University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Similar documents
University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

2 CGA WG 10 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 3 CGA WG 12 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 4 CGA WG 7 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

University of GA Coop Ext Service

9/12/2009 (C8 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

(FORAG9-02) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 4 University of Georgia, CES Tolerance of newly-sprigged forage bermudagrass to broadleaf herbicides.

(03 08 CRR-03 MAN Parallel Heavy South Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

Oct (16S-TPAC-CORN-16) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 13 Purdue Weed Science. One Pass vs. Two Pass Programs for Conventional Till Corn

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

9/14/2009 (C39 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia Twelve inch GR Palmer amaranth response to burndown herbicides.

(11 BAS SB D9F Get the Most) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center. General Trial Information. Trial Location.

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

GENERAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

(TURF2002) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 2 University of Georgia, CES Crabgrass Control in Bermudagrass with Preemergence Herbicides.

Smooth Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass with Pendulum Formulations

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Nov (16S-CORT-SOY-08) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 15 Purdue Weed Science. Xtend Soybean System Compared to Competitor.

(AG-02d-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Ignite/graminicide tank-mix interactions as affected by graminicide rates and AMS

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

Southern Illinois University

(Forage2-06) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service. Dogfennel Control in Pastures

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

HARD APPLICATION BAREGROUND TREATMENTS COMPARING AE WP AND ROUNDUP PRO COMBINATIONS Trial ID: 09-T6 Protocol ID: 09-T6

1/Jun/2005 (03-PPAC-CORN-BURC) Site Description Page 1 of 10 Purdue University Burcucumber control in corn

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 10 FT BORDER FRONT

General Trial Information Study Director: Dustin Johnson Title: Research Associate Investigator: Dr. Bill Johnson Title: Professor

Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Mel Grove Organization: ISK Biosciences City: Houston State/Prov: TX

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Crop Stage at Each Application A B C Crop Name: ZEAMX ZEAMX ZEAMX Height (In.): 12-15(14) 21-27(24) Stage (L): V5-6(6)8L V8 11L

General Trial Information Study Director: Bill Nutt Affiliation: UGA CAES

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

(BD-04b-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Comparison of 2,4-D formulations for burndown. Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): N

Trial Location. Objectives: Evaluate efficacy of Engenia in sequential programs compared to early postemergence plus residual programs.

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Southern Illinois University

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

MSU Weed Science Research Program. General Trial Information. Personnel. Pest Description

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Influence of AMS on Drift Reduction Antagonisms.

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Valor PRE Test

Application Description. Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

LSU AgCenter. Postemergence Command Combinations

Glyphosate and 2,4-D Burndown.

LSU AgCenter. Early Postemergence Graminicide Combinations

No-Till Corn Burndown.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

Comments: Select Max (12 fl oz/a) + COC (1% v/v) was applied to the entire study to control grass weeds.

MSU Weed Science Research Program Weed control and crop tolerance in Balance Beans - "Stewardship"

MSU Weed Science Research Program Comparison of bentazon formulations in dry edible beans

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

Crop Stage at Each Application

MSU Weed Science Research Program

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

OILSEED RAPE AND TURNIP RAPE / CONTROL OF SCLEROTINIA STEM ROT EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES ACANTO, PROLINE AND PROSARO

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Rice Weed and Pest Management Project

Rice Weed and Pest Management Project

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Formulation and Tank Mix Test #1

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 299/02/ : USFALLTIM* 01/16/2004 APPLICATIONS

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

FIELD RESEARCH REPORT

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 255/03/ : USOYADJ* C /16/2004 APPLICATIONS

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 801/05/ : PCNOTILL* /24/2006 APPLICATIONS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

(01-ASC-15) Date June 27

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Weed Science Annual Research Report

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

Transcription:

Reps: 4 Plots: 1 by 2 feet Spray vol: 25 gal/ac Mix size: 2 liters (min.01738) Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Amt Product Plot No. By Rep No. Name Conc Type Description Rate Unit to Measure 1 2 3 4 1 Nontreated 101 204 306 402 2 Sand 102 207 303 404 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 1.19 GR Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 152.5 g/1 pl 103 206 302 407 4 Nutrelene 40 GR Urea 38-3-4 SGN 220 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 4.536 g/1 pl 104 203 307 405 5 Nutrelene + Sand 40 GR Fert + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 4.536 g/1 pl 105 201 304 406 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 34 GR Urea 38-3-4 SGN 220 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 5.336 g/1 pl 106 205 301 403 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 34 GR Fert + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 5.336 g/1 pl 107 202 305 401 Sort Order: Treatment Product quantities required for listed treatments and applications in one trial: Amount* Unit Treatment Name Form Conc Form Type Lot Code 609.869 g Nitamin Coated Sand 1.19 GR 18.144 g Nutrelene 40 GR 18.144 g Nutrelene + Sand 40 GR 21.345 g Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 34 GR 21.345 g Ammonium nitrate + Sand 34 GR * 'Per area' calculations based on 4 replicates of 1 by 2 feet plots (area of one treatment). * 'Per area' calculations based on spray volume= 25 gal/ac, mix size= 2 liters (mix size basis).

General Trial Information Title: Technicians Affiliation: C&SS - The University of Georgia Postal Code: 30223-1797 E-mail: Title: Asst. Professor Affiliation: C&SS - The University of Georgia Postal Code: 30223-1797 E-mail: CWaltz@UGA.edu Trial Location City: Griffin Trial Status: ONE-YEAR/FINAL State/Prov.: Georgia Trial Reliability: Excellent Postal Code: 30223-1797 Initiation Date: 31/Aug/2005 Country: USA Planned Completion Date: 28/Oct/2005 _ -Longitude of LL Corner : -Latitude of LL Corner : Altitude of LL Corner: Unit: Angle y-axis to North : Directions: _ Objectives: By evaluating turfgrass performance on commonly used warm-season species (i.e. hybrid bermudagrass), the specific goals of this research are to determine the efficacy of nitrogen coated sand to improve divot recovery.. Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Country: USA Organization: Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Phone No: Address 1