Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Similar documents
F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

THE ALTERNATIVE FUEL PRICE REPORT

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Quarterly Progress Report

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

NEW-VEHICLE MARKET SHARES OF CARS VERSUS LIGHT TRUCKS IN THE U.S.: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

ON-ROAD FUEL ECONOMY OF VEHICLES

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

METRO CNG Program Phase I Update. Customer Service Committee April 2014

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

BENEFITS OF RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

Emerging Technologies

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Agenda Item No. 6b June 24, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

New Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel and new engines and vehicles with advanced emissions control systems offer significant air quality improvement.

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Alternative Fuel Price Report

Fueling Savings: Higher Fuel Economy Standards Result In Big Savings for Consumers

Helping Ensure. Electric & Hybrid Vehicles Are Fully Contributing to the Maintenance of America s Transportation Network

Clean Cities Presentation

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Your Fuel Can Pay You: Maximize the Carbon Value of Your Fuel Purchases. Sean H. Turner October 18, 2017

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

7000 Series Railcar Program Overview

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 5: UPDATE THROUGH 2012

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

Impacts of Weakening the Existing EPA Phase 2 GHG Standards. April 2018

Economic Development Benefits of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in Massachusetts. Al Morrissey - National Grid REMI Users Conference 2017 October 25, 2017

The Funding of Pupil Transportation In North Carolina March, 2001

Transcription:

U.S. Department Of Transportation Federal Transit Administration FTA-WV-26-7006.2008.1 Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices Final Report Sep 2, 2008

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE Sep 2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices 6. AUTHOR(S) Nigel N. Clark, Feng Zhen, W. Scott Wayne, and Donald W. Lyons 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines & Emissions Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 Website URL [cafee.wvu.edu] 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Final Report / Sep 2008 5. FUNDING NUMBERS WV-26-7006 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER FTA-WV-26-7006.2008.1 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Website URL [www.fta.dot.gov] 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER FTA-WV-26-7006.2008.1 11. Supplementary Notes. 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Available From: National Technical Information Service/NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Phone 703.605.6000, Fax 703.605.6900, Email [orders@ntis.fedworld.gov] 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) National average diesel and compressed natural gas fuel price increased to $4.71 per gallon and $14.41 per thousand cubic feet in July 2008. West Virginia University did a life cycle cost analysis for the Federal Transit Administration on diesel hybrid-electric bus technology, conventional diesel bus technology using ultra low sulfur diesel, conventional diesel bus technology using B20 biodiesel fuel, and compressed natural gas bus technology. The fuel price forecast in the previous analysis ($2.67 per gallon for diesel and $13.34 per thousand cubic feet estimated in 2008) was much lower than the current fuel price. The life cycle cost of the four technologies was recalculated according to the high fuel cost. The report addressed how fuel costs were estimated and presented the life cycle cost summary charts for the four different fuel price scenarios. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Life Cycle Cost, Capital Cost, Operation Cost, Fuel Price, Ultra Low Sulfur Bus, Bio-diesel Bus, Compressed Natural Gas Bus, -Electric Bus 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT Unclassified 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE Unclassified 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT Unclassified 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18298-102 i

DISCLAIMER NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. ii

Table of Contents Table of Contents... iii Figures... iv Table... v Acronyms... vi Introduction... 7 Fuel Price Forecasts... 8 Summary Charts... 10 Case 1: Adjusted AEO Forecast... 11 Case 2: 25% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast... 15 Case 3: 50% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast... 19 Case 4: 100% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast... 23 Discussion and Conclusions... 27 References... 29 iii

Figures Figure 1: 2008 AEO original fuel price forecast and adjusted fuel price forecast (CNG price data were all converted to the base of diesel gallon (energy) equivalent (DGE)).... 9 Figure 2: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.).... 11 Figure 3: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast... 12 Figure 4: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast... 13 Figure 5: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast... 14 Figure 6: A comparative chart for 100-Bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the 25% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.).... 15 Figure 7: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 25% higher fuel price forecast... 16 Figure 8: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 25% higher fuel price forecast... 17 Figure 9: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 25% higher fuel price forecast... 18 Figure 10: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the 50% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.).... 19 iv

