AIAA Al ANS A /AS M WAS E E 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit June 28-30, 1993 / Monterey, CA. The RD-170, A Different Approach

Similar documents
AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

IAC-04-IAF-S.2.06 NEW PROPELLANT IGNITION SYSTEM IN LV SOYUZ ROCKET ENGINE CHAMBERS

Ground Test Demonstrator Engine Boost Turbopumps Design and Development

Lessons in Systems Engineering. The SSME Weight Growth History. Richard Ryan Technical Specialist, MSFC Chief Engineers Office

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Demonstration Program to Design, Manufacture and Test an Autonomous Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator to Gimbal Large Booster-Class Engines

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

Development Status of H3 Launch Vehicle -To compete and survive in the global commercial market-

6. The Launch Vehicle

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

EXTENDED GAS GENERATOR CYCLE

Modern Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

IAC-15-C4.3.1 JET INDUCER FOR A TURBO PUMP OF A LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

Pratt & Whitney Aircraft o,v,.,o_ o_,._o..,._ o.,,,,.._ o

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

Design Reliability Comparison for SpaceX Falcon Vehicles

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

Development of Low Cost Propulsion Systems for Launchand In Space Applications

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

SABRE FOR HYPERSONIC & SPACE ACCESS PLATFORMS

Preliminary Design Study of Main Rocket Engine for SpaceLiner High-Speed Passenger Transportation Concept

Modern Approach to Liquid Rocket Engine Development for Microsatellite Launchers

Current Launch System Industrial Base

Paper Session II-A - Lockheed Martin's Next Generation Launch Systems

Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC Status Report

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to.

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

Component and System Level Modeling of a Two-Phase Cryogenic Propulsion System for Aerospace Applications

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

Progress. on the SKYLON Reusable Spaceplane. Alan Bond Managing Director. 7 th Appleton Space Conference. 8 December 2011

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics

DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF NEXT: NASA S EVOLUTIONARY XENON THRUSTER

Rocket 101. IPSL Space Policy & Law Course. Andrew Ratcliffe. Head of Launch Systems Chief Engineers Team

CHALLENGES IN CRYOGENIC DEVELOPMENT PRESENT & THE FUTURE

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

Development of Low-thrust Thruster with World's Highest Performance Contributing to Life Extension of Artificial Satellites

Welcome to Vibrationdata

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology

Success of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle (Test Flight No. 1)

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

LAUNCHERS that are able to deliver a payload into low

List of Illustrations

A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to the Heavy Lift Launch System Architecture Study

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41 CCAFS, FL

Low Cost Propulsion Systems for Launch-, In Space- and SpaceTourism Applications

AFRL Rocket Lab Technical Overview

Recent Developments for Future Launch Vehicle LOX/HC Rocket Engines

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FLEET AND EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I/II

Design Rules and Issues with Respect to Rocket Based Combined Cycles

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

ALCOHOL LOX STEAM GENERATOR TEST EXPERIENCE

Focus Area Level Report Including Knowledge and Skills, and Performance Indicators

Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to. Stephen Hevert Visiting Assistant Professor Metropolitan State College of Denver

Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

Rocketry, the student way

Supersonic Combustion Experimental Investigation at T2 Hypersonic Shock Tunnel

AIRCRAFT MEANS APPLICATION FOR SUBORBITAL TOURIST FLIGHTS AND COMMERCIAL SATELLITES LAUNCHING INTO AN ORBIT

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

An Overview of Electric Propulsion Activities in China

Subjects: Thrust Vectoring ; Engine cycles; Mass estimates. Liquid Bipropellant rockets are usually "gimballed" to change the thrust vector.

