PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Similar documents
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Public Information Session June 2, Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Toronto Transit Commission

Scarborough Transit Planning

Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS)

CONNECTING THE REGION

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to 2031

Yonge Relief Network Study: Technical Summary Final July Metrolinx

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

RELIEF LINE PRELIMINARY BENEFITS CASE ANALYSIS. November 2012

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Regional Express Rail: Kipling Station Project Update. Ryah Kazman, Community Relations Specialist Metrolinx

CONNECTING THE REGION

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

Issues Facing the Panel

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Yonge Subway Extension. driving progress in the GTA» more transit, stronger economy and cleaner environment

Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit

Journey to Excellence. Building Markham s Future Together. Development Services Committee. Transit. Update. June 23, 2015

Re: EX16.1. Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan to Attachment 5

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1

Benchmarking, Planning, and Promoting Transit- Oriented Intensification in Rapid Transit Station Areas: Project Key Indicators March 2016

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN WATERLOO REGION

METROLINX REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

YRRTC Business Plan

TRANSFORMING THE WAY OUR REGION MOVES

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN RICHMOND HILL

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN EAST GWILLIMBURY

CONNECTING THE REGION

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Making Tracks to Torontonians 2012

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) PLEASE SIGN IN

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Needs and Community Characteristics

Maryland Gets to Work

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF WATERLOO

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

INTEGRATED GO RER- SMARTTRACK OPTIONS

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF KITCHENER

EX29.1 REPORT FOR ACTION. SmartTrack Project Update and Next Steps SUMMARY

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

The Bloor-Danforth Subway 40 Years After Opening Why Was It So Successful? By Steve Munro March 14, Background

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN AURORA

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Project Description

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Supports Item No. 1 T&T Committee Agenda October 5, 2010

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

Ottawa LRT Stage 2. McKellar Park Information Session

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

East Turnaround. Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan.

LRT vs. Subway. Scarborough RT and Sheppard

Waterfront Transit Reset Phase 2 Study. Public Information & Consultation Meetings September 18 & 26, 2017

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Metrolinx: Transforming the Way We Move - A Network Wide Approach. Greg Percy, Chief Operating Officer November 1, 2016

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Caltrain Business Plan

3. SIGNALLING 3.1 INTRODUCTION. Present Operation - Facts and Figures

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Appendix A-M Public Information Centre 4 Materials

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Draft Results and Recommendations

Transcription:

AGENDA 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Project Background 3. Project Approach & Schedule 4. Draft Long List of Options 5. Evaluation Process 6. Next Steps 2

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

OUR RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK TODAY 4

OUR FUTURE RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK 5

BACKGROUND 6 2009 City Council approved Yonge North Extension EA, contingent on Relief Line and City/TTC commenced study to determine need for the Relief Line 2012 TTC s Downtown Rapid Transit Expansion Study concluded the initial phase of Relief Line and GO Transit improvements would help ease crowding 2013 Relief Line identified as part of the Next Wave of transit projects in the Metrolinx s Big Move plan and identified by Metrolinx as a priority for future transit investment 2014 Relief Line (South) Project Assessment launched. City/TTC commenced planning for preferred route and station locations for the Relief Line South. 2015 Metrolinx s Yonge Relief Network Study recommended a subway from Downtown to Don Mills Station. Metrolinx Board gave direction to advance planning of Relief Line South, Yonge Subway Extension, and assess a northerly extension of the Relief Line. 2016 City Council approved Relief Line Initial Business Case and Preferred Alignment for Relief Line South (Pape to Downtown via Queen/Eastern) subject to assessment of an additional alignment west of Pape. May 2017 City Council approved Carlaw alignment for Relief Line South between Gerrard and Queen and authorized commencing TPAP, proceeding with conceptual design, and developing an initial business case for Relief Line North.

RELIEF LINE OVERVIEW North & South of Pape Station Relief Line North - Alignment and stations to be determined through study now being initiated - First round of engagement happening now Relief Line South - TPAP being initiated in April 2018 - Design underway for 8 stations from Osgoode to Pape - Conceptual Design& costing underway - Draft Environmental Project Report 90% complete - Report back to Council late 2019 7

RELIEF LINE NORTH STUDY AREA From Pape Station on Line 2 (Danforth) north to Steeles Avenue From Yonge / Bayview east to Victoria Park Avenue 8

WHY DO WE NEED THE RELIEF LINE NORTH? Problem Statement 9

WHY DO WE NEED THE RELIEF LINE NORTH? Crowding on Line 1 Yonge Morning Rush Hour into Downtown With the roll-out of the new Toronto Rocket Subway fleet in 2014, capacity increased by 10 percent. This has resulted in a minor improvement for certain sections, however Bloor Station to Dundas Station remains at or above capacity. 10

WHY DO WE NEED THE RELIEF LINE NORTH? Relieve congestion Line 1 currently operates over capacity during peak travel times. A continuation of Relief Line South, travelling north from Pape Station will provide more capacity and reduce overcrowding, helping to improve the performance of the entire regional transportation network. Improve experience, health and environment Rapid transit options reduce per trip greenhouse gas emissions, provide an alternative to car use and are a more active form of transportation helping to protect our environment and our health. Connect people and places RLN will provide improved transit access for more communities not yet served by rapid transit, helping to create connected places and better connect people with urban centres, employment nodes and regional destinations. Grow with the Region By 2041, the GTHA, which had a population of nearly 7 million in 2016, is expected to grow to over 10 million people and 4.8 million jobs. 11

PROJECT APPROACH & SCHEDULE 12

PROJECT APPROACH & SCHEDULE 13 We Are Here

ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Consultation on: Study Area Evaluation Criteria Problem Statement Long List of Station Areas Long List of Corridors Consultation on: Short List of Corridors and Stations Emerging Preferred Alignment Initial Business Case Consultation on: Conceptual Design Phasing Analysis Consultation on: Draft Environmental Project Report Project Impacts Mitigation Strategies We Are Here 14

WHAT WE HAVE HEARD FROM YOU SO FAR: Online Feedback Connect communities across the City Whether it s going to work, school or key destinations across the city, people want easier connections to get to where they re going. Enhance the transit experience Transit experiences would be more enjoyable with a reduction in congestion on transit lines and highways. This means faster and more efficient travelling to, from and within the City. Support growth Design the Relief Line North to maximize development potential in residential and employment areas along the route and surrounding neighborhoods. Improve transit equity Create an affordable transit service with station accessibility in high density neighbourhoods. Build an integrated transit network Increased connections between local and regional transit systems would help build an integrated and convenient transit network with more options. Extend service times Longer service hours will offer transit users more options when planning their route. Expedite the Relief Line North Transit lines trains, subways and buses are all experiencing crowding within the study area and the Relief Line North is required quickly. 15

DRAFT LONG LIST OF OPTIONS 16

DRAFT LONG LIST OF STATION AREAS Potential station areas were identified based on: Major transit network connections: Existing transit network (TTC and GO) Future Regional and City transit networks Locations of major activity: Key destinations Higher densities Existing planning permissions (urban structure, land use, future vision) 17

DRAFT LONG LIST OF CORRIDOR OPTIONS Corridors were identified by: Connecting potential station areas; and Serving communities with significant existing transit ridership. A total of six corridors were identified going north from Pape station on Pape avenue: 1. Bayview to Finch Station 2. Leslie 3. Don Mills to Leslie Station via GO corridor 4. Don Mills to Sheppard Avenue East 5. Don Mills to Victoria Park 6. Victoria Park via O Connor 18

OPTION 1: BAYVIEW TO FINCH STATION Option would Go north from Pape Station to Thorncliffe Park Connect with Line 5 Eglinton at Laird Station Head north on Bayview Avenue Connect with Line 4 Sheppard at Bayview Station Connect with Line 1 Yonge at Finch Station. 19

OPTION 2: LESLIE Option would Go north from Pape Station to Thorncliffe Park Connect with Line 5 Eglinton at Sunnybrook Park Station Head north on Leslie Street Connect with Line 4 Sheppard at Leslie Station 20

OPTION 3: DON MILLS TO LESLIE STATION VIA GO RAIL CORRIDOR Option would Go north from Pape Station to Thorncliffe Park Head north on Don Mills Road Connect with Line 5 Eglinton at Science Centre Station Cut across via the GO Corridor, north of Lawrence Avenue Connect with Line 4 Sheppard at Leslie Station and with Oriole GO Station on the Richmond Hill line. 21

OPTION 4: DON MILLS TO SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST Option would Go north from Pape Station to Thorncliffe Park Head north on Don Mills Road Connect with Line 5 Eglinton at Science Centre Station Connect with Line 4 Sheppard at Don Mills Station. 22

OPTION 5: DON MILLS TO VICTORIA PARK Option would Go north from Pape Station to Thorncliffe Park Head north on Don Mills Road to connect with Line 5 Eglinton at Science Centre Station Cut across the DVP to Victoria Park Avenue Line 4 could be extended to Sheppard Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue. Potential to run continuous service from Sheppard-Yonge Station to Osgoode Station. 23

OPTION 6: VICTORIA PARK VIA O CONNOR Option would: Go north from Pape Station Follow O Connor Drive to Victoria Park Avenue Line 4 could be extended to Sheppard Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue Potential to run continuous service from Sheppard-Yonge to Osgoode 24

EVALUATION PROCESS 25

HOW WILL WE GET TO A SHORT LIST OF CORRIDORS? A high level evaluation of the long list of stations and corridors will be conducted to narrow down the options for the Relief Line North. The following steps will be taken: Evaluation 1 Station areas will be evaluated based on impacts and potential mitigation to: Natural heritage areas, environmentally sensitive areas, parkland and/or open spaces Flood plains Land uses Evaluation 2 Corridors will be evaluated based on: Ability to relieve congestion Ability to provide continuous service north of Pape Station Connections to the existing and future transit network Feasibility based on engineering standards Ability to accommodate a Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) for vehicles The Result The short list of corridors 26

HOW WILL WE EVALUATE THE SHORT LIST? The evaluation framework and your input capture key considerations in transit project decision-making including operational needs, ridership, city-building and financial viability. 27

NEXT STEPS 28

29 Environmental assessment

CONTACT US We want to hear your ideas, suggestions and opinions We are committed to keeping you informed and engaged as we complete each phase of the planning process If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Project Team: By phone: 416-338-1065 By email: reliefline@toronto.ca Visit the project website at reliefline.ca 30