Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

Similar documents
Long Island Rail Road Performance Metrics Report

Customer Service, Operations and Security Committee. Information Item III-A. January 12, 2017

Presentation to the Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Addressing the Gap. LIRR President s Testimony. Raymond P. Kenny Acting President - MTA Long Island Rail Road February 8, 2007

High Quality Service through Continuous Improvement st Quarter Performance Report

PROGRESS ON BUDGET THEMES AND PERFORMANCE METRICS RECEIVE AND FILE PROGRESS REPORT ON BUDGET THEMES AND PERFORMANCE METRICS

Emerging Technology Panel Autonomous Ticketing Kiosks March 30, 2010 Ian Newberg

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. July 2018

Angelo State University Energy Savings Program October 30, 2014

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Paid Parking Pilot Program Parking Management

December 2018 ISSUE BRIEF HAS NEW YORK CITY S SUBWAY SYSTEM IMPROVED? A DATA-BASED REPORT CARD. Nicole Gelinas. Senior Fellow

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Municipal fleets and plug-in vehicles in Indianapolis

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. April 2018

LIGHT RAIL VEHICLE PROCUREMENT PHASE 2 Replacement Fleet Upgrades, February 2019

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012

Turnaround: Fixing NYC s Buses 2017 Report Card

Sound Transit Fare Enforcement Program

Toronto Police Service Annual Report: Parking Enforcement Unit 2017 Parking Ticket Issuance. Andy Pringle, Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Jeff Hanley Vice President Sales Energy Tubulars

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

Commuter Rail Update. October 25, 2018

Safety and Operations Committee. Action Item III-A. December 13, 2018

Rate Review 2017 Off-Street Municipal Parking Facilities

METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2018 JULY and NOVEMBER FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET REDUCTION PROGRAM (BRPs) ($ in millions) - Fav/(Unfav)

Energy Technical Memorandum

Streetcar Update. Review of December 2018

Commuter Rail Performance. October

AEP Ohio Distribution Reliability and Technology Programs

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION No. 57 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

EROAD HALF YEAR 2018 ANNOUNCEMENT AND UPDATE 28 November 2017 EROAD achieves record sales in New Zealand and US markets

Background Subway crowding and unmet transit needs: Slowing bus speeds: A growing city: Limited capital funding:

workplace charging an employer s guide

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS TRANSIT FLEET UPDATE

V. Gap Closing Programs and other Policy Actions

Manager of Market Strategy and Planning September 22, 2008

ScoreCard Jun 2014 [May 14 Data] Ridership

ScoreCard February 2014 [Jan 14 Data] Ridership

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Executive Summary October 2013

California s Emission Reduction Plan for Ports and International Goods Movement

Late Starter. Tuesday, November 6, 2018

DECEMBER 12, Parking Meter and Time Limit Preliminary Evaluation

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Expansion Projects Description

JULY 2009 REPORT: THE HOTEL INDUSTRY IS NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

Single Occupancy HOV Lane

Embracing the Challenge of the Broadband Energy Crisis

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

2010 Long Island Rail Road Service Reductions. Includes Changes to Commuter Rail Service REVISED

Our mission is to be the best public service transporter for passengers in the city of Kigali using modern, clean and safe urban city buses.

STATE OF THE SUBWAYS REPORT CARD

Beyond Commuter Rail International Models of Rail and Transit Excellence

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

ScoreCard November 2013 [Oct 13 Data] Ridership

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT FY 2005 PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN QUARTERLY KPI REPORT FOR: FISCAL YEAR 2015 THROUGH QUARTER 4 (JULY 2014 THROUGH JUNE 2015)

Pace of Infrastructure Deployment. Anthony Lambkin Manager EV Infrastructure, East Coast Nissan North America

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and MTA Metro-North Railroad (MNR) System-wide Service Standards

Goals, Objectives, Performance Measurements. Mayor s Transition Team Public Input Session: Finance & Budget/Pensacola Energy 1/22/2019

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Safety Communications Campaign

Final Administrative Decision

DOWNTOWN DUNEDIN WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR DOWNTOWN PAID PARKING

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

The Central London Congestion Charge

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 17, CONTACT: Mayor s Press Office

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Terry Blackwell Page 1 of 5. Education North Carolina State University BS, Electrical Engineering Power Systems emphasis

Modernising the Great Western railway

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. July 2017

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

The Future of Rail in Maryland. Kevin B. Quinn, Jr. Administrator

Precision Station Stopping Progress Update

Mobility Management: Caltrain

Monro, Inc. Second Quarter Fiscal 2019 Earnings Call. October 25, 2018

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Muni Forward: Get On Board! Siemens S200 SF Light Rail Vehicle

