View Numbers and Units

Similar documents
Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

2 Dynamics Track User s Guide: 06/10/2014

Rotational Kinematics and Dynamics Review

Hovercraft

EE 370L Controls Laboratory. Laboratory Exercise #E1 Motor Control

d / cm t 2 / s 2 Fig. 3.1

Working Model 2D Tutorial 2

Angular Momentum Problems Challenge Problems

The stopping distance of a car is the sum of the thinking distance and the braking distance.

Lab 4 Constant Acceleration by Drew Von Maluski

Chapter 9 Motion Exam Question Pack

Features of the Ball Screw

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

Analysis of Tire Rub Rail Interaction

Figure 1. What is the difference between distance and displacement?

Drag Factors in Spins and on Hills

OWNER S MANUAL SUPPLEMENT for Performance Computer with VFD display. New Features. Metric Operation. Metric/US config

Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance.

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Name: New Document 1. Class: Date: 221 minutes. Time: 220 marks. Marks: Comments:

Figure 1: Forces Are Equal When Both Their Magnitudes and Directions Are the Same

LEAD SCREWS 101 A BASIC GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A LEAD SCREW ASSEMBLY FOR ANY DESIGN

Physics 121 Practice Problem Solutions 11 Faraday s Law of Induction

WORKSHOP 5: FLOAT-OVER ANALYSIS

Page 2. The go-kart always had the same mass and used the same motor.

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

CNG Fuel System Integrity

Physics 2048 Test 2 Dr. Jeff Saul Fall 2001

Can Physics Teaching be improved by Explanation of Tricks with

Year 11 Physics. Term1 Week 9 Review Test

Research on Skid Control of Small Electric Vehicle (Effect of Velocity Prediction by Observer System)

MAGNETIC FORCE ON A CURRENT-CARRYING WIRE

Boardworks Ltd Braking Distance

SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering

The drag lift pulls the skier from the bottom to the top of a ski slope.

[2] [2]

APS 400 ELECTRO-SEIS. Long Stroke Shaker Page 1 of 5. Applications. Features

Q1. The graph shows the speed of a runner during an indoor 60 metres race.

WDS INDUSTRIAL SHOCK ABSORBERS. & : * 1-a. Deceleration technologies: WDS

distance travelled circumference of the circle period constant speed = average speed =

Physics 2. Chapter 10 problems. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

VISSIM Basics #2 Traffic Composition, Reduced Speed Areas CIV 475 Oregon Tech.

APS 420 ELECTRO-SEIS Long Stroke Shaker with Linear Ball Bearings Page 1 of 5

Faraday's Law of Induction

B.TECH III Year I Semester (R09) Regular & Supplementary Examinations November 2012 DYNAMICS OF MACHINERY

FRONTAL OFF SET COLLISION

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Bill the Cat, tied to a rope, is twirled around in a vertical circle. Draw the free-body diagram for Bill in the positions shown. Then sum the X and

ALAR Series Direct Drive, Large-Aperture, Rotary Stage

CH16: Clutches, Brakes, Couplings and Flywheels

VR-Design Studio Car Physics Engine

Friction and Momentum

Applied Fluid Mechanics

APS 113 ELECTRO-SEIS Long Stroke Shaker with Linear Ball Bearings Page 1 of 5

III B.Tech I Semester Supplementary Examinations, May/June

FEASIBILITY STYDY OF CHAIN DRIVE IN WATER HYDRAULIC ROTARY JOINT

National 4/5. Dynamics and Space

SHORT PAPER PCB IN-LINE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

A-level PHYSICS A PHYA5/2C. Unit 5C Applied Physics. Section B. Tuesday 28 June 2016

Exampro GCSE Physics. P2 Forces and their effects Self Study Questions Higher tier. Name: Class: Author: Date: Time: 117. Marks: 117.

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

25 B43 B43.1 THE MEASUREMENT OF e/m BY THE BAINBRIDGE METHOD

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

Development and validation of a vibration model for a complete vehicle

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

ISO 8855 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Road vehicles Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability Vocabulary

STUDENT ACTIVITY SHEET Name Period Fire Hose Friction Loss The Varying Variables for the One That Got Away Part 1

Physics 12 Circular Motion 4/16/2015

Drive Right Chapter 5 Study Guide

P5 STOPPING DISTANCES

NEW CAR TIPS. Teaching Guidelines

(3) When the brake pedal of the car is pushed, brake pads press against very hard steel discs.

MECA0494 : Braking systems

Friction. Coefficients of friction for rubber on roads are listed in the table. asphalt road) Dry road Wet road 0.53

The drag lift pulls the skier from the bottom to the top of a ski slope.

Modelling and Simulation Study on a Series-parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Homework # Physics 2 for Students of Mechanical Engineering

WEEK 4 Dynamics of Machinery

time in seconds Amy leaves diving board

Last date for sending comments : 30 November 2011

Coupled Aero-Structural Modelling and Optimisation of Deployable Mars Aero-Decelerators

Theory of Machines. CH-1: Fundamentals and type of Mechanisms

Single Vehicle Loss of Control

A STUDY OF HUMAN KINEMATIC RESPONSE TO LOW SPEED REAR END IMPACTS INVOLVING VEHICLES OF LARGELY DIFFERING MASSES

Bisnet Solutions for Tomorrow, Today! The Die Casting Process Planner. Users Manual. August 5, A Product By: Bisnet - 1 -

Accident Reconstruction & Vehicle Data Recovery Systems and Uses

BRAKE SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS KARAN BHARDIYA ASSISTANT MANAGER -R&D ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. DISC BRAKES

4.4. Forces Applied to Automotive Technology. The Physics of Car Tires

Thinking distance in metres. Draw a ring around the correct answer to complete each sentence. One of the values of stopping distance is incorrect.

The Effect of Weight Distribution on a Quarter Midget. Joey Dille

Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Hydraulic Power Steering Systems

Skid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit

Comparison of Braking Performance by Electro-Hydraulic ABS and Motor Torque Control for In-wheel Electric Vehicle

1.half the ladybug's. 2.the same as the ladybug's. 3.twice the ladybug's. 4.impossible to determine

3. DESCRIPTION OF SHAKING TABLE SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Suspension systems and components

Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission (EC) Informal Document No. GRRF (62nd GRRF, September 2007, agenda item 3(i))

Transcription:

To demonstrate the usefulness of the Working Model 2-D program, sample problem 16.1was used to determine the forces and accelerations of rigid bodies in plane motion. In this problem a cargo van with a forward speed of 30 ft/s is suddenly decelerated by the applied brakes. With the wheels locked up the van skids to rest in a distance of 20 ft. With specific dimensions of the van and the information given above, the magnitude of the normal reaction force and of the friction force at each wheel are to be determined. The first thing that was to be done in the program was to change the units to those used in the problem. In the View menu the Numbers and Units was chosen to accomplish this task. The mass and force were changed to English units.

The first object drawn was the ground that the cargo van operated on. This was done by selecting the Rectangle tool and clicking on the screen, while dragging the rectangle to a desired length and height.

Clicking once on the ground allowed the dimensions of the shape to be changed. The x, h, and w variable were given the values of 15 ft, 2 ft, and 60 ft, respectively. This assured that the cargo van had plenty of room to come to a complete stop after it skidded for 20 ft.

The next step was to draw the body of the cargo van. To do this the Rectangle tool was selected and placed right above the ground to allow room for the addition of the wheels that were subsequently added. The dimensions of the cargo van body was given a height of 5 ft, width of 17 ft and placed 4 ft on the Y-axis. This places the center of gravity at the distance specified in the problem.

The wheels of the van were drawn next by choosing the Circle tool and clicking on the screen. A copy was made and pasted next to the other wheel to make them the same size. The ground was also anchored during this process and placed on the bottom left side of the ground rectangle.

The wheels were positioned on the van by entering the value of the rear wheel as -5 ft and a value of the front wheel as 7 ft, at the bottom of the screen. This is the position of the wheels indicated by the problem.

To fix the wheels onto the body of the van the Pin Joint tool was used and placed at the center of each wheel.

In this next screen the velocity and the mass of the cargo van were given by double-clicking on the body upon which time the properties window appeared. For the velocity in the x-direction a value of 30 ft/s was entered. In the same window a mass of 2000 lbs. was given to the body; an approximate weight of a light truck or van.

The breaking mechanism was added in the form of Pin Joints at the backend of the wheels. This simulated the locking of brakes and skidding.

To measure the position, velocity, and acceleration of the cargo van the point element at the center of mass of the body was selected. Measure is selected in the menu and all three of these options were chosen.

The mass of the wheels were then entered by double-clicking on the wheels and using a mass of 1.4 lbs.

The kinetic friction coefficient specified in the sample problem was used in this model. By double-clicking on the two wheels and on the ground a value of 0.699 was entered in the appropriate properties window.

In the View menu the Workspace option was selected. This allowed the Ruler, Gridlines, and X-Y axis to be used. This made it possible to know the position of the cargo van while it came to rest.

To be able to read the normal reaction forces and the friction forces the ground was selected by clicking once then, while holding the shift button down, the rear tire was selected. The same procedure was performed to read the front wheel forces.

Velocity and Acceleration vectors were displayed by selecting the center of mass and selecting Define menu where these options were chosen.

With the values given in the original problem and the assumed weight of the cargo van it was determined that as the vehicle skidded to a stop the reactions at each wheel (normal and friction) followed the solution equations of N front = 0.5N B = 0.325W N rear = 0.5N A = 0.175W F front = 0.5F B = 0.227W F front = 0.5F A = 0.122W which correspond to one of the two wheels in the back of the cargo van. With a total weight of 2000 lbs, a normal and friction force of the rear of the van was 701.8 lbs and 490.5 lbs, respectively. For the front of the vehicle normal and friction forces were 1300.9 lbs and 909.3 lbs, respectively. The deceleration of the cargo van was also determined to be 22.49 ft/s 2 and a total distance traveled after breaks were applied of 20.4 ft. The very small errors obtained may be due to the weight estimate given to the cargo van and/or the wheels. With very close approximations, the Working Model 2-D program was useful in determining forces and accelerations of plane motion of rigid bodies.