Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Similar documents
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Critical Design Review

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

Presentation Outline. # Title

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

Flight Readiness Review

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

Project NOVA

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NASA SL Critical Design Review

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

The University of Toledo

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

University Student Launch Initiative

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

University of Notre Dame

Critical Design Review Report

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

University Student Launch Initiative

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Critical Design Review

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

CYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE

Preliminary Design Review

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

The University of Toledo

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

USLI Critical Design Report

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Palos Verdes High School 1

Mercury VTOL suas Testing and Measurement Plan

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

Post Launch Assessment Review

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Innovating the future of disaster relief

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

USLI Flight Readiness Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

Post Launch Assessment Review

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction

Modified shock-cord mount and cables (cables are shown pushed into motor mount here)

Electric Penguin s philosophy:

SSC Swedish Space Corporation

Critical Design Review

Super Squadron technical paper for. International Aerial Robotics Competition Team Reconnaissance. C. Aasish (M.

UHABS-5 Mission Zeppelin

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

This Week. Next Week 4/7/15

Lecture 1: Basic Ideas, Safety and Administration.

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

Transcription:

Preliminary Design Review Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Overview Team Overview Mission Statement Vehicle Overview Avionics Overview Safety Overview Payload Overview Requirements Compliance Plan

Team Structure

Team Organization

Website & Social https://m2i.aere.iastate.edu/cysli/ Facebook: ISUcysli Instagram: cyclonestudentlaunchinitiative Twitter: @IowaStateCySLI

Mission Statement Cyclone Student Launch Initiative s mission is to successfully design, build, test, launch, and recover a reusable high-powered model rocket while meeting and exceeding the safety standard set by the competition. The rocket will reach an apogee of 4750 feet and, upon landing, will deploy an autonomous rover which will travel a minimum of ten feet and collect a minimum of 10 ml soil sample. Additionally, CySLI has set out to educate and inspire the engineers of tomorrow through demonstrations and hands on activities for all ages.

Vehicle Overview

Vehicle Mission Success Criteria Ability to launch again without modifications after recovery Retention of rover during flight Deployment of the rover safely upon RSO approval Ability to reach an apogee between 4650 feet and 4850 feet.

Vehicle Dimensions 11 feet 2 inches long 23.3125 lbs with motor (20.7 lbs without) 4 Outer Diameter

OpenRocket Diagram Main Parachute Bay Nose Cone & Fore Altimeter Bay Payload Bay Aft Altimeter Bay Drogue Bay Motor Mount Avionics Bay

Stability CG: 90.4 from nose cone CP: 102 from nose cone Stability Margin: 2.8 cal

Mass Statement Independent Sections under Drogue: Independent Sections under Main: Motor Mount: 8.47 lbs Motor Mount: 8.47 lbs Rest of Rocket: 12.19 lbs Nose Cone and Main: 4.74 lbs Rest of Rocket: 7.45 lbs Section: (without motor) Nose Cone Main Bay Payload Bay Aft Altimeter Bay Drogue Bay Avionics Bay Motor Mount Mass: (lb) 1.81 3.07 4.99 0.731 1.52 1.42 3.06

Performance Predictions Rail exit velocity 99.6 fps Maximum velocity 756 fps Maximum acceleration 614 ft/s^2 Apogee: 5641 ft

Minimum Diameter Reduces weight, cost, and build time significantly Decreases strength of fins Airframe experiences higher temperatures Motor Retention: Internal Less cross-sectional area 75mm vs 98mm 75 is too small for rover 98 has less motor selections

Fin Strengthening Tip-to-tip fiberglassing Fin Can Greatly increases strength without additional drag Low heat resistance Removable High Heat resistance Heavy Complex to manufacture More drag Using TTTF for strength Moving fins forward 2 to reduce thermal load

Material Selections Carbon Fiber Airframe Blue Tube Coupler Strong and light Will need antenna openings Easy to work with Light and thin Fiberglass Reinforced Motor Mount Heat resistant Strong

Nose Cone 5.5:1 Filament Wound Von Karman Nose Cone 22 long Aluminum tip Von Karman vs Ogive vs Parabolic Ogive has a smaller fineness ratio Parabolic manufacturing difficulty

Motor Selection AeroTech K1999N-P Average Thrust: 424.3 lb Total Impulse: 571 lb-s Launch Mass: 6.59 lb Empty Mass: 3.96 lb Thrust to Weight: 17.7 Burn Time: 1.38 seconds

