Publishable Executive Summary (M1-M48)

Similar documents
Molten-carbonate fuel Cells for Waterborne APplication

MARANDA project overview at M20/M48

P1 - Public summary report

A Mobility for Growth European Innovation project call Towards the energy-efficient and very low emission vessel

NEMESIS 2 + (278138)

MARANDA Marine application of a new fuel cell powertrain validated in demanding arctic conditions

DESTA - Demonstration of 1 st European SOFC Truck APU Jürgen Rechberger AVL List GmbH

Shipping Guidance Notice 069. EU Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) regulations and IMO Data Collection Data Collection System (DCS)

An update on MTCC Caribbean s Pilot Projects: Preliminary Results of Data Collection Stephan Nanan

P2 - Public summary report

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 September 2016 (OR. en)

Fuel Cell Application in a New Configured Aircraft PUBLISHABLE REPORT

European Bus System of the Future

Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH 2 JU) Frequently Asked Questions

Green emotion Development of a European framework for electromobility

Helsinki Pilot. 1. Background. 2. Challenges st challenge

Monitoring, reporting and verification of CO 2 emissions from ships - EU MRV regulation and obligations and the parallel IMO activities

European Regulation MRV. Luis Guerrero 2 nd November 2015

IALA Guideline No The Reporting of Results of e-navigation Testbeds. Edition 1. December 2013

GIBRALTAR ERDF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME POST ADOPTION STATEMENT

Maritime Fuel Cell Applications

Official Journal of the European Union

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR THE SELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE TACHOGRAPH FORUM

June 2017 MARANDA. Introduction

Offshore Application of the Flywheel Energy Storage. Final report

MARANDA project overview

Dissemination Workshop

GREENER SHIPPING SUMMIT 2017

Final report. 1.1 Project details. 1.2 Short description of project objective and results. 1.3 Executive summary. 1.4 Project objectives

2020 GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT HISTORY, CURRENT STATUS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION S (IMO S) WORK PLAN FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

Service Center Denmark PrimeServ Frederikshavn

REDUNDANT PROPULSION SHIPS RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF NEWBUILDINGS DET NORSKE VERITAS SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS ADDITIONAL CLASS PART 6 CHAPTER 2

ECA enforcement & lessons for future action

DemoEV - Demonstration of the feasibility of electric vehicles towards climate change mitigation LIFE10 ENV/MT/000088

DESTA Demonstration of 1st European SOFC Truck APU

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC)

CEN Workshop - Business Plan - Method for testing separation performance of centrifugal separators for marine residual fuels

Positive Energy Roads CALL FOR PROPOSALS

DG system integration in distribution networks. The transition from passive to active grids

Revision of Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues

Challenges for sustainable freight transport Maritime transport. Elena Seco Gª Valdecasas Director Spanish Shipowners Association - ANAVE

DNVGL-CP-0110 Edition March 2016

Potential areas of industrial interest relevant for cross-cutting KETs in the Transport and Mobility domain

Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge

CIMAC Position Paper

PLUG Final Publishable Report

Advanced Filtration TEchnologies for the Recovery and Later conversion of relevant Fractions from wastewater

Navis NavDP 4000 Series

Centerwide System Level Procedure

Regulatory Update what s hot?

Development of Business Cases for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Applications for Regions and Cities. FCH Airport ground handling equip.

FAIRMODE Technical Meeting, LillestrØm, April 2014 Experiences with standardization in Germany

Terms of Reference (ToR) Trade & Traceability Standing Committee (T&T SC)

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

Mandate to CEN on the revision of EN 590 to increase the concentration of FAME and FAEE to 10% v/v

ASSENT (Contract number ) Jari Kiviaho VTT/Chief Research Scientist

AMBER M. KLESGES BOARD SECRETARY. No.\w-Tm

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

Marine product guide. Engines and generator sets

Labelling Smart Roads DISCUSSION PAPER 4/2015

Sustainable Development IMO s Contribution Beyond Rio+20

EGVIA Workshop: European funded project results - Reduction of CO2 emissions from Heavy-Duty Trucks.

GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS UPDATE ON IMO EU MRV REGULATION

The 8th Annual Event

MSC.285(86) and Code for gas-fuelled ships (IGF-Code) technical challenges and perspective - Dr Gerd Würsig, Benjamin Scholz,

EU MRV Regulatory update & the IMO Data Collection System

The District Heating Barometer, why and how

The SHIFT2RAIL Joint Technology Initiative Presentation to the Rail Forum Europe 15 November 2011

The step forward Onboard DC Grid

BATTERY THE LADY RECHARGES HER

Conclusions of the thirteenth plenary of the European Regulators Group

IMPROVE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE BY RAISING CREW SKILL LEVELS THROUGH DNV CERTIFIED TRAINING MODULES

Scania presents the bus of the future: Innovative hybrid concept from Scania improves fuel-efficiency by at least 25%

UIC/ UNIFE Technical Recommendations (TecRec)

ITD Systems Core Partners Wave 04

Onboard DC Grid. Jan Fredrik DP Conference 2011; Houston. for enhanced DP operation in ships

Environmental Ship Index (ESI)

COMPASS Competitive Auxiliary Power Units for vehicles based on metal supported stack technology

SEAGULL S GUIDE TO BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT

Joint Research Centre

Background, structure and objectives of the EffShip project

Market development for green cars. Geneva, 24 April 2012 Andrea Beltramello, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD

Summary of survey results on Assessment of effectiveness of 2-persons-in-the-cockpit recommendation included in EASA SIB

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

RESOLUTION MEPC.181(59) Adopted on 17 July GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE REVISED MARPOL ANNEX VI

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Update on the proposal for "A transparent and reliable hull and propeller performance standard"

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

Creating a zero-emissions shipping world

Z-Damper Z-Coupled Full System for Attenuation of Vibrations

SINAMICS S120 Cabinet Modules Application Shaft Generator Drive

ASSENT (Contract number ) Jari Kiviaho VTT/Chief Research Scientist

Development of Business Cases for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Applications for Regions and Cities. FCH Aircraft

Consumers, Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project

Contextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning

ENABLING COST OPTIMIZED HYBRID POWERTRAINS

Decommissioning & Re-use in NL: A Joint Effort

Challenges in the implementation of MRV regulation. Yiannis Kokarakis Bureau Veritas

HyCoRA Hydrogen Contaminant Risk Assessment

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Transcription:

Project no. 031414 Project acronym: METHAPU Project title: Validation of Renewable Methanol Based Auxiliary Power System for Commercial Vessels Instrument: Specific Targeted Research Project Thematic Priority: 1.6.2 Sustainable Surface Transport (M1-M48) 15.12.2010 Period covered: from 1.11.2006 to 30.10.2010 Date of preparation: 16.5.2011 Start date of project: 1.11.2006 Duration: 30+18 months Project coordinator name: Project coordinator organisation name: Tho Phan Wärtsilä Finland Oy Revision: 1.0

Publishable executive summary Project objectives Validation of Renewable Methanol Based Auxiliary Power System for Commercial Vessels (METHAPU) aims to validate methanol technology on board a cargo vessel involved in international trade. In addition to that, another major aim is to innovate necessary technical justifications for the use of renewable methanol on board commercial vessels in order to support introduction of necessary regulations to allowing the use of methanol as a marine fuel. The specific components of the technology to be validated are methanol fuel bunkering, distribution and storage system and methanol consuming SOFC unit. Contractors The consortium is made up of experts in the field of fuel cell system integration, sustainable shipping, classification work and environmental assessment: Wärtsilä Finland Oy (coordinator), Lloyd s Register, Wallenius Marine, University of Genoa and Det Norske Veritas AS. Coordinator: Wärtsilä Finland Oy Mr. Tho Phan, address: Tekniikantie 14, FI-02150 Espoo e-mail: tho.phan@wärtsilä.com, tel. +358 40 567 2087 Results achieved The following achievements were reached and deliverables prepared during the project: Reassessed project plan was prepared immediately in the beginning of the project Marine Project Guide for SOFC installations Stakeholder analysis and requirements Definition of approval procedure Study on state-of-the-art of LCA Study on category rules for the product group (marine SOFC) Life cycle assessment for marine SOFC installation Test bench tested methanol reformer A 20kW prototype SOFC unit modified for marine conditions Factory acceptance test approved for the SOFC unit Factory acceptance test approved for the fuel cell unit and fuel cell room Factory acceptance test approved for the methanol tank container SOFC system installed onboard the ship Undine Harbor and Sea Acceptance test for SOFC installation, including concluded assessment of onboard SOFC system User manuals for SOFC system Ship procedures concerning SOFC system Test plan for field testing period Field testing period of 5 months including evaluation of results Introduction and training package for main users and ship crew General review of design for marine SOFC installation Project website: www.methapu.eu, www.methapu.com METHAPU, no 031414 publishable Page 2

