Scientific expert workshop on CO2 emissions from light duty vehicle Lisbon 7-8 June Session 3: challenges of measuring real driving emissions

Similar documents
RDE LEGISLATION AND REAL- WORLD EMISSIONS ERMES (TNO/TUG/LAT)

A CO2 based indicator for severe driving? (Preliminary investigations - For discussion only)

EMISSION FACTORS FROM EMISSION MEASUREMENTS. VERSIT+ methodology Norbert Ligterink

AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015

Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles

Questions to the PSA GROUP

Details RDE Legislation Europe. Speaker: Nikolas Kühn June 27th ECMA

ACEA RDE Cold Start. 30 th August 2016

RDE PN emissions from a GDI vehicle without and with a GPF

EU emissions regulations: An Update

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

Explanation and Validation of the Flat Belt Method ENTWURF Fahrzeugtechnik Fahrleistung und Verbrauch EGNT/2

Real Driving Emissions (RDE) Introduction of new legislation in Europe. Boundary Conditions

On-road emission measurements with PEMS on a MERCEDES-BENZ ATEGO Euro VI N2 heavy-duty truck

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) GRBP 68 th session

Review of in use factors affecting the fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions of passenger cars On going study. Brussels 9 December 2014

Vehicle Simulation for Engine Calibration to Enhance RDE Performance

Presentation to RDE stakeholder group

Experience with emissions from a PHEV and RDE data evaluation methods

Simulation of Collective Load Data for Integrated Design and Testing of Vehicle Transmissions. Andreas Schmidt, Audi AG, May 22, 2014

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General Joint Research Centre. Directorate C Energy, Transport and Climate Sustainable Transport Unit C.

The Automotive Industry

New results from a 2015 PEMS testing campaign on a Diesel Euro 6b vehicle

Real Driving Emissions

Technical Committee Motor Vehicles 15 September RDE 3 discussion

Expected Light Duty Vehicle Emissions from Final Stages of Euro 6

Real Driving Emissions of a GPF-equipped production car

RDE LDV ACEA Input for EU Com working group Brussels, 31 March 2014

Development of the Japan s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure

Progress at LAT. October 23, 2013 LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS

Additional written questions to Ms Elżbieta BIEŃKOWSKA

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices

Evaluation of exhaust emissions from three dieselhybrid. cars and simulation of after-treatment

WLTC* methodology. Proposed by Japan (Reviewed by UK, JRC and Mr. Steven) DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group

Real-driving emissions regulation update

Testing of Emissions- Relevant Driving Cycles on an Engine Testbed

CO2 Emissions and Vehicle Performance

Evolution of Advanced Emissions Control System to meet NOx and Particulates Regulations

Mobile Air Conditioning (MAC)

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Evaluation of PEMS data based on the Moving Averaging Window and a composite severity indicator

Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006

EVOLUTION OF RDE REGULATION

Accurate Remaining Range Estimation for Electric Vehicles

An update of vehicle emissions control policies and regulations in Europe

CITY DRIVING ELEMENT COMBINATION INFLUENCE ON CAR TRACTION ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

Status European RDE emission legislation

AUTUMN BUDGET 2017 AND FLEET

Alfonso PORCEL, Olivier MACCHI - PSA Peugeot Citroen, France

Where do Euro 6 cars stand? Nick Molden 29 April 2015

WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

Chip Simulation for Virtual ECUs

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Options for Certification, Validation and Monitoring and Reporting of HDVs

REPEATABILITY OF CPX TYRE/ROAD NOISE MEASUREMENTS. Gillian Adams, Frits Kamst and Stephen Pugh ASK Consulting Engineers, Brisbane, Australia

Verfication of road test normality Parameter Analysis TF Normalisation

Correction of test cycle tolerances: assessing the impact on CO 2 results. J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo

Future Powertrain Conference 24 th February C 2016 HORIBA Ltd. All rights reserved.

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) Overview of Tyre Industry / ISO activities. Ottawa

DOC design & sizing using GT-SUITE European GT Conference Gauthier QUENEY 09/10/2017

DG CLIMA studies on CO2 emissions from vehicles

Co-Simulation of GT-Suite and CarMaker for Real Traffic and Race Track Simulations

Update on the development of the WLTP and its implementation into the EU legislation

Evaluation methods for RDE Outcome of the lessons learnt and proposal for RDE4 package. RDE-LDV Meeting of 7 November 2017

Implementation and Challenges of RDE with BSVI Norms

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

In-use testing in the European vehicle emissions legislation

AVL India Seminar May 2018 REAL DRIVING EMISSIONS (RDE) Challenges for On-Road Tests. AVL M.O.V.E In-Vehicle Testsystem.