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

Rocketdyne Development of the Supercritical CO 2 Power Conversion System

For permission to copy or to republish, contact the copyright owner named on the first page. For AIAA-held copyright, write to AIAA Permissions

Progress Report on Preliminary Design of the LE-X Components

Upper Stage Evolution

NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

Using Pressure-Fed Propulsion Technology to Lower Space Transportation Costs

STUDYING THE POSSIBILITY OF INCREASING THE FLIGHT AUTONOMY OF A ROTARY-WING MUAV

AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition. RFP: Cruise Missile Carrier

USA DELTA DELTA Mc DONNELL DOUGLAS SPACE SYSTEMS

Influence of Fuel Injector Position of Port-fuel Injection Retrofit-kit to the Performances of Small Gasoline Engine

System Testing by Flight Operators the Rosetta Experience

Experimental Testing of a Rotating Detonation Engine Coupled to Nozzles at Conditions Approaching Flight

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology FY 2012 OCO

Responsive Access to Space The Scorpius Low-Cost Launch System

Fluid Propellant Fundamentals. Kevin Cavender, Franco Spadoni, Mario Reillo, Zachary Hein, Matt Will, David Estrada

The Falcon 1 Flight 3 - Jumpstart Mission Integration Summary and Flight Results. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2008 Paper SSC08-IX-6

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Media Event Media Briefing Arif Karabeyoglu President & CTO SPG, Inc. June 29, 2012

Liquid Rocket Engine TCA

IST Sounding Rocket Momo User Guide

Joint Services Environmental Management (JSEM) Conference

Development of Japan s Next Flagship Launch Vehicle

Unit C: Agricultural Power Systems. Lesson 6: Using Multiple Cylinder Engines

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

Transcription:

AIAA 93-2415 The RD-170, A Different Approach to Launch Vehicle Propulsion Boris I Katorgin and Felix J Chelkis NPO Energomash, Khimky, Russia Charles D Limerick Pratt & Whitney, West Palm Beach, Florida Al ANS A /AS M WAS E E 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit June 28-30, 1993 / Monterey, CA For permisslon to copy or republish, contact the American Instltui J Aeronautics and Astronautics 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washlngton, DC 20024

The RD-170, A Different Approach to Launch Vehicle Propulsion Boris I Katorgin' and Felix J Chelkis** NPO Energomash Khimky Russia 'LJ Charles D Limerick"* Pratt & Whitney West Palm Beach, Florida Abstract In the early 1960's, the United States and USSR took different paths in developing launch vehicle propulsion The United States focused on the lower performance gas generator cycle rocket engine because of the less demanding technology involved and the resulting easier development process The USSR adopted the high performance staged combustion cycle with oxygen rich turbine drive gases and have since striven to perfect that system The RD-170 is the culmination of over 30 years of staged combustion cycle propulsion system development This paper discusses the evolution of high pressure turbomachinery and combustion chamber designs from the RD-253 (the first operational high pressure staged combustion rocket engine, introduced in 1965) to the RD-170 The operating characteristics of the RD-170 will be explained along with the operability features included as part of the engine system The quality approach used in the manufacturing, component test, and assembly process will be described and the unique health monitoring and life prediction system will be unveiled Potential application of the RD-170 to US launch vehicle needs has been studied and these results will also be presented General Director and General Designer ** Chief Designer ***Manager, SE&I, Russian Programs Member AlAA Introduction The RD-170 is a mature engine Development started in 1976 and the first flight was in 1985 Over 200 engines have been built and over 900 tests accumulating more than 100,000 sec have been completed The RD-170 is a total propulsion unit with hydraulics for control valve actuation and thrust vector control gimbaling, pneumatics for valve actuation and purging, and a thrust frame to distribute loads all self contained as part of the engine The engine was developed to provide the booster propulsion for the Energia and Zenit launch vehicles One of the requirements of the Energia application was reusability, the RD-170 strap-on booster units were intended to be used up to 20 times without overhaul or removal from the booster stage Hence, along with the traditional requirements of high performance and reliability were reusability and operability requirements not previously demonstrated in rocket engines It was required that between flight servicing and initial flight preparation be accomplished using a minimum of hand operations LJ The engine is the current product of an engine design philosophy initiated with the RD-253 engine which started development in the early 1960's NPO Energomash embarked on a course to develop high pressure, staged combustion, oxidizer rich turbine drive gas rocket engines, and the RD-253 which became operational in 1965 was the first engine of this type This L, Copyright 0 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc, 1993 All rights reserved

