Prior Lake - Savage Area Schools Prior Lake, MN

Similar documents
Prepared: November 2011 (revised)

Prepared: November 2010

GREENE COUNTY SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT APRIL 12, 2017

MAY 2014 ROCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS ROCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEAMWORKS INTERNATIONAL

WORTHINGTON SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT FEBRUARY 14, 2018

WORTHINGTON SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT JANUARY 25, 2019

DRAFT. Enrollment Projections Report. November 25, 2015

School Districts of Randolph County, IN Demographic Study

Transportation Effects of Consolidation September 21, 2016

Yale University Race/Ethnicity and International Student Enrollment by School to Race/Ethnicity Unknown.

Watauga County Schools Capital Improvement Plan 2015

Greenwich Public Schools Enrollment Projections. Enrollment Information

Retail Site Analysis. Filling Station Car Wash FM 1092 Missouri City, Texas 77459

prepared by Western Suffolk BOCES, Office of School Planning and Research, for Chappaqua CSD, 2008/09

Plan and Profile for the Black Dog Natural Gas Pipeline Project Docket No. G002/GP

FAMU Completers Satisfaction Survey Results 2010

Preliminary Survey ART, DANCE, DRAMA, MUSIC STATEWIDE

Jarrell Independent School District

SUMMARY OF FALL 2009 ENROLLMENTS. November 2, 2009

RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENTS

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

WESTON, CONNECTICUT Demography and Enrollment Projections

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

-- CURRENT AND PROJECTED CAPACITY UTILIZATION -- SCHOOL YEARS

Purpose of Tonight s Meeting

Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 3- November 13, 2013

OFFICE OF FLEET MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 7, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Grease Monkey E State St, Rockford, IL 61108

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Carson City School District Completed School Bond

Appendix A. Community Workshop Results PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

School Project Summary Report

Student Attendance Area Committee September 13, ES Existing Cond.

DRAFT. Enrollment Projections Report. February 12, 2016

Price Category Breakdown - February 2010

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

2012 Water Consumption Statistics Report. Water Services Department

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Demographic Study. Boyd Independent School District. Fall Learn from Yesterday Understand Today Plan for Tomorrow

Liberty Hill ISD. District Housing Activity Report 3rd Quarter, 2012

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

Zone Based Structured Scheduling: A Case Study in Lee County, North Carolina

DEMOGRAPHY OF THE SALTON SEA STUDY AREA POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT TO ENSURING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE *

Commercial Industrial Land Available

residents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by

New Construction, Mixed Use Opportunity 6351 Crawfordsville Rd, Indianapo-

increase of over four per cent compared to the average of $409,058 reported in January 2010.

DIBELSnet System- Wide Percentile Ranks for. DIBELS Next. Elizabeth N Dewey, M.Sc. Ruth A. Kaminski, Ph.D. Roland H. Good, III, Ph.D.

WCSD Zoning Advisory Committee. New Middle School in the Sun Valley area for SY 2019/20

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

South Carolina State University Program Enrollment Fall Semesters

FOR SALE DEMPSTER STREET RETAIL CENTER Dempster St / Skokie, IL farabrokerage.com. Property Highlights FOR SALE: $895,000

Scenario 22. Abbey Lane. Percent tutilization

Student Attendance Area Committee November 29, 2018

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT SCHOOL PROFILE PUBLIC HEALTH FALL 2018

New Construction, Mixed Use Opportunity 6351 Crawfordsville Rd, Indianapo-

Sigmon Commons 5225 Sigmon Rd, Wilmington, NC 28403

Demographic Report. Jarrell Independent School District. Spring Learn from Yesterday Understand Today Plan for Tomorrow

VACANT LAND FOR SALE: 20.4 Acres

The first chart is a listing of Pre K schools and their membership for the current month.

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

WINDOM ELECTRIC UTILITY: RATE STUDY. Tim Miller Manager, Financial Analysis & Rates Missouri River Energy Services December 30, 2015

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Wilson Pacific Elementary and Middle School. Departures Committee 28 May 2014

Rare ±1 Acre Drive Thru Opportunity 281 S Cannon Blvd, Kannapolis, NC 28083

Morning Parking Utilization Trends

Prime Commercial Land in Developing Area

Retail Site Analysis. Shenandoah Filling Station Interstate 45 Spring, Texas 77381

Transit System Technical Report

Transportation Update. Binford Sloan, Director of Transportation, October 9, 2018 Presented to School Board

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

14138 SR 50-Clermont FL- Automobi

Fund 3XX Revenue vs Expenses

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

INTERNET ACCESS GOALS AND PLANS

For Sale Auto Body Shop

2005 City of Santa Paula Potable Water System Master Plan Amendment

Robb Drive Development

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Customer Preferences & Solar PV Adoption

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT COLLEGE PROFILE LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES FALL 2017

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Commercial Highway 27 Land Lake Hamilton Florida 3.5 AC +/- only $475, US HIGHWAY 27, Lake Hamilton, FL 33851

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Adult Elementary Preferred Standard Approved Standard Standard for New or Relocated Blanket Range Range Fixtures, Grab Bars, etc.

Appendix 3 Traffic Technical Memorandum

ELKO JUNCTION SOUTH EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY STRATA REALTY GROUP DEVELOPED & MANAGED BY MERIDIAN PACIFIC

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L82

Q1 I would classify myself as a... (you may choose only one)

Elementary and Middle School Spring 2015 Results

Transcription:

Prior Lake - Savage Area Schools Prior Lake, MN Elementary Boundary Change Options A-1 and B-1: March 12 th, 2019 Report created by TeamWorks International, Inc 7037 20th Avenue S. Centerville, MN 55038 (651) 429-7340 www.teamworksintl.net

Prior Lake Savage Area Schools: Boundary Change Scenario Options A-1 andb-1 1 INTRODUCTION The following analysis presents two possible scenarios (Options A- 1 and B-1) at will add a new elementary school to the Prior Lake Savage Area School District, along with adjusting elementary attendance boundaries. In addition to adding a new elementary school, the following is included in each Model: Grainwood becomes a district-wide Spanish Immersion School Edgewood (former location of Spanish Immersion) becomes a district-wide Pre-K Center Construction at several buildings resulting in added classrooms and new Ideal Capacity numbers SAGE uses 5 classrooms at Westwood for grades 3-5 Option A-1 expands on a previous model, Option A. Adjustments were made to the Jeffers Pond and Westwood boundaries around the Eagle Creek Ave NE corridor. Additionally, an adjustment to the Northern portion of the Hamilton Ridge boundary was made adding more kids to Hamilton Ridge and reducing kids in the Redtail Ridge boundary. Option B-1 expands on a previous model, Option B. In this option, the same adjustments were made to the Jeffers Pond and Westwood boundaries as described above and very minor adjustments to Jeffers Pond and Five Hawks where Eagle Creek Ave NE crosses the Prior Lakes. Table 1 shows a breakdown of Ideal Capacities for school year 2019-2020 for the current design, and Options A-1 and B-1. Maps 1-3 shows the design current design, and Options A-1 and B-1, while Maps 4-6 represents the active developments currently factored into the enrollment projections found throughout this report with the respected modeled boundaries. Appendix 1 presents enrollment projections for all elementary schools based on the current design, and Options A-1 and B-1. It assumes that all construction is completed school year 2019-2020; which is not the case but used here to show 5 years worth of a completed design. Appendix 2 presents socioeconomic tables for the current design, and Options A-1 and B-1. These tables represent all K-5 resident students living within that boundary and not necessarily the students that will attend that particular school. NOTE: The Prior Lake Savage Area School District has provided TeamWorks International with updated Ideal Capacity numbers that differ from the previous numbers used in the full Demographic, Housing, and Enrollment report presented in January 2019 and the Boundary Change Model 1A and 2A report presented in February. The Ideal Capacity Numbers found in this report used for school year 2018-2019 have been updated and are different than in past reports. Ideal Capacity for projected school years in both models use capacity numbers based on post-construction. TABLE 1: IDEAL CAPACITY SUMMARY (RESIDENT STUDENTS ONLY) Boundary Current Design 2019-2020 Model A-1 2019-2020 Model B-1 2019-2020 Five Hawks 80% 91% 78% Glendale 83% 77% 76% Grainwood 96% NA NA Jeffers Pond 80% 73% 72% Hamilton Ridge NA 63% 76% Spanish Immersion 130% 95% 95% Redtail Ridge 117% 69% 64% Westwood 66% 71% 79%

2 Map 1: Prior Lake Savage Area Schools: Current Design

3 Map 2: Prior Lake Savage Area Schools Option A-1

4 Map 3: Prior Lake Savage Area Schools Option B-1

5 Map 4: Active Developments Current Design

6 Map 5: Active Developments Option A-1

7 Map 6: Active Developments Option B-1

8 APPENDIX 1 Pre and Post-Construction Capacity and Enrollment Projections

9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS Existing Elementary Capacity # of spaces below do not include Art or Music Rooms. Computer labs included in classroom count. Total # # of Large Remaining of full size Rooms Used # used for Available for K-5 classrooms for SPED Pre-K K-5 Capacity Five Hawks 29 2 0 27 634.5 Glendale 30 1 1 28 658 Redtail Ridge 28 2 0 26 611 * Jeffers Pond 28 0 2 26 611 Grainwood 25 4 2 19 446.5 Edgewood 21 3 8 10 235 WestWood 28 0 0 28 658 Avg. students per K-5 classroom: * Changed based on March 12th meeting Totals: 189 12 13 164 3854 23.5 Post Construction Elementary Capacity Total # # of Large Remaining of full size Rooms Used # used for Available for K-5 classrooms for SPED Pre-K K-5 Capacity Five Hawks 29 1 0 28 658 * Glendale (CID) 30 2 2 26 611 Redtail Ridge 30 2 0 28 658 * Jeffers Pond 30 1 2 27 634.5 * Grainwood (LODL) 23 1 0 22 517 Edgewood (PreK Center) 20 4 14 0 0 WestWood (SAGE) 29 0 0 29 681.5 New Elementary (CID) 32 2 0 30 705 Totals: 223 13 18 190 4465 Avg. students per K-5 classroom: 23.5 Above Grid Reflects: 2 PreK Rooms GD (Nature-based) 2 PreK Rooms JP (Nature-based) 14 PreK Rooms EW 5 Rooms allocated for SAGE at WW GW: Community Education Allocation of 2 Classrooms/1 Classroom remodel with Media Center * Changed based on March 12th meeting

10 Middle School Capacity Includes specialty classrooms/teaching stations (ie. Art, Music, PE, Labs) Current # Current # of Large Proposed # Proposed # of Large Teaching Student SPED Teaching Student SPED Stations Capacity Classrooms Stations Capacity Classrooms Hidden Oaks 47 1119 6 56 1333 6 Twin Oaks 39 928 4 48 1142 4 Totals: 86 2047 10 104 2475 10 Avg. students per classroom: 28 High School Capacity Includes specialty classrooms/teaching stations (ie. Art, Music, PE, Labs) Current # Current # of Large Proposed # Proposed # of Large Teaching 9-12 SPED Teaching 9-12 SPED Stations Capacity Classrooms Stations Capacity Classrooms High School 93 2530 125 3400 Avg. students per classroom: Use classroom utilization rate of: Bridges ALC Capacity 32 85% Current Current Proposed Proposed # of Student # of Student Classrooms Capacity Classrooms Capacity Bridges ALC 5 100 7 140 Avg. students per classroom: 20

11 PRIOR LAKE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT (RESIDENT STUDENTS) K 413 454 484 425 481 520 549 565 560 598 561 554 570 1 431 451 479 475 467 519 533 558 615 587 626 585 580 2 454 463 437 504 488 527 544 550 597 659 628 672 626 3 516 481 460 421 534 535 565 550 580 630 698 659 703 4 477 534 484 443 484 560 551 559 561 589 639 710 668 5 521 502 540 490 490 510 600 562 536 543 560 608 678 6 544 528 493 557 546 563 585 640 612 584 592 610 663 7 522 544 540 509 604 579 579 604 662 633 604 612 631 8 552 531 548 544 517 631 610 595 624 683 654 624 632 9 525 598 575 615 629 594 689 657 651 682 747 731 692 10 586 526 594 571 615 628 594 685 651 658 684 743 733 11 539 615 518 589 565 607 624 593 667 691 640 671 739 12 517 581 603 527 618 586 636 666 594 735 678 665 713 Total K - 5 2,812 2,885 2,884 2,758 2,944 3,171 3,342 3,344 3,449 3,607 3,713 3,789 3,825 Total 6-8 1,618 1,603 1,581 1,610 1,667 1,773 1,774 1,839 1,898 1,901 1,850 1,846 1,926 Total 9-12 2,167 2,320 2,290 2,302 2,427 2,415 2,543 2,601 2,563 2,766 2,749 2,811 2,876 Total K - 12 6,597 6,808 6,755 6,670 7,038 7,359 7,659 7,784 7,910 8,273 8,312 8,446 8,627 Ideal Target Facility Utilization K-5 % 86% 76% 80% 82% 84% 85% Ideal Target Facility Utilization 6-8 % 90% 77% 77% 75% 75% 78% Ideal Target Facility Utilization 9-12 % 99% 72% 78% 78% 79% 81% Ideal Target Facility Utilization K-12 % 91% 75% 79% 79% 80% 82%

12 FIVE HAWKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT PROJECTED ENROLLMENT (CURRENT DESIGN) K 45 46 57 80 75 73 89 91 83 87 100 84 72 1 69 81 81 86 85 74 78 88 105 84 89 101 86 2 93 75 80 85 89 93 74 78 91 108 86 91 104 3 79 95 78 88 92 101 95 67 80 93 110 88 93 4 68 84 104 82 98 99 99 95 68 81 94 112 90 5 78 76 91 109 83 107 106 95 99 71 84 98 117 Total Students 432 457 491 530 522 547 541 514 525 524 563 575 562 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 81% 80% 80% 86% 87% 85.4% FIVE HAWKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 45 46 57 80 75 73 89 91 101 108 101 100 103 1 69 81 81 86 85 74 78 88 110 107 114 106 105 2 93 75 80 85 89 93 74 78 107 119 115 123 114 3 79 95 78 88 92 101 95 67 97 106 119 113 121 4 68 84 104 82 98 99 99 95 96 99 109 122 116 5 78 76 91 109 83 107 106 95 88 88 90 99 115 Total Students 432 457 491 530 522 547 541 514 599 627 648 663 674 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 81% 91% 95% 98% 101% 102.4% FIVE HAWKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 45 46 57 80 75 73 89 91 86 93 86 85 88 1 69 81 81 86 85 74 78 88 94 91 98 91 90 2 93 75 80 85 89 93 74 78 92 102 98 106 98 3 79 95 78 88 92 101 95 67 83 91 102 97 104 4 68 84 104 82 98 99 99 95 82 85 93 105 99 5 78 76 91 109 83 107 106 95 75 76 77 85 98 Total Students 432 457 491 530 522 547 541 514 513 538 555 569 578 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 81% 78% 82% 84% 86% 87.8%

13 GLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (CURRENT DESIGN) K 68 54 54 40 69 58 56 99 75 83 77 78 89 1 95 83 63 61 60 68 61 75 111 84 93 86 88 2 75 88 82 89 63 68 77 72 86 128 97 107 99 3 98 68 84 45 68 64 78 89 80 95 142 107 118 4 83 98 69 57 82 67 69 89 95 85 102 151 115 5 96 81 98 70 88 86 74 84 100 107 96 114 170 Total Students 515 472 450 362 430 411 415 508 547 582 605 644 678 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 77% 83% 88% 92% 98% 103% GLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 68 54 54 40 69 58 56 99 80 85 80 79 81 1 95 83 63 61 60 68 61 75 87 84 90 84 83 2 75 88 82 89 63 68 77 72 85 94 91 97 90 3 98 68 84 45 68 64 78 89 76 84 94 89 96 4 83 98 69 57 82 67 69 89 76 78 86 97 91 5 96 81 98 70 88 86 74 84 69 70 71 78 90 Total Students 515 472 450 362 430 411 415 508 472 495 511 523 532 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 77% 77% 81% 84% 86% 87% GLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 68 54 54 40 69 58 56 99 78 84 78 78 80 1 95 83 63 61 60 68 61 75 86 83 89 82 82 2 75 88 82 89 63 68 77 72 84 93 89 96 89 3 98 68 84 45 68 64 78 89 75 82 92 88 94 4 83 98 69 57 82 67 69 89 74 77 85 95 90 5 96 81 98 70 88 86 74 84 69 69 70 77 89 Total Students 515 472 450 362 430 411 415 508 466 488 504 516 524 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 77% 76% 80% 82% 84% 86%

14 JEFFERS POND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (CURRENT DESIGN) K 47 66 63 63 74 86 77 63 68 96 81 74 79 1 70 80 90 79 70 76 87 71 71 67 95 80 73 2 78 96 66 94 86 85 87 89 80 79 75 106 89 3 95 81 66 61 94 77 83 89 86 77 77 72 103 4 87 103 74 71 74 102 87 84 96 92 83 82 77 5 101 98 97 72 76 78 114 93 91 103 100 90 88 Total Students 478 524 456 440 474 504 535 489 492 516 510 503 508 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 80% 80% 84% 83% 82% 83% JEFFERS POND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 47 66 63 63 74 86 77 63 78 83 78 77 79 1 70 80 90 79 70 76 87 71 85 82 88 82 81 2 78 96 66 94 86 85 87 89 83 92 88 95 88 3 95 81 66 61 94 77 83 89 74 82 92 87 93 4 87 103 74 71 74 102 87 84 74 77 84 94 89 5 101 98 97 72 76 78 114 93 68 68 70 76 88 Total Students 478 524 456 440 474 504 535 489 461 483 499 511 519 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 80% 73% 76% 79% 80% 82% JEFFERS POND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 47 66 63 63 74 86 77 63 77 83 77 76 79 1 70 80 90 79 70 76 87 71 84 81 87 81 80 2 78 96 66 94 86 85 87 89 82 91 88 94 87 3 95 81 66 61 94 77 83 89 74 81 91 86 93 4 87 103 74 71 74 102 87 84 73 76 83 94 89 5 101 98 97 72 76 78 114 93 67 68 69 76 88 Total Students 478 524 456 440 474 504 535 489 458 480 496 507 516 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 80% 72% 76% 78% 80% 81%

15 LODL (SPANISH IMMERSION) - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTIONS A1 & B1 K 140 154 158 51 48 61 66 72 82 86 83 81 82 1 50 48 62 65 93 82 86 83 81 2 50 53 61 88 95 84 88 84 3 53 49 82 87 95 83 88 4 50 67 78 84 90 80 5 79 85 92 99 95 Total Students 140 154 158 51 98 159 234 297 491 514 523 525 511 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 126% 95% 99% 101% 102% 99%

16 HAMILTON RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 75 81 75 74 77 1 82 79 85 79 78 2 80 89 86 92 85 3 72 79 89 84 91 4 71 74 81 91 86 5 66 66 67 74 85 Total Students 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 447 468 483 495 503 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 63% 66% 69% 70% 71% HAMILTON RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 90 96 90 89 91 1 98 95 101 94 93 2 96 106 102 110 102 3 86 94 106 100 108 4 85 88 97 109 103 5 78 78 80 88 102 Total Students 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 532 557 576 590 599 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 76% 79% 82% 84% 85%

17 REDTAIL RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (CURRENT DESIGN) K 46 58 70 85 101 111 129 100 153 142 122 135 129 1 73 89 103 109 89 124 111 119 105 161 149 128 142 2 86 87 91 102 110 103 119 117 126 111 170 157 136 3 96 96 85 93 113 111 112 106 117 125 111 169 157 4 86 98 91 89 92 118 115 103 106 116 125 111 169 5 96 89 95 97 93 96 132 109 107 110 121 130 115 Total Students 483 517 535 575 598 663 718 654 713 765 798 831 847 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 107% 117% 125% 131% 136% 139% REDTAIL RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 46 58 70 85 101 111 129 100 77 83 77 76 79 1 73 89 103 109 89 124 111 119 84 81 87 81 80 2 86 87 91 102 110 103 119 117 82 91 88 94 87 3 96 96 85 93 113 111 112 106 74 81 91 86 93 4 86 98 91 89 92 118 115 103 73 76 83 93 88 5 96 89 95 97 93 96 132 109 67 67 69 76 87 Total Students 483 517 535 575 598 663 718 654 457 479 495 506 515 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 107% 69% 73% 75% 77% 78% REDTAIL RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 46 58 70 85 101 111 129 100 71 76 71 70 72 1 73 89 103 109 89 124 111 119 77 75 80 75 74 2 86 87 91 102 110 103 119 117 76 84 81 87 80 3 96 96 85 93 113 111 112 106 68 75 84 79 85 4 86 98 91 89 92 118 115 103 67 70 77 86 81 5 96 89 95 97 93 96 132 109 62 62 64 70 81 Total Students 483 517 535 575 598 663 718 654 421 441 455 466 474 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 107% 64% 67% 69% 71% 72%

18 WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (CURRENT DESIGN) K 32 37 49 63 60 75 64 68 54 50 63 67 77 1 58 71 78 79 68 63 76 65 70 56 52 65 69 2 62 55 76 78 81 81 63 69 67 72 57 53 67 3 81 79 88 96 111 113 91 84 89 86 93 74 68 4 92 82 83 86 103 118 115 84 84 89 86 93 74 5 82 97 88 85 89 106 117 110 83 83 88 86 92 Total Students 407 421 462 487 512 556 526 480 447 436 439 437 448 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 70% 66% 64% 64% 64% 66% WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION A-1 K 32 37 49 63 60 75 64 68 68 73 68 67 69 1 58 71 78 79 68 63 76 65 74 72 77 71 71 2 62 55 76 78 81 81 63 69 72 80 77 83 77 3 81 79 88 96 111 113 91 84 65 71 80 76 82 4 92 82 83 86 103 118 115 84 64 67 73 82 78 5 82 97 88 85 89 106 117 110 59 59 61 66 77 Total Students 407 421 462 487 512 556 526 480 402 421 435 445 452 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 70% 71% 75% 77% 79% 80% WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTION B-1 K 32 37 49 63 60 75 64 68 75 81 75 75 77 1 58 71 78 79 68 63 76 65 82 80 85 79 79 2 62 55 76 78 81 81 63 69 80 89 86 92 85 3 81 79 88 96 111 113 91 84 72 79 89 84 91 4 92 82 83 86 103 118 115 84 72 74 81 91 87 5 82 97 88 85 89 106 117 110 66 66 68 74 86 Total Students 407 421 462 487 512 556 526 480 448 469 484 496 504 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 70% 79% 83% 86% 88% 89%

19 SAGE PROGRAM AT WESTWOOD - HISTORICAl ENROLLMENT & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR OPTIONS A-1 & B-1 3 40 40 40 40 40 4 NO DATA 40 40 40 40 40 5 40 40 40 40 40 Total Students 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 120 120 120 120 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

20 HIDDEN OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (RESIDENT STUDENTS) 6 286 282 268 297 276 281 296 356 321 307 311 321 348 7 274 284 278 267 321 290 288 304 341 326 311 315 325 8 312 280 291 270 274 348 312 296 328 359 344 328 332 Total Students 872 846 837 833 870 919 896 956 990 992 966 964 1,005 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 85.4% 74.3% 74.4% 72.4% 72.3% 75.4% TWIN OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (RESIDENT STUDENTS) 6 258 246 225 261 271 282 290 284 291 278 281 290 315 7 248 260 262 243 283 289 291 301 321 307 293 297 306 8 240 251 257 275 244 283 298 299 296 324 310 296 300 Total Students 746 757 744 778 797 854 879 884 907 909 884 883 920 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 95.2% 79.5% 79.6% 77.4% 77.3% 80.6%

21 PRIOR LAKE HIGH SCHOOL - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT (RESIDENT STUDENTS) 9 524 595 573 615 625 592 687 656 651 682 747 731 692 10 583 514 585 567 606 617 584 680 648 642 673 738 722 11 534 559 506 575 549 585 603 563 660 629 624 654 716 12 478 510 546 484 555 531 571 590 548 642 612 607 636 Total Students 2,119 2,178 2,210 2,241 2,335 2,325 2,445 2,489 2,506 2,596 2,656 2,730 2,766 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 98.4% 73.7% 76.3% 78.1% 80.3% 81.4% BRIDGES ALC - HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT 10 3 12 9 4 9 11 10 5 3 16 11 6 11 11 5 56 12 14 16 22 21 30 7 62 16 17 23 12 39 71 57 43 63 55 65 76 47 93 66 59 77 Total Students 47 139 78 61 88 88 96 111 57 170 93 81 110 Ideal Target Facility Utilization % 111.0% 40.7% 121.7% 66.6% 57.9% 78.6%

22 APPENDIX 2 Socioeconomics

23 CURRENT DESIGN SOCIOECONOMIC SUMMARY Boundary Total Students White Black Asian Hispanic Am. Indian Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education Avg. Median H.H. Income Five Hawks 654 86.9% 3.2% 4.7% 4.3% 0.9% 10.7% 10.4% $103,759 Glendale 448 76.3% 8.7% 8.3% 4.7% 1.8% 12.3% 10.5% $120,692 Grainwood 432 71.8% 12.3% 5.8% 5.6% 4.6% 26.4% 12.5% $90,581 Jeffers Pond 488 84.8% 2.3% 7.0% 3.5% 2.5% 4.7% 11.3% $126,058 Redtail Ridge 810 77.5% 9.8% 6.7% 5.1% 1.0% 15.3% 9.6% $110,308 Westwood 443 86.2% 4.1% 3.4% 5.4% 0.9% 12.9% 12.0% $101,169 Totals 3,275 80.7% 6.7% 6.0% 4.7% 1.8% 13.5% 10.8% $108,929 OPTION A-1 SOCIOECONOMIC SUMMARY Boundary Total Students White Black Asian Hispanic Am. Indian Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education Avg. Median H.H. Income Five Hawks 702 80.1% 5.6% 5.3% 6.3% 2.8% 19.9% 11.3% $98,244 Glendale 523 71.5% 13.2% 8.4% 5.2% 1.5% 17.6% 11.1% $115,891 Jeffers Pond 542 87.3% 1.3% 6.3% 3.0% 2.2% 4.1% 9.6% $118,255 Hamilton Ridge 520 80.0% 7.7% 5.6% 5.6% 1.2% 16.3% 10.6% $95,733 Redtail Ridge 514 80.5% 8.2% 6.4% 3.3% 1.6% 9.5% 8.9% $120,064 Westwood 474 85.4% 5.1% 4.0% 4.6% 0.8% 11.6% 13.7% $108,812 Totals 3,275 80.7% 6.7% 6.0% 4.7% 1.8% 13.5% 10.8% $108,929 OPTION B-1 SOCIOECONOMIC SUMMARY Boundary Total Students White Black Asian Hispanic Am. Indian Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education Avg. Median H.H. Income Five Hawks 600 79.8% 5.3% 5.3% 6.3% 3.2% 18.7% 10.5% $101,830 Glendale 516 72.5% 12.8% 7.8% 5.2% 1.6% 16.9% 11.0% $116,350 Jeffers Pond 539 87.2% 1.3% 6.3% 3.0% 2.2% 3.9% 9.5% $118,415 New Elementary 625 77.0% 10.4% 6.6% 5.1% 1.0% 16.6% 9.8% $91,655 Redtail Ridge 471 84.5% 4.2% 5.9% 3.8% 1.5% 9.6% 10.6% $124,860 Westwood 524 84.4% 5.9% 4.0% 4.6% 1.1% 14.1% 13.9% $106,277 Totals 3,275 80.7% 6.7% 6.0% 4.7% 1.8% 13.5% 10.8% $108,929