NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Similar documents
NDCEE. Renewable Doesn t Mean Carbon Neutral: Emerging Greenhouse Gas Inventory Challenge. E2S2 Conference Denver, Colorado May 6, 2009

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Quarterly Progress Report

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

Predator Program Office

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

INDIRECT LAND USE CHANGE, LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARDS, & CAP AND TRADE: The Role of Biofuels in Greenhouse Gas Regulation

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Portable Fluid Analyzer

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Champions & Facilitators. Mr. David Franke HQ AFMC/AQ

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

Overview of California AB32 Regulations

Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)

Transcription:

NDCEE Renewable Doesn t Mean Carbon Neutral: Emerging Greenhouse Gas Inventory Challenge DoD Executive Agent Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) FES-East Conference Bethesda, Maryland June 17, 2009 Mr. Jeremey Alcorn, CTC/NDCEE Dr. Shannon Lloyd, CTC/NDCEE The NDCEE is operated by: Technology Transfer Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 17 JUN 2009 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Renewable Doesn t Mean Carbon Neutral: Emerging Greenhouse Gas Inventory Challenge 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) (NDCEE),Concurrent Technologies Corporation,100 CTC Drive,Johnstown,PA,15904 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Presentation Overview Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Drivers Federal Efforts Moving Forward What are Biogenic Emissions? GHG Protocols and Biogenic Emissions Biogenic Emissions: Area of Concern? Calculation Example Biogenic Calculation Challenges Considerations and Next Steps 2

GHG Inventory Drivers Executive Order 13423 Complements goals of Energy Policy Act 2005 (EPAct 2005) and Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) Massachusetts v. EPA - U.S. Supreme Court (2007) EPA s GHG Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) or GHG Rule (2008) New Administration Direction State of Union call for GHG Cap and Trade System New GHG Executive Order(s) State and Regional GHG Mandates and Activities 3

Federal Efforts Moving Forward These drivers are spurring DoD and civilian federal agencies to better understand: GHG inventory frameworks Calculation methodologies Registry and regulatory programs Proactive federal GHG inventory efforts emerging in: Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (ESOH) via NDCEE NASA Headquarters and Goddard Space Flight Center Army Environmental Command U.S. Air Force National Park Service Some efforts already looking at biological sequestration 4

What are Biogenic CO 2 Emissions? Biogenic emissions are CO 2 emissions produced from combusting a variety of biofuels, such as biodiesel, ethanol, wood, wood waste and landfill gas per CCAR 2008 guidance Biogenic CO 2 could be generated by direct combustion of renewable fuels (and materials), such as: Biomass, wood, and wood waste Landfill gas / biogas Biofuels (B100, E100) Biofuel component of mixed fuels (B20, E85) Renewable energy purchases produced via combustion of: Biomass / biogas Biofuels Biomass portion of MSW 5

Most Federal Efforts Developed Using GHG Inventory Protocols/Guidance WBCSD/WRI GHG Protocol ISO 14064 Standards EPA Climate Leaders Guidance CCAR Reporting Protocol 6

GHG Protocol Overviews on Biogenic WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol, The Greenhouse Gas Protocol P.25 - Stationary emissions of biomass, not included in Scope 1 or 2 P.63 - Biologically sequestered carbon reported separately from scopes P.88 - Biologically sequestered atmospheric carbon explained U.S. EPA Climate Leaders, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol, Design Principles P.15,16 - Direct emissions from combustion of biomass, not included in Scope 1 or 2 emissions P.85 - Biofuels fall under renewable energy CCAR, General Reporting Protocol, Version 3 (April 2008) P.41 Lack of international consensus on biogenic emissions but distinct from anthropogenic emissions P.45 - Provides specific example of calculation methodology for biodiesel mixes 7

Biogenic Emissions: Area of Concern? Growing area of concern is calculation of biogenic CO 2 emissions from renewable sources Urgency with keen interest in sequestration quantification and offset projects GHG Protocols exclude biogenic (or biologically sequestered) CO 2 emissions from Scope 1 & 2 inventories But, the N 2 O or CH 4 emissions from same biomass / biofuel sources are considered anthropogenic (or human generated) and are included in Scope 1 & 2 inventories Biogenic CO 2 emissions to be calculated but are considered optional by most protocols and registry programs 8

