Iceland Information / latest news. High-quality transit system in Reykjavik Capital Area

Similar documents
BORGARLÍNA RECOMMENDATIONS

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Strategic Plan

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

RAIL INFRASTRUCTURES AND SERVICES: CONNECTING EUROPE FOR CITIES AND PEOPLE CITY OF SOFIA MOBILITY MANAGEMENT POLICIES. Metodi Avramov City of Sofia

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Bringing Bus Rapid Transit to Tanzania

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program moving

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

Role of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

HOW TO DELIVER PUBLIC TRANSPORT ON REDUCED BUDGET

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT, PLANNING AND OPERATIONS.

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Development of local public transport in Oradea

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Financing Public Transport - The Example of Belgrade

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Transport Demand Management Policies in Beijing. CAI Jing Beijing Transport Energy and Environment Center April 2016 in New Delhi

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Formalizing Mobility in Dakar: Labor Implications. Amadou Saidou BA President of CETUD, Dakar - Senegal

Transit on the New NY Bridge

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Build a Green, Harmonious and Integrated Public Transport System

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Financing Public Transportation Operations

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Parking policies as a tool to foster sustainable urban mobility

Needs and Community Characteristics

Transport systems integration into urban development planning processes

Green and Inclusive Urban Transport

Urban Mobility and Energy Trends in Istanbul

The Century of Cities

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

BRTS IN DHAKA: DESIGNING UNDER CONSTRAINTS

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016

Presentation 22 February 2019

Experiences in the field of electric mobility in Katowice

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Mobility As A Service: Czech approach to MAAS

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Green Line Long-Term Investments

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Transport Gautrain Update. Jack vd Merwe (Pr. Eng) CEO: Gautrain Management Agency 25 August 2009

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

ON THE ROAD TO ELECTRIFICATION

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

FACTSHEET on Bus Rapid Transit System

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Doubling the Market Share of Public Transport Worldwide by 2025: A Smart Future for Cities

Energy Efficiency Transport Sector

Reducing Congestion and Funding Transportation Using Road Pricing

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Modal Choice for Mass Rapid Transit

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

Path to achieving a good transport system:

Two years since our book

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Transcription:

Iceland Information / latest news High-quality transit system in Reykjavik Capital Area NVF s udvalg Udformning Møde 18.-20. april 2018 Levi, Finland Valtýr Þórisson / Margrét Silja Þorkelsdóttir

City-Line / Borgarlína A high-quality transit system is a key element in the regional plan for Reykjavik Capital Area 2015-2040. 2

Reykjavik Capital Area Facts Greater Reykjavik - The Capital Area of Iceland is made up of seven municipalities, with 215.000 inhabitants or two thirds of the Icelandic population. Year 1985 2012 Land used It is the only urban area in Iceland and therefore plays an important role as a centre of government, education and culture for the whole country. In recent decades, the Capital Area has experienced extensive growth with urban sprawl, increased traffic and longer distances for people to travel. Population Inhabitants/ha AADT main arterial road 135.000 205.000 25.000 75.000 3

1985 2013 +70.000 2040 +70.000

The Capital Area 2040 Key aspect A key aspect of the 2040 vision is that population growth must be dealt with without car traffic increasing at the same rate and without uninhabited greenfield being developed on to the same extent as in previous decades. Growth should be smart and not impair environmental quality. The focus is therefore on improving public transport where the aim is to increase the modal share of public transport. 2012 4% 2040 20% 12% 76% 58% 30% 5

2 paths different results Continue on the same path Change travel pattern

Year 2030 Modal splits

Investment until 2030 Transportation projects Road infrastructure 400 million EUR Roads 150 million EUR Public Transit 250 million EUR

Year 2030 Increase in daily car trips Increase in daily transit passengers

Year 2030 Delays in traffic

Conclusion More traffic Increased delays Bigger eco footprint More travel options Decreased delays Smaller eco footprint The goal that increase in car traffic will not be more than population growth can only be met by changing travel patterns. Therfore investment in infrastructure must provide public transit in a roadway that is dedicated to buses independent from other traffic.

Seperate lanes 5-10 min. frequency Pay fares outside bus What is Cityline? Priority at intersections Reliable service Low steps at door

Bikes in buses Heated main bus stops Real time travel information High class transit system Bus rapid system Entry thru all doors Increased capacity

Longterm project many phases ahead A. Initial, organization and overall screening phase New Regional Plan B. Screening and scoping phase Corridor in master plans C. Clarification report phase Financing D. Outline design, EIA E. Detail design and construction

Cowi - screening report Multi criteria analysis Corridors to alignments

All the analysed alignments within the defined corridors Háholt D-1 D-2 D-3 Harpa B-2 B-1 Mosfellsbær Eiðistorg Hamrar BSÍ Kringlan Vogar A-1 C-1 C-3 C-4 C-4 Mjódd Ártún Hamraborg Smáralind C-1 C-2 B-3 Norðlingaholt Garðatorg A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 Hafnarfjörður C-3 Vellir

B-corridors B(Artun) B1 B2 B3 Length, km 7,5 16,3 11,9 12,7 Stops 13 23 20 20 Traveltime, min 20 42 32 33 Speed, km/h 22,1 23,4 22,1 23,0

MCA results B-corridor B(Artun) B1 B2 B3 Catchment area today, inh. pr km (400 m) 1.950 1.230 2.060 1.800 Catchment area, incl. growth potential pr. km 3.910 3.060 3.720 3.250 Passenger estimates pr. km (elasticity model) 970 600 810 660 Passenger estimates pr. km (Trip gen. - vision) 2.190 1.660 1.750 1.620 Frequency and capacity ++ ++ ++ Travel time improvement (min.) + (42) ++ (32) ++ (33) Coherence 0 0 0 Urban growth potential +80 % +42 % +37 % Construction Cost total cost index (BRT) 100% 84% 88% Construction Cost total cost index (LRT) 100 % 86 % 88 % Physical challenges and risks - - - Operation costs Borgarlina (hours/year) 33.000 67.900 52.500 54.100 Operation costs bus +++ ++ ++

Recommendations for the further Borgarlína process 58 km of infrastructure until 2040 First phase should be 25-30 km BRT chosen but not LRT Costs for the first phase of a BRT is around 250-285 million EUR

Thank you!

Acknowledgement This presentation is in part based on presentations/ reports from the following: Lilja G. Karlsdóttir, Viaplan Hrafnkell Á. Proppé, Association of municipalities in the Capital area SSH: Hvað er Borgarlína? Cowi: Borgarlína recommendations, screening report