DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

Similar documents
2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

TO BE USED FOR MAINTENANCE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2 3/16" x 2 3/16" x 10 Ga. 12" 15.5" 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 12 Ga.

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

Interchange Ramp Characteristics (Selection and Design)

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

South Carolina. It s serious. Deadly serious.

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

STATE ND PROJECT NO. CP 0883 (14) & CP 1152 (14) SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 9 31 SIGN NUMBER SIGN SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REQUIRED UNITS PER AMOUNT UNITS

The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR SURVEYING OPERATIONS END ROAD WORK END ROAD WORK * ** END ROAD WORK END ROAD WORK. TCP (S-1a) TCP (S-1b)

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

Access Management: An R-CUT Above the Rest

.MAINTENANCE. Strategic Initiative Four:

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET NUMBER

SCDOT TRAFFIC SIGNAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

Section 2B.59 Weight Limit Signs - Interim Revisions

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

59-2 KA Page 1 of 16

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

DIVISION 4: STREET. Improvement Design Standards City of Dundee Oregon. Division 4 : Street Page 1

La Paz County Public Works Standards Volume I

SECTION STREETS CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT, MISSOURI DESIGN CRITERIA

s Contact the Area Construction Engineer at for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

2013 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD, Part 6 September 2013

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

Support: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.

Work Zone Worker Protection

Traffic Engineering Study

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

Work Zone Safety & New Interstate Resurfacing Provision

TURN AND CURVE SIGNS

Fire Department Access & Water Supply

Introduction. 3. The sample calculations used throughout this paper are based on a roadway posted at 35 mph.

Diverging Diamond & Roundabouts: How to Keep on Trucking Along. Meredith K Cebelak, PhD, PE & Michael A Flatt, PE

KENT COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

CITY OF SAN MARCOS ENGINEERING DIVISION

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

Two-Way, Continuous. Turn Lane

Maine Turnpike Authority

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

PARKING LOT REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR: SJRSC PALATKA CAMPUS

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Date: 04/20/2018 City Project No.: Addendum No.: 4. The following changes shall be made to the project plans and specifications:

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

CDOT SPF Development and 10 Years of Application. A Practical Approach...

MOTOR VEHICLE ORIENTED BUSINESSES.

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 961 PORTABLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS OCTOBER 17, 2008

DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED FINES DOUBLE. Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation. Infrastructure and Transportation. Traffic Engineering

PART 8. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Brent Spence Bridge Design Exceptions - Alternative I

SECTION 4 STREETS. 4-1 STREET TYPES AND DESIGN WIDTHS The standard approved street types and design widths for Sutter County are as follows:

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

Intersection Design: Switch Point

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Portland to Longview/Kelso, CHSR inter-city and inter-city express trains.

Page 1 of KA

Interstate 85 Widening Traffic Analysis Report

Maine Turnpike Authority

Geometric Design Elements to Reduce Wrong-Way (WW) Entry at Freeway Interchanges Hugo Zhou, Ph.D., P.E.

SINGLE 4" 4" 1-Size 2 reflector. 1-Size 1 reflector. unit. unit. Yellow, White or Red Type B or C Reflective Sheeting FLX GND, SRF GND 12" 12"

St. Johns River State College BID-SJR Addendum Three ADDENDUM THREE DATED JUNE 13, 2016

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Skills and Sequences for In-Car Instruction

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS Affecting Capacity ICD 2

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

Work Zone Safety. Guidelines for Temporary Traffic Control

NCDOT Report on Improving Safety on Secondary Roads

STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH REPORT. Safety Analysis for the Prioritized Three Safety Improvement Locations on I-495

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 907B. Incentive/Disincentive Clause

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Safety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County

Created by: St. Louis County

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

SPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Transcription:

200' TYP. 0' < EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS END OF MERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR ALL 2-LANE MERGES EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS A MERGE FROM THE RIGHT AND NO OFFSET IN THE THROUGH LANES END OF MERGE LANE TAPER 200' TYPICAL (YELLOW DELINEATORS) DIVERGE LANE TAPER 0' < EACH SIDE OF RAMP AND RIGHT SIDE OF TANGENT SECTION END OF MERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR ALL 2-LANE MERGES WITH NO OFFSET IN THE THROUGH LANES 0' < EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS 200' TYP. DIVERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON BOTH SIDES 200' TYPICAL (YELLOW DELINEATORS) DIVERGE LANE TAPER 0' * EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON RIGHT SIDE DIVERGE LANE TAPER 0' * EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS 200' TYP. 200' TYPICAL (WHITE DELINEATORS) TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON LEFT SIDE DELINEATION OF FREEWAY TO FREEWAY CONNECTIONS * WHEN THE WIDTH EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY IS 12', PLACE DELINEATOR 14' FROM THE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY. THE WIDTH OF THE GORE WILL BE INCREASED TO 24'. * 12' WIDTH WIDTH * 12' AREA * 22' WHITE ING DELINEATOR YELLOW ING DELINEATOR * 22' AREA 8' 8' EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY DIVERGE WIDTH ( 9' OR 10' ) WIDTH MERGE S FOR NORMAL 10' S EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Paul C. Ajegba Michigan Department of Transportation PREPARED BY APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES DESIGN DIVISION DRAWN BY: B.L.T. APPROVED BY: W.K.P. CHECKED BY: 1 OF 8 DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) AT 400' MAINLINE END OF ACCELERATION LANE TAPER DECELERATION LANE TAPER 500' ' DELINEATORS ALSO ON THE LEFT OF RIGHT-CURVING RAMP WHEN RADIUS IS LESS THAN 1000' (TYPICAL) WHEN THE RAMP RADIUS IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 480', USE FLEXIBLE YELLOW ING DELINEATORS AT ALL LOCATIONS INTERCHANGE AREA SEE NOTES FOR DELINEATOR OVERLAP (TYPICAL) DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINTS 100' 100' 100' DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT END OF ACCELERATION LANE TAPER DECELERATION LANE TAPER 5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) AT 400' MAINLINE INTERCHANGE DELINEATION 2 OF 8

