Type of Containment Systems in select 30 cities

Similar documents
Sl.No. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Saharanpur Muzaffarnagar Shamli Bijnor Moradabad Sambhal

A systematic approach to scale up FSM services Case of Government of Maharashtra

BLIND SPOT IN NAMAMI GANGE

Citywide Coordination & Regulation of Septage Management Services - Opportunities in Vizag, India

FSM is not just an urban issue Findings from a rapid assessment in rural Vietnam

WWCH 2018 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

Citywide Inclusive Sanitation in Practice

Government of Bihar GUIDELINES FOR FAECAL SLUDGE AND SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT IN BIHAR

PAS Project 1. SaniPlan Tool. PAS Project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

Operationalising Septage Management guidelines in Tamilnadu. Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Government of Tamilnadu

Urban Sanitation Strategies and City Sanitation Planning

GIZ Support to Ministry of Urban Development Training on Preparation of City Sanitation Plan Part I State of Andhra Pradesh

MANAGEMENT OF FAECAL SLUDGE BY RAJSHAHI CITY CORPORATION

RESEARCH PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ON-SITE TREATMENT OF FAECAL SLUDGE

PAS Project, CEPT University, INDIA

ASSESSING THE EXISTING CONTAINMENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF FAECAL SLUDGE IN A WARD OF KHULNA CITY

A guide to septage transfer stations

Co-Composting of Municipal Solid Waste and Faecal Sludge for Agriculture in Kushtia Municipality, Bangladesh

Toilets And Beyond How to implement ODF+ in small towns in India. Aasim Mansuri Dhruv Bhavsar & Omkar Kane CEPT University

Haryana Fecal Sludge & Septage Management (FSSM) Policy

Emptying pit latrines

Primer on Faecal Sludge and Septage Management

DISTRICT WILSE ANALYSIS OF IEM s FILED FROM TO BAREILLY PRINTING &

PAS Project 1 CITY SANITATION PLAN. for SINNAR Municipality. PAS Project, CEPT University, INDIA

Faecal Sludge Management in Kushtia Municipality

REPORT ON POOLING OF CENTRAL AND STATE SAMPLE DATA OF NSS 66 th ROUND (July June 2010)

Septage Management (Capture to Disposal) - Regulations 2016

Urban pit waste management

DISTRICT WILSE ANALYSIS OF IEM s FILED FROM TO ALIGARH 12 GENERATION OF FUEL ALIGARH 34 PROCESSING/SORTING MISC.

RELN Septic & Holding Tanks

Breaking the stigma around manual pit emptiers in Freetown and transforming faecal sludge into a useful product

Faecal Sludge and Septage Management

ADB Wastewater Management Program in Viet Nam

Suggested improvements to existing decanting station at Anna stadium Trichy

SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT. A Practitioner s Guide Urban India's journey beyond ODF

Operationalizing FSM regulations at city level: a case study of Warangal, India

FAECAL SLUDGE AND SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT

Approaches for Planning Wastewater and Septage Systems in the Philippines

Odisha Urban Septage Management Guidelines, For Urban Local Bodies in Odisha

Faecal Sludge Treatment Technologies in India - Compendium

A GUIDE TO SEPTAGE TRANSFER STATIONS

When is Septage Really Septage? GLAD TO SEE YOU MADE THE MOVE!

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Fecal Sludge Management for Municipalities in Gujarat(Draft) Urban Management Centre. PAS program.