Biogenic CO 2 Devil is in the Details Current federal inventory calculation approaches account for biogenic emissions in divergent ways Common approach is to zero out the biogenic CO 2 Pros - Easier calculation and simpler calculation paths Cons - Emission factors or calculations that omit biogenic CO 2 portion Alternative approach to fully but separately account for biogenic emissions Pros - Enables fuller accounting of GHG emissions and supports future biogenic requirements whether optional or mandatory Cons - More calculation complexity and limited emission factors Lets work through a biogenic calculation example 9

Mixed Renewable Fuel Example (B20 Combustion in Vehicle) Petrodiesel (B20) is a mixed renewable or alternative bio-fuel. It consists of 80% Petro-diesel and 20%. (B20) (B100) 10 Source: I.S. Higuchi, NASA and J. Alcorn, CTC

Mixed Renewable Fuel Example (B20 Combustion in Vehicle) Petrodiesel (B20) is a mixed renewable or alternative bio-fuel. It consists of 80% Petro-diesel and 20%. (B20) Installation Alternative Fuel Vehicle (B100) 11 Source: I.S. Higuchi, NASA and J. Alcorn, CTC

Mixed Renewable Fuel Example (B20 Combustion in Vehicle) Petrodiesel (B20) (B100) (B20) is a mixed renewable or alternative bio-fuel. It consists of 80% Petro-diesel and 20%. Installation Alternative Fuel Vehicle 80% 20% Calculating B20 s combustion emissions first requires a percentage breakdown into its fuel constituents (i.e., Petro-diesel & B100). Petro-diesel Combustion Combustion Source: I.S. Higuchi, NASA and J. Alcorn, CTC 12

Petrodiesel Mixed Renewable Fuel Example (B20 Combustion in Vehicle) (B20) is a mixed renewable or alternative bio-fuel. It consists of 80% Petro-diesel and 20%. Scope 1 Emissions N 2 O CH 4 (B20) (B100) Installation Alternative Fuel Vehicle 80% 20% Calculating B20 s combustion emissions first requires a percentage breakdown into its fuel constituents (i.e., Petro-diesel & B100). Next, the B100 s respective anthropogenic CH 4 and N 2 O emissions must be allocated to Scope 1 emissions category while its respective biogenic CO 2 emissions are reported separately. Petro-diesel Combustion Combustion N 2 O CO 2 CO 2 CH 4 Biogenic Emissions Source: I.S. Higuchi, NASA and J. Alcorn, CTC 13

Biogenic Calculation Challenges Lack of international consensus on biogenic emissions Not currently a required element Emission factors often don t differentiate between biogenic and anthropogenic or zero out the biogenic CO 2 portion Increases data calculation complexity and recordkeeping Many of GHG inventory efforts jump from Scope 1 & 2 to sequestration projects but ignore optional biogenic emissions 14

Considerations and Next Steps Despite dynamic regulations/consensus, protocols have biogenic provisions to reporting Prudently develop federal GHG inventory approaches with biogenic calculation provisions from the start because: Requires minimal resources to do so now Avoids costly rework and recalculation in the future Enables fuller accounting of GHG emissions whether biogenic emissions requirements are optional or mandatory Build awareness of optional protocol provisions Makes for easier progress to sequestration/offset projects 15

Contact Information CTC Technical Lead Shannon Lloyd, Principal Research Engineer lloyds@ctc.com (814) 248-7599 CTC Technical Team Jeremey Alcorn, Senior Environmental Engineer alcornj@ctc.com (703) 310-5662 16

Acknowledgements NDCEE Executive Agent Mr. Tad Davis, DASA (ESOH) NDCEE Program Director Mr. Hew Wolfe, ODASA (ESOH) NDCEE Program Manager Mr. Tom Guinivan, USEAC NDCEE Contracting Officer s Mr. Tom Moran, ODASA (ESOH) Representative Government Technical Monitor Mr. Pete Heinricher, ERDC-CERL NDCEE Project Manager Ms. Cristina Tomlinson, CTC Key Technical Collaborator Mr. I. Sam Higuchi, NASA This work was funded through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) and conducted under contract W74V8H-04-D-0005 Task 548. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this paper are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other official documentation. 17

Key Reference Resources WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol, The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Revised Edition - http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf U.S. EPA Climate Leaders, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol, Design Principles - http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/designprinciples.pdf CCAR, General Reporting Protocol, Version 3 (April 2008) - http://www.climateregistry.org/resources/docs/protocols/grp/grp_v3_april2008 _FINAL.pdf 18