Marco Ruggeri, Stefania Fortuna and Francesco Rodeghiero. Supplementary appendix

Similar documents
2122: Testicular/Germ Cell Cancer Post-HSCT Data

Section: Deterioration Factor Version: 4 +EUROMOT COMMENTS Date: 19 Oct 2015 (revised by EUROMOT 29 Nov 2015)

RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

QbD In Extended Topicals Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals

Driver Medical Fitness Program Overview. RoadSafetyBC

How to Prevent Malnutrition. Bilateral Pitting Oedema (Nutritional Oedema) Algorithm for Management of Malnutrition in Children

Renault Trafic SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Treatment Research Institute Annual Progress Report: 2009 Formula Grant

Audi A4 90% 87% 75% 75% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist.

Audi Q7 94% 88% 76% 70% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Off-Road. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist.

Fusesaver specification form

RADIATION CONTROL - RADIATION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICLE ACCELERATORS NOT USED IN THE HEALING ARTS

Ford Edge 76% 85% 67% 89% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Placebo and vaccines were administered intramuscularly into the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant upper arm.

March 28, Re: N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Division of Medical Assistance Recodification of Rules

AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013

EGR System EGR System Eg 1

Fuel System Diagnosis

PORTAGAUGE 4 USER MANUAL

PEMS EXPERTS WORKING GROUP

Contribution to the RDE working group

VW Passat VW Passat 2.0 TDI 'Comfortline', LHD

SPN 51 or Suspect Parameter Number (SPN) and Failure Mode Indicator (FMI) Description

Rider 11 Partial Requirements Service (PRS)

Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129

Using Active Customer Participation in Managing Distribution Systems

MG3 69% 71% 59% 38% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR. MG3 1.5VTi-TECH 3Form Sport, RHD SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT

Audi Q2 86% 93% 70% 70% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

An Urgent Bulletin from CSA Group

Audi TT SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Dacia Duster 66% 71% 56% 37% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

Evaluation methods for RDE Outcome of the lessons learnt and proposal for RDE4 package. RDE-LDV Meeting of 7 November 2017

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) February 2014: Economic Sentiment broadly unchanged in the euro area and the EU

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Rubber Tyred Vehicles Technical Bulletin

U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program. United States Advanced Battery Consortium Battery Test Manual For Electric Vehicles

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT)

VW Touran 89% 88% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Copyright Australian Hearing Demographic Details

Lancia Ypsilon 79% 44% 64% 38% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Acknowledgements. n Research team: Dr. Bingham (PI), Dr. Carter, Dr. Flannagan, Mr. Bowman, Ms. Almani

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF A COMMON RAIL SYSTEM FOR DIESEL ENGINES

WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

Case Study Involving Surface Durability and Improved Surface Finish

ppbrae & MiniRAE 2000 Service Training Firmware v 1.25(rev B)

DIAGNOSTIC TROUBLE CODE (DTC) P0430 AMPLITUDE RATIO OF POST AND PRE HEATED OXYGEN SENSORS BANK 2 (3.2L DOHC)

Skoda Superb 86% 86% 76% 71% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.

E-15 Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS)

Skoda Kodiaq 77% 92% 71% 54% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2

Seat Ibiza 77% 95% 76% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Driveline Application Guidelines

Seat Ateca 84% 93% 71% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

AGN 041 Alternator Operating Speed

Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing. Sentencing Guideline Software Web Version Training Manual

SCHEMATIC AND ROUTING DIAGRAMS

WLTP Revision 1

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Facts about DOT Audits

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT)

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

A manufacturer s view of bushing reliability, testing and analysis. Lars Jonsson Håkan Rudegard

AUTO ELECTRICAL WORK

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL VULNERABLE ROAD USER PROTECTION

Diversion Manual (Section 6.0): 31 March 03

Jaguar XE 82% 92% 81% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Volvo XC90 97% 87% 100% 72% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Off-Road 4x4. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Test Report No.: SDHGR FM Date: Jun.08, 2012 Page 1 of 3

Ford Focus 85% 87% 75% 72% SPECIFICATION TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Safety Assist. Vulnerable Road Users

University Of California, Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering. ME 131 Vehicle Dynamics & Control (4 units)

VW Tiguan 96% 80% 68% 68% SPECIFICATION TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian Impact Protection

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS Annex 1 006REC1025 V 1.0

VW Arteon 85% 96% 85% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (dual), Passenger (dual)

VW T-Roc 87% 96% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Fuel System Diagnosis

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION

Opel/Vauxhall Astra 84% 86% 83% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

RANDO HDZ. Rando HDZ, our premium, zinc additized, anti-wear hydraulic oil that helps provide you with:

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet

Land Rover Discovery 80% 90% 75% 73% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant.