1 Project objectives and major achievements General project objectives The objectives of the project were: 1. Introduction of renewable fuel on board in support of the wider use of sustainable fuels in the marine transportation sector through research activities 2. Validate marine compatible methanol running solid oxide fuel cell technology 3. Innovate necessary technical justifications for the use of methanol on board cargo vessels involved in international trade in order to support the introduction of necessary regulations to allowing the use of methanol as a marine fuel 4. Facilitate future research activities on larger marine compatible SOFC units and methanol based economy 5. Assess short-term and long-term environmental impacts of the application Current marine research projects focus on the use of fossil fuels, such as natural gas, and not on renewable fuel like methanol. This research project tackled the technological issues but also the regulatory challenges concerning the use of methanol, a fuel currently not permitted, as a fuel on board. Even though the validation was done with a 20kW test unit, the activities were devised to facilitate future research activities on larger SOFC units, on greener marine vessels and on more sustainable economy. This project aimed at proving that the renewable methanol is a good fuel of choice for seaborne vessels utilising fuel cells, and that SOFC is a good fuel cell technology for seaborne vessels. To the extent possible within the project, the formulation of the Rules and Regulations for the use of methanol as fuel on board was facilitated. The project aimed to study and validate the SOFC technology in real marine conditions. In addition, research on the life cycle cost of the renewable methanol based marine compatible SOFC system on board a marine vessel was performed. The project was seen as to enable future research on the wider use of methanol in society, and on larger marine compatible SOFC units. The results of the project could have provided some impulse to facilitate future research activities on greener marine transportation and on larger SOFC systems utilising sustainable fuels Relevance of the objectives Based on the description of the objectives of the project, the particular objective in the Sustainable Surface Transport Priority that matches with the project s objectives was the objective number one New technologies and concepts for all surface transport modes (road, rail and waterborne). In actual, SOFC is not a new technology, but its use to generate auxiliary power for seaborne vessel is a new concept that needs to be validated. Furthermore, to use renewable methanol on board is a ground-breaking action, but that fitted well with the research domain 1.4 of the objective number one since: methanol is a renewable and alternative fuel methanol is a clean fuel and available around the world and in large quantities METHAPU, no 031414 publishable Page 3

using methanol on board requires new bunkering, storage and distribution systems SOFC is a clean and efficient technology for propulsion and power generation on board Furthermore, by enabling the future development of larger SOFC units for marine applications this research project contributed to the European Union s objective of sustainable use of marine resources while also improving the competitiveness of the European marine industry. The Consortium of this project was made of a world-class fuel cell developer and instances rated as to be among the most influential players in the European marine industry. Links to other European research activities The results of this project will be available to future FP7 projects focusing on sustainable marine transportation in which the use of sustainable fuels, such as methanol, and larger fuel cell systems would be the key points. Dissemination The consortium aimed to share the knowledge on the use of sustainable fuel and fuel cells in marine vessels to the wider marine industry, in particular stakeholders in marine power generation, marine operations, by e.g. presentations and article in congresses, conferences, organising workshops and to the wider community through publishing information on our website and a leaflet. The dissemination work was performed on a wide front as possible with the available resources. Main achievements in the project WP1, the reassessment of the project plan, was delivered timely in the beginning of the project to support the implementation of the project. For WP2, the marine modification of the 250 kw unit, the scope for the Project Guidedocument was changed as the project proceeded. The scope was shifted to cover the prototype SOFC-unit as this was seen to give the most benefit to the project. The deliverable, Project Guide for marine SOFC units, was prepared by end of the project. WP3, the safety and reliability study, was carried out for especially the 20 kw prototype SOFC unit, in order to support the installation and test run onboard the ship. Stakeholder analysis was prepared. This analysis acted as input for the verification and validation process. The assessment process concerning the prototype installation was defined for this project in particular as the existing Regulations and classification Rules alone could not as such be applied to the fuel cell installation. The product and process review was finalised with a presentation of the intended procedure for the Swedish Maritime Administration. WP4, the life-cycle analysis (LCA) for the vessel using renewable based methanol fuel cells, was commenced with data transfer from the FCShip-project. In the subsequent task the objectives of the analysis were set and a State-of-the-Art -study prepared. The work continued with an inventory data collection, where field data was used as far as possible. The LCA was carried out and shows clearly better environmental performance of a SOFC system in comparison with conventional engine solutions. METHAPU, no 031414 publishable Page 4

