Effect of variants for an Lurban ASEP approach

Similar documents
Christian Theis 52 nd GRB, 6-8 September 2010, ASEP outline. Summary & Conclusion

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2

Economic and Social Council

Additional Sound Emission Provisions. Additional Sound Emission Provisions

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values

Torque Influence on C3 category tyres

Revision of ASEP Considerations for Future Steps Enhancement of the presentation from Germany

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~

STUDY ON EURO 5 SOUND LEVEL LIMITS OF L-CATEGORY VEHICLES PROGRESS AND CBA RESULTS

Analysis of Swiss vehicle database for ECE-R51/02 and proposals for noise limit values from EC, Ger, Jap

Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

ASEP Development Strategy for ASEP Revision 2 Development of a Physical Expectation Model Based on UN R51.03 Annex 3 Performance Parameters

Additional Sound Emission Provisions in the new European type approval method for exterior noise of road vehicles

The ASEP Excel Sheet

Interim Report by GRB IWG ASEP About UN R51.03 ASEP by Paragraph Last Sentence Informal Document to GRB 68 (Sep-2018)

China is finding common solutions for Sub-categories of M1 and N1 Categories

The trend of noise regulation in Japan

Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles New EU Legislative proposal

Reducing Noise Emissions. Commission legislative proposal

Proposal for a Limit Value Reduction Scenario for Road Vehicles compatible with the German National Traffic Noise Prevention

Tyre noise limits of EC/661/2009 and ECE R117: Evaluation based on sold tyres in the Netherlands

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3

Study on Pass-by Noise Testing Methods Incorporating Urban Driving Conditions Test method of N2 category

Economic and Social Council

P R E S E N T A T I O N O F

Japan proposal for. Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle

Economic and Social Council

WLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class

STUDY ON EURO 5 SOUND LEVEL LIMITS OF L-CATEGORY VEHICLES

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/9

Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles. 58 th GRB (2 4 September 2013) JASIC

Statistics of tyre noise label values in Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) tyres.

Economic and Social Council

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

Road Vehicle noise Regulations and standardization Impacts and Stakes

GRRF The target of a Brake Assist System... reduce the pedal force emergency situation

Introduction. Materials and Methods. How to Estimate Injection Percentage

HARMONOISE -IMAGINE road source model

The reason why Japanese proposal Stage3 has [ ] JASIC

REGULATION No. 117 (Tyres rolling noise and wet grip adhesion) Proposal for amendment to the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2010/63. Annex 8.

Midterm Event. Holger Czuday, Bayern Innovativ 7th February Automotive Battery Recycling and 2nd Life

World Light Duty Test Procedure

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

Perodua Myvi engine fuel consumption map and fuel economy vehicle simulation on the drive cycles based on Malaysian roads

Stimulation of low noise road vehicles in the Netherlands

190 MONTAUK : Mercury 115 L4NA

Minutes. Meeting of the Member States Expert Group on AVAS for M & N category vehicles (E01295) 16 November 2016, Brussels

Tyres in Europe Tightening of tyre limits and further suggestions for improvement

a) Calculate the overall aerodynamic coefficient for the same temperature at altitude of 1000 m.

ACEA RDE Cold Start. 30 th August 2016

Bergey Excel 10 MCS Certification Summary

INTER-NOISE AUGUST 2007 ISTANBUL, TURKEY

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Economic and Social Council

Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation

124 th MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP ON "MOTOR VEHICLES" 20 October 2014 Agenda item 4:

EXAMPLES OF PRODUCT ENGINEERING WITH OPTISLANG AT DIESEL SYSTEMS

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.91/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.91/Rev.1/Amend.2

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No.79 (Steering equipment)

Audi TT 68% 81% 64% 82% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Pedestrian.