Škoda Karoq 79% 93% 73% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

ASPIRO & GUARDIAN BATTERY MANAGEMENT WITH ACC EXTENDED CONTROLLER

Audi Q5 86% 93% 73% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Module 3: Influence of Engine Design and Operating Parameters on Emissions Lecture 14:Effect of SI Engine Design and Operating Variables on Emissions

Airworthiness Directive

Audi Q3 86% 95% 76% 85% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Jaguar I-Pace 81% 91% 73% 81% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Jaguar XE 82% 92% 81% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Porsche Cayenne 80% 95% 73% 62% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

VW Polo 85% 96% 76% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Nissan LEAF 86% 93% 71% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Volvo XC60 87% 98% 76% 95% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Qualifying an On-Line Diagnostic and Prognostic Sensor for Fixed and Rotary Wing Bearings and Gears

Jeep Compass 83% 90% 64% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Peugeot % 86% 67% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Evolution 3E INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Part 1/2 Ref.: 65051/US. MORIA S.A. 15, rue Georges Besse - F Antony France #65051/US-C-02.

Transcription:

HETEROGENEITY OF TERMINOLOGY AND CLINICAL DEFINITIONS IN ADULT IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA : A CRITICAL APPRAISAL FROM A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Marco Ruggeri, Stefania Fortuna and Francesco Rodeghiero Supplementary appendix

Table. Definition of ITP, based on platelet count( ) (x 0 9 /L) (0 papers) Grade of severity, based on platelet count (x 0 9 /L) (22 papers) N % N N N < 50 (ref: 5, 5, 7, 5 50 8, 20) 20 (ref:3) 0 00 (ref:4, 6, 9, 2) 4 40 Severe 00 (ref: 36) 50 (ref: 30) 30 (ref: 5, 4, 27-8 29, 38, 39, 48) 20 (ref:7, 22, 26, 5 35, 40) 0 (ref: 9, 23, 3-5 33) 5 (ref: 37) Moderate 30 00 (ref:4, 2 22) 30 (ref:26) Mild 30 (ref:26) 80 (ref:32) 40-90 (ref:9) variable time intervals from the first platelet count to definitive diagnosis: 2 consecutive platelet assays; from 2 to 6 months; ITP acute 2 months, sub-acute between 2 and 6 months. (ref:,5,7, 8, 20-25) 2

Table 2. FIRST LINE THERAPY: PLATELET LEVEL (x 0 9 /L) TO START TREATMENT (23 papers) N % 0 (ref: 23) 4 20 (ref: 7,, 8, 35, 44) 5 22 30 (ref:, 5, 6, 7, 9, 26, 27, 30, 32, 34, 4, 4 60 43, 45, 46) 50 (ref: 3, 5, 42) 3 4 3

Table 3. FIRST LINE THERAPY: PLATELET COUNT (x 0 9 /L) TO DEFINE RESPONSE CR (8 papers) PR (8 papers) NR (9 papers) Response (9 papers) 50 (ref: 7, 8, 20, 34, 35, 50-54) 0 56 20 x 0 9 /L (ref: 3) 5 00 x 0 9 /L (ref: 4, 36, 4, 47, 49) 5 28 to "normal values" (ref: 24, 27) 2 < 00 (ref: 47) 6 50 00 (ref: 36, 49, 50) 3 5 50 20 (ref: 3) 6 50 50 (ref: 34, 35, 5-54) 6 33 50 50 or doubling initial values (ref: 8, 20) 50 50 x 0 9 /L or increase 30 (ref: 7) N % N % N % N 2 0 6 50 < normal limit (ref: 24) 6 30 < normal limit (ref: 27) 6 30 50 (ref: 4) 6 30 00 (ref: 4) 6 50 (ref: 3, 8, 20, 24, 34, 36, 50, 0 53 5, 53, 54) 30 (ref: 4, 27, 47) 3 7 30 or no doubling initial values or 5 relapse during tapering (ref: 56) 20 (ref: 35) 5 30 o 50 after 0 days (re: 44) 5 20 within 2 weeks or 50 within 4 weeks (ref: 49) 50 o 30 to initial values (ref: 7) 5 5 Worsening score (ref: ) 5 20 (ref: 30) 20-30 (ref: 4) 30 (ref: 7) 50 (ref: 50) 30 or doubling initial values (ref: 56) 50 or doubling initial value (ref: 5) 50 within 0 days or 30 and stop bleeding (ref: 44) 80 x 0 9 /L or doubling initial value (ref: 42) improve bleeding score (ref: ) CR: complete response PR: partial response NR: no response Other definitions not included: minimal response: between 20 and 50 x 0 9 /L or doubling basis value 35 incomplete response: 00-50 x 0 9 /L 50 good response: 50 x 0 9 /L; poor response: 50 x 0 9 /L 57