EN 1 EN. Second RDE LDV Package Skeleton for the text (V3) Informal EC working document

DTP Subgroup LabProcICE. WLTP 5th DTP Meeting Zuerich slide 1

REAL WORLD DRIVING. Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing. Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association

Toyota. Stephen Stacey - General Manager Arjan Dijkhuizen - Senior Engineer. Government & Technical Affairs Toyota Motor Europe TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

João Rafael Dezotti Neto, Everton Lopes da Silva, Eduardo Tomanik, Eduardo Nocera. MAHLE Metal Leve S.A.

Implementation of Rolling Resistance in R117

Challenges in the implementation of MRV regulation. Yiannis Kokarakis Bureau Veritas

Validation of a simulation model for the assessment of CO 2 emissions of passenger cars under real-world conditions

GRPE/HDH Engine-Base Emissions Regulation using HILS for Commercial Hybrid Vehicles JASIC

MoBEO: Model based Engine Development and Calibration

THE DRIVING EMISSIONS TEST

An Innovative Approach

Supporting Analysis regarding Technology Deployment and Test Procedure Flexibilities for Review of the Light Duty Vehicle CO 2 Regulations

Research Challenges for Automated Vehicles

SESSION 2 Powertrain. Why real driving simulation facilitates the development of new propulsion systems

English Report. The stop & Start System. By RIGOUR Sophie. & NOCQUET Cécile

D6.5 Public report on experience & results from FCEV city car demonstration in Oslo

Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS

ERMES WP ERMES plenary meeting Brussels September Panagiota Dilara

- Status Report - System Power Determination of Electrified (Light Duty) Vehicles. Subgroup Leader: Germany, Korea. EVE-17 meeting

HDV CO2 emission certification 1 st meeting of the Editing board

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre. VECTO - Overview VECTO Workshop Ispra, November, 2018

AABC Europe 2017 Mainz, Germany Dr. Jörn Albers, Dr. Christian Rosenkranz Johnson Controls Power Solutions EMEA. Johnson Controls Power Solutions EMEA

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Data Evaluation Method(s): Contribution to (Possible) additional elements -

Energotest July 2010: Fuel Consumption Tests of the RM2J FMZ Device

Real Driving Emissions from a Gasoline PHEV with and without a GPF

Engine encapsulation. A synergic approach to exterior noise and CO 2 emissions reduction. Brussels, 18th December 2012 Maurizio Mantovani - Autoneum

CHINA S STAGE 6 EMISSION STANDARD FOR NEW LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES (FINAL RULE)

Insights into WLTP and RDE

SPEED LIMITS AND ECO-DRIVING Cleaner air through lower speed limits and Eco-driving

Transcription:

Scientific expert workshop on CO2 emissions from light duty vehicle Lisbon 7-8 June 2016 Session 3: challenges of measuring real driving emissions DIRECTION RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT Stéphane RIMAUX (Fuel consumption expert) Bernard SWOBODA (Fuel consumption senior expert)

Index Real driving emission measurement challenges Step 1 : selection and verification of the vehicle Step 2 : Driving the vehicle and measurement Step 3 : Data post treatment First results Next Steps Conclusion 2

Real driving consumption challenges What real driving consumption are we talking about? A user value? User survey=> not a unique value but a distribution Many reasons to have a wide spread consumption repartition (see session 2) Urban/ Road / highway % Driver sportiness Auxiliary use Average consumption Challenge : measurement of the x% (=50% for PSA) consumption value 3

Real driving consumption challenges What real driving consumption are we talking about? A 50% user? Statistics for a given user=> not one value! Holidays/working weeks Summer/winter =>consumption should be evaluated on a yearly basis Average consumption Challenge : measurement of the 50% user yearly consumption value with simple and short test 4

Real driving consumption challenges Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Driver driving behavior Gear shiftings Tyre resistance Drag Vehicle Use Urban/Road/highway% Trip distances, stop duration Plug frequency Auxiliary use (A/C..) Challenge : try to find conditions leading to the average consumption of the average driver Sportiness External conditions Temperature Traffic density 5

Real driving consumption challenges Average consumption conditions Real test conditions Vehicle data Driver driving behavior Vehicle data Driver driving behavior Mass (load, tank level..) Gear shiftings Mass (load, tank level..) Gear shiftings Tyre resistance Tyre resistance Sportiness Sportiness Drag Vehicle Use Drag Vehicle Use Urban/Road/highwa Urban/Road/highwa y% y% External condition s External condition s Temperat Plug frequency Temperat ure Plug frequency ure Auxiliary (A/C..) Auxiliary (A/C..) Challenge : try to stick to average conditions and be able to correct difference impacts 6