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) GRBP 68 th session

DRAFT REPORT 2nd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:10min)

2ND EXAM OF MAIN MACHINERY AND AUXILIARY MARINE SYSTEMS

Low Carbon Vehicle Technology Project Benchmarking and Teardown Activities Undertaken on Nissan Leaf and Chevrolet Volt

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (Noise of M and N categories of vehicles)

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79

Proposals for amendments to Regulation No. 63

Transmitted by the expert from Germany

APPLICATION NOTE AN-ODP March 2009

Horizontal Alignment

Modeling tire vibrations in ABS-braking

* * * Brussels, 9 February 2015

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.40/Rev.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.40/Rev.2

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

LinMot. Tutorial LinMot Designer NTI AG LinMot Bodenaeckerstr. 2 CH-8957 Spreitenbach

Multi-Body Simulation of Powertrain Acoustics in the Full Vehicle Development

Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006

A CO2 based indicator for severe driving? (Preliminary investigations - For discussion only)

An algorithm for braking curve calculations in ERTMS train protection systems

CMP271 Initial thoughts on Cost Recovery of GB Demand Transmission Charges

WLTP Revision 1

The DDFT is the time period from the moment the doors start to close till the moment the doors are fully open on the next target floor.

Simulation of Collective Load Data for Integrated Design and Testing of Vehicle Transmissions. Andreas Schmidt, Audi AG, May 22, 2014

Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs

Renault Trafic 91% 52% 53% 57% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Test results of Validation test 1b and Cycle modifications

Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles

Technical Information

REPORT ON THE PRICING POLICY FOR GASOLINE AND DIESEL 1st QUARTER 2017 BACKGROUND

series RVV Variable flow rate controllers

Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles

SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE GRPE INFORMAL WORKING GROUP ON HEAVY DUTY HYBRIDS (HDH) Madrid, 08 to 09 April 2014 MINUTES OF THE MEETING

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Evaluation of PEMS data based on the Moving Averaging Window and a composite severity indicator

Design, Fabrication and Testing of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Catapult Launcher

DRAFT REPORT. 3 rd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

Methods of brake efficiency evaluation for heavy duty vehicles in Slovakia

7.4 Parshall flumes Description

Transcription:

Informal document GRB-53-26 (53 rd GRB, 15-17 February 2011, Agenda item 3(c)) Effect of variants for an Lurban ASEP approach As requested by the GRB Chairman GRB feb 2011 Erik de Graaff

Basic assumptions in analysis as stated by the GRB chairman ASEP Methods Chair-ASEP = slope method doc 2011-02 annex 10 par 3 KBA-ASEP = KBA method doc 2011-02 annex 10 par 4 Lurban-ASEP = accel method doc 2011-02 annex 10 par 6 NL ASEP = doc 2011-08 KBA always applicable (independent of choice for Lurban/ASEP or Chair/ASEP) Acceleration boundaries Annex 3: 3 m/s 2 ASEP: 5 m/s 2

Huge amount of data How to clarify in a simple presentation?

If necessary: Formulas L WOT,ASEP 3 - k p,asep x L crs + L 1- k urban + p,asep 0.15 x (v BB,ASEP - 50) All factors influencing Lwot,ASEP are mutiplied by a factor 1/(1-kp,ASEP) For the example vehicle this factor has a value of 3 this means The margin of 3 db on Lurban translates into a margin of 9 db on Lwot

Huge amount of data How to clarify in a simple presentation? Strategy for this presentation No formulas One example vehicle Three variants of Lurban-ASEP For every variant One graph with the principle One graph with the data

The example vehicle Blue dots are measured noise levels max WOT-SPL in db(a) 100 95 sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 2 Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 NL 4 NL 5 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D- range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D- range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

The example vehicle Whythisexample? Reason 1: sound emission Not very linear Jump of 10 db Estimated Lmax,nrated 110 db max WOT-SPL in db(a) 100 95 sound emissions Estimated R51-ASEP database Lmax = 110 db 10 db jump linear linear Chair 2 Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 NL 4 NL 5 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D- range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D- range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 resonances 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

vehicle 200-49 PMR 159 kw/t assumed limit A3: 73 Whythisexample? Sound emission Not very linear Jump of 10 db Lmax,nrated circa 110 db Annex 3 on the edge R51.02: -0.9 db R51.03 +0.7 db Fulfills KBA Acceleration < 4 m/s 2 Sound emission not everywhere as could be expected from the Annex 3 result max WOT-SPL in db(a) 100 95 60 sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 2 Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 NL 4 NL 5 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D- range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D- range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