/ " engine which operated at over 2000 psia using the staged combustion cycle was as far in advance of other engines of that generation as the RD-170 is relative to the current generation of engines Figure 1 shows the chamber pressure versus time characteristics of some representative NPO Energomash developed engines with the US developed F-I and SSME noted for reference advanced health rnonitoring/life prediction system Development of the engine was initiated in the mid 1970's with the first flight occurring in 1985 The quality control system and specifications were developed from strong requirements close to US standards The extensive NPO Energomash experience, the 4 chamber modular configuration of the engine, and development of a wide range of similar turbopumps of different thrust sizes provides confidence in low risk, low cost development of Derivative Configurations (1 chamber, 2 chamber, uprating, etc) 4000 3000 Engine chamber pressure 2040 1000 0 w- 20996A The RD-170 engine assembly shown in Figure 2 consists of a single high-pressure turbopump assembly driven by two preburners, four injector/thrust chamber assemblies, integral fuel and oxidizer boost pumps, helium bottles for valve actuation and start and shutdown purging, thrust structure, gimbal actuators, propellant ducting, hypergolic-fuel cartridges, sequencing and control valves, shielding, and telemetry systems Figure 1 Rocket Engine Development History RD-170 Enqine Characteristics The RD-170 is a high performance lox/kerosene rocket booster propulsion system with operability and reusability features not previously demonstrated on rocket propulsion systems The engine was designed to provide a minimum of 20 reuses before overhaul and enable between flight servicing and initial flight preparation with automated operations lj v The operability of the RD-170 is a major contributor to the less than 7 day launch timeline of the Zenit launch system The engine is >IO% higher in performance than other loxlkerosene booster engines and has a fully developed, operational, Figure 2 RD- 170 Propulsion Assembly 2

The RD-170 is a staged combustion cycle LodKerosene booster rocket propulsion assembly producing 16 million Ibs sea level thrust and a sea level impulse of 309 sec at an overall mixture ratio of 26 to 1 It has a 2 to 1 throttling range, an assembly dry weight of 26,575 Ibs and overall dimensions of 1579 inches length and 146 inches diameter The single high-pressure turbopump assembly feeds four identical injector thrust chamber assemblies Two preburners are used to drive the single stage turbine with oxidizer rich combustion products The high pressure turbopump assembly, shown in Figure 3, consists of two rotors connected by a quill shaft One rotor has the turbine and oxidizer pump and the other the fuel pumps Both shafts operate with subcritical rotor dynamics Figure 4 RD-170 Flow Schematic 28'JWA The fuel and oxidizer boost pumps are integrated into the inlet lines and are driven with turbine discharge gas (oxidizer) and recirculated fuel (fuel) that reenters the propellant flow upstream of the highpressure pumps The four injector/thrust chambers are each integrally welded/brazed assemblies with hypergolic ignition and a combination of film and regenerative cooling (shown in Figure 5) All four injector chamber assemblies can gimbal in two directions or can be limited to a single direction by installing a fixed link The linear actuators are powered by fuelsupplied by the high pressure fuel pump The two parallel preburners are ignited by a unique single-shot hypergolic ignition system -i/ Figure 3 High Pressure Turbopump Assembly All oxidizer flows through the preburners but the fuel is split between the preburners and chambers (fuel cooled) Thrust control is achieved by regulating fuel flow to the preburners, and mixture ratio by regulating fuel flow to the chambers An engine flow schematic with only two chambers shown is presented in Figure 4 Figure 5 Injectorflhrust Chamber Assembly 20987A 3

