Damper Analysis using Energy Method

Similar documents
Design of Formula SAE Suspension

Development of a Nonlinear Shock Absorber Model for Low-Frequency NVH Applications

Track Simulation and Vehicle Characterization with 7 Post Testing

Wide Tires, Narrow Tires

Bus Handling Validation and Analysis Using ADAMS/Car

Steady-State Vehicle Optimization Using Pareto-Minimum Analysis

Study on Dynamic Behaviour of Wishbone Suspension System

Formula SAE Race Car Cockpit Design An Ergonomics Study for the Cockpit

Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Hydraulic Power Steering Systems

SURFACE VEHICLE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

Estimation of Vehicle Side Slip Angle and Yaw Rate

Engine Coolant Testing: Fourth Volume

Shift-time Limited Acceleration: Final Drive Ratios in Formula SAE

Design and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs

A New 4.5 Liter In-Line 6 Cylinder Engine, 1FZ-FE for the Toyota Land Cruiser

Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008 Vol II WCE 2008, July 2-4, 2008, London, U.K.

MODELING SUSPENSION DAMPER MODULES USING LS-DYNA

Measurement of Dynamic Properties of Automotive Shock Absorbers for NVH

DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR STUDY OF A PASSENGER CAR DURING HANDLING MANEUVERING

PETROLEUM MEASUREMENT MANUAL THE PERFORMANCE OF TURBINE METERS IN LOADING GANTRIES - A REVIEW OF PROVING AND TEST DATA

Faculty Code: AU13. Faculty Name: RAJESH. M. Designation: LECTURER

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

Anti-Lock Braking Performance and Hydraulic Brake Pressure Estimation

Vehicle Handling with Tire Tread Separation

Properties of Passenger Car Tires with Tread Detachment

Design of a Winston Cup Chassis for Torsional Stiffness

Selected Technical Papers STP1564 Viscosity and Rheology of In-Service Fluids as They Pertain to Condition Monitoring

Evaluation of Deadband Effect in Steer- by-wire Force Feedback System by Using Driving Simulator Nuksit Noomwongs a and Sunhapos Chantranuwathana b

Testing Of Fluid Viscous Damper

Simulation and Analysis of Vehicle Suspension System for Different Road Profile

Australian Standard. Caravan and light trailer towing components. Part 1: Towbars and towing brackets AS

Surface Coating on Engine Valve

Experimental Heat Transfer Analysis of Air Gap in Twin Tube Shock Absorber

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PUSH ROD ROCKER ARM SUSPENSION USING MONO SPRING

A 6-Speed Automatic Transmission Plant Dynamics Model for HIL Test Bench

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Modeling of 17-DOF Tractor Semi- Trailer Vehicle

Design, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System

Cane Creek Double Barrel Instructions

Modern Instrumental Methods of Elemental Analysis of Petroleum Products and Lubricants

Constructive Influences of the Energy Recovery System in the Vehicle Dampers

The Shock Absorber Handbook Second Edition

Analysis on Steering Gain and Vehicle Handling Performance with Variable Gear-ratio Steering System(VGS)

QUARTER CAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM WITH ONE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SIMULATED USING SIMULINK. L. Bereteu, A. Perescu

Throttle Icing: Understanding the Icing Mechanism and Effects of Various Throttle Features

Special edition paper

Automotive STP Lubricant Testing. and Additive Development. Simon Tung, Bernard Kinker, and Mathias Woydt Editors

Case study on Carbon Fiber spring suspension for FORD ENDEVOUR THUNDER+

PART XV Metering Systems SECTION 2 GUIDE TO GAS METERING SYSTEMS

SP Commercial Vehicle Electronics Design. The 46th L. Ray Buckendale Lecture. Vern A. Caron, Caron Engineering. 560uH. C12.

GLOBAL TOUCHLESS SENSING & GESTURE RECOGNITION MARKET ( )

Hybrid Vehicles Lessons Learned and Future Prospects

Design and Testing of an Active Suspension System for a 2-1/2 Ton Military Truck

Jim Kasprzak 36 years racing experience Developed 7-post testing for GM Racing Currently Race Engineer for SRT Viper Expertise includes:

Experimental Investigation of Effects of Shock Absorber Mounting Angle on Damping Characterstics

Mathematical Modelling and Simulation Of Semi- Active Suspension System For An 8 8 Armoured Wheeled Vehicle With 11 DOF

Collegiate Design Series Suspension 101. Steve Lyman Formula SAE Lead Design Judge DaimlerChrysler Corporation

Passenger Vehicle Steady-State Directional Stability Analysis Utilizing EDVSM and SIMON

