SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

Similar documents
Optimizing Community Benefits with Shared Mobility. Susan Shaheen, Ph.D

Shared Mobility: Past, Present, and Future. Susan Shaheen, PhD Twitter: SusanShaheen1 LinkedIn: Susan Shaheen

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Is The Future Of Urban Mobility Multi-Modal And Digitized Transportation Access?

SHARED MOBILITY UPDATE: WINTER 2017

Shared Automated Vehicles: 2018 Update on Developments and Policies

Presentation Overview

Carsharing for Older Populations

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

New Mobility Business Models

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

UC Berkeley Policy Briefs

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

MOBILITY AND THE SHARED ECONOMY

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Disruptive Innovations in Ridesharing:

TRANSPORTATION & THE SHARING ECONOMY DYNAMIC MARKET

Shared Mobility and Technologies Impact on Parking Design and Curbside Management

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Transportation Demand Management Element

Can car sharing facilitate a more sustainable car purchase?

Shared Mobility and Automated Vehicles: Policy and Data Sharing

TRANSPORTATION TRANSFORMATION

Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning and Alternative Services Program 2016 APTA Annual Meeting. City of Seattle

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHARED USE MOBILITY SERVICES IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

Shared mobility as an equity strategy: local and global context. Cassie Halls, Program Coordinator

NEW YORK CITY CARSHARE PILOT

Ridesourcing s Impact and Role in Urban Transportation

NEW YORK CITY CARSHARE PILOT

Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic

EVOLUTION OF MOBILITY: FOUR PREDICTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Alternative Transportation Options:

Shared Mobility in Seattle:

Case Study: City of San Diego

TNC s and Everything Else: The New Wave in (Public) Transportation

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Impacts of Ridesourcing: Opportunities and Risks with MaaS

NEW YORK CITY CARSHARE PILOT

Emergency Ride Home Program Survey

Transportation Demand Management. Overview of Tools and Strategies

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System

Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation First and Last Mile Connections TNC Partnership Study

Contra Costa Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan

Are we ready to jump back in the pool? Prospects for Carpooling and Ridesharing in the Years Ahead

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Evolution in Multi-Modal Transportation

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change


Susan A. Shaheen a a Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of

Electric Mobility-on-Demand a long step beyond carsharing. Jan-Olaf Willums Chairman EMN and Move About

The Next Million Car Sharing & Changing Parking Requirements

WELCOME TO TECH. talks TECHNOLOGY ENERGIZES

A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY FUTURE Rethinking Transit Solutions Presented by Jonathan Chai & Elli Papaioannou HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

Transit Oriented and City Center Development

TOMORROW S MOBILITY THE INNOVATIVE ROLE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT. Caroline Cerfontaine Senior Manager Combined Mobility UITP

Thoughts on carsharing Robin Chase

Chicago, IL Los Angeles, CA SHARED-USE MOBILITY REFERENCE GUIDE Shared-Use Mobility Center. All Rights Reserved.

Parking & Transportation Services (P&TS) C a r d i n a l a t W o r k W e l c o m e C e n t e r

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Parking & Transportation Services Virtual Parking Permits at Stanford Stanford Staffers Brown Bag Forum Kingscote Gardens, Room 140 November 8, 2018

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

The TDM Plan for Fort Washington Office Park NOVEMBER 1 6, 2017 FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE PARK STAKEHOLDERS

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

INNOVATION AND REGULATION IN SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Impacts of Transportation Network Company (TNC) and Autonomous Vehicles

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

EMERGING NEW MOBILITY VENTURES IN URBAN INDIA

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

City of Kelowna Regular Council Meeting AGENDA

Planning for the Future(s) The FDOT Initiative to Develop Guidance about LRTP Impacts of ACES

Will self-driving cars help or hurt efforts to cut emissions? Don MacKenzie Civil & Environmental Engineering

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

Regulations vs. Impeding Innovation

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola. Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Verkehrsingenieurtag 6. March 2014 Carsharing: Why to model carsharing demand and how

Our Shared Autonomous Future. Thomas Fisher Director, Minnesota Design Center University of Minnesota

#4.. DOCKLESS MOBILITY. Packet page: 2

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS THE

Systematic evaluation of new services at mobility hubs

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE Campus Planning and Transportation Services

3.0 MULTI-MODAL PROGRAM AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A method to define the spatial stations location in a carsharing system in São Paulo -Brazil

MaaS - AN ACCELERATING REVOLUTION AND THE LESSONS LEARNED TO DATE 20 FEBRUARY 2018

The Future of TDM History can help us understand the present, and predict the future!

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

What car should I drive? Ken Chu, Elliot Deal, Betty Hui, Jennifer Tse, Natalie Yin

Transcription:

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS Susan Shaheen, Ph.D. Adjunct Professor, Civil and Envt l Engineering, UC Berkeley Co- Director, Transportation Sustainability Research Center February 23, 2015

Overview Audience Poll What is Shared Mobility? Definitions Market Trends Understanding Acknowledgements

Poll: Have you ever used? Carsharing (e.g., Zipcar, car2go, Getaround) Bikesharing (e.g., Capital Bikeshare, Citi Bike) Carpooling or vanpooling? Ridesourcing (e.g., uberx, Lyft, Sidecar)

Shared- Use Mobility: Mobility services shared among users including: Traditional public transportation services, such as buses and trains; Vanpools, carpools, shuttles, ridesourcing/tncs, e- Hail taxis; Carsharing, bikesharing, scooter sharing in all its forms; and Flexible goods movement à Can be b2c and p2p Definitions What is shared- use mobility?