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Credit: Image Source / Rex / Shutterstock. Sustainability Research November 2017

Transcription:

Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

Performance Metrics Service Performance Improvement Metrics Service Metric OTP SHORT TRAINS SWITCH/SIGNAL DELAYS Change from 2018 2019 Goal YTD Target YTD Actual Difference 2.9% 93.0% 93.0% 96.1% 3.1% Higher -10% 1,138 190 180-5.3% Lower -15% 1,896 316 143-54.7% Lower Revenue Collection Improvement Metrics Fare Metric Change from 2018 2019 Goal YTD Target YTD Actual Difference FARE NOT COLLECTED RATE -10% 2.6% 2.6% 4.0% 1.4% Higher INCORRECT FARE COLLECTED RATE -10% 12.5% 12.5% 17.9% 5.4% Higher CREDIT CARD CHARGEBACK RATE -10% 0.045% 0.045% 0.076% -0.031% Higher e-tix REFUNDS PROCESSED -10% 25,413 4,236 4,640 9.6% Higher

MTA METRO-NORTH RAILROAD PAYMENT FRAUD / FARE EVASION STRATEGY REPORT ACTION ITEMS FEBRUARY 2019 2019 TARGET Action Items: DATE STATUS PAYMENT / CREDIT CARD FRAUD 1. Deploy Chip Credit/Debit Card Acceptance at Ticket Selling Machines 4th Qtr. In Progress 2. Deploy Visa Anti-Fraud Tool 1st Qtr. In Progress 3. Shift Monthly Pre-Sale Dates from 20th to 25th Day of Month 2nd Qtr. Implemented / May ticket 4. Eliminate Check Payment for New Mail&Ride Accounts 1st Qtr. Implemented ON BOARD TICKET COLLECTION / VALIDATION 1. Enhance Train Crew/Customer Education Efforts (focus on MTA etix) 2nd Qtr. In Progress 2. Charge On-Board Fare if a Customer has not pre-purchased an e-ticket 1st Qtr. In Progress 3. Reduce the Time Flag for Recently Activated e-tickets from 5 to 2 Minutes. 1st Qtr. Implemented 4. Reduce the e-tix Refund Fee Waiver Period from 5 Minutes to 2 Minutes 1st Qtr. Implemented 5. Request that MTA Audit Services Re-Assess Its On Board Compliance Program and Evaluate Whether a Redesign or Expansion, Performed Either In- House or by a Third Party, Would Be Beneficial 2nd Qtr. In Progress

Long Island Rail Road Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

Long Island Rail Road Performance Metrics Report The LIRR has greatly expanding its wheel truing capacity. This enables it to maintain car availability and reduce the number of short trains.

Executive Summary The Long Island Rail Road has developed a robust performance management program enabling it to assess agency performance, measure whether goals and objectives are being achieved and guide investments decisions. At its February 2019 meeting, the MTA Board approved an action item directing the LIRR to report monthly on three key metrics: Systemwide On Time Performance (OTP), the Number of Short Trains, and the Number of Track Circuit Incidents Causing At Least One Delay. Highlights through February 2019 include: Year to date through February the LIRR s 2019 OTP is 92.4%, including a 92.7% OTP in January 2019, which was almost 10% better than January 2018. The 2019 annual goal is 94%. Year to date through February the number of short trains dropped by 8.6% when compared to the same period in 2018 (730 versus 799). The annual goal is a 10.0% reduction. Year to date through February, the LIRR experienced 13 track circuit failures that caused at least one delay. This was four incidents more than the same period in 2018. The annual goal is a 16% reduction versus 2018. In addition, the LIRR has embarked on an anti fare evasion strategy that focuses both on reducing credit card fraud and improving on board fare collection. Highlights of this effort so far in 2019 include: The key initiative to reducing credit card fraud is the deployment of special chip readers on ticket selling machines and is scheduled to begin in Q2 2019 and be completed by the end of the year. Through February 2019, the LIRR s Credit Card Chargeback Rate was 0.77% versus a year end goal of 0.10%. Effective February 12th, 2019, the LIRR is no longer accepting checks for payment on new Mail & Ride accounts. The Transportation Department has strategically deployed train crews to increase its ability to collect fares onboard. The LIRR s Fare Not Collected Rate as of February 2019 was 6.1%, which was less than the 2018 annual rate of 6.9%. The 2019 goal is 5.0%. The LIRR s Incorrect Fare Collected Rate year to date as of February 2019 was 10.8%, which was less than the 2018 rate during the same time frame of 13.2%. The 2019 goal is 10.0%. The LIRR has established ambitious goals for 2019 and the leadership team is reviewing performance monthly to assess the impact that its activities and investments are having on the customer experience. It will use this information to shape decisions as the year progresses. Mark Young Vice President Management & Finance and Chief Financial Officer