MEDIAN CROSSOVER (FREEWAYS AND FREE ACCESS) DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER 4 SPACES AT 100' AT INTERSECTIONS NOTE: BEGIN OR END DELINEATORS AT CURB RETURN OR SPRING POINT. DIVIDED HIGHWAY & MEDIAN CROSSOVER 4 SPACES AT 100' AT INTERSECTIONS RURAL TWO-LANE TWO-WAY ROADWAYS (OPTIONAL) 5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) END OF ACCELERATION LANE DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT BEGIN DECELERATION LANE ' ' REST AREA & WEIGH STATION DELINEATOR FACE 90 DELINEATOR FACE RADIAL TANGENT DELINEATOR FACE 90 DELINEATOR FACE RADIAL DELINEATOR ORIENTATION ON HORIZONTAL CURVES FOR ONE WAY TRAFFIC 3 OF 8

LEGEND DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON RIGID STEEL POSTS WHITE PANEL DELINEATORS: 400' MAXIMUM ON TANGENT AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS GREATER THAN 3500' 200' MAXIMUM IN INTERCHANGE AREAS 100' MAXIMUM ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS YELLOW PANEL DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM IN MERGE OR DIVERGE AREAS OF MAJOR ROADWAYS 100' MAXIMUM ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS BACK TO BACK WHITE PANEL DELINEATORS: 400' MAXIMUM ON TANGENT AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS GREATER THAN 3500' 100' MAXIMUM ALONG RIGHT TURN LANES RED PANEL DELINEATORS ON BACK OF WHITE PANEL DELINEATORS RED PANEL DELINEATORS ON BACK OF YELLOW PANEL DELINEATORS GREEN PANEL DELINEATORS DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON FLEXIBLE POSTS 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM IN INTERCHANGE AREAS 100' MAXIMUM ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS 3" x 12" YELLOW ING DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM IN MERGE OR DIVERGE AREAS OF MAJOR ROADWAYS 100' MAXIMUM ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS 3" x 12" RED ING ON BACK OF 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS 3" x 12" RED ING ON BACK OF 3" x 12" YELLOW ING DELINEATORS BACK TO BACK 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS NOTE: WHEN THE ABOVE CONFLICTS WITH THE CURVE CHARTS ON 5, USE WHICHEVER VALUE RESULTS IN THE CLOSER. 4 OF 8

CURVE RADIUS KNOWN CURVE RADIUS UNKNOWN RADIUS (R) OF CURVE (FT) (S) ON CURVE (FT) BEFORE/AFTER CURVE CURVE ADVISORY SPEED (MPH)* (S) ON CURVE (FT) BEFORE/AFTER CURVE 2S 3S 6S 2S 3S 6S 50 20 40 25 25 50 75 30 90 25 40 80 230 40 80 30 50 100 325 50 100 35 450 40 70 140 210 595 70 140 210 45 80 1 7 80 1 50 90 270 950 90 270 55 100 200 11 100 200 115 230 1395 110 220 65 130 2 1650 70 140 280 1930 130 2 75 1 2230 140 280 * POSTED OR STATUTORY SPEED LIMIT IF NO ADVISORY POSTED 2550 2895 1 32 170 3650 40 190 4495 200 4950 210 5430 220 5930 230 6450 6995 250 75 2 8 270 87 280 9395 290 10,050-17,830 17,830 NORMAL THE "S" IS FOUND USING THE FORMULA S = 3 R - 50 WHERE "R" IS THE RADIUS OF THE CURVE IN FEET. BEYOND (6S, 3S, 2S) ON CURVE (S) (SEE CHART) IN ADVANCE (2S, 3S, 6S) BEYOND (6S, 3S, 2S) ON CURVE (S) (SEE CHART) IN ADVANCE (2S, 3S, 6S) IN ADVANCE (6S, 3S, 2S) ON CURVE (S) (SEE CHART) BEYOND (2S, 3S, 6S) NOTE: DELINEATORS SHALL BE PLACED ON TWO LANE TWO WAY ROADWAY HORIZONTAL CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF 1900' OR LESS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE REGION/TSC TRAFFIC AND IN ADVANCE (6S, 3S, 2S) ON CURVE (S) (SEE CHART) BEYOND (2S, 3S, 6S) SAFETY ENGINEER. DELINEATOR FACE SHALL BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR (OR RADIAL) TO ROADWAY. DELINEATOR LOCATION ON FREEWAY AND DIVIDED ROADWAY CURVES DELINEATOR LOCATION ON TWO LANE TWO WAY ROADWAY CURVES 5 OF 8