A method to measure consumption? An initiative for transparency from PSA, with two NGOs (T&E, FNE)*, and a certification body (Bureau Veritas) working together to offer better information to customers *Transport & Environment, France Nature Environnement 7

A method to measure consumption? PSA Groupe took the initiative to announce the publication of customer fuel consumption for their principal vehicles, under the control of an independent parties (T&E, FNE and BV ) A Protocol has been developed to measure the average customer fuel economy PSA, presented at the 2016 Geneva motor show the validated protocol with the 3 first results Before summer 2016: PSA will publish the measurements of average fuel consumption for 30 Peugeot, Citroën and DS models Following elements on real driving consumption measurement comes from this working group 8

The different steps of the protocol Step 1 : Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Selection of the vehicle Verification of the vehicle Tyre resistance Drag 9

The different steps of the protocol Step 1 : Selection and verification of the vehicle Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Tyre resistance Driver driving behavior Gear shiftings Sportiness Step2: driving and measurement Drag External conditions Temperature 10

The different steps of the protocol Step 1 : Selection and verification of the vehicle Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Tyre resistance Average Real driving consumption Step3: Data post treatment Driver driving behavior Gear shiftings Sportiness Step2: driving and measurement Drag Vehicle Use Urban/Road/highway% External conditions Temperature Trip distances, stop duration Auxiliary (A/C..) Plug frequency 3 steps to determine the average real driving consumption 11

Step 1 of the protocol : selection and verification of the vehicle 12

Selection of the vehicle Selection of vehicle to fit to average user vehicle With mainstream options which have an impact on consumption (AC, tyre size,..) Above 1000km vehicle 13

Verification/ Preparation of the vehicle Check list verification Oil level Battery SOC Tire pressure and wear Service manual check 14

Real Driving Consumption value Measurement: 4 different ways Information from Engine Computer : No accuracy requirement on OBD signal. Accuracy on low load situation not good Need to be connected to the Engine Computer Fuel Flowmeter: Need to modify the fuel circuit With the fuel pump value (using fueling gun stop) Poor precision >> 5 % Need lot of km Do not give access to urban/road/ highway consumption independently PEMS (Portable Emission measurement system) Need an exhaust pipe modification Aero drag impact Same tool as for RDE Precision: See PEMS Precision slide 15

Step 2 of the protocol : driving the vehicle and measurement Step 1 : Vehicle ready for measurement Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Tyre resistance Average Real driving consumption Step3: Data post treatment Driver driving behavior Gear shiftings Sportiness Step2: driving and measurment Drag Vehicle Use Urban/Road/high way% External conditions Temperature Plug frequency Auxiliary (A/C..) 3 steps to determine the average real driving consumption 16

Circuit and Driving instructions Definition of a circuit with diversified driving conditions (city, road, motorway) City / Road / Motorway mix City : 22,8 km Road : 39,6 km Motorway : 29,9 km Total: 92,3 km Driving instructions: No obligation to follow Gear Shifting Indicator (GSI) Use of auxiliaries (HVAC, lights ): as needed depending on conditions Be as close as possible to average customer driving dynamics Only rules: follow road traffic code, especially speed limits One circuit to have 3 consumption values. 17

Validation of each drive Comparison to driver 50% statistics driving dynamics average speed in Urban/Road/HighWay average positive acceleration in U/R/HW average speed average longitudinal acceleration < -0,1-0,1 à 0,1 > 0,1 Vehicle speed [km/h] 0 à 60 60 à 90 90 à 250 75.0 km/h Distance : 9,78% average acceleration : 0,37 m/s^2 These statistics are deduced from Customer database segment and fuel type dependent for each U/R/HW use Comparison to driver 50% 18

Validation of each drive A trip is accepted if The average speed for U/R/HW is within ± 3 km/h of the driver 50% The average positive acceleration for U/R/HW is included between the customer 30% and customer 70% values. Tolerances are defined to have : Little consumption difference within tolerances Easiness to have a valid test Others are rejected (too much or not enough dynamical driving ) Each test should be in a velocity/acceleration windows to be accepted 19

Measurement: number of tests On a given circuit with the same driver=> some variations wind, rain, road traffic, use of auxiliaries, dynamics conditions On a given circuit average consumption depend of driver => At least 3 valid measurements with minimum 2 different drivers should be performed At the end: completion with Correlation test with test bench Cold start effect measurement 20

Measurement: PSA experience from 01/01/16 to 31/05/16 130 tests on the road 60 correlation tests on the bench To get an accurate fuel consumption result, it is necessary to correct the PEMs measurement by the correlation factor PEMS / bench A correction of PEMs measurement should be performed 21