On Time Performance (OTP) Systemwide OTP represents the average on time performance of all LIRR trains. The national commuter railroad industry standard defines on time as a train that arrives at its final destination within 5 minutes and 59 seconds of its scheduled time. OTP provides the best overall picture of the Rail Road s operating performance and surveys have revealed that it is the single most important factor affecting customer satisfaction. The LIRR s 2019 OTP goal is 94.0%, which is significantly better than the five year average of 91.6%. While the LIRR has not achieved an annual 94.0% OTP since 2009, it will continue to strive to achieve that level of performance even though there will be at least 209 scheduled track work programs during 2019 (including significant efforts related to Penn Station, Mainline Expansion, East Side Access and other projects) with a potential for more. Note there were only 67 track work programs in 2009. Performance Performance Yearly Performance Indicator 2017 2018 2019 YTD OTP Goal OTP 91.4% 90.5% 92.4% 94.0% December 2018 and January 2019 reveal dramatic improvements in OTP when compared to the prior year. While still short of the 94.0% goal, OTP improved from 89.7% in December 2017 to 93.5% in December 2018, and from 83.9% in January 2018 to 92.7% in January 2019. Additionally, OTP in February was 92.1% with a total 2019 year to date OTP of 92.4%. While the LIRR is yet to achieve its goal of 94% it is encouraged by the success of LIRR Forward in improving key facets of performance that will make the 94.0% goal that much more attainable. Some examples of these service improvements include a reduction in failures at our addressed switch locations, and the complete elimination of cars turning onto the right of way at our grade crossings, PSEG poles falling onto the right of way, and bridge strikes at Buckram Road and Post Avenue Bridges after their replacement.

Number of Short Trains The number of short trains is defined as the total number of AM and PM peak trains that operate with fewer cars than planned. This is an important metric because operating with fewer cars than planned can result in overcrowding and produce delays. It is one of the most important indicators of customer satisfaction and short trains can result in standees. The LIRR s 2019 goal for this metric is 3,397 short trains, which represents an 10.0% reduction from 2018 s number. Performance Indicator Number of Short Trains Performance Yearly Performance Reduction 2017 2018 2019 Goal Short Trains Goal 2691 3774 730 10.0% 3397 December 2018 and January 2019 represented marked improvements over the prior year. There was a 46% reduction in the number of short trains in December 2018 when compared to December 2017, and there was a 19% reduction in the number of short trains in January 2019 when compared to January 2018. In February 2019, the number of short trains increased slightly to 256 from 212 in 2018. The 8.6% reduction year to date is due to a few initiatives. The LIRR increased its wheel truing capacity by 30%; it adopted an aggressive vegetation management campaign along the right of way, clearing over 220 miles of trees and shrubbery that could negatively impact performance with their leaf fall; and it proactively reduced the speed of trains in strategic locations, which mitigates the risk of flat wheels.

Number of Track Circuit Failures The LIRR is committed to addressing those issues that cause the most train delays. Because of their location at major interlockings, track circuits are a critical piece of the infrastructure and their failure can cause significant delays. Improved performance in this area will have a dramatic impact on the customer experience and the Rail Road s performance. The LIRR s 2019 goal will be to reduce the number of track circuit failures that cause at least one train delay to 72 incidents, which is the midpoint between the Rail Road s best year since 2014 (59 failures in 2016) and its worst year (86 failures in 2018) and would also represent an approximate 16% reduction from 2018. Through two months of 2019, the LIRR had experienced 13 track circuit failures causing at least one delay. This was four more incidents than the same period in 2018. Many of these failures occurred in Harold Interlocking, which is the busiest interlocking in North America, and undergoing a tremendous amount of construction as part of the East Side Access construction project. The LIRR Engineering Department is carefully reviewing the nature of these failures and determining what actions it can take to reduce this number going forward. Performance Indicator Track Circuit Failures Performance Yearly Performance 2019 Reduction 2017 2018 YTD Goal Incident Goal 61 86 13 16% 72

Anti Fare Evasion Strategy The LIRR has developed a two pronged approach to its anti fare evasion strategy: 1. Address Payment/Credit Card Fraud 2. Enhance onboard ticket collection/validation Credit Card Fraud Strategy 1. Deploy Chip Credit/Debit Card Acceptance at Ticket Selling Machines Deployment will begin in Q2 2019 and be complete by the end of 2019. 2. Deploy Visa Anti Fraud Tool Deployment will take place in Q2 2019. 3. Shift Monthly Pre Sale Sates from 20 th to 25 th Day of Month Implementation scheduled for the May monthly ticket April 25, 2019. 4. Eliminate Check Payment for New Mail and Ride Accounts Status: Implemented on February 12, 2019. While the LIRR s chargeback rate is trending upward, once chip readers are deployed, full responsibility for fraud will shift to credit card companies and this rate will drop dramatically.