" w0 Control valve command signals are generated by a vehicle computer running sofhrvare generated during engine acceptance testing Heated helium is supplied from the engine for oxidizer tank pressurization The engine is reusable and over 20 repeat firings have been performed on ground test engines The health monitoring system automatically assesses engine health and defines/tracks remaining engine life The RD-170 has completed 28 flight firings (20 ZENIT and 8 ENERGIA) and over 900 test firings with an accumulated total of over 100,000 operational seconds Table 1 provides a general description of the RD-170 and characteristics are presented in Table 2 Table 1 RD-170 General Description Staged combustion cycle engine LoHkerosene propellants 4 thrust chambers (gimbal+w) 2 oxygen rich prebumers High pressure turbopump assembly - 2 stage fuel pump - single stage oxygen pump - single turbine Hydraulic system (valves, TVC) powered with kerosene from fuel pump Hypergolic ignition Operational certification 1985 200+ engines produced > 100,000 sec and > 900 firings 28 flight firings (December 1992) - 20 Zenit - 8 Energia Qualified for 10 mission reusability Fully developed health monitoring/life prediction system Table 2 RD-170 Characteristics Nominal thrust (SL) 1,632,000 Ib (Vacuum) 1,777,000 Ib Specific impulse (SL) 309 sec (Vacuum) 337 sec Chamber pressure 3,560 psia Nozzle area ratio 364:l Mixture Ratio 26 Length 1579 inches Diameter (1488 frame/ 146 nozzles) inches Throttle range 50-105 Yo Total system dry weight 26,575 Ibs Operability Features The RD-170 was designed for operability, wherever possible flight preparation, and between flight operations (for reusable applications) have been minimized and automated After installation in the vehicle, all engine operations are automated through the launch phase The engine requires minimal preparation for launch as shown in Table 3 Interfaces are minimized and there are no flexible interfaces with the vehicle The hydraulics systems for the control valves and thrust vector control are self contained as part of the engine with hydraulic power furnished with kerosene from the high pressure fuel pump There are no hydraulic interfaces with the vehicle or pad 4

Table 3 RD-170 Launch Preparation At the engine factory before shipping Line closeouts chamber throat plugs, and hypergolic start cartridges installed In the vehicle assembly building Continuity and function checks as part of vehiclelengine assembly process All automated operations on pad Helium bottles filled Low level GN2 purg,e and low level dry air purge at start of LOX tankina LOX cooldown by ~circulatlon (15 min after completion of tanking) Fuel GN2 ejector for 10 min Control valve hydraulic system prepressurized 100 sec to fill fuel system (fuel prevalve opened) Hydraulic control valves positioned 60 sec before start Hiah level GN7 fuel side purge - 20 sec before L start Helium bottle pressure, hydraulic control valve position, and GN2 ejector operation monitored (pressure switches) Helium for pneumatic valve actuations and purging during the shutdown is also selfcontained as part of the engine This system is automatically filled through a pad interface during the launch preparation process The comprehensive health monitoring and life prediction was designed and the necessary data base compiled during development to provide automated reusability of the engines for Energia The projected launch rates have not materialized for Energia and reuse of the booster modules was never attempted; however, the engine has been qualified for 10 reuses (17 with 5 mission margin and 2 firings in acceptance) The continuous throttling capability of the RD-170 to less than 50% also provides potential operability advantages The engine could be started to a low thrust level and checked out prior to committing to launch The throttling capability could also be used to provide real time trajectory matching during the boost phase This would enable a significant reduction in avionics programming, significantly improving the operability of the launch system Health MonitorinslLife Prediction System Evaluation of the engine technical state after firing or flight use is accomplished using a technical diagnostics system (TDS), which deals with measured engine parameters The TDS uses both static and dynamic parameters of the engine and consists of the following subsystems: static parameters diagnostics subsystem for evaluating measurement validity Darameters algorithm evaluation dynamic parameters diagnostics vibroacoustic characteristics evaluation subsystem for estimating expired life time Full cycle of calculations and analysis for all subsystems can be performed within a day after engine testing All subsystems use measurements of all engine parameters during a test (or a flight) Total number of measurements is about -150 A diagram visually presenting the health monitoring life prediction process is shown in Figure 6 L/ 5