The use of transfer stations for faecal sludge management in Accra, Ghana

Septage treatment in Indonesia: lessons from field investigations in seven cities

Faecal Sludge Management in Urban India: Policies, Practices, and Possibilities

GIS analysis and optimization of faecal sludge logistics at city-wide scale in Kampala, Uganda

Testing and developing of desludging units for emptying pit latrines and septic tanks

FINAL RESULT FOR THE POST OF CATEGORY C /CLERICAL CADRE OF UTTAR PRADESH CIVIL COURT STAFF UNDER CENTRALIZED RECRUITMENT SCHEME-2014

CONTRACT TERM: APRIL 28, 2018 THROUGH APRIL 27, 2020 RES. NO

Guidebook for Urban Local Bodies to Implement Septage Management Plan

Septage Management in India

What is essential for the decentralized waste water management? Experience of Japan, Malaysia, India

Scheduled Desludging Services in Indonesia

Our Company AUSWASTE

Domestic Wastewater Program. Septage Update. Focus On Change 2017

GL0098P Beta+ Septic Tanks Installation & Operation Guidelines

Towards More Sustainable Faecal Sludge Management Through Innovative Financing

List of Files (NOC/ Consent/ Authorization - HW/BMW) Consent To Establish - CTE (NOC)

Co-treatment of Septage with Municipal Wastewater in Medium Sized Cities in Vietnam

Sewerage Service Regulation, Fees and Charges Bylaw

LIST OF MSME CREDIT GROWTH INITIATIVE BRANCHES

Presentation on URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR MEERUT CITY. Presentation by: Meerut Development Authority

Workshop on Septage Treatment Technology October 20-21st 2016 Hotel Hyatt, Kalyani Nagar, Pune

Advanced Railway Pension Access Network

SEPTIC TANKS. Round septic tanks. Standard version ECO version. Rectangular septic tanks. ECO version

Creative Commons License

Although Indonesia has 150 septage treatment plants, 90 percent are no longer in operation and only four percent of collected septage is treated at a

OPTIONS FOR DEALING WITH FULL PITS...

SASKATCHEWAN AMENDMENTS TO APPENDICES OF THE NATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, 2005

Sectoral Perspective: Domestic Water and the Role of Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Rebecca R. de Vera Project Management Officer

Faecal Sludge Management in Toamasina, Madagascar and Bamako, Mali. Experiences of Protos

PORTER TOWNSHIP CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN PUBLIC WORKS SECTION PART 60 SEPTAGE RECEIVING ORDINANCE ORDINANCE #

Water Residuals Management Presented by Michael F. Graves, PE CP&Y Co-Authors Larry L. Hare, PE Oklahoma City J. Dustin Segraves Oklahoma City

RAS & WAS Pumps (FLYGT Pump)

HYDROCARBON SEPARATORS

Sludge Management EENV Overview of Sludge Treatment & Disposal

Sewerage Services.

Western Virginia Water Authority Schedule of Monthly Water Rates Roanoke City and Roanoke County Customers

STUDY OF MOBILITY PLAN IN LIGHT OF UPCOMING METRO RAILWAY IN MEERUT CITY REROUTINGOF CITYBUSROUTES ALLOCATIONOFDEPOTSOFUPSRTCANDMCTSL

National/scandinavian requirements for septic tanks

Western Virginia Water Authority Schedule of Monthly Water Rates Franklin County Customers

A WORLD OF ORANGE TRUCK MASTER YEARBOOK

CHAPTER 20.1 WASTEWATER HAULING. Section Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply:

ANGLIAN WATER SERVICES LTD. Great Billing Wastewater Treatment Works Odour Management Plan

I. The MWSS Regulatory Office. Role Function Structure. Legal Framework Reasons for Privatization Objectives of Privatization

KESSEL-Grease Separator Under sink

DIRECTIONS ISSUED TO LICENSED PROVIDERS PURSUANT TO STANDARD LICENCE CONDITION B1 THE WATER INDUSTRY COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND.