On Board Strategy 1. Enhance Train Crew/Customer Education Efforts The LIRR has launched a more robust education campaign through customer communications (public announcements, social media, etc.) and internal communications to train crews (bulletin boards, FAQs, notices, etc.). Phase 1 will be completed in Q2 2019. 2. Charge On Board Fare if a Customer has not Pre Purchased an e Ticket LIRR is considering the best approach to addressing this issue. 3. Reduce the Time Flag for Recently Activated e Tickets from 5 to 2 Minutes. This will be applicable to LIRR once e Ticket electronic scanning begins in Q2 2019. 4. Reduce the e Tix Refund Fee Waiver Period from 5 Minutes to 2 Minutes Implemented on February 12th, 2019. 5. Request that MTA Audit Services Re Assess Its On Board Compliance Program and Evaluate Whether a Redesign or Expansion, Performed Either In House or by a Third Party, Would Be Beneficial Will launch in Q2 2019. The data shows progress with regard to the Fare Not and Incorrect Fare Collected rate in recent months. The LIRR expects continued improvement as the year progresses and the initiatives take hold.

New York City Transit Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

Subway Service Metrics Customer Journey Time Performance Weekday Terminal On-Time Performance Monthly Delay Reduction NYCT Performance Metrics Feb-19 82.0% 76.4% 267% of goal achieved Goal 80.0% 71.0% 10,000 Bus Service Metrics Mean Distance Between Failures Service Delivered Wait Assessment Feb-19 Goal 8,834 6,800 97.5% 97.5% 78.9% 78.0%

Fare Evasion Rate Transit Fare Evasion, 4 th Quarter 2018 Subway Fare Evasion Results The 4 th quarter 2018 fare evasion rate for subways was relatively flat compared to the same period the year prior, but the rate for the 12 months ending December 2018 is up 0.9% from 2017. Subway Fare Evasion Survey Summary Oct-Dec 2018 Oct-Dec 2017 Change Percentage Points 12 Mo. Ending Dec 2018 12 Mo. Ending Dec 2017 Change Percentage Points Total Subway Fare Evasion 3.4% 3.5% -0.1% 3.2% 2.3% +0.9% Estimated Fare Evasion Revenue Loss ($ Millions) $26 $27-4.5% $97 $70 +38.3% Enforcement Actions TOS TABS Summonses 17,102 11,465 +49.2% 53,142 54,846-3.1% TOS C-Summonses 1,826-1,826 TOS Arrests 1,017 3,818-73.4% 5,904 17,842-66.9% Total Enforcement Actions 19,945 15,283 +30.5% 60,872 72,688-16.3% 5% Quarterly Subway Fare Evasion 4% 3.5% 3.8% 3.4% 3% 2.9% 2.1% 2.4% 2.8% 2% 1% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7% 1.5% 1.8% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% 0%

Fare Evasion Rate Bus Fare Evasion Results The 4 th quarter bus fare evasion rate increased to 21.9%, up 5.9% from the same period the year prior, and the rate for the 12 months ending December 2018 is up 5.1% from 2017. Bus Fare Evasion Bus Fare Evasion Survey Summary Oct-Dec 2018 Oct-Dec 2017 Change Percentage Points 12 Mo. Ending Dec 2018 12 Mo. Ending Dec 2017 Change Percentage Points Local Bus Evasion (Excl SBS) 24.2% 17.7% +6.5% 20.3% 14.7% +5.6% Select Bus Service (SBS) Evasion 2.5% 2.0% +0.4% 2.3% 2.2% +0.1% Total Local & SBS Bus Evasion 21.9% 16.0% +5.9% 18.4% 13.4% +5.1% Estimated Fare Evasion Revenue Loss ($ Millions) $39 $29 +35.6% $128 $97 +32.3% 30% Quarterly Local & SBS Bus Fare Evasion 25% Local SBS Local & SBS 24.2% 20% 17.7% 20.4% 21.9% 15% 13.8% 11.1% 15.1% 10.8% 10% 10.6% 10.2% 15.2% 12.6% 13.2% 12.6% 16.7% 16.5% 5% 2.8% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 2.2% 2.5% 0%