Measurement: PEMS uncertainty For diesel engine (1.6 and 2.0 displacement) Use of a 2 flowmeter The uncertainty quite low and constant for the 4 phases of the WLTP Diesel engine: PEMS uncertainty OK 22

Measurement: PEMS uncertainty For petrol engine (1.2 TC and 1,6 TC displacement) Use of a 1,5 flowmeter The uncertainty is just sufficient and not constant for the 4 phases of the WLTP Need to be improved High power petrol engine: PEMS uncertainty quite OK, need be improved 23

Measurement: PEMS uncertainty For petrol engine (1.0 NA and 1.2 NA displacement) Use of a 1,5 flowmeter The uncertainty is not OK and not constant for the 4 phases of the WLTP The 1 flowmeter is not suitable for the 1.0 NA and 1.2 NA Validation of the 1,25 flowmeter once available Low power petrol engine: PEMS uncertainty not OK, must be modified 24

Step 3 of the protocol : Data post treatment Step 1 : Vehicle ready for measurement Vehicle data Mass (load, tank level..) Tyre resistance Average Real driving consumption Step3: Data post treatment Driver driving behavior Gear shiftings Sportiness Step2: driving and measurment Drag Vehicle Use Urban/Road/high way% External conditions Temperature Plug frequency Auxiliary (A/C..) 25

Post treatment Why a post treatment? To be as close as possible to the «driver 50%» => Correction of the fuel consumption to better match real average uses Normalisation to driver 50% use conditions. 26

Correction of the fuel consumption Consumption test result corrections by calculation to bring them to the driver 50% use 1. Correction for mass and weather conditions 2. Aerodynamic impact of the PEMS 3. Correction for the mix City, Road, Motorway 4. Weighting of the cold phase 5. Taking into account not continuously working devices (eg. DPF (diesel particulate filter) regeneration) 27

Correction of the fuel consumption 1. Correction for mass and weather conditions Using coast-down values and WLTP formula to bring back rolling resistance to standard conditions 14 C 100 kpa Average «target» mass as driven by the customer Target mass is the sum of Empty weight for the vehicle equipment level tested Average options mass for the vehicle equipment level considered Average occupants mass Luggage mass Occupants mass and luggage mass from customer database 28

Correction of the fuel consumption 2. Aerodynamic impact of the PEMS 3 rear body styles considered Fuel penalties substracted 3. Correction for the mix Urban, Road, Highway Bringing back to the average customer mix Average customer mix depends on segment and fuel type, from customer database 29

Correction of the fuel consumption 4. Weighting of the cold phase The trip begin by a cold start (at workshop temperature), the measurement already includes a cold penalty The trip is approximately 92 km whilst the average customer trip is shorter. Cold start phase during which Fuel Consumption is higher is therefore under estimated. A weighting of the cold phase is necessary by adding a fixed extra fuel consumption to be representative of the customer average use Correction principle Identification of cold start overconsumption Identification of cold start impact duration weight the overconsumption using statistics of customer trips (customer surveys). 30

Correction of the fuel consumption 5. Taking into account the possible DPF regeneration (diesel particulate filter) Looking at PEMS exhaust temp, regeneration can be easily identified Trip rejected when regeneration occurs Trip valid if no regeneration occur We add a fixed penalty with the real life Ki Factor, based on real regeneration intervals 31

First results shown at Geneva 32

3 vehicle tested on the 1 rst of March Vehicle tested Consumption measurement (l/100km) PEUGEOT 308 1.6l BlueHDi 120 S&S BVM6 CITROËN C4 GRAND PICASSO 1.6l BlueHDi 120 S&S BVM6 DS 3 1,6l BlueHDi 120 S&S BVM6 T&E Customer use protocol 5,0 5,6 4,9 Customer consumption (Customers survey / Spritmonitor) 5,0 / 5,1 5,5 / 5,7 5,1 / 5,3 Homologated consumption (NEDC) 3,2 4,0 3,6 Results consistent with the average costumer consumption 33

Next Steps 34

Next Steps Before summer 2016: target of 30 vehicles tested. 24 already done Adapt the protocol for Hybrids LCVs Working with Sensors (our PEMS provider) to identify best flowmeter for all engine types 35

Conclusion 36

Conclusion Measuring Real driving consumption on road is a challenge To know the average consumption conditions: Reduce all drivers to an average one Reduce all uses to an average one Reduce all driving conditions to an average one To measure this average consumption value Have tests with as low variability as possible deduce average consumption from real tests performed in non average conditions A methodology is proposed Still remain a noticeable uncertainty Some improvement still needed on PEMS (especially for small displacement petrol engines) Need adjustments for HEV/PHEV and LCV 37