Roundtrip Carsharing: A fleet of autos used for round trips that require users to pay by hour or mile. Peer- to- Peer Carsharing: Shared use of private vehicle typically managed by third party One- Way Carsharing: A fleet of autos used for point- to- point trips, facilitated by parking agreements Fractional Ownership Carsharing: Individuals sublease or subscribe to a vehicle owned by a third party Carsharing Many forms of carsharing

Carsharing Membership Growth: Americas 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 MEMBERS 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Brazil (n=1) 98 347 910 2,884 2,857 Mexico (n=1) 750 2,654 6,174 Canada (n=20) 7,007 10,001 11,932 15,663 26,878 39,664 53,916 67,526 78,856 101,502 147,794 281,675 United States (n=23) 25,640 52,347 61,658 102,993 184,292 279,234 323,681 448,574 560,572 806,332 995,926 1,337,803 The Americas (n=45) 32,647 62,348 73,590 118,656 211,170 318,898 377,597 516,198 639,775 909,494 1,149,258 1,628,509 Shaheen and Cohen, 2014

Carsharing Vehicle Growth: Americas 30,000 25,000 20,000 VEHICLES 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Brazil (n=1) 12 18 58 46 56 Mexico (n=1) 40 47 Canada (n=20) 397 521 599 779 1,388 1,667 2,046 2,285 2,605 3,143 3,933 5,048 United States (n=23) 696 907 1,192 2,561 5,104 5,840 7,722 8,120 10,019 12,634 16,811 19,115 The Americas (n=45) 1,093 1,428 1,791 3,340 6,492 7,507 9,768 10,417 12,642 15,835 20,830 24,266 Shaheen and Cohen, 2014

Scooter Sharing: An operator- owned fleet of motorized scooters made available to users by the hour or minute Scooter Sharing Fills niche between cars and bicycles

Public Bikesharing: Fleet of bicycles for short, point- to- point trips usually found at stations Closed Community Bikesharing: Campuses and closed membership, mainly roundtrip Peer- to- Peer Bikesharing: Rent or borrow hourly or daily from individuals or bike rental shops Bikesharing Exponential growth in urban areas

Worldwide & US Bikesharing: February 2015 Worldwide: 850 cities with IT- based operating systems 992,000 bikes ~789,000 bikes in China (and 247 cities) US: 69 cities with IT- based systems ~23,700 bikes 2,266 stations In 2015, 7 new programs began operating in world: 5 in China and 2 in US Source: Russell Meddin, 2015

Bikesharing Statistics: North America as of January 1, 2013 United States Canada Mexico North American Total Number of programs 22 4 2 28 Total Number of users 884,442 197,419 71,611 1,153,472 Number of members 41,695 53,707 71,611 167,013 Number of casual users, 1-30 Day 842,747 143,312 0 986,059 Number of bicycles 7,549 6,115 3,680 17,344 Number of kiosks 800 492 307 1,599 Number of docks 12,955 10,506 7,487 30,948 Shaheen et al., 2014

Carpooling: Grouping of travelers into a privately owned vehicle, typically for commuting Vanpooling: Commuters traveling to/from a job center sharing a ride in a van Real- time ridesharing services: Match drivers and passengers, based on destination, through app before the trip starts Ridesharing Evolving system of services and operators

Ridesharing in North America: A Snapshot (July 2011) 612 carpooling services 153 vanpooling services 127 services offer both carpooling & vanpooling Includes both online and off- line programs Chan and Shaheen, 2011

Ridesourcing/TNCs: Service that allows passengers to connect with and pay drivers who use their personal vehicles for trips facilitated through a mobile application; can also facilitate ridesplitting E- Hail or Taxi Apps: Taxis can be reserved through an e-hail Internet or phone application maintained either by the taxi company or a third-party provider and cover multiple companies Ridesourcing, TNCs, E- Hail App- enabled services; need for study

Some Ridesourcing/E- Hail Market Trends Lyft: 60 cities Uber 161 cities; 162,000 drivers Sidecar: 10 cities; 10,000 drivers Flywheel: 5 cities, 5,000 drivers, including LA and SF Curb: 60 cities; 35,000 cabs Said, 2015

Corporate Regional Shuttles: Employer- funded regional transit, closed systems, limited stops Local Shuttles: Employer or development agreement service, door- to- door, closed systems, workplace to transit hub Shuttle Services Growing system of local and regional shuttles

Flexible Goods Movement Opportunities for creating greater efficiencies Flexible Goods Movement: By sharing vehicles and combining point- to- point private user trips with delivery, opportunity for quicker and more efficient deliveries

Shared Mobility: Impacts Typically reduces car ownership/use and increases walking/cycling e.g., 50% auto reduction in carsharing Can complement & compete with public transit Depending on model and location Why? Time savings Cost savings Mobility benefits (e.g., health)

Shared Mobility: Impacts (cont d) Typically used by: Younger Well educated Upwardly mobile Caucasian individuals Living in urban areas How to scale this to other populations & land uses (accessibility, paratransit)? More research needed on mobility ecosystem and collective impacts Data critical to understanding new services

Acknowledgements Shared- use mobility providers from across the Americas and globe Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) University of California Transportation Center Caltrans US DOT Adam Cohen, Nelson Chan, Matthew Christensen, Rachel Finson, and Elliot Martin, TSRC Russell Meddin, Philadelphia Bike Share

www.tsrc.berkeley.edu