V. Prakash C. Raghul Aravind. K. Ramesh P. Jagadeesh. Under the Guidance Of A.K.Anbarasan M.E Assistant Professor

Similar documents
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Modal Choice for Mass Rapid Transit

Stakeholders Advisory Working Group Traffic and Transit Group Meeting #4, October 10, 2007

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Two years since our book

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT, PLANNING AND OPERATIONS.

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

The Bus Rapid Transit System of Lagos, Nigeria

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Needs and Community Characteristics

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT WITH ITS

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Urban traffic situation and possible solutions for HANOI

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

TransMilennio Bogota Colombia 84 7m 45,000 1,300,000

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Safer Swifter Better Leadrail Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. / INDIA

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Strategic Plan

Mobility of Gurugram & NCR-

BRT: A solution to an urban transport crisis or a financial burden?

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

Click to edit Master title style

BENCHMARKING URBAN TRANSPORT-A STRATEGY TO FULFIL COMMUTER ASPIRATION

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

CA PACITY TRA MWAY. November CODATU XVII High capacity tramway November

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Draft Results and Recommendations

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

SOLUTIONS Training Kit Cluster 1: Public Transport.

FACTSHEET on Bus Rapid Transit System

Sustainable Urban Traffic in Vietnam

The project faces a number of challenges:

Bringing Bus Rapid Transit to Tanzania

Bus Rapid Transit in Asia: From Quantity to Quality. What is a Bus Rapid Transit system?

Green and Inclusive Urban Transport

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

Troost Corridor Transit Study

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Path to achieving a good transport system:

World Bank Support to Urban Transport in India

Power Generation From Speed Breaker Department: Mechanical Guided by: Prof. P.M. Patel Prepared by: Ajaysinh( ) Rushabh( )

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

STUDY ON IMPLEMENTING THE EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

Public Transport Options for Small and Medium Cities

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Istanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

INTELLIGENT URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTIONS MARTIN ERTL CHIEF INNOVATION OFFICER BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION BERLIN,

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Transcription:

Implementation of in Madurai City V. Prakash C. Raghul Aravind PG Student PG Student Dept Of Civil Engg Dept Of Civil Engg K.L.N College Of Information technology K.L.N College Of Information technology K. Ramesh P. Jagadeesh UG Student UG Student Under the Guidance Of A.K.Anbarasan M.E Assistant Professor Abstract - BusRapid Transit System () is the Safe, Economical, Rapid, Convenient & New concept of Public transport in Indian scenario perhaps in India there are more than 150 series of was running successfully world wide the few examples are Bogota, Beijing, etc, Ahmadabad (India) is also a successful example of. Population wise India is the second largest country & fastest growing economy of the In spite of numerous measures, the mass transportation facilities haven t controlled the rising traffic rate. Also the upcoming METRO network in the city does not have an efficient feeder network. Madurai is the second largest city in tamilnadu, this city is more congested in peak hours, So travelling time in peak hours are high.so the are implemented in the city. INTRODUCTION Most of the million plus cities are faced with serious problem of congestion and pollution. They are looking for cost effective, efficient and sustainable means of public transport solutions. is increasingly being recognized as amongst most effective solution for providing a cost effective and high quality public transport service in urban areas for both the developed andthe developing countries. Bus rapid transit (BRT) is a bus-based mass transit system. true BRT system generally has specialized design, services and infrastructure to improve system quality and remove the typical causes of bus delay. BRT systems can easily be customized to community needs and incorporate state-of-theart,low-cost technologies that Result in more passengers and less congestion. basically consists of segregated lanes dedicated exclusively to these buses. The outermost or the innermost lanes can be reserved for the system. AIM It should be a high quality public transportation system oriented to the users that offer FAST, COMFORT and LOW CARBON MOBILITY, EASILY ASSESIBLE by the public. OBJECTIVE BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM () which should be, Fast Comfortable Safe Reliable Affordable Environment friendly CHARACTERISTICS OF As we look at the length, area and population of cities, there is increases in the type of BRT and level of BRT changes from a basic bus service to a Full BRT service. The other factors that affect the type of BRT system may include local preferences and culture, population density, distribution of trips, climate, geography, topography, available financial resources, local technical capacity. NEED FOR The basic premise on which public transport is based is that if the road seems too narrow with high volumes of traffic, there is a case for public transport. The higher the volume of traffic on a road, the stronger is the case for public transport.. A new, faster & cost efficient system is required for quality conscious groups, over & above the existing low 233