Table 4. FIRST LINE THERAPY Timing to assess response (3 papers) Time required to define a response as durable (4 papers) N % % 3-7 days (ref:, 35, 5 38 3 weeks (ref: ) 7 4, 42, 5) At 6 months (ref: 24, 2 5 4 weeks (ref: 3, 20, 34, 4 29 44) 54) At 6-9 months (ref: 36) 2 months (ref: 4, 49) 2 4 At last control (ref: 47) 3 months (ref: 24, 27, 36) 3 2 At stop therapy (ref: 7) 6 months (ref: 4) 7 At 5 days (IVIg) or at 6 weeks (steroid) (ref: 56) Immediate at 2 ws Retarded at 6 ms (re: 53) Transient at 4 ws Defined at 6 ws (ref: 54) Persistent:2 months (ref: 35) Sustained: 6 months (ref: 3, 44) 7 2 5

Table 5. DEFINITION OF CHRONIC ITP: PLATELET THRESHOLD (x 0 9 /L) AND DURATION FROM INITIAL THERAPY Platelet threshold ( papers) Duration (25 papers) N % N % 50 (ref: 7, 5, 25, 47, 58) 5 45 3 months (ref: 9, 5, 58, 63) 00 (ref: 45, 60) 2 6 months (ref:, 3, 5, 7, 22-25, 42, 45, 47, 54, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64-66) 50 (ref: 7, 5) 2 many months (ref: 32) normal value (ref: 59, 6) 2 Years (not specified) (ref: 29) 4 6 9 76 6

Table 6. Minimal platelet count (x 0 9 /L) required to perform splenectomy safely (7 papers) 30 (ref: 5) 50 (ref:, 23) 2 80 (ref: 48) 00 (ref: 68) N Sufficient (ref : 6*, 2 50) * If platelet count < 20 x 0 9 /L, treatment with IVIg 6 7

Table 7. INDICATION TO SPLENECTOMY (5 papers) Main indication Clinical conditions N 4-6 weeks after initial treatment (ref: 23, 26) Refractory to steroids 6 weeks after initial treatment if severe form, Refractory/relapsing after 3 months if moderate (ref: 6,4, 34) to steroids 2 3 3 months after initial treatment (ref:65) Chronic 6 months after initial treatment (ref: 40) Chronic 3-6 months after initial treatment (ref:, 7) Chronic 2 Many months after initial treatment (ref: 69) Chronic When necessary (ref: 47) Chronic After 4 weeks if <50 x 0 9 /L; Postpone after 6-8 weeks if < normal value o relapse during tapering (ref: 3) Chronic Within 4 days Postpone after 4 weeks if <30 x 0 9 /L (ref: 27,43,50) Refractory to steroids/ivig 3 8

Table 8. SPLENECTOMY: PLATELET COUNT (x 0 9 /L) TO DEFINE RESPONSE CR (24 papers) PR (20 papers) NR (6 papers) 50 (ref: 8, 7, 8, 20, 3 54 2, 34, 5, 52, 54, 55, 67, 68, 70) 00 (ref: 2, 4, 6, 47, 6 25 56, 72) 00-50 (ref: 23) 4 To "normal values" (ref: 3 3 24, 26, 46) 50 x 0 9 /L (ref : 7) 4 N % N % N % 30 00 (ref: 4, 56, 3 5 72) 00 50 (ref: 68) 5 50 00 (ref: 6, 6) 2 0 00 (ref: 47) 5 50 50 (ref: 8, 2, 9 45 24, 34, 5, 52, 54, 55, 70) 50 50 or doubling 2 0 initial value (ref: 8, 20) 50 50 or increase 5 30 (ref: 7) 30 to normal value (ref: 69) 5 50 (ref: 8, 6, 8, 20, 2, 70 24, 34, 5, 54, 55, 70) 30 (re: 4, 7, 56, 69) 5 30 CR: complete response PR: partial response NR: no response Other definitions:: response is a count 00 x 0 9 /L 22 good response is 50 x 0 9 /L; poor response is 50 x 0 9 /L 57 9

