Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Similar documents
Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Quarterly Progress Report

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

Predator Program Office

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

ANALYSIS OF NON-TACTICAL VEHICLE UTILIZATION AT FORT CARSON COLORADO

SMC Standard SMC-S June Supersedes: New issue. Air Force Space Command SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER STANDARD

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Champions & Facilitators. Mr. David Franke HQ AFMC/AQ

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

Transcription:

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4 Interim Technical Report SERC-2012-TR-015-4 March 31, 2012 Principal Investigator: Dr. Walter Bryzik, DeVlieg Chairman and Professor Mechanical Engineering - Wayne State University Team Members Dr. Gary Witus, Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering -Wayne State University Contract Number: H98230-08-D-0171 Report No. SERC-2012-TR-015-4 March 31, 2012 DO2, TTO2, RT0026

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 31 MAR 2012 2. REPORT TYPE Final 3. DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER H98230-08-D-0171 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Bryzik /Dr. Walter 5d. PROJECT NUMBER RT 26-4 5e. TASK NUMBER DO2 TTO2 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Stevens Institute of Technology Wayne State University 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) DASD (SE) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER SERC-2012-TR-015-4 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT TARDEC s mission is to conduct full service life cycle engineering support to the TACOM Life Cycle Management Command and the Program Executive Offices associated with it, for all DoD ground vehicle system acquisition and life cycle management. The TARDEC Systems Engineering Group is constantly looking for systems engineering methods, tools and procedures (MPT) to support this mission. TARDEC has found that many systems engineers from the automobile industry have significant experience in systems engineering (SE), but lack experience in some of the competencies deemed critical to systems engineering in the DoD workforce. This research will identify the differences between education needs of system engineers in both industry and the DoD workforce, and develop methods, processes and tools to address the shortfalls in educating SEs in the DoD workforce. This report summarizes work done in the phase 4 of the project on Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Copyright 2012 Stevens Institute of Technology, Systems Engineering Research Center This material is based upon work supported, in whole or in part, by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) under Contract H98230-08-D-0171. SERC is a federally funded University Affiliated Research Center managed by Stevens Institute of Technology Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense. NO WARRANTY THIS STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN AS-IS BASIS. STEVENS MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. STEVENS DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribution except as restricted below. Internal use:* Permission to reproduce this material and to prepare derivative works from this material for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and No Warranty statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works. External use:* This material may be reproduced in its entirety, without modification, and freely distributed in written or electronic form without requesting formal permission. Permission is required for any other external and/or commercial use. Requests for permission should be directed to the Systems Engineering Research Center at dschultz@stevens.edu * These restrictions do not apply to U.S. government entities. Report No. SERC-2012-TR-015-4 March 31, 2012 2

RESEARCH TOPIC DESCRIPTION TARDEC's mission is to conduct full service life cycle engineering support to the TACOM Life Cycle Management Command and the Program Executive Offices associated with it, for all DoD ground vehicle system acquisition and life cycle management. The TARDEC Systems Engineering Group is constantly looking for systems engineering methods, tools and procedures (MPT) to support this mission. TARDEC has found that many systems engineers from the automobile industry have significant experience in systems engineering (SE), but lack experience in some of the competencies deemed critical to systems engineering in the DoD workforce. This research will identify the differences between education needs of system engineers in both industry and the DoD workforce, and develop methods, processes and tools to address the shortfalls in educating SEs in the DoD workforce. 3

This page intentionally left blank 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS Research Topic Description... 3 Table of Contents... 5 Figures... 6 1 Introduction... 7 2 Project Status... 7 2.1 Task 1: Identify TARDEC SE Needs... 7 2.2 Task 2: Identify SE Education Gaps... 7 2.3 Task 3: Case Studies... 7 2.3.1 Requirements Definition for Versatile Ground Vehicles... 8 2.3.2 Case Study No. 2: Application of SE to S&T Projects... 8 2.4 Task 4: Dissemination Packaging... 8 3 Project Plans... 9 3.1 Task 1: Identify TARDEC SE Needs... 9 3.2 Task 2: Identify SE Education Gaps... 9 3.3 Task 3: Case Studies... 9 3.4 Task 4: Dissemination... 9 Appendix... 10 MTRS Communications and Situation Awareness MAST Project Plan... 10 Annex A: Technology Transition Agreement (TTA)...10 Annex B: MCSAM Requirement and Summary...10 Annex C: Technical Review Guidelines...10 Annex D: Technical Review Checklists...10 Annex E: Requirement SUmmary...10 Annex F: MCSAM PP Req. Management Plan...10 Annex G: MCSAM PP Conf Management Plan...10 Annex H: MCASAM Risk Management Plan...10 5