ly, I I, i Automated Analysis : Y*rUr*ylrn*"n - a* 01 "mn Pn-1,~=, Allowed limits for diagnostic indicators were defined by statistical modeling In order to make a formal decision concerning a state of engine components, a special logical state model is used All evaluation and formal analysis procedures are performed with special software on computers of IBM 360/370 type - - I Figure 6 Health Monitoring/Life Prediction Process Static Parameters Diaanostics Subsystem for Evaluating Measurement Validity - This subsystem evaluates -' parameters, which were recorded during engine operation in start-up, steady state, smooth throttling, final stage, and shutdown modes Totally, this subsystem evaluates over 100 engine parameters b In the event that some parameters are beyond allowable statistical limits, the causes of why these parameters are out of the limits are analyzed by a special logical model The procedure of evaluating parameter values and their derivatives and a formal analysis of causes of parameters being out of limits are fully automatic and performed by means of a special software for computers of IBM 360/370 type Parameters Algorithm Evaluation - The engine diagnostics for this evaluation is performed on the main mode for 17 engine subsystems for 30 diagnostic indicators These diagnostic indicators are calculated by a mathematical model using engine parameters measured during operation I_ Dynamic Parameters Diagnostics Vibroacoustic Characteristics Evaluation - This subsystem evaluates vibroacoustic characteristics of engine parameters obtained on start-up mode, nominal mode, smooth throttling mode, and final stage mode The amount of parameter characteristics, which are calculated and evaluated, totals 100 Allowable characteristics limits are obtained from statistics Characteristics are calculated and compared with allowable limits by special equipment complex, which consists of spectrum analyzer and a personal computer connected to it This computer enables the use of spectrum analysis for calculations The process uses special software for calculating and analyzing vibroacoustic characteristics Subsystem for Estimating Expired Life Time - This subsystem evaluates an engine state based on expired life time by the end of the current engine test during all life cycle Amount of evaluated parameters (which are called "accumulated damage owing to expiring main engine aggregates life time") totals 70 Allowed limits for these parameters are set based on results of durable engine life time testing cycles during development, and on certification and reliability confirmation test results The "accumulated damage" is calculated by the same equipment complex as for vibroacoustic characteristics control and stability subsystem There is a software for calculating "accumulated damage" at the end of each testing 6

Qualitv Amroach Quality control system at NPO Energomash meets Is0 9000 series standards requirements Quality control system procedures are implemented during project development, working documentation development, manufacturing, and testing of engine components and the engine system Project Quality At NPO Energomash, input data for a project ("technical task") are considered by all departments, which participate in the project Results of such a consideration are certified by department chiefs' signatures A technical task is agreed upon by scientific organizations Requirements, which are included in a technical task, should meet the State Standard for Liquid Rocket Engine Reliability Development materials ("technical proposal," "sketch project") are subject to standard control procedures, during which a project is checked for whether requirements of Single Design Documentation System State Standard are met Then a project is directed to scientific organizations that investigate it Documentation Quality a customer For controlling the process of developing manufacturing processes for engine components and engine system, the Experimental Plant develops a development program for technological processes This program is agreed upon by the Design Bureau and a scientific technological institute Results, reached at design development stages, are reflected in design bureau reviewing reports Results of manufacturing processes development are certified by engaging specialized industry branch scientific institutes Manufacturinq and Testinq All materials, purchased parts, semifinished items, which are supplied to the company, are subject to input control Control procedures are provided by industry branch and company standards All parts and subassemblies during the manufacturing process are subject to control procedures by Technical Control Department employees Controlling operations are an integral part of the manufacturing process The fact of passing through a control operation is certified with a mark in documentation for the part by the controller Periodically units and subassemblies are assembled and disassembled for the purpose of control Subassemblies that have independent specifications are subject to product acceptance tests (each specimen should be tested) or selective tests (selective specimen of a batch should be tested) During development all documentation passes through a multi-stage quality control process: first, it is controlled by an executor, then by a controller, and managers up to Design Bureau Chief The documentation is controlled by the Standards Control Deoartment Droiect management department, and ' by 'the experimental plant technological service An experimental developmental program for engine components and engine system is developed for controlling engine design development process This program is list of allowed waivers is certified, agreed upon by scientific organizations and All waivers from a documentation are considered according to company standards They are recorded and accounted in speck forms A conclusion for every waiver is certified by Technical Control Department Chief At the moment of engine shipment all single waivers are considered in combination, as a whole A u W W 7

