wind onshore solar. W. D. Schulze, et al., Interactions of Multiple Market-Based Energy and Environmental Policies in a Transmission-Constrained Competitive National Electricity Market, Publication 12-25, Sept. 2012. hww.pserc.wisc.edu/documents/publications/reports/2012_reports/schulze Report_M-24_2012.pdf
Emissions regulations scenarios Natural gas prices: $/MMBtu 2012 2022 2032 High Gas Prices (HG) 2.5 7 14 Low Gas Prices (LG) 2.5 4.77 5.86
Emissions regulations scenarios Base: No new environmental policies No renewable incentives Cap and Trade (C&T) 36.94 $/ton in 2022, 60.18 $/ton in 2032 Renewables incentives 22 $/MWh EPA CO 2 regulation 1000 lb/mwh CO 2 limit for new plants (no coal) Renewables incentives 22 $/MWh
GW GW WECC results Zhouxing Hu, Wichita State Retirements Natural Gas Coal 0.0-5.0-10.0-15.0-20.0-25.0-30.0-35.0-40.0 2022 2032 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 0.0-5.0-10.0-15.0-20.0-25.0-30.0-35.0-40.0 2022 2032 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG
GW GW WECC results New generation 800 MW Nuclear in 2032 70.0 Wind Built in WECC 25.0 Solar Built in WECC 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 0.0 2022 2032 0.0 2022 2032
TWh Energy generated in WECC 1150.0 1100.0 1050.0 1000.0 950.0 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 900.0 2012 2022 2032
$/MWh Average Wholesale Prices in WECC 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 20.00 10.00 2012 2022 2032
Megatonnes CO 2 Emissions in WECC 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 Base HG Base LG C&T HG C&T LG EPA HG EPA LG 50.0 0.0 2012 2022 2032
Bulk Energy Storage
Battery storage technologies Lead Acid Vanadium Redox Sodium Sulphur Zinc Bromine
Western grid results with electric energy storage Zhouxing Hu, Wichita State o A more detailed planning model that included these storage technologies that were found to be economical in some scenarios: Compressed air Pumped hydroelectric Vanadium redox batteries o And these technologies that were not: Sodium sulphur batteries Lithium Ion batteries Zhouxing Hu, Optimal Generation Expansion Planning with Integration ovariable Renewables and Bulk Energy Storage Systems. PhD Dissertation, Wichita State University, May 2012.
WECC results with Electric Energy Storage
Simulation Results In HG cases, the average production costs drop significantly from 2022 to 2032 because fuel consumption shifts from natural gas to coal, nuclear, wind or solar generation. Base Cases have the highest average production cost because of the prevailing natural gas generation. C&T policy is the most effective way to reduce CO 2 emission regardless of natural gas price. CO 2 emissions in EPA cases are sensitive to natural gas price.
Proposed AEP 765 kv Transmission Overlay $60B: $0.0024 $/kwh if spread over all US kwh American Electric Power, Interstate Transmission Vision for Wind Integration, www.aep.com/about/i765project/docs/windtransmissionvisionwhitepaper.pdf
Conservation 10 9 kwh % 150 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1.34 lb CO 2 /kwh x 250 x 10 9 kwh = 335 x 10 9 lb CO 2 152 MMT out of 2375 MMT produced by the industry in 2005 = 6.4% Energy Information Administration, eia.doe.gov.
Demand Response http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=130
Carbon Sequestration
Residential rooftop solar Depends on: Net metering Incentives Cost of PV cells Changes the electric distribution business significantly.
The electric energy system of the future will be substantially different from the system of today. The electric energy business will change significantly.
Thanks to Power Systems Engineering Research Center pserc.org ABB American Electric Power American Transmission Company AREVA T&D Arizona Public Service Bonneville Power Administration British Columbia Transmission Co. California Independent System Operator CenterPoint Energy Duke Energy Entergy EPRI Exelon FirstEnergy Corporation GE Energy Institut de Recherche d'hydro-québec ISO New England ITC Holdings Ward Jewell Wichita State University Ward.jewell@wichita.edu MidAmerican Energy Midwest Independent System Operator National Grid USA National Rural Electric Cooperative Association New York Independent System Operator New York Power Authority Pacific Gas and Electric Company PJM Interconnection PowerWorld Corporation Quanta Technology Salt River Project Southern California Edison Southern Company Tennessee Valley Authority Tri-State Generation and Transmission U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration