Project Working Group Meeting #5

Similar documents
SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Technical Feasibility Report

Alternatives Considered

PUBLIC MEETING. Bear Creek Park Community Center. January 24, :30 pm to 7:30 pm

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

NEWS RELEASE November 8, 2017

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

Traffic Signal Timing Diamond Operation. Innovation for better mobility

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

I-84 Hartford Project Public Advisory Committee Meeting #19. March 28, 2019

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

US 67 WIDENING PROJECT

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

SOUTH ACCESS TO THE GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE DOYLE DRIVE DOYLE DRIVE. Doyle Drive Presentation Golden Gate Bridge Board Meeting July 24, 2009

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

Metro Highway Program

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

I-190/Silver Street Study

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

DIRECTIONS TO SCHOOLS Updated 10/2015

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

2.1.5 Traffic and Circulation. Table Level of Service Criteria for Highway Segment Regulatory Setting Affected Environment

Brent Spence Bridge Design Exceptions - Alternative I

WOODVILLE HIGHWAY (SR 363) PD&E STUDY From Capital Circle Southeast To Paul Russell Road FPID NUMBER: Public Hearing

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Key Project Elements Status Report

Interchange Justification Report

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Public Information Workshop

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

Final Interchange Justification Report

Draft US Corridor Study Traffic Analysis Report

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

2016 Congestion Report

5 VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE AND SURROUNDING AREAS TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROGRESS

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

I-35 Access Justification Report Kearney/Clay County

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

APPENDIX A Interstate 26 Widening Traffic Analysis Report

4.0 Conceptual Alternatives Innerbelt Curve. August 11, 2006 Page Innerbelt Curve: Background. Figure 4-1: Innerbelt Curve Section Location

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Federal Way Link Extension

ST. CROIX RIVER CROSSING PROJECT 2004 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE:

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A

Business Advisory Committee. November 3, 2015

City of Pacific Grove

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS STAFF REPORT

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) Intersection Concept, Case Studies, and Design Guide ITE Midwest Annual Meeting June 30, 2015 Branson, MO

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

SR 3/SR 304 Bremerton Interchange Improvements. Feasibility Study

December 12, Dear Secretary Foxx:

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Interchange Modification Justification Study. I-90/Timberline Road Interchange, Exit 402 SIOUX FALLS MPO

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project Johnson Creek Boulevard

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

METRO Light Rail Update

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

Transcription:

September 17, 2013 Project Working Group Meeting #5 1 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Meeting Purpose Project update Discuss Range of Alternatives Discuss next steps 2 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Project Study Area Lockport Plainfield Crest Hill Shorewood Joliet New Lenox Rockdale Minooka Channahon Manhattan 3 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Development of Draft Purpose & Need STAKEHOLDER INPUT -PWG, Public and Stakeholder Meetings -Submitted Comments - Problem Statement TECHNICAL ANALYSIS -Data Collected -Crash Data Analysis -Traffic Data Analysis -Deficiencies Analysis PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED PUBLIC AND AGENCY COORDINATION Subject to FHWA review and approval 4 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

I-80 Purpose and Need Project Purpose To improve the transportation system along I-80 from Ridge Road to US Route 30 Project Need Improve regional & local travel and access Improve facility condition and design Improve safety for all users 5 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Project Update Purpose and Need approval received on March 1, 2012 Since then: Developed alternatives for the Des Plaines River Bridge Input on Alternatives Sought May 20, 2011: PWG #4 July 28, 2011: PM #2 Developed and analyzed interchange alternatives Continued coordination with the FHWA 6 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Range of Alternatives No-Build Alternative Build Alternative(s) Freeway Alternative Des Plaines River Bridge Alternative Interchange Alternative 7 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Freeway Alternative Freeway Widening General Purpose Lane Managed Lane High Occupancy Toll (HOT 2+) lanes Truck-Only Truck-Only Toll lanes Express Toll lanes 8 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Freeway Alternatives General Purpose Capacity 6 lanes 8 lanes 6 lanes RIDGE RD I-55 HOUBOLT RD LARKIN AVE CENTER ST CHICAGO ST RICHARDS ST BRIGGS ST 9 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Des Plaines River Bridge Alternatives Goals Address geometric deficiencies Provide additional capacity to accommodate demand Maintain two lanes open in each direction during construction Only corridor location where alignment is being shifted 10 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives DPR Bridge North Alternative RESIDENTIAL OZINGA PLANT RESIDENTIAL 11 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 11

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives DPR Bridge South Alternative LANDFILL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PROP. JOLIET WATER TREATMENT FACILITY 12 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 12

DPR Bridge Alternatives Proposed Alignment Impacts Impacts North Alignment South Alignment Land Acquisition 4.3 Acres 4.5 Acres Residential Buildings 14 9 Commercial Buildings 2 0 13 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Interchange Alternatives Address geometric deficiencies Improve local travel and access Enhance safety Accommodate existing and projected travel demand 14 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Interchange Alternatives Potential improvements will be evaluated at these interchanges: PROJECT LIMIT RIDGE RD I-55 PROJECT LIMIT HOUBOLT RD LARKIN AVE CENTER ST CHICAGO ST RICHARDS ST BRIGGS ST 15 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 15