FIGURES 6

1 INTRODUCTION This report documents sixth quarter progress and seventh quarter plans for project RT26. Fifth quarter activities focused on the second case study of Task 3, the application of SE processes to Science and Technology (S&T) projects. The details of these developments are described in Section 2, Project Status. Plans for the next quarter are described in Section 3, Project Plans. 2 PROJECT STATUS 2.1 TASK 1: IDENTIFY TARDEC SE NEEDS No activity. This task was completed in the first quarter. 2.2 TASK 2: IDENTIFY SE EDUCATION GAPS No activity. This task was completed in the first quarter. 2.3 TASK 3: CASE STUDIES In coordination with TARDEC, we are conducting two case studies. The first case study on requirements definition for versatile ground vehicles was previously completed and delivered. The second case study applying SE to Science and Technology (S&T) projects is in progress. The objective products of the second case study are snapshots of the RDECOM Project Plan at several points during the execution of a project. The Project Plan is RDECOM requirement (OPORD 10-065) that replaces the requirement for a Systems Engineering Management Plan. The Project Plan combines the Project Management Plan and the Systems Engineering Management Plan. In the current quarter, we completed drafts of the Project Plan as of the Stakeholder Needs Review, the System Requirements Review, and the Critical Design Review (we previously completed a draft Project Plan as of the Preliminary Design Review). We reviewed and discussed these drafts with TARDEC in a series of meeting. The draft Project Plan snapshots completed this quarter are attached as appendices. 7

2.3.1 REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION FOR VERSATILE GROUND VEHICLES A presentation and draft report on the first case study were completed and previously delivered. The case study was presented and discussed at the SERC Annual Review. 2.3.2 CASE STUDY NO. 2: APPLICATION OF SE TO S&T PROJECTS In coordination with TARDEC, we are conducting two case studies. The first case study on requirements definition for versatile ground vehicles was previously completed and delivered. The second case study applying SE to Science and Technology (S&T) projects is in progress. The objective of the second case study were initially intended to illustrate TARDEC s Systems Engineering process applied to a real S&T project. Later TARDEC objectives shifted to illustrating the Project Plan at several points in the course of an S&T project, specifically at the technical reviews. The August 2010 RDECOM OPORD 10-065 folded the Systems Engineering Management Plan and Project Management Plan into a combined Project Plan. Annex B to the RDECOM OPORD provided a template for the Project Plan. TARDEC s interest is to elucidate the template by way of an illustration. The current draft version of the example Project Plan is attached in the Appendix. 2.4 TASK 4: DISSEMINATION PACKAGING A presentation and draft report on the first case study were previously delivered. The draft report from the second case study is attached in Appendix A. 8

3 PROJECT PLANS This section describes project plans for the second quarter. 3.1 TASK 1: IDENTIFY TARDEC SE NEEDS This task has been completed. No activity is planned. 3.2 TASK 2: IDENTIFY SE EDUCATION GAPS This task has been completed. No activity is planned. 3.3 TASK 3: CASE STUDIES TARDEC as continued to provide guidance regarding the content and level of detail desired in the Project Plan snapshots. In the following quarter we will complete the Project Plan snapshots. 3.4 TASK 4: DISSEMINATION At the end of the next quarter, we plan to deliver a illustrations of the S&T Project Plan and associated SE artifacts as it would be at additional technical review points, for the second case study. 9

APPENDIX MTRS COMMUNICATIONS AND SITUATION AWARENESS MAST PROJECT PLAN PDF including the Project plan and all Annexes are attached. Below are the Annexes: ANNEX A: TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION AGREEMENT (TTA) ANNEX B: MCSAM REQUIREMENT AND SUMMARY ANNEX C: TECHNICAL REVIEW GUIDELINES ANNEX D: TECHNICAL REVIEW CHECKLISTS ANNEX E: REQUIREMENT SUMMARY ANNEX F: MCSAM PP REQ. MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNEX G: MCSAM PP CONF MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNEX H: MCASAM RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN 10