Shock Absorbers What is Ride Control Vehicle Dynamics Suspension System Shock Absorbers Struts Terminology

2017 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Active Suspensions For Tracked Vehicles

TEST METHODS CONCERNING TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

DOUBLE WISHBONE SUSPENSION SYSTEM

The Effect of Transfer Port Geometry on Scavenge Flow Velocities At High Engine Speed

Comparative study between double wish-bone and macpherson suspension system

Design of Damping Base and Dynamic Analysis of Whole Vehicle Transportation based on Filtered White-Noise GongXue Zhang1,a and Ning Chen2,b,*

Parameter optimisation design for a six-dof heavy duty vehicle seat suspension

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

ELECTRICITY GENERATION USING WIND POWER

This is a repository copy of Combating automative engine valve recession.

SHOCK DYNAMOMETER: WHERE THE GRAPHS COME FROM

Industrial Controls Training System. Motor Drives. Courseware Sample F0

Study on System Dynamics of Long and Heavy-Haul Train

EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERMEASURES IN RESPONSE TO FMVSS 201 UPPER INTERIOR HEAD IMPACT PROTECTION

Seismic-upgrading of Existing Stacks of Nuclear Power Station using Structural Control Oil Dampers

Semi-Active Suspension for an Automobile

Optimization of Seat Displacement and Settling Time of Quarter Car Model Vehicle Dynamic System Subjected to Speed Bump

The operating principle and experimental verification of the hydraulic electromagnetic energy-regenerative shock absorber

Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle

Influence of Internal Combustion Engine Parameters on Gas Leakage through the Piston Rings Area

Developed Technologies of the New Rotary Engine (RENESIS)

NOVEL DAMPER FOR PASSIVE SECURITY INCREASING

Vehicle functional design from PSA in-house software to AMESim standard library with increased modularity

Methods for In-Vehicle Measurement of Truck Driver Postures

Comparison Of Multibody Dynamic Analysis Of Double Wishbone Suspension Using Simmechanics And FEA Approach

Steering Actuator for Autonomous Driving and Platooning *1

DEVELOPMENT OF HYDRAULIC BRAKE DESIGN SYSTEM APPLICATION

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

KINEMATICAL SUSPENSION OPTIMIZATION USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT METHOD

A Relationship between Tyre Pressure and Rolling Resistance Force under Different Vehicle Speed

THE SIMULATION OF ONE SIDE OF TETRAHEDRON AIRBAGS IMPACT ATTENUATION SYSTEM

Part 1: Basic requirements

Load Analysis and Multi Body Dynamics Analysis of Connecting Rod in Single Cylinder 4 Stroke Engine

BRAKING SYSTEM DESIGN FOR ALL TERRIAN VEHICLE (ATV)

Roehrig Engineering, Inc.

ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF AIR-GAP BETWEEN INTERNAL CYLINDER AND OUTER BODY IN AUTOMOTIVE SHOCK ABSORBER

A STUDY OF HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE OF VISCOUS BYPASS GAP IN MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPER

Do-It-Yourself Battery Pack

Transcription:

SAE TECHNICAL 2002-01-3536 PAPER SERIES E Damper Analysis using Energy Method Angelo Cesar Nuti General Motors do Brasil Ramon Orives General Motors do Brasil Flavio Garzeri General Motors do Brasil 11 th International Mobility Technology Congress and Exhibition São Paulo, Brasil 2002, November 19-21 AV. PAULISTA, 2073 - HORSA II - CJ. 2001 - CEP 01311-940 - SÃO PAULO SP

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. For permission and licensing requests contact: SAE Permissions 400 Commonwealth Drive Warrendale, PA 15096-0001-USA Email: permissions@sae.org Fax: 724-772-4891 Tel: 724-772-4028 For multiple print copies contact: SAE Customer Service Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA) Fax: 724-776-1615 Email: CustomerService@sae.org ISBN 0-7680-1109-4 Copyright 2002 SAE International Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions. Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication by SAE should send the manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE. Printed in USA