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Interchange Alternatives No Work Minor Improvements Major Reconfiguration Ridge Road Houbolt Road Interstate 55 US Route 30 Larkin Avenue Center Street Richards Street Chicago Street Briggs Street 16 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 16

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Interstate 55 Poor Weaving High Volumes Slow Operations 17 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 17

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Interstate 55 Structure Required Separate Weaving Sections (New Structure) SB to EB Directional Ramp Structure Required Widen to 2 Lanes 18 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 18

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Houbolt/Hollywood Road WB & SB Approach LOS F in 2040 No-Build Nearly Backs Up Onto I-80 EB Approach LOS F in PM 2040 No-Build 19 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 19

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Houbolt/Hollywood Road WB Dual Right-Turn Lanes SB Right-Turn Lane Add NB Left-Turn Storage SB Dual Left-Turn Lanes Widen EB Entrance Ramp 20 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 20

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Larkin Avenue Poor NB Weaving Poor EB Weaving LOS E in 2040 No-Build LOS F in PM 21 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 21

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Larkin Avenue Realign Ramp for New Signal Begin Additional Mainline Lane 22 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 22

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Center Street Missing Movements: EB to SB NB to WB Realignment of I-80 Bridge Simplify Interchange 23 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 23

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Center Street Option 1: Parclo Allows for all movements Provides Acceptable LOS 24 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 24

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Center Street Option 2: ¾ Diamond w/ SW Loop Ramp Allows for all movements Provides Acceptable LOS Reduces Interchange Footprint 25 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 25

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Chicago Street Option 1: Keep Existing 2012 Illinois 5% Location EB Approach LOS D in 2040 No-Build WB Weave LOS F in 2040 No-Build LOS D EB Right-Turn LOS F in 2040 No-Build 26 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 26

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Chicago Street Option 2: Parclo Less Through Capacity (3-Phase vs. 2-Phase Signals) Requires More Traffic Lanes (NB to WB Movement) 27 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 27

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Chicago Street Option 3: Diverging Diamond (DDI) Best Operational Analysis Among Various Configurations Mitigates High NB Chicago to WB I-80 Turning Volume New Bridge Required New Bridge Required Weave Issues 28 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 28

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Chicago Street Option 4: Parclo w/ Directional Ramp Comparable Operational Capacity to DDI Mitigates High NB Chicago to WB I-80 Turning Volume Structure Required Structure Required 29 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 29

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Richards Street WB Approach LOS F in 2040 No-Build Poor Operations Poor Operations Poor Operations Poor Operations EB Approach LOS E in 2040 No-Build 30 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 30

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Richards Street Option 1: Closure of Interchange Option 2: Widen All Ramps To Improve Geometry Provide Additional Turn-Lane Storage Provide Additional Turn-Lane Storage 31 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 31

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Briggs Street WB & SB Approach LOS F in 2040 No-Build LOS E in 2040 No-Build LOS E in 2040 No-Build EB & NB Approach LOS F in 2040 No-Build 32 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 32

Range of Alternatives Build Alternatives Briggs Street Additional NB Left-Turn Storage Traffic Signal & WB Storage Being Completed As Separate Project Compress Ramps ~200 North Provide Dual EB Left-Turn Lanes & NB Right-Turn Lane Extend SB Left- Turn Storage 33 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 33

Environmental Considerations and Best Practices 34 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Potential Open Space for Water Quality BMPs Ridge Road I-80 DuPage River Interstate 55 Thorne Creek I-80 Des Plaines River Rock Run Creek Chicago Street Hickory Creek Briggs Street I-80 35 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 35

Environmentally Sensitive Areas Hickory Creek Crossing DuPage River Crossing River Road Zone A Ingolsby Road Zone A I-55 LARKIN AVE CENTER ST CHICAGO ST RICHARDS ST RIDGE RD Rock Run Creek Crossing HOUBOLT RD 36 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com 36

Potential Open Space for Water Quality BMPs 37 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ingolsby Road Zone A DuPage River Crossing Hickory Creek Crossing River Road Zone A Rock Run Creek Crossing 38 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Wildlife Crossings 39 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Noise Levels Noise Walls are being evaluated as part of our study. Thus far we have taken noise measurements to assess the existing noise levels along the corridor, and our next steps are to model the noise levels once our preferred improvement plan is developed to see where noise walls will be warranted and considered for inclusion in the project. 40 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Next Steps 41 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Interstate 80 Project Questions and Discussion 42 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com

Phase I Long-Term Schedule Public Meeting on Alternatives: Fall 2013 FHWA Review and Refinement of Alternatives: Fall 2013 through Spring 2014 PWG #6: Review of Preferred Alternative Spring 2014 Public Hearing: Presentation of Preferred Alternative Summer 2014 43 September 17, 2013 www.i-80will.com