Figure 11: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 50% higher fuel price forecast... 20 Figure 12: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 50% higher fuel price forecast... 21 Figure 13: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 50% higher fuel price forecast... 22 Figure 14: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.).... 23 Figure 15: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 100% higher fuel price forecast... 24 Figure 16: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast... 25 Figure 17: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast... 26 Figure 18: Four technologies incremental life cycle cost percentage to diesel technology... 28 Table Table 1: Average fuel price for the four price scenarios... 10 v

Acronyms AEO B20 Biodiesel CNG CPI DGE DOE EIA FTA LCC WVU Annual Energy Outlook 20% Biodiesel and 80% Fossil Compressed Natural Gas Consumer Price Index Gallon (Energy) Equivalent Department of Energy Energy Information Administration Federal Transit Administration Life Cycle Cost West Virginia University vi

Introduction West Virginia University did a life cycle cost (LCC) analysis a on four types of bus technologies in 2007. The year 2007 analysis estimated and compared total capital and operation costs on purchasing and operating four bus technologies from 2007 to 2019. 1. 100 diesel hybrid-electric buses 2. 100 conventional diesel buses using ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel 3. 100 compressed natural gas (CNG) buses 4. 100 conventional diesel buses using B20 biodiesel In 2008, diesel fuel price rose dramatically. In the 2007 report, the ULSD price was projected to be 2.67 $/gal in 2008 and CNG fuel price was projected to be 13.34 $/MCF b in 2008. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported the price of ULSD increased from 3.32 $/gal in January 2008 to 4.71 $/gal in July 2008 [1]. Commercial CNG price increased from 11.07 $/MCF in January 2008 to 14.41 $/MCF in June 2008 [2]. Fuel cost is a major concern in bus operation cost. The 2007 LCC were recalculated to reflect the new fuel price in 2008. The recalculated LCC was based on the latest EIA fuel price forecast [3] and calibrated with the current real-world fuel price. Three additional fuel price scenarios assumed that future fuel price would be 25%, 50%, and 100% higher than the projection in the first price scenario. a The report is available at FTA website. http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/wvu_fta_lcc_final_report_07-23- 2007.pdf b MCF = Thousand Cubic Feet. The projected prices were presented in 2007 dollars. The latest inflation rate is 1.06 from 2007 to 2008 provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 7

In the 2007 report, the operation and capital cost factors were literally presented in 2007 dollar. They were converted to 2008 dollars by adjusting with 6% inflation rate according to the latest 2007 to 2008 inflation rate obtained from the inflation calculator c provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics [4], although they were not adjusted for inflation in the 2007 LCC report. This report first introduced how the four fuel price projections were made. Life cycle cost summary charts were then created for the four scenarios and presented in the following section. Fuel Price Forecasts The following task was very similar to the analysis that was included in the 2007 LCC report. In the 2007 report, the fuel prices (CNG and diesel) were adopted from the price forecast from the 2007 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) from EIA [3]. By the time of writing, the 2008 AEO was published by EIA [3]. The authors adopted the fuel price forecast from the new AEO. The new AEO predicted the transportation fuel prices in 2006 dollars from 2005 to 2030. The price (CNG and diesel) was converted from 2006 dollars into 2008 dollars by using the rate of inflation 9% from the inflation calculator [4]. As shown in Figure 1a, AEO predicted that the price of fuel (in 2008 dollar) will drop over the next 12 years. In the figure, CNG price data were all converted to the base of diesel gallon (energy) equivalent (DGE). c The inflation calculator uses the average consumer price index (CPI) for a given calendar year. 8

$4.00 AEO Original Forecast [a] $4.50 Adjusted Forecast [b] $3.50 $4.00 2008 $/DGE $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 2008 $/DGE $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.50 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Biodiesel CNG Biodiesel CNG Figure 1: 2008 AEO original fuel price forecast and adjusted fuel price forecast (CNG price data were all converted to the base of diesel gallon (energy) equivalent (DGE)). The AEO predicted that the diesel price will be 3.50 $/gal and CNG price will be 2.00 $/DGE in year 2008. The average 2008 diesel price was 4.07 $/gal calculated from 2008 ULSD monthly prices reported by EIA (from January 2008 to July 2008) [1, 2]. The authors assumed that the average diesel price will not change for year 2008. The original AEO forecast curve was raised and aligned to the 2008 average price (4.07 $/gal) as shown in Figure 1b. The same procedure was done to the CNG price forecast by aligning the CNG price curve to $2.01 $/DGE in 2008. The B20 biodiesel price was projected in the following way. The year 2008 B100 price was taken as the base, and this was an average annual B100 price from available Clean Cities Alternative Fuel Price Reports (four quarterly reports from October 2007 to July 2008) [5]. The average fossil diesel price (from August 2007 to July 2008) was from the EIA real-world report [1, 2]. The B20 biodiesel price ($4.16) was calculated by adding 20% of the B100 biodiesel price ($4.07) and 80% of the fossil diesel price ($3.68). The price was 2% higher than the fossil diesel price (it was 4.3% in the previous LCC report). It was assumed that the B20 biodiesel price 9

would remain in the same ratio to the fossil diesel price during the 12 year period, as shown in Figure 1b. Three additional higher price cases were considered in this report. Three cases considered that future fuel price could be 25%, 50%, and 100% higher than the projected prices. Table 1 shows and compares their average 12-years fuel prices. Fuels Table 1: Average fuel price for the four price scenarios Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Adjusted AEO Forecast 25% Higher to Case 1 50% Higher to Case 1 100% Higher to Case 1 (per gallon) $3.33 $4.16 $5.00 $6.66 B20 (per gallon) $3.40 $4.25 $5.10 $6.80 CNG (per DGE) $1.91 $2.39 $2.87 $3.82 Summary Charts As mentioned in the introduction section, LCC was recalculated by introducing the new fuel price forecasts and adjusting other cost factors with 2007 to 2008 inflation. The summary charts were created and shown in this report. 10

Case 1: Adjusted AEO Forecast Price in 2008 $ Millions 100-Bus Life Cycle Cost with Agency Paying 20% of Bus Price and Paying $110 Full Price $90 $77 $81 $82 $70 $54 $55 $59 $47 $50 $30 $10 $104 -$10 CNG CNG ULSD ULSD B20 B20 Total: CC+OC Compression Electricity Facility Maintenance Propulsion-related System Maintenance Battery Replacement Fuel Costs Emissions Equipment Depot Modification Refueling Station Vehicle Cost Figure 2: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.). CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 11

100-Bus Life Cycle Cost Millions $110 $90 $77 $81 $82 $104 $70 Price in 2008 $ $50 $30 $10 -$10 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $76,523,289 $81,340,149 $82,359,664 $104,334,870 Compression Electricity $2,014,342 $0 $0 $0 Facility Maintenance $2,589,869 $2,196,633 $2,230,084 $1,851,806 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $6,634,346 $7,037,786 $6,646,798 $6,740,415 Battery Replacement $0 $0 $0 $7,155,000 Fuel Costs $25,946,468 $38,064,523 $39,441,575 $32,089,157 Emissions Equipment $0 $152,014 $152,014 $0 Depot Modification $927,500 $0 $0 $148,400 Refueling Station $2,120,000 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Cost $36,290,764 $33,889,193 $33,889,193 $56,350,093 Figure 3: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 12

$2.50 Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile $2.349 $2.00 $1.723 $1.832 $1.854 2008 $ pe bus mile $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $1.723 $1.832 $1.854 $2.349 Compression Electricity $0.045 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Facility Maintenance $0.058 $0.049 $0.050 $0.042 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.149 $0.158 $0.150 $0.152 Battery Replacement $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.161 Fuel Costs $0.584 $0.857 $0.888 $0.723 Emissions Equipment $0.000 $0.003 $0.003 $0.000 Depot Modification $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 Refueling Station $0.048 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Vehicle Cost $0.817 $0.763 $0.763 $1.269 Figure 4: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 13

Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile per Seat $0.06 $0.0587 2008 $ per passenger seat per mile per bus $0.05 $0.04 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 $0.0432 $0.0458 $0.0464 $0.00 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $0.0432 $0.0458 $0.0464 $0.0587 Compression Electricity $0.0011 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Facility Maintenance $0.0015 $0.0012 $0.0013 $0.0010 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.0037 $0.0040 $0.0037 $0.0038 Battery Replacement $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0040 Fuel Costs $0.0146 $0.0214 $0.0222 $0.0181 Emissions Equipment $0.0000 $0.0001 $0.0001 $0.0000 Depot Modification $0.0005 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0001 Refueling Station $0.0012 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Vehicle Cost $0.0205 $0.0191 $0.0191 $0.0317 Figure 5: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on the adjusted AEO fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 14

Case 2: 25% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast Price in 2008 $ Millions 100-Bus Life Cycle Cost with Agency Paying 20% of Bus Price and Paying $120 Full Price $100 $91 $92 $83 $80 $64 $65 $67 $60 $54 $40 $20 $112 $0 CNG Total: CC+OC Facility Maintenance Battery Replacement CNG ULSD ULSD B20 B20 Compression Electricity Propulsion-related System Maintenance Fuel Costs Emissions Equipment Depot Modification Refueling Station Vehicle Cost Figure 6: A comparative chart for 100-Bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the 25% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.). CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 15

100-Bus Life Cycle Cost Millions $120 $100 $91 $92 $112 $83 $80 Price in 2008 $ $60 $40 $20 $0 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $83,009,906 $90,856,280 $92,220,058 $112,357,160 Compression Electricity $2,014,342 $0 $0 $0 Facility Maintenance $2,589,869 $2,196,633 $2,230,084 $1,851,806 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $6,634,346 $7,037,786 $6,646,798 $6,740,415 Battery Replacement $0 $0 $0 $7,155,000 Fuel Costs $32,433,085 $47,580,654 $49,301,969 $40,111,446 Emissions Equipment $0 $152,014 $152,014 $0 Depot Modification $927,500 $0 $0 $148,400 Refueling Station $2,120,000 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Cost $36,290,764 $33,889,193 $33,889,193 $56,350,093 Figure 7: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 25% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 16

$2.80 Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile $2.530 2008 $ pe bus mile $2.30 $1.80 $1.30 $0.80 $1.869 $2.046 $2.077 $0.30 -$0.20 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $1.869 $2.046 $2.077 $2.530 Compression Electricity $0.045 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Facility Maintenance $0.058 $0.049 $0.050 $0.042 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.149 $0.158 $0.150 $0.152 Battery Replacement $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.161 Fuel Costs $0.730 $1.071 $1.110 $0.903 Emissions Equipment $0.000 $0.003 $0.003 $0.000 Depot Modification $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 Refueling Station $0.048 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Vehicle Cost $0.817 $0.763 $0.763 $1.269 Figure 8: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 25% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 17

Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile per Seat $0.07 $0.0632 2008 $ per passenger seat per mile per bus $0.06 $0.05 $0.04 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 $0.0468 $0.0511 $0.0519 $0.00 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $0.0468 $0.0511 $0.0519 $0.0632 Compression Electricity $0.0011 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Facility Maintenance $0.0015 $0.0012 $0.0013 $0.0010 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.0037 $0.0040 $0.0037 $0.0038 Battery Replacement $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0040 Fuel Costs $0.0183 $0.0268 $0.0278 $0.0226 Emissions Equipment $0.0000 $0.0001 $0.0001 $0.0000 Depot Modification $0.0005 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0001 Refueling Station $0.0012 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Vehicle Cost $0.0205 $0.0191 $0.0191 $0.0317 Figure 9: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 25% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 18

Case 3: 50% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast Price in 2008 $ Millions 100-Bus Life Cycle Cost with Agency Paying 20% of Bus Price and Paying $130 Full Price $110 $100 $102 $89 $90 $73 $75 $75 $70 $60 $50 $30 $10 $120 -$10 CNG CNG ULSD ULSD B20 B20 Total: CC+OC Compression Electricity Facility Maintenance Propulsion-related System Maintenance Battery Replacement Fuel Costs Emissions Equipment Depot Modification Refueling Station Vehicle Cost Figure 10: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on the 50% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.). CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 19