Recovery Subsystem Drogueless 55 inch annular main parachute Separation at apogee Main event at 600 feet Piston Ejection System Starting with 60 inch, resize two gores Less black powder Eliminates parachute protection More complex build Drift Calculations Descent time: 86 seconds Section Kinetic Energy (ft*lb) Nose Cone 40.7 Payload and Drogue 63.4 Motor Mount 72.1 Wind Speed Drift Distance (ft) 5 mph 324 10 mph 1247 15 mph 1871 20 mph 2495

Recovery Subsystem Two altimeter bays inside vehicle Four altimeters, two per bay Shielded by carbon fiber, copper tape Altimeters: Stratologger and AIM USB Each powered independently by 9V batteries Activated by external key switches Two in-flight separation points Apogee separation between airbrake bay and drogue bay Main parachute deployment between nose cone and main parachute bay

Airbrake Subsystem External Internal 2 bars, 4 panels, & 2 hinges each Mostly straight to Diamond shape Straight would not open Panels held on w/ screw Servo w/ cage and wire Strong Simple Bar Splits into internal and external Parts screw together Wire connected by wire collar

Airbrake analysis through CFD Four models analyzed during retraction and deployment Two with wind-redirectors Two without wind-redirectors Four without wind-redirectors Two with a covering plate

Avionics Overview

Avionics: Apogee Control Method Systems considered: Ballasting, PID Controller, Apogee Prediction Dynamically Deployable Air Brake System (DDABS) Less maintenance and assumption on launch day Reduced error Microcontroller predicts apogee continuously during flight Computer controls brakes through servo motor Brakes increase drag of the vehicle during coast phase Process repeats until desired apogee is predicted Brake actuation restricted using software

DDABS: Electrical Hardware

DDABS: Flight Computer Comparison Results Teensy 3.5 0.521 Raspberry Pi 3 B+ 0.283 Arduino Mega 2560 0.195 Criteria Processor Speed Physical Size Ease of Use All Consistency Indices are below the.1 standard

DDABS: Flight Computer Hardware Teensy 3.5 120 Mhz ARM Processor 192KB of RAM Runs Arduino-compatible software 2.5 x 0.7 x 0.2 inches Integrated SD card slot for data logging Acceleration, altitude, launch events, brake action https://sparkfun.com/products/14055

DDABS: Hardware Configuration

DDABS: Battery and Requirements Component Maximum Current Draw (ma) Current Draw after 4 hours (mah) Teensy 3.5 60 240 BMP280 1.12 4.48 BNO055 12.3 49.2 Micro SD Card (onboard Teensy) 50 200 Total 123.42 493.68 Battery: Lithium-Ion Polymer More compact and dense compared to NiMH Rated capacity: 1200 mah

DDABS: Software

DDABS: Interior Bay Rail-Sled system will be implemented instead of metal rods Avionics sled will hold all electronic components and batteries for DDABS Materials: plywood, aluminum rails, assorted Ease of access plastics, epoxy glue Batteries mounted on bottom, flight computer mounted on top Total Dimensions of sled: 1.47 inches tall, 3.37 inches wide, and a depth of 5 inches

Safety Overview

Safety Team Safety Officer Alex Sommers Responsibilities Compilation and maintenance of records of material safety data sheets hazard analysis risk mitigation methods Ensuring completion of safety and lab trainings Compliance with laws, policies, regulations

Personnel Hazard Analysis Analyzes the all possible risks to personnel Includes severity ranking and planned mitigation

Environmental Hazard Analysis Examines How the rocket can affect the environment How the environment can affect the rocket. Same format as PHA

Failure Modes and Effects Analyses Analyses to recognize and evaluate possible failures in order to mitigate all possible risks to acceptable probability levels. Conducted FMEA for rocket, payload, and avionics subsystems

Safety Manual Separate document containing: Build procedures Safety Guidelines NRA/TRA, FAA, and EPA regulations Local, state, and federal laws for high-powered rocketry Launch procedures Lab safety manual MSDS

Payload Overview

Payload Mission Success Criteria Handle in-flight forces during launch Handle landing impact forces with no damage to mechanical or electronic components Deploy from payload bay upon the receipt of manual trigger from base Drive ten feet (or more) from landing site Collect ten milliliters (or more) of soil after driving ten feet from landing site

Payload Deployment Subsystem Servo w/ disk and pins Minimum of six 4-40 Nylon Shear Pins as backup retention Black Powder Piston Ejection System Stiff, flexible material

Preliminary Payload Design Unique, side-oriented design Expanding drive train that doubles as orientation mechanism Aluminum chassis design that conforms to existing mechanism No component exists beyond a 1.75 in radius of the center of the rover Tentative weight: 2.16 lb