quality bus network. fulfills these requirements & is perhaps, the only available alternative. ADVANTAGES OF BRT having more flexibility than Light Rail Bus Rapid Transit routes can also be adjusted and rerouted over time to serve new development Bus Rapid Transit can respond to changes in employment, land use, and community patterns. On the other hand, Light Rail Transit lines are fixed and cannot easily change to adjust to new patterns of housing and employment. Compared to other mass transit alternatives, the BRT is by far the most cost-effective means of providing rapid transit service about 10 20 percent of the cost of light rail and 1 10 percent of Metro. MAIN FEATURES OF BRT systems normally include most of the following features: Dedicated lanes Bus Way Alignment Off board Fare Collection Intersection Treatment Plat form level boarding ADDITONAL FEATURES FOR High Capacity Vehicle Quality Stations Prominent brand (or) Identity ELEMENTS FOR BRT is tailored to each unique corridor BRT can be implemented incrementally DEFINITION OF Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is a high-quality busbased transit system that delivers fast, comfortable, and cost-effective services at metro-level capacities. It does this through the provision of dedicated lanes, with bus ways and iconicstations typically aligned to the center of the road, off-board fare collection, and fast and frequent operations. HISTORY OF The first BRT system in the world was the implemented in Curitiba, Brazil, in 1974. Most of the elements that have become associated with BRT were innovations first suggested by Curitiba Mayor Architect Jaime Lerner. Initially just dedicated bus lanes in the center of major arterial roads, in 1980 the Curitiba system added a feeder bus network and interzone connections, and in 1992 introduced off-board fare collection, enclosed stations, and platform-level boarding. Other systems made further innovations, including platooning (three buses entering and leaving bus stops and traffic signals at once) in Porto Alegre, and passing lanes and express service in São Paulo US BRT began in 1977, with Pittsburgh South Busway, operating on 4.3 miles of exclusive lanes. Its success led to the 1983 Martin Luther King Jr. East Bus way a fuller BRT deployment including a dedicated bus way, traffic signal preemption, and peak service headway as low as two minutes. SCOPE OF COMPARISION FOR AND 1.Not crowded 2.Separate route 3.No Traffic 4.Time Management 5.Possibilities of Accident is less 6.No intersection of other vehicles 7.Plays a role in development of the country 1 crowded 2. Common route 3. Traffic 4.No Time Management 5. Possibilities of Accident are more. 6. Intersection of other vehicles 7. Plays a normal role in country. 234

REASON FOR IMPLEMENTING Shortest trip time Short wait Easy to use Comfortable PRE FEASIBILITY FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM () FOR MADURAI Madurai is a major city and cultural headquarters in the state of Tamil Nadu in southern India. It is the second largest city in Tamil Nadu and connects the southern districts to northern districts in Tamil Nadu, and is also the major transport city in Tamil Nadu. The city covers an area of 242.97 km 2 and had a population of 1,017,865 in 2011. Modes of transport in Madurai include road, rail and air. Madurai faces increasing daily traffic problems, so master plans have been prepared to reduce the city traffic and traffic problems in suburbs. Day by day Madurai city faces more traffic problems. It is the one of the important traffic circles in Tamil Nadu.The other major mode of local transportation in Madurai is the city bus. People travel from one part of the city to the other by city buses only. During peak hours, like in the morning and the evening, the buses are quite crowded. Being one of the most important means of public transport, you will find a lot of rush in the buses during the festivals. The other options available are Town buses and suburban buses, connecting the nearby places. Madurai has five bus stands to cater to the needs of the people Integrated Distinctive Low environmental impacts Incremental development 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Year PCU SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR Automated vehicle location system (AVLS ) Fleet management system (FMS ) Passenger announcement and passenger Information System (PA & PS) Fare collection System (FCS) OVER ALL TRAFFIC SURVEY DATA IN MADURAI CITY 235

PUBLIC OPINION FOR ELEVATED CORRIDOR DESIGN FROM THAMUKKAM TO CORPORATION OFFICE OPINION FROM TRAFFIC OFFICIAL CONCLUSION From this project we come to the traffic problems faced all over the world and also come to know about basic and advanced techniques transport systems in world. We know about existing system which is been adopted. We studied and analysed about the traffic congestions, mode of transportation existing in Madurai. We collected data about PLY data of buses, Number of buses, existing routes, and type of buses from Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation. We got information about the Road systems and upcoming road plans from Highway Department. We studied about the Elevated Corridor which is an upcoming project in Madurai. By analysing these data s, we come to conclude that implementing in Elevated Corridor in Madurai has many merits and essential. COLLECT THE VEHICLE TRAFFIC SURVEY IN PERIYAR BUS STAND SIGNAL 236

BRT STATIONS IN MADURAI CITY 20 FINAL SURVEY ABOUT 5 REQUIRED REFERENCE AN OVERVIEW ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM by Agarwal P K, Sharma Anupama, Singh A.P JERS/Vol.I/Issue II/Oct.-Dec.,2010/195-205 Bus Rapid Transit Features and Deployment Phases for U.S.Cities Published on Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2009 BRT Case Study, Transit Corporation Research Program (TCRP), Report 90, Volume 1, Sponsored by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) &Studied By, Transportation Research Board (TRB), U.S.A. Baltes M.R. (2003) The Importance Customers Place on Specific Service Elements of Bus Rapid Transit, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 1-19 Deng T. and Nelson J.D. (2010) Recent Developments in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Literature, Transport Reviews, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 69-96. Trichina A. and Hens her D.A. (2011) Bus congestion, optimal infrastructure investment and the choice of a fare collection system in dedicated bus corridors, Transportation Research Methodological, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 828-844. 75 NOT REQUIRED NO COMMENTS FINAL REPORT FOR 237