A snapshot of Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. in the WHO Region of the Americas

LOW CARBON IPT ACTION PLAN FOR UDAIPUR

OSCAR- LOWeFLOW Treatment System Homeowner s Manual. January 2016

WHO / UNICEF. Joint Monitoring Programme. for Water Supply and Sanitation. Estimates for the use of. Improved Sanitation Facilities

ATTACHMENT 3: SPECIFICATION FOR SEWER CLEANING

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION CENTER AND FORT RUCKER FORT RUCKER, ALABAMA

Washtenaw County DESIGN PROCEDURES AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

2. Director (W &P) UPPTCL, Shakti Bhawan Extn,3rd floor, 14, Ashok Marg, Lucknow (Fax: )

ROTAMAT Sludge Acceptance Plant Ro 3

Western Virginia Water Authority Schedule of Monthly Water Rates Botetourt County Customers

% % % % % LANGUAGE

GAMMA Septic Tanks Installation & Operation Guidelines

Transcription:

Type of Containment Systems in select 30 cities Break up of containment systems 8% 5% 3%2% 1%0% 45% Septic Tank connected to open drain Fully Lined Tank connected to open drain Lined Pit with semi-permeable walls and open bottom Lined Tank with impermeable walls and open bottom Septic Tank connected to soak pit 36% Pit Latrine Fully Lined Tank connected to open ground Septic Tank connected to open ground/water body

Type of Emptying in select 30 cities Break up of emptiers Break up of vehicles 9% 50% 50% Manual Mechanical Truck Mounted Tractor Mounted 91%

Extent of faecal sludge treatment FS treated 13% FS not treated FS treated FS not treated 87%

CLUSTER 1: Cities with population more than 10 lakh Lucknow, Kanpur, Agra, Allahabad, Meerut, Banaras, Aligarh

Large Cities ( More than 10 lakh) City Population FS collected based on current demand (in KLD) FS generated in KLD (based on once in 3 years emptying) Allahabad 11,12,544 72 Varanasi 1198491 22 223 246 Aligarh 8,89,408 84 346 Meerut 1305429 230 Kanpur 2765348 320 Lucknow 2817105 350 Agra 1874542 260 370 388 673 479 Total 1,19,62,867 1338 2725

Characteristics of cluster 1 : Large Cities Around 44% population is dependent on centralized sewerage system, but wastewater of only 28% is safely treated 32% population dependent on tanks connected to open drains In absence of scheduled desludging, only 40-50% of FS generated gets emptied, rest remains in the tank and reduces the treatment efficiency of the septic tank 72 % emptier are private operators - 90% of the vacuum tankers are tractor mounted rest are truck mounted. Due to inaccessible tanks ( lack of small scale mechanized systems), manual emptying is still observed There are 38 STPs with cumulative capacity of 1560 MLD which receive 1265MLD of sewage as on date More than 30 private operators are registered with local bodies As a preliminary measure Allahabad, Meerut and Lucknow have allowed the discharge of collected faecal sludge to its pumping stations and Kanpur allows it to be directly discharged into its STP. The faecal sludge collected by unregistered operators is disposed in drains/fields/ponds

CLUSTER 2: Cities with population between 5 and 10 lakh Jhansi, Firozabad, Moradabad, Gorakhpur, Loni

Medium Cities ( 5-10 lakh) City Population FS collected based on current demand (in KLD) Jhansi 507293 10 222 Firozabad 603797 55 FS generated in KLD (based on once in 3 years emptying) 242 Moradabad 887871 243 Gorakhpur 673446 120 478 314 Loni 516082 50 235 Total 3188489 474 1491

Characteristics of cluster 2 More than 70% population is dependent on tanks connected to open drain and roughly half of them qualify to be called as septic tanks In absence of scheduled desludging, only 30% of FS generated gets emptied, rest remains in the tank and reduces the treatment efficiency of the septic tank 78 % emptying is done by private operators. 40% of the vacuum tankers are truck mounted rest all are tractor mounted Due to inaccessible tanks, manual emptying is rampant There are 4 STPs of cumulative capacity of 133 MLD which receives only 81 MLD sewage Only Jhansi has a designated disposal site, in rest of the cities the collected faecal sludge is disposed in drains/fields/ponds - 1 FSTP of 6 KLD, which receives around 3KLD as on date

CLUSTER 3: Cities with population between 1.2 and 5 lakh Bahraich, Raebareli, Fatehpur, Amroha, Ayodhya, Hapur