vehicle 200-49 PMR 159 kw/t sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 2 Chair 3 NL 2 The vehicle fails both NL ASEP and Chair ASEP at various engine speeds NL ASEP and Chair ASEP differ less than 3 db max WOT-SPL in db(a) 100 95 NL 3 NL 4 NL 5 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D-range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D-range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 D. Moore 2 D. Moore 3 D. Moore 4 D. Moore 5 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

How do the Lurban-ASEP variants perform?

Variant 1 of Lurban-ASEP

Variant 1 for Lurban ASEP 3 db margin on Lurban Lcruise Lwot,A3 Lurban Lwot, ASEP, expected allowed behavior in ASEP Lurban + Margin noise level (db(a)) Lwot,ASEP allowed 3 db Margin 9 db Margin Expected behavior in ASEP 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 Acceleration (m/s2) Margin on Lwot in 2nd gear = Margin on Lurban multiplied by a factor 3

vehicle 200-49 PMR 159 kw/t Variant 1 Lurban ASEP: 3 db margin on Lurban The vehicle never fails Lurban-ASEP Limit of Lurban-ASEP is 7 to 10 db higher than chair-asep and up to 15 db higher than NL ASEP max WOT-SPL in db(a) 100 95 sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 2 Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 NL 4 NL 5 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D-range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D-range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

Variant 2 of Lurban-ASEP

Variant 2 for Lurban ASEP 3 db margin on Lwot Lcruise noise level (db(a)) Lwot,A3 Lurban Lwot, ASEP, expected Lwot,ASEP allowed allowed behavior in ASEP 3 db Margin on Lwot Expected behavior in ASEP 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 Acceleration (m/s2) margin independent of acceleration

vehicle 200-49 PMR 159 kw/t Chair 2 sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 100 NL 4 NL 5 Variant 2 Lurban ASEP: 3 db margin on Lwot instead of Lurban 95 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 The vehicle is a boarder case for Lurban-ASEP Lurban-ASEP is 0-6 db more liberal than chair- ASEP and NL ASEP max WOT-SPL in db(a) D- range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D- range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

Variant 3 of Lurban-ASEP

Variant 3 for Lurban ASEP noise level (db(a)) Lcruise Lwot,A3 Lurban Lwot, ASEP, expected Annex 3 limit Lwot,ASEP allowed A3 limit Alowed Lwot depends on A 3 limit independent from A3,Lurban result allowed behavior in ASEP Expected behavior in ASEP 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 Acceleration (m/s2) Check Lurban-ASEP against Annex3 limit with 0 db margin on Limit

Variant 3 for Lurban ASEP Example: different Annex 3 result noise level (db(a)) Lcruise Lwot,A3 Lurban Lwot, ASEP, expected Annex 3 limit Lwot,ASEP allowed A3 limit Alowed Lwot depends on A 3 limit independent from A3,Lurban result allowed behavior in ASEP Expected behavior in ASEP 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 Acceleration (m/s2) No effect on ASEP limit ASEP limit only depends on Annex 3 limit, not the Annex 3 result

vehicle 200-49 PMR 159 kw/t Chair 2 sound emissions R51-ASEP database Chair 3 NL 2 NL 3 100 NL 4 NL 5 Variant 3 Lurban ASEP: Check with A3 limit 0 db margin on A 3 limit The vehicle fails Lurban- ASEP Lurban-ASEP limit is comparable to chair- ASEP and NL ASEP max WOT-SPL in db(a) 95 R51-03 a3 gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 gear 5 D- range R51-03 a3 gear 2 new gear 3 new D- range new KBA- 3 KBA- 4 Lurban 2 Lurban 3 Lurban 4 D. Moore 5 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 engine speed

Discussion Chair-ASEP rejects this vehicle Lurban ASEP Variant 1 vehicle passes Variant 2 boarder case Variant 3 rejected