100-Bus Life Cycle Cost Millions $120 $100 $89 $100 $102 $120 Price in 2008 $ $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $89,496,523 $100,372,410 $102,080,452 $120,379,449 Compression Electricity $2,014,342 $0 $0 $0 Facility Maintenance $2,589,869 $2,196,633 $2,230,084 $1,851,806 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $6,634,346 $7,037,786 $6,646,798 $6,740,415 Battery Replacement $0 $0 $0 $7,155,000 Fuel Costs $38,919,702 $57,096,785 $59,162,363 $48,133,735 Emissions Equipment $0 $152,014 $152,014 $0 Depot Modification $927,500 $0 $0 $148,400 Refueling Station $2,120,000 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Cost $36,290,764 $33,889,193 $33,889,193 $56,350,093 Figure 11: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 50% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 20

$2.80 Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile $2.711 $2.30 $2.015 $2.260 $2.299 2008 $ pe bus mile $1.80 $1.30 $0.80 $0.30 -$0.20 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $2.015 $2.260 $2.299 $2.711 Compression Electricity $0.045 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Facility Maintenance $0.058 $0.049 $0.050 $0.042 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.149 $0.158 $0.150 $0.152 Battery Replacement $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.161 Fuel Costs $0.876 $1.286 $1.332 $1.084 Emissions Equipment $0.000 $0.003 $0.003 $0.000 Depot Modification $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 Refueling Station $0.048 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Vehicle Cost $0.817 $0.763 $0.763 $1.269 Figure 12: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 50% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 21

Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile per Seat $0.07 $0.0678 2008 $ per passenger seat per mile per bus $0.06 $0.05 $0.04 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 $0.0505 $0.0565 $0.0575 $0.00 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $0.0505 $0.0565 $0.0575 $0.0678 Compression Electricity $0.0011 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Facility Maintenance $0.0015 $0.0012 $0.0013 $0.0010 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.0037 $0.0040 $0.0037 $0.0038 Battery Replacement $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0040 Fuel Costs $0.0220 $0.0321 $0.0333 $0.0271 Emissions Equipment $0.0000 $0.0001 $0.0001 $0.0000 Depot Modification $0.0005 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0001 Refueling Station $0.0012 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Vehicle Cost $0.0205 $0.0191 $0.0191 $0.0317 Figure 13: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 50% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 22

Case 4: 100% Higher on Adjusted AEO Forecast Price in 2008 $ Millions 100-Bus Life Cycle Cost with Agency Paying 20% of Bus Price and Paying $140 Full Price $119 $122 $120 $102 $100 $92 $95 $91 $80 $73 $60 $40 $20 $136 $0 CNG Total: CC+OC Facility Maintenance Battery Replacement CNG ULSD ULSD B20 B20 Compression Electricity Propulsion-related System Maintenance Fuel Costs Emissions Equipment Depot Modification Refueling Station Vehicle Cost Figure 14: A comparative chart for 100-bus life cycle cost for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast (Agency pays 20% and 100% (full) of bus price.). CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 23

Millions $140 $120 100-Bus Life Cycle Cost $119 $122 $136 $100 $102 Price in 2008 $ $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $102,469,757 $119,404,672 $121,801,239 $136,424,027 Compression Electricity $2,014,342 $0 $0 $0 Facility Maintenance $2,589,869 $2,196,633 $2,230,084 $1,851,806 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $6,634,346 $7,037,786 $6,646,798 $6,740,415 Battery Replacement $0 $0 $0 $7,155,000 Fuel Costs $51,892,936 $76,129,046 $78,883,150 $64,178,314 Emissions Equipment $0 $152,014 $152,014 $0 Depot Modification $927,500 $0 $0 $148,400 Refueling Station $2,120,000 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Cost $36,290,764 $33,889,193 $33,889,193 $56,350,093 Figure 15: Total life cycle cost for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years without procurement subsidy based on 100% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 24