Table 9. SPLENECTOMY: TIMING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE RESPONSE Time to assess response ( papers) Time required to define a response as durable (3 papers) N % N % At 3 days/at last 9 month (8, 20, 34, 54, 5 38. control (ref: 68) 55) At 3-7 days (ref: 5) 9 2 months (4, 69) 2 5 At 30 days (ref: 8, 55) 2 8 3 months (24, 26, 46) 3 23 At months (ref: 56) 9 2 months (57) 7 At 3 months (ref: 22) 9 During follow-up (56) 7 At 6 months (ref: 24) 9 Stable: 0 years (72) 7 At last control (ref: 47) 9 During and after therapy (ref: 69) 9 Any time after surgery 9 (ref: 54) 5-60 days (ref 67) 9 0

Table 0. PLATELET COUNT (x 0 9 /L) USED IN THE DEFINITION OF REFRACTORY ITP (7 papers) N % 20 (ref: 7, 57, 65) 3 43 30 (ref: 62, 69) 2 29 50 (ref: 22) 00 (ref: 2)

Table. SECOND LINE THERAPY: PLATELET COUNT (x 0 9 /L) TO START TREATMENT (24 papers) Platelet count N % 0 (ref: 26) 20 (ref:, 9, 39, 65, 66, 75, 77) 7 29 30 (ref: 6, 7, 29, 3, 32, 45, 48, 58, 62, 45 74, 76) 35 (ref: 22) 50 (ref: 64) 50 in two separate plt counts (ref: 63) 60 (ref: 38) 90 (ref: 78) 2

Table 2. SECOND LINE THERAPY: CRITERIA TO DEFINE RESPONSE (PLATELET COUNT x 0 9 /L) CR (3 papers) PR (27 papers) MR (4 papers) NR (25 papers) N % N % N N % 80 (ref: 83) 50 (ref: 9, 7-20, 38, 58, 63, 2 39 65, 74, 8, 82) 20-200 (ref: 80) 0 (ref: 62) 00 (ref: 25, 37, 45, 64, 66, 7 23 73, 75) 00 or doubling initial value (ref: 59) 00 50 (ref: 60) "normal values" (ref: 24, 29, 39, 48, 69, 77, 79) 7 23 80 20 (ref:29, 48) 2 50 00 (ref: 25, 37, 60, 75, 5 6 82) 50 50 (ref: 9, 58, 74, 8) 4 3 50 80 (ref: 83) 50 50 or doubling initial 4 3 value (ref: 8, 20, 38, 63) 50 50 or increase 30 (ref: 7) 50 00 or doubling initial 2 value (ref: 59, 64) 50 to "normal values" (ref: 24, 2 79) 50 (ref: 66, 73, 80) 3 40 (ref: 62) 30 00 (ref: 45) 30 50 (ref: 77) 30 to "normal values" (ref: 69) 0 x (ref: 9) No clinical response (ref: 39) >30 <50 (ref: 82) > 30 (ref: 77) < 50 (ref: 73, 75) 2 0 (ref: 9) 50 (ref: 8-20, 24, 25 37, 53, 0 40 58, 64, 83) 40 (ref: 29, 48, 62) 3 30 (ref: 69, 77, 82) 3 20 (ref: 65) no increase (ref: 73) no increase or 50 (ref: 60, 3 75, 80) 50 or increase 30 (ref: 7) 50 or increase 20 (ref: 59) Bleeding symptoms (ref: 38) Other definitions: Significant response 38 : increase of platelet count 50 x 0 9 /L or doubling initial value Response : doubling the initial count, 20 50 x 0 9 /L (59) ; 20 x 0 9 /L without therapy (65) ; 50 x 0 9 /L or doubling initial value (38) ; Transient : 40 x 0 9 /L in 2-4 weeks (62) ; Maintained : platelet count stable during therapy (48) ; Good : 30 x 0 9 /L and stable level (39) ; Adequate : 00 x 0 9 /L (76) ; Relapse : < 50 or < 30 x0 9 (54, 56) /L after initial response 3

Table 3.. SECOND LINE THERAPY (TIME PARAMETERS) Time to assess response ( papers) Time required to define a response as durable (3 papers) At 2 weeks (ref: 82) Permanent (without therapy) (80) N N At month (ref: 62, 75) 2 6 weeks (ref: 63, 66) 2 At 2 weeks (ref: 59) month (ref: 20, 77) 2 Transient at 2 months Long lasting 2 months (ref: 64) 2 months (ref: 58) At 3 months (ref: 38, 48) 2 3 months (ref: 9, 24, 29, 65) At 6 months (ref: 24, 60) 2 6 months (ref: 25, 45, 75) At last control (ref: 79) 4 3 Temporary while on therapy (ref: 80) 4