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL DELINEATOR LOCATED 1 FOOT BEHIND TYPE 1 LAST POST (FROM APPROACH END) TYPE 2 FIRST POST (FROM APPROACH END) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS GREEN DELINEATORS AT GUARDRAIL INSTALLATIONS 6 OF 8

START OF DECELERATION LANE OR TAPER (TYP) MAINTENANCE CROSSOVER EACH END OF CURB & GUTTER RUN INTERSECTION NOTE: MAY BE OMITTED AT FREEWAY RAMP TERMINALS DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF OTHER DELINEATORS EACH END OF CURB & GUTTER RUN AT CATCH BASINS IN YARDS AND FIELDS CURB & GUTTER AND CATCH BASINS GREEN DELINEATOR LOCATIONS 7 OF 8

TOP OF DELINEATOR REFLECTOR APPROX. FLUSH WITH POST TOP AGGREGATE 2'-0" TOP OF DELINEATOR REFLECTOR APPROX. FLUSH WITH POST TOP TOP OF REFLECTIVE ING SHALL BE 1" BELOW TOP OF POST AGGREGATE 2'-0" EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION 4'-0"< EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION 4'-0"< 2'-0" 4'-0"< INSTALLATION OF DELINEATOR REFLECTORS ON RIGID STEEL POST CURB DEPTH AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE ING ON FLEXIBLE POST 3" 1 " 7'-0" < 1" 1" " DIAMETER HOLES (BEFORE GALVANIZING) AT 1" O.C. (18 MINIMUM) 12" 1 " " DIA. HOLE (TYP.) ƒ" R (TYP.) DELINEATOR REFLECTOR DETAIL NOTES: DELINEATORS SHOULD BE PLACED 2'-0" BEYOND THE AGGREGATE, 2'-0" BEYOND THE FACE OF A BARRIER CURB, IMMEDIATELY BEHIND THE GUARDRAIL POST, OR AS NEAR AS POSSIBLE BEHIND CONCRETE BARRIER. DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON FLEXIBLE POSTS SHALL NOT BE PLACED BEHIND GUARDRAIL. FLEXIBLE POST DELINEATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD PLAN, OR WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ON RAMPS, WHITE DELINEATORS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE RIGHT AND YELLOW DELINEATORS SHALL ALSO BE PLACED ON THE LEFT FOR A RIGHT-CURVING RAMP WITH A RADIUS OF 1000' OR LESS. WHERE DELINEATION ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROADWAY OR RAMP ENDS AND DELINEATION ON THE OTHER SIDE APPEARS, AN OVERLAP OF TWO DELINEATOR INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE USED. RED DELINEATORS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE BACK OF RAMP DELINEATORS TO FACE WRONG-WAY TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS. PLACEMENT SHALL START AT RAMP TERMINAL AND END MILE IN ADVANCE OF THE DECELERATION LANE..852" X Y.382" 2.25" NOMINAL WEIGHT = 1.12 LBS/FT MINIMUM MOMENT OF INERTIA ABOUT X-X AXIS = 0.031 in. 4 RIGID STEEL POST DETAIL.871" DELINEATORS SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL RAMPS AT RURAL INTERCHANGES WHETHER OR NOT THE INTERCHANGES ARE LIGHTED. DELINEATORS SHALL BE OMITTED ALONG THE THROUGH ROADWAY BETWEEN INTERCHANGES WHERE FIXED SOURCE LIGHTING EXISTS. DELINEATOR PLACEMENT SHOULD CONTINUE WHERE GUARDRAIL OR CONCRETE BARRIER IS PRESENT. DO NOT PLACE DELINEATORS BEHIND GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINALS EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON 6 OF THIS STANDARD. IF TERRAIN OR OTHER FACTORS PROHIBIT POST MOUNTED DELINEATOR PLACEMENT, INSTALLATION OF GUARDRAIL OR BARRIER MOUNTED ENHANCED DELINEATORS IS RECOMMENDED. ALTERNATE DELINEATOR LOCATION METHOD: THE FIRST DELINEATOR ON EACH SIDE OF THE ROADWAY IS LOCATED FROM THE AGGREGATE. A NEW OFFSET REFERENCE IS GENERATED BY MEASURING FROM THE LOCATED DELINEATOR TO THE STRIPED EDGELINE. THIS MEASUREMENT CAN BE USED TO LOCATE THE OTHER DELINEATORS IN A CORRIDOR OF SIMILAR CROSS SECTION. 8 OF 8