Soil Collection Mechanism consists of an scoop attached to a Servo Scoop made of aluminum Micro Servo MG90S Servo will lower scoop into ground Soil will be collected via driving forward Scoop will also double also double as the soil container Scoop will be raised into a cap within the chassis Tentative weight estimate:.107 lbs or 1.71 oz

Drivetrain Small rocket diameter 3-3.75 limits drivetrain size Treads fold out to support rover and orient Two sided timing belt used for grip Powered by HiTEC HS - 485HB servos and 12V DC Motor Electronic components protected by triangular aluminum support Tentative weight: 1.32 lb

Drivetrain Rigid support system for servos and treads Pulleys attached to treads are free spinning on shaft Motors are free spinning as well; attached to pulleys Supports only attached to servo Solves problem of stationary treads and moving motor on same shaft

Chassis The chassis will be made of 6061 aluminum The chassis will hold all the electrical components of the rover The pieces of the chassis will be machined and then fastened together Triangular design Tentative weight: 0.51 lb

Payload Electronics Pixhawk 4 GPS Rangefinder Transmitter and receiver Motor Servo Power rail Battery

Pixhawk 4 Open-hardware controller Contains enough ports for all electronic connections Capable of providing autopilot to the rover Utilizes the ArduRover software User-friendly interface Reliable results Open source

GPS Pixhawk 4 GPS Module Specifically designed for compatibility with the Pixhawk 4 Combined GPS and compass Embedded safety switch

Rangefinder TFMini - Micro LiDAR Module 12in to 39ft range detection Wide angle of view Time of Flight LiDAR

Transmitter and Receiver Micro Transceiver Telemetry Radio Set Used to start the rover after the rocket lands Ground control transmitter and rover receiver Configurable through ArduRover Mission Planner

Motor Brushless DC Motor with Encoder Used to move the treads Build-in motor driver Directional control, pulse-width modulation speed control and speed feedback output Small in size

Servo Drivetrain HiTEC HS-485HB Capable of supplying enough torque to control the folding tread system Soil Collection Micro Servo - MG90S High Torque Metal Gear Capable of supplying enough torque to control the scoop

Power Rail HobbyKing Matek Micro PDB w/bec (5V and 12V) Used to distribute power from the battery to the motors and servos Contains four ESC

Payload: Deployment Adafruit Feather M0 with RFM95 Radio https://www.adafruit.com/product/3178 Adafruit Ultimate GPS selected for our design. Used to communicate to ground station Receive commands for rover deployment License free signal (920MHz): does not require amateur radio certification. Small size: Will report the current coordinates at a rate of 1Hz Stacks with Feather Dual radio deployment for rover Deactivate failsafe servo for payload housing Deploy rover using controlled charge? https://www.adafruit.com/product/3133

Payload Battery Budget Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 Standby Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) 100 1 2.000 200.000 GPS 0 1 2.000 0.000 Rangefinder 0 1 2.000 0.000 25 1 2.000 50.000 Motor 0 2 2.000 0.000 Servo 8.8 5 2.000 88.000 Power Rail 25 1 2.000 50.000 Receiver

Payload Battery Budget (cont.) Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 System Boot Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) 2500 1 0.013 31.250 GPS 500 1 0.013 6.250 Rangefinder 250 1 0.013 3.125 25 1 0.013 0.313 Motor 700 2 0.013 17.500 Servo 600 5 0.013 37.500 Power Rail 100 1 0.013 1.250 Receiver

Payload Battery Budget (cont.) Rover Battery Budget Estimation Mission Stage Component Pixhawk 4 Mission Execution Max Current Draw (ma) Run Time (hr) Quantity Power Density (mah) 2500 1 0.167 416.667 GPS 500 1 0.167 83.333 Rangefinder 250 1 0.167 41.667 25 1 0.167 4.167 Motor 700 2 0.167 233.333 Servo 600 5 0.167 500.000 Power Rail 100 1 0.167 16.667 Total 1,781.0208 Receiver

Battery Blomiky 11.1V 3S 2200mAh LiPo Battery Easily capable of powering all the electronics in case of launch delays Pixhawk recommends LiPo batteries for power Rechargeable

Payload Preliminary Weight Buildup

Requirements Compliance Plan

Requirements Compliance Plan List of all NASA requirements for SLI competition and how we plan to achieve them. Table is included in PDR and each verification plan Is classified with a verification method.

Requirements Compliance Plan (cont.) List of team derived requirement List for each sub-team

Questions?