Copyright 2002 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc 2002-01-3536 Damper Analysis using Energy Method Angelo Cesar Nuti Flavio Jose Garzeri Ramon Alberto Orives General Motors do Brasil Ltda. ABSTRACT The force x velocity graph is the most used tool for suspension damper analysis. This approach hides important information regarding the bleeds / spring / orifice combination. This paper describes the energy analysis, comparing two different damper suppliers, with comfort measurements using B&K Human Response Vibration Meter and MTS single channel Four Post system. INTRODUCTION The damper is speed sensitive, but with some suppliers adds the displacement and even acceleration sensitivity. In overall, the tuning work is select the bleeds / spring (disc) / orifice, changing the damping values for low / medium / high velocities respectively. This tuning work is performed for compression and rebound, creating a great number of combinations. The focus of this paper will be the bi-tube design, were the valve design is different for each supplier. The supplier A uses the blow off design for base valve and piston. The supplier B uses the blow off design for piston and disc design for the base valve. - Reference dampers supplier A - First proposal supplier B (peak damping forces and energy) - Second proposal - supplier B (peak damping forces) TESTS PERFORMED The tests will be divided in: - Damper Measurement The dampers were measured in an electric hydraulic system, with constant displacement and different frequencies, resulting in different velocities. The plotted charts show the peak rebound force, peak compression force and energy. - Four Post Comfort Measurement - Uneven Belgian Blocks - Uneven Asphalt Road - Bounce / Pitch / Roll Motion - Four Post Subjective Evaluations - Uneven Belgian Blocks - Uneven Asphalt Road SYSTEMS COMBINATION Three proposals will be tested, assuming the following configurations: - Bounce / Pitch / Roll Motion The Four Post inputs are based on Cruz Alta Proving Ground tracks. 1

13 3-2 5 6 32 13 3-2 5 6 32 133 39 9 26 6 39 9 26 6-67 65 98 665 798 133 133-6 65-5 3 32 9 DATA ANALYSIS Damper Measurements For the following charts, the reference damper is represented by the continuos bolt line, damper proposal#1 by the gray line and damper proposal#2 by the dashed line. Rear Damper Velocity # 1 Front Damper Velocity # 1 Rear Damper Velocity # 2 Front Damper Velocity # 2 Rear Damper Velocity # 3 Front Damper Velocity # 3 The previous charts shows that the shape are different for the first and second velocity, being almost the same for the third velocity and higher. Just to remember the area of this curve means the energy. 2

Four Post Measurements The measurements were done at z-axis using special equipment (Human Response Vibration Meter B&K). Equivalent Exposure Measurement (EEQ) was used to compare the proposals. This parameter is a percentage of the daily whole body vibration mentioned in ISO 2631. The ISO 2631 defines the human limit exposure time for different frequencies. The Human Response Vibration Meter could not read the differences between the three proposals for the Uneven Asphalt Road and Bounce / Pitch / Roll Motion. For the Uneven Belgian Blocks, the values measured are represented bellow: Supplier A 84% CONCLUSIONS The EEQ could not be applied for some road conditions, which are important for the vehicle behavior, being limited for the Uneven Belgian Blocks. The EEQ shows that the supplier B#1 and supplier B#2 have almost the same behavior and supplier A is completely different from supplier B#1 and supplier B#2. The subjective evaluation shows that the supplier A has almost the same behavior as the supplier B #1 and supplier B#2 is completely different from supplier A and supplier B#1. The EEQ value does not represent the driver feeling. The use of the Four Post System gives us a controlled environment and being possible to create any vertical input combination. The negative side is that reactions due to lateral acceleration can not be repeated. Supplier B # 1 99% Supplier B # 2 96% Four Post Subjective Evaluations The supplier A damper will be used as reference. The used rating varies from 0 to 10. Uneven Belgian Blocks Supplier B#1 deteriorated by 0.5 point. Supplier B#2 improved by 2.0 points. Uneven Asphalt Road Supplier B#1 has the same rating. Supplier B#2 deteriorated by 1.5 point. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the Cruz Alta Proving Ground, General Motors do Brasil, ITDC (Opel-Germany) and Vehicle Dynamic Group (MPG- GMC USA). REFERENCES [1] Human-Response Vibration Meter 2512 / Instruction Manual B&K, Denmark, 1985. [2] REIMPELL, J., STOLL, H. - The Automotive Chassis: Engineering Principals, SAE, 1996. [3] GILLESPIE, T.D. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, SAE, 1992. Bounce / Pitch / Roll Motion Supplier B#1 has the same rating. Supplier B#2 deteriorated by 3.0 points. 3

The appearance of the ISSN code at the bottom of this page indicates SAE s consent that copies of the paper may be made for personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition however, that the copier pay a $ 7.00 per article copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Operations Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale. SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of publication. Direct your orders to SAE Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. Quantity reprint rates can be obtained from the Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. To request permission to reprint a technical paper or permission to use copyrighted SAE publications in other works, contact the SAE Publications Group. All SAE papers, standards, and selected books are abstracted and indexed in the Global Mobility Database. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISSN 0148-7191 Copyright 2002 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions. For permission to publish this paper in full or in part, contact the SAE Publications Group. Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication through SAE should send the manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE.