Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins

Similar documents
Upgrade Bottom of the Barrel to Improve Your Margins

Maximize Vacuum Residue Conversion and Processing Flexibility with the UOP Uniflex Process

Anton Chebotarev. нефтехимического комплекса» 2017 UOP LLC. A Honeywell Company All rights reserved. 23 November 2017

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

Removing High Sulphur Bunker from the Refineries: Eni s case study

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

UOP Unicracking TM Process Innovations in Hydrocracking Technology

The Changing composition of bunker fuels: Implications for refiners, traders, and shipping

MERTC 23 rd 24 th January, 2017 Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain

Residue Upgrading Technologies Key Technologies, Considerations & Options for your Refinery Russia BBTC 2015 MOSCOW

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

EST technology: an advanced way to upgrade the bottom of the barrel G. Rispoli

Refinery / Petrochemical. Integration. Gildas Rolland

Converting Visbreakers to Delayed Cokers - An Opportunity for European Refiners

Eni Slurry Technology:

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

Bottom of Barrel Processing. Chapters 5 & 8

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

CAPTURING THE MAXIMUM VALUE IN THE POST-IMO 2020 WORLD. Jock Hughson, Licensing Technology Manager, Shell Global Solutions

- Supercritical Water Cracking Technology -

Implications Across the Supply Chain. Prepared for Sustainableshipping Conference San Francisco 30 September 2009

Crude to Chemicals. Opportunities and Challenges of an Industry Game-Changer. MERTC, Bahrain. January 23, 2017

IMPACTS OF THE IMO SULPHUR REGULATIONS ON THE CANADIAN CRUDE OIL MARKET

THE OIL & GAS SUPPLY CHAIN: FROM THE GROUND TO THE PUMP ON REFINING

Acombination. winning

Regional Energy Trade and Refining Industry in Northeast Asia

Residual Fuel Market Issues

Trends for Refining Residual Fuel Oil. Prepared for Bunker Asia Forum 2011 Singapore 7 September 2011

AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION SULPHUR REGULATIONS

Enhance Naphtha Value and Gasoline Reformer Performance Using UOP s MaxEne TM Process

FCC pretreatment catalysts

LC-FINING Options for Heavy Oil Upgrading

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Compliance with IMO Regulations - New Strategies for Refiners in the U.S. and Internationally

Coking and Thermal Process, Delayed Coking

OPPORTUNITY CRUDES: TO PROCESS OR NOT TO PROCESS?

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

EURONAV TALKS IMO 2020 FROM THE VIEW OF A SHIPOWNER JUNE

UTILIZING CHEAP GAS TO MAXIMIZE REFINERY PROFITS IN NORTH AMERICA. Daniel B Gillis and Ujjal K Mukherjee, Chevron Lummus Global Gary M Sieli, CB&I

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

The low sulphur fuel starting from the bottom of the barrel: EST a novel and industrial proven technology

ERGMed Coastal. Refining

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

Technical Session: Crude Oil Supply High Quality Competitive Distillate Fuels from Coal-to-Liquids Processing

ARA TT Market Projections

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

ECA changes and its impact on distillate demand

RSH Technology (TIPS RAS - CLG) for ultra-heavy feed processing

Modernization of Libyan Oil Refineries and Petrochemical Plants

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 222 PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OUTLOOK (July 1999)

ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Bill Haverland ConocoPhillips Company

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

UOP/EMRE Alliance for High Quality Lube and Diesel Production Technology

MEG/WRI s Partial Bitumen Upgrader Project Adding Value to MEG and Alberta

Unity TM Hydroprocessing Catalysts

UPGRADER FOR HEAVY, EXTRA-HEAVY CRUDE/BITUMEN AND RESIDUAL FRACTIONS

Market Report Series Oil 2018 Analysis and Forecasts to Columbia University Centre on Global Energy Policy, New York, May 22 nd 2018

Refining Outlook: elements for a modern industrial culture in Italy

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

VTTI. Storage Markets : Our Perspective. StocExpo Europe March Onur Capan: Market Intelligence

9e Lustrum VKRT. Oils, A surprising impact on rubber. 12 November 2010,Vaals. Rogier van Hoof. General Manager Benelux

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 211A HYDROCRACKING FOR MIDDLE DISTILLATES (July 2003)

China s Refining Industry: History and Technology Evolution. Rob Tufts, BRSI Inc., Cochrane Alberta, Canada

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

Ebullating Bed Dual Catalyst Systems from ART

IHS CHEMICAL PEP Report 29J. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. PEP Report 29J. Gajendra Khare Principal Analyst

ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Bill Haverland ConocoPhillips Company

New hydrocracking catalyst brings higher diesel yield and increases refiner s profitability

Impact on Crude Quality

Options for Resid Conversion

TITTLE: IMPROVING REFINERY MARGIN BY INCREASING CONVERSION. BOTTOM OF THE BARREL TECHNOLOGIES.

Fig:1.1[15] Fig.1.2 Distribution of world energy resources. (From World Energy Outlook 2005, International Energy Agency.)[16,17]

Unit 4. Fluidised Catalytic Cracking. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Hydroprocessing and Hydrocracking DAO: Achieving Unlimited Cycle Lengths with the Most Difficult Feedstocks AM

What Do the Impending New Bunker Specs Mean for Refiners

INTRODUCTION Enabling Iran s Future Through Partnership and Technology

Russia's downstream: Old Problems and New Reality

Technology for Producing Clean Diesel Utilizing Moderate Pressure Hydrocracking With Hydroisomerization

Market Report Series: Oil 2018 Analysis & Forecasts to Energy Community 10 th Oil Forum, Belgrade, 25 September 2018

The Transition to Low Sulfur Bunker Fuel

ACO TM, The Advanced Catalytic Olefins Process

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Bonus Report. Consider new technologies to increase diesel yield from bottom-of-the-barrel products. Refining Developments

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Q Analyst Teleconference. 9 August 2018

Focus on Refinery Product Flows

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

Issues to be Discussed ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Crude Oil Supply (2006) CRUDE OIL SUPPLY. Crude Oil Demand CRUDE OIL PRICING

Platts Refining Sept Stephen Bowers

Transcription:

Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins Phil Hunt UOP LLC, A Honeywell Company Russia & CIS BBTC 2015 April 22-24, 2015 Moscow A Century of Innovation in the Oil and Gas Industry 2015 UOP LLC. All rights reserved. UOP 7081-1

Agenda 1 2 3 4 5 Market Opportunity, Russian Export Duties, Demand UOP Residue Upgrading Technology Portfolio UOP Uniflex Technology Update Mendeleev Group Deep Processing Project Summary 2 UOP 7081-2

Million barrels Per Day Global Refined Product Demand has Followed a Consistent Trend... 40 40000 35000 30000 25000 20 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 1970 Global Oil Product Demand (Fuel Oil and Distillates) Middle Distillates Light Distillates Heavy Fuel Oil 30 year trend 1980 1990 2000 2010 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 0 Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2013 Global HFO demand equaled each of Light and Middle Distillates in 1970 Distillates have now passed 70% of total demand globally Globally HFO has declined to 10% of total product demand In Asia, the Light Distillate demand is driven by Petrochem Feedstock end-uses 3...with Distillate demand increasing and Fuel Oil demand declining UOP 7081-3

There are 3 Parts to the European Fuel Oil Market Bunkers 80 40 80 (Units presented are MTPA) Source: EIA Statistical Data 65 HFO 40 1 2 3 HFO Exports Demand Production Imports 1 2 3 European Fuel Oil demand is split between Marine Bunkers and HFO Production currently aligns with demand However, Europe also imports and then exports 65 million MTPA 3 65 Europe is very long in HFO (particularly HSFO) 4 UOP 7081-4

Why do we also need to understand developments in Russia and their impact on European HFO? Russia has... Third highest installed refining capacity (after U.S. and China) The largest production of Vacuum Residue that is not upgraded, the majority of which is exported to Europe Most of Russia s Fuel oil exports go to Europe Russia recently introduced... New export duties on crude oil and products (so-named 60-66 ) These provide significant incentive to upgrade HFO into Distillate products Russian refiners plan to invest $50 billion to minimize HFO exports 5 UOP 7081-5

Marine Bunker Fuels: EU and IMO Developments Sulphur content allowable in bunker fuel (pc by weight) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Jan 05 Mar 06 Global Emission Control Areas May 07 Jul 08 Sep 09 Nov 10 Jan 12 Mar 13 May 14 Jul 15 Sep 16 Nov 17 IMO reduction timing subject to study re availability to be undertaken in 2018 Jan 19 Mar 20 May 21 Jul 22 Sep 23 Nov 24 IMO (MARPOL) Regulations ECAs: Sulphur reduces from 1.0% to 0.1 % (January 2015) EU: Sulphur reduces from 3.5% to 0.5% (January 2020) Rest of the World: Sulphur reduces from 3.5% to 0.5% (January 2020/2025) 6 UOP 7081-6

Let s Start with the Fundamentals... What is residue and why convert it? Characteristics: Heavy, dirty, low value, limited uses Properties: High MW, stable and carbon rich, hydrogen deficient Composition: Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, Asphaltenes Impurities: Sulfur, nitrogen, heavy metals Feedstock characterisation is a key parameter in residue processing with composition, properties and molecular structure all important factors 7 UOP 7081-7

UOP Solutions for Residue Conversion (Low to Moderate Conversion Options) UOP RCD Unionfining Process UOP/FWUSA Visbreaking FWUSA SYDEC Delayed Coking Process Limited conversion and feed flexibilty LS fuel oil production or RFCC feed prep Emerging role again Up to 30% conversion Achieves reduction in cutter stock for fuel Can be a partial fix, not a full solution Fuel oil outlet needed Higher conversion - up to 75% Require further upgrading to meet final product specs Need an outlet for the pet coke 8 UOP 7081-8

UOP / FWUSA Solvent Deasphalting... De-Asphalted Oil (DAO) feed to: FCC HCU Vacuum Residue (VR) SDA Not a conversion process, but a solvent / gravity separation process Separation also driven by the molecular type - paraffins vs aromatics 9 SDA Pitch feed to: Bitumen Boiler / Power DCU Uniflex Unit DAO yield ( lift ) is typically 40-60+%, limited by DAO quality and at high lifts by pitch quality UOP 7081-9

The UOP Uniflex Technology Offering is... Once through Catalyst Products require further upgrading Offered either as a stand-alone-unit or with integrated DHT Vacuum Residue Feed 100 UNIFLEX UNIT (Wt-%) 15 50-55 H 2 S, NH 3 Gas, LPG Naphtha Diesel HDT 90-95% Conversion Maximum Diesel Minimum VGO Catalyst H 2 10-15 VGO Pitch MHC & FCC or HCU 10 UOP 7081-10

Uniflex Process Thermal Cracking of Asphaltenes The process benefits from combination of: 1. Thermal cracking to shorter chain lengths 2. Inhibiting formation of coke through: Hydrogenation of free radicals from thermal cracking Catalyst physically hinders mesophase coalescence Archipelago Model of Asphaltenes, Carbon # = 313, MW = 4705 Source: M. Gray, Univ of Alberta 11 UOP 7081-11

Uniflex Process Reactor Achieves High Conversion Products and Catalyst Optimal design for high conversion Upflow Near Isothermal Efficient utilization of reactor volume Effective Asphaltene management Inhibit formation of coke pre-cursors by hydrogen pressure, optimum temperature and catalyst 12 Feed, H 2 and Catalyst Simple Commercially proven Reactor design for highly effective performance UOP 7081-12

Catalyst (Additive) & Pitch Catalyst (Additive) UOP global supply Multiple manufacturing locations Simple logistics and storage Cement: Often the most attractive outlet option Boiler/Power: Conventional power plants CFB or Rotary Kiln Furnace Gasification Pitch Solidification: Proven technology (Pellets or Big Bags) Facilitates transportation and storage 13 UOP 7081-13

Hydrogen to Carbon Atomic Ratio Uniflex Process Attributes Summary 3 Converting VR into Diesel Needs 2 DIESEL HYDROGENATION Thermal Cracking and Hydrogenation Uniflex Complex Achieves this 1 CRUDE OIL THERMAL CRACKING VAC RESID In a single slurry bed reactor With Post treatment to meet finished product specifications H 2 addition maximises margin 0 20 40 60 14 Average Carbon Number (Atoms per Molecule) UOP 7081-14

UOP Uniflex Process - Licensed Units Update Name Location Capacity, MMTA Start-up Petro-Canada, Montreal Canada 0.3 1985 NRL, Pakistan Pakistan 0.6 2017 Undisclosed China 0.9 2016 Mendeleev Group Russia 0.4 2017 Undisclosed China 0.8 2017 Undisclosed China 0.9 2017 Undisclosed China 0.8 2017 15 UOP 7081-15

OGT Background Oil Gas Trade (OGT) was established in 2002 Key Business is fuels (jet, diesel, gasoline) and lubricants supply Acquired Yaroslavl Mendeleev Refinery in 2012 New Mendeleev Group Project / Complex Construction of a new 3 MMTA Deep Processing Complex (DPC) Robust economics with Russian export duty regime Zero residue production (via Uniflex & Unicracking) Maximum diesel production Captive Power, Steam & H 2 production 16 100+ year old existing refinery, open to new innovation, planning new Deep Processing Complex UOP 7081-16

It is Essential to assess a Major Project s Rate-of-Return Relative to Risk The early years of a Project s performance are always the most visible Lifetime performance covers a 20+ year period RISK RoR Window of Opportunity Consequences of Pushing the Risk Envelope too Far Reliability Availability Throughput Timeline 17 It is important to evaluate and mitigate any major project risks technical, operational or other otherwise forecast financial returns can be undermined through under-performance UOP 7081-17

Million barrels Per Day Global Fuel Oil is now Entering the Final Stages of Decline, Trending to Zero... 40 40000 Global Fuel Oil Demand 35000 VGO VR 30000 25000 20 20000-3 MBPD 15000-2 MBPD -1.5 MBPD 10000 <10% of Total Demand 5000 18 0 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2012 It is realistic to assume further reduction via further switching to natural gas and tighter IMO MARPOL regulations for Bunker Fuels UOP 7081-18

Price spreads and project economics are the main driver of any major residue upgrading project: The Diesel minus HSFO Price Spread is the Key Economic Driver $450/t $350/t EXCELLENT $250/t GOOD MARGINAL Europe Pre 2012 Europe 2013/15 Russia 2014/15 19 Russian pricing offers attractive economic returns UOP 7081-19

Ongoing Innovation in Vacuum Residue Conversion Product - Feed Uplift, $/MT 250 Slurry Hydrocracking Conv 95% 200 150 Ebullated Bed Conv 70% 100 Delayed Coking Conv 70% 20 50 today s pricing Dubbs Conv 25% Visbreaking Conv 15% 0 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year Demand for transportation fuels vs. fuel oil has driven a seven times increase in the gasoline + diesel yield enabling alignment of production with demand UOP 7081-20

Q&A 21 UOP 7081-21