City Small and medium cities ( 1.2-5 lakh) Population FS collected based on current demand (in KLD) FS generated in KLD (based on once in 3 years emptying) Bahraich 186223 30 74 Raebareli 1,91,316 40 65 Fatehpur 193193 40 101 Amroha 1,98,471 78 109 Ayodhya - Faizabad 221118 40 95 Hapur 262983 58 107 Total 1253304 286 551

Characteristics of cluster 3 More than 60% population is dependent on tanks connected to open drain and 28% of them qualify to be called as septic tanks In absence of scheduled desludging, only 40-50% of FS generated gets emptied, rest remains in the tank and reduces the treatment efficiency of the septic tank 94% of the vacuum tankers are tractor mounted rest are truck mounted Due to inaccessible tanks, manual emptying is rampant There is only 1 STP of 12 MLD in Ayodhya which receives only 6 MLD sewage as on date There is no designated disposal site for the collected faecal sludge hence it is disposed in drains/fields/ponds

CLUSTER 4: Cities with population less than 1.2 lakh Saidpur,Hastinapur,,Chunar, Ramnagar, Gangaghat, Bijnor, Baraut, Balia, Shikohabad, Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Nagar, Chandousi, Basti

Small cities (less than 1.2 lakh) City (Nagar Palika /Parishaed) Populati on FS FS collected generated based on in KLD current demand (in KLD) Saidpur 24338 3 11 Hastinapur 26452 3 11 Chunar 37185 4.5 15 Ramnagar 49132 4.5 4 Gangaghat 84072 6 39 Bijnor 93297 12 49 Baraut 103764 32 51 Balia 104424 34 35 Shikohabad 107300 10 43 Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay 109650 34 48 Chandousi 1,14,383 50 53 Basti 114657 38 50 Total 968654 231 409

Characteristics of cluster 4 More than 60% population is dependent on tanks connected to open drain and roughly half of them qualify to be called as septic tanks Ramnagar, Chandousi and Baraut have some kind of sewerage network, but there is negligible treatment of waste water Quite a few households don t even have an open drains in their neighbourhood In absence of scheduled desludging, only 50% of FS generated gets emptied, rest remains in the tank and reduces the treatment efficiency of the septic tank 81% emptying is done by private operators- 95% of the vacuum tankers are tractor mounted Due to inaccessible tanks, manual emptying is rampant Except Bijnor no other city has any sewage treatment plant, 24 MLD STP at Bijnor is yet to be commissioned There is no dedicated faecal sludge treatment plant in any of the cities in the cluster, the collected faecal sludge is disposed in drains/fields/ponds

Proposed FSSM Approach Urban Areas in U.P. % Households with On-site Sanitation Systems Town/Cities Saidpur, Hastinapur, Chunar, Ramnagar, Gangaghat, Bijnor, Baraut, Balia, Shikohabad, Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Nagar, Chandousi, Basti Jhansi, Loni, Moradabad, Gorakhpur, Bahraich, Fatehpur, Amroha, Ayodhya-Faizabad, Hapur, Shahjahanpur 100 Full FSSM Full FSSM Partial FSSM Raebareli, Firozabad, Bareilly Aligarh, Meerut 75 Partial FSSM Partial FSSM Partial FSSM 50 Allahabad, Varanasi, Agra, Kanpur, Lucknow, Ghaziabad Partial FSSM Gap filling FSSM Gap filling FSSM Cluster 4 (less than 1.2 lakh) Cluster 2 & 3 ( 1.2 10 lakh) Town / Cities (population) Cluster 1 (more than 10 lakh) Full FSM with dedicated treatment facility Partial FSSM Combined FSSM & Sewerage system; co- treatment; DEWATs; On-site treatment system, FSSTP wherever necessary. Gap Filling Complete Sewerage; FSSM only for non - sewered pockets with treatment at FSSTP or Co-treatment at STP