Product Category Rules were prepared, which define common calculation procedures to ensure that similar procedures are used for data collection and handling within the same product system. Finally, the environmental impacts were compared to preliminary results, through data from the field test period of the prototype SOFC system. Due to limitations in the scalability of the test results, this data could not give a real picture of a generic marine SOFC in operation and therefore an alternative analysis method was applied. In WP5, the design and build of a methanol reformer, the methanol reformer was built as a test module, to support testing in operation temperatures without the need to connect it to the actual SOFC system. The work for the testing included preparation of testing protocols. The testing was concluded with results supporting the suitability of the reformer for a 20 kw prototype unit. The work in WP6, build a marine compatibility 20 kw SOFC unit, was supported by the build and operation of a 20 kw sister unit. This sister unit provided valuable feedback to the design and manufacturing of the project s 20 kw unit. The 20 kw unit was ready for Factory Acceptance Testing in April 2010 with the delivery of the methanol pump unit. WP7, the testing of the marine SOFC unit, was commenced in sequence after WP6. The work comprised commissioning activities and finally the Factory Acceptance Testing carried out in Espoo with the main stakeholders in April 2010, which concluded the activities in WP8 as well. WP 8, the acceptance of the 20 kw SOFC unit, was carried out closely together with WP7 and WP3 (definition of acceptance process). The work produced a submission map to facilitate the collation of relevant material for the acceptance and included dialogs between Wärtsilä and LR to support the design. The final validation of the SOFC unit was carried out in WP11 as part of the overall system. In WP9, modification of a commercial vessel for methanol use, the ship Undine was chosen as the platform for the prototype SOFC testing. The ship was prepared with structural modifications to support the SOFC installation and the work was concluded in May 2010 with the installation of the Fuel cell room and Methanol tank. WP10, the installation, integration and commissioning onboard of the 20 kw unit, delivered documentation for the installation as well as the actual installation and commissioning work onboard. During commissioning a Harbor Acceptance Test was conducted. The final deliverable from this workpackage was an updated Commissioning checklist for marine SOFC units. WP11, the acceptance of the overall installation, produced a technology review of the complete fuel cell system onboard and comprised all preceding assessment phases as well as the Harbor Acceptance Test in Bremerhaven. WP12, the operational safety assessment, delivered i) updated SOFC user manuals, ii) a crew introduction pamphlet, iii) a bunkering checklist and a follow-up report with revision remarks based on field testing phase experience by the crew. WP13, field testing of the prototype SOFC unit, produced a testing plan with parameters identified relevant for the feedback. The testing period lasted 5 months, during which the ship travelled one turn around the world. The SOFC unit was operated on constant load. Field METHAPU, no 031414 publishable Page 5

maintenance support was carried a few times, both during sea voyage and harbour visits. The workpackage was concluded with the end of the project. The work in WP14, review of the 250 kw design, produced generic design guidelines for methanol operating SOFC system and a study on heat recovery solutions for marine SOFC systems. The design guidelines were based from the experience of work in all phases of the project. Table 2: Summary of the leaders and participants in the workpackages. Wärtsilä LR Wallenius Genoa DNV WP1 leader X X X X WP2 leader X WP3 X leader X WP4 X X leader X WP5 WP6 WP7 leader leader leader WP8 X leader WP9 X leader WP10 leader X WP11 X leader X WP12 X X leader WP13 leader X X X WP14 leader X METHAPU, no 031414 publishable Page 6