"- t/ Technological, measurement and testing equipment are subject to control NPO Energomash standards provide an order of controlling procedures When the ground development is completed, the engine quality is controlled in "interagencies" tests A special commission estimates results of the testings and certifies them with a special statement Each specimen quality is controlled by a fire test (product acceptance test) Periodically (annually) engine manufacturing stability and existing engine design margins are checked out This procedure is performed in periodical certification tests After completion of a ground engine development or a break in engine manufacture, qualification tests are carried out Qualitv System Control The quality system is periodically checked This is performed by a group of NPO Energomash's specialists under an order of the firm's management A part with a waiver can be permitted for further operations, if the waiver does not affect the engine quality and reliability Such a permission for a waiver is made by a special permission card In the permission card are shown a waiver cause, a person liable for the waiver, and measures to be undertaken to prevent from waiver causes in the future A card has marks, which define a job order number, drawing and part numbers, quantity and others Permission cards are numbered by a fabricating shop number and job order number Cards are kept in a fabricating shop The card form allows copying Specialists and managers sign a card Then it is certified by Design Bureau Chief and agreed upon by a customer Then the card is copied and sent to relevant NPO Energomash's departments When assembling an engine specimen, data for all waivers are gathered in the allowed waivers list Before accepting an engine, this list is considered and certified by engine components designers NPO Energomash's Quality Control Service accounts and analysis waivers in engine system and parts Potential Applications The RD-170 is a mature fully developed engine It provides the opportunity to develop a high performance new booster stage without the high cost and long lead time of developing a new engine A common booster stage concept powered with a single RD-170 engine was analyzed to determine its applicability to projected vehicle needs The booster stage defined is intended to be used as the first stage of a two stage expendable launch vehicle and also as a liquid rocket booster (LRB) that could replace the solid rocket boosters on the Space Shuttle, and also be used on potential early heavy lift launch vehicle Two ELV missions (20k and 50k payloads to LEO) were used in sizing the common booster stage The design propellant load for the booster was set by the 50k payload mission at 800,000 Ibs, approximately 90,000 Ibs greater than the propellant load of the Russian common booster used on the Zenit and Energia vehicles The two missions require different upper stages, initial thrust settings, and some propellant is off loaded for the 20k mission with a cryogenic upper stage Figure 7 shows the 2 stage ELV configurations with key characteristics noted For use as strap-on LRB's on the Space Shuttle, the propellant load was reduced to 720,000 Ibs to optimize payload The delivered payload to 82 NM was 57,000 Ibs, approximately 8,000 Ibs less than the baseline Space Shuttle capability with RSRM's An early Heavy Lift Configuration (External Tank with 3 SSMEs at 104%) was defined and evaluated with different numbers of strap-on common boosters 8

Table 4 RD-170 Booster Strap-ons Effect on Early Heavy Lift Vehicle Performance Configuration Payload (Shuttle ET with 3 SSMES @? 104%) (20 x 185 @ 516'7 Wgross millions Ibs TNV Liftoff 2 RD-170 LRB'S 156,000 36 122 3 RD-170 LRBs 234,000 45 I 35 4 RD-170 LRB's 287,000 54 143 6 RD-170 LRBs'* 388,000 7 I 160 "IOO x 100 Circular Parking Orbit The two strap-on common booster configurations would place 156,000 Ibs in a 20 by 185 mile LEO parking orbit Table 4 lists the additional payload capability available by adding more strap-on boosters Summary The RD-170 rocket engine is: PByI00 28k 195 X Z15k 11,101~ }%*," High performance 13 13 133 Reusable Designed for operability Available now Figure 7 Two-Stage ELV Configurations High technology FEZ{ smd ar M 9