$3.10 $2.60 Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile $2.307 $2.689 $2.743 $3.072 2008 $ pe bus mile $2.10 $1.60 $1.10 $0.60 $0.10 -$0.40 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $2.307 $2.689 $2.743 $3.072 Compression Electricity $0.045 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Facility Maintenance $0.058 $0.049 $0.050 $0.042 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.149 $0.158 $0.150 $0.152 Battery Replacement $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.161 Fuel Costs $1.168 $1.714 $1.776 $1.445 Emissions Equipment $0.000 $0.003 $0.003 $0.000 Depot Modification $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 Refueling Station $0.048 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Vehicle Cost $0.817 $0.763 $0.763 $1.269 Figure 16: Life cycle cost per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 25

Life Cycle Cost per Bus per Mile per Seat $0.08 $0.0768 2008 $ per passenger seat per mile per bus $0.07 $0.06 $0.05 $0.04 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 $0.0578 $0.0672 $0.0686 $0.00 CNG ULSD B20 Total: CC+OC $0.0578 $0.0672 $0.0686 $0.0768 Compression Electricity $0.0011 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Facility Maintenance $0.0015 $0.0012 $0.0013 $0.0010 Propulsion-related System Maintenance $0.0037 $0.0040 $0.0037 $0.0038 Battery Replacement $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0040 Fuel Costs $0.0293 $0.0429 $0.0444 $0.0361 Emissions Equipment $0.0000 $0.0001 $0.0001 $0.0000 Depot Modification $0.0005 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0001 Refueling Station $0.0012 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Vehicle Cost $0.0205 $0.0191 $0.0191 $0.0317 Figure 17: Life cycle cost per passenger seat per bus per mile for a 100-bus fleet for 12 years based on 100% higher fuel price forecast. CC = Capital Cost, OC = Operation Cost 26

Discussion and Conclusions The LCC analysis was made for a 100-bus fleet purchase and operation. The buses were assumed to be operated at 12.7 mph average speed (national average speed). Annual mileage for each bus was 32,007 miles. When considering or selecting bus technologies, it is important to recognize that fuel economy and emissions depended strongly on bus route and bus operation conditions. The summary charts revealed that hybrid technology had a higher cost than diesel technology, without considering any hybrid incentives for all four cases. Although hybrid buses offered the best fuel economy, this was offset by the bus purchase price and battery replacement cost. However, hybrid-electric bus technology dropped from 28% to 14% higher cost compared to diesel technology as shown in Figure 18, when average diesel price increased from 3.33 $/gal to 6.66 $/gal. If the 80% federal subsidiary was considered, the two technologies were very similar on cost when diesel fuel price averaged 5.00 $/gal for 12 years (as shown in Figure 10). buses operating on B20 were not separately evaluated, but would have similar cost to hybrid buses operating on ULSD. 27

35.0% Incremental LCC Percentage to Bus Technology 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% Adjusted AEO 25% Higher 50% Higher 100% Higher B20 Biodiesel CNG 20.0% Fuel Price Forecast Scenarios Figure 18: Four technologies incremental life cycle cost percentage to diesel technology The LCC summary charts show that CNG buses are the most economic technology in four scenarios. Purchase of 100 buses was big enough to dilute the CNG infrastructure cost in the overall cost, so that the capital cost was slightly higher for CNG buses than for diesel buses. However, CNG price remains much lower than the diesel fuel price in the analysis, compensating for CNG bus throttled engine fuel economy and additional cost of procurement, infrastructure, and compression electricity. Disadvantaged by increasing fuel price, diesel buses were no longer the most economic technology in this analysis. The diesel buses fueled by B20 biodiesel were only slightly higher in overall cost due to the added expense of the fuel. Again, the nature of bus activity influences the performance of hybrid drive systems, throttled engines, and diesel engines in different ways. Relative cost differences between technologies will change with parameters such as average speed of operation and terrain (grade) of the route. 28

References 1. Energy Information Administration Weekly Retail Gasoline and Prices, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_gnd_dcus_nus_m.htm, Accessed in August, 2008. 2. Energy Information Administration Natural Gas Prices, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm, Accessed in August, 2008. 3. Annual Energy Outlook (AEO 2008), US DOE Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html, Accessed in February 2007. 4. US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index, http://www.bls.gov/bls/inflation.htm, Accessed in August 2008. 5. Alternative Fuel Price Report, US DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/price_report.html, Accessed in August 2008. 29