on the Real Estate Industry Rutt Bridges

Similar documents
Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

Oslo The EV Capital. Agency for Urban Environment City of Oslo Sture Portvik

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Role of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

AMERICA. rides the BUS

Program Overview. February 2018

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

Needs and Community Characteristics

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program. The Ellipse, St. Louis Park, 2009

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Planning for AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. Presentation on the planning implications of self-driving vehicles. by Ryan Snyder Transportation Planning Expert

Strategic Plan

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

AUTONOMOUS TRANSPORT. Investment Opportunity Brief

AVs and Transit. Stephen Buckley, P.E., AICP NACV Summit June 12, 2018

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

Transit Hub Case Study: Owings Mills Metro Station. By: Kathleen Cary Rose, J. Luke Byrne and Catherine Buhler

Incentives for Green Fleets

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Innovation and Transformation of Urban Mobility Role of Smart Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) service

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

WHAT DOES OUR AUTONOMOUS FUTURE LOOK LIKE?

Denver Car Share Permit Program

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

New York s success was built on a transportation system that was fast, safe, and fair. It s time to return to those principles.

Organization. SDOT Date and Commute Seattle. Dave Sowers, Deputy Program Administrator

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Autonomous Vehicles: Status, Trends and the Large Impact on Commuting

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Bus The Case for the Bus

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

New York, We ve Got a Problem!

KRM Corridor Transit Service Options: Frequently Asked Questions

Kathrine Wilson-Ellis Strategic Safety Team. Phil Proctor Future Technologies

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

TOWARDS A NEW SUSTAİNABLE MOBİLİTY

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Application of Autonomous Vehicle Technology to Public Transit

Building smart transport in Moscow

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Driving a More Sustainable Future of Mobility OCTOBER 19, 2017

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Thoughts on carsharing Robin Chase

Driving change. Investing in the Future of London s Mobility

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

Electric Vehicle Programs & Services. October 26, 2017

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Summary FEBRUARY 2019

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Schoolcraft County Public Transit

Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions

Autonomous Vehicles: A look into the past - a look into the future

Rui Wang Assistant Professor, UCLA School of Public Affairs. IACP 2010, Shanghai June 20, 2010

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Transportation Demand Management Element

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

Transforming Mobility: Business Models in the Age of Autonomous Vehicles

AVs in BOSTON Shared rides, Seagulls, & Streets. Kris Carter Mayor s Office of New Urban Mechanics City of Boston

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

SouthWest Transit s Microtransit Service 2018 APTA State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Wednesday, August 15 th

Structure. Transport and Sustainability. Lessons from Past. The Way Forward

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

Autonomous Vehicles and Land Use

Three Technologies That Will Change The World

Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Vehicle Program 1993-Present

SA TAXI IMPACT DELIVERING A SOCIAL & COMMERCIAL BENEFIT R18.6 BILLION LOANS ORIGINATED CREATING R2.9 BILLION LOANS ORIGINATED CREATING

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

a d its i pact on the Real Estate Industry Rutt Bridges

How Real are Driverless Cars? Seven years of Google research and testing 1.7 million miles with 11 fender-benders and no injuries From open highways to congested suburbs and cities Many other companies, from Apple to Mercedes, are developing driverless cars Google s goal is o er ial a aila ility y 2020

The New Google Car Prototype

Google s Strategy: Sell Mo ility, Not Metal Mobility can be delivered for 39 /mile solo, 19 /mile per passenger with 2 people ridesharing A d that s at a 48.5% pre-tax profit (29 /14 at 25%) Dispatch software manages ridesharing arrangements All passengers must be registered (photo & voiceprint)

Mo ility s Value Propositio Safe, efficient transportation that saves you thousands/year Low-stress door-to-door service while you work, read, relax Less congestion, less pollution, faster commutes, with no parking or car ownership hassles Arrive at work or at home stress-free

How Driverless Cars Navigate in Traffic

Will Driverless Cars find a Market? History insists that when a technology has obvious utility and is economically compelling, it will be used.

Car Ownership versus Mobility Service

Are Driverless Cars Safe? We lost 426,129 to combat in all 20 th Century wars We lost 531,886 to auto crashes in the first 14 years of this century 93% of accidents are due to distraction, drowsiness, drunkenness, or driver error Dri erless ars do t suffer fro those pro le s

Mo ility s Market Seg e ts Early Adopters: Millennials, seniors, disabled, low income, alcohol-impaired Early Majority: Commuters, kids, businesses (fleets, employees, environmental sustainability) Late Majority: The skeptics Never: People who truly love their cars

Winners and Losers The Winners: The public (savings, free time and safety), government (road expansions), environment (cleaner air, greener downtowns), downtown developers, seniors, disa led, The Losers: The auto industry, oil industry, insurers, taxi drivers, car rental, auto repair, personal injury attorneys, parki g lot o ers, e erge y edi al ser i es,

The Impact on Mass Transit In Denver, RTD riders pay about 23% of the cost, taxes and grants pay 77% Can a $2.60 local bus fare compete with 19 /mile mobility? - door-to-door, 24/7 on demand service, zero emissions - pay by the mile, no big empty buses crowding the roads Could Light Rail become our $6 billion stranded asset?

How Would Free Rail Impact Economic Growth?

Supercharge Light Rail: Double Ridership Exit most bus service routes, saving $288M/year in subsidies Eliminate Light Rail fares on all 158 miles of track ($140M/year) Increase railcars by 50% to accommodate doubling of rush-hour riders - 303 Siemens S200 vehicles @ $3.7M, 20 years @ 5% interest = $89M/year) Added cost of servicing additional passengers and railcars ($44M/year) Total cost to provide free rides to 268,000 commuters: $273M

Public-Private Partnership to Feed Light Rail GM s Che y EN-V (electric, 25 mph) Two person urban mobility vehicle Not driverless, but could be in the future Currently being deployed for field trials in Shanghai

Public-Private Partnership to Feed Light Rail Feed riders within a 5 mile radius into stations Close coordination between RTD and mobility providers Average fare per person: 3 miles at 14 /mile = 42 Use Free MallRide in Denver, urban vehicles elsewhere Double ridership, maximize return on sunk cost of rails

How Would Free Rail Impact Economic Growth?

Real Estate Consequences of Free Light Rail FreeRail would attract more corporate headquarters Far larger development radius around rail stations Easy free access means residents range further away for evenings out Strip malls are OK, but a vibrant downtown is better Drinking and driving is less of an issue

Needed Infrastructure for Mobility Services One or two central maintenance and repair facilities Commercial and residential pickup / drop off lanes Redevelopment of Light Rail stations: efficient pickup / drop off lanes Approximately one Rapid Charging Facility for every 1,200 vehicles

Driverless Car Rapid Charging Facility

Mo ility s I pa t o Real Estate Reduction of commercial/residential parking ratios Redevelopment of commercial and residential for pickup and drop off lanes Downtown parking lots available for redevelopment Some urban parking lanes becoming sidewalk cafés Less highway expansion, but more money for repairs

Mo ility s I pa t o Real Estate Residential parking garages: storage units? Home garages: nursery, spare bedroom, home office Mall parking lots become retail and restaurant development opportunities Is there a solution for I-70 congestion? Use of feeder vehicles, driverless 10 passenger buses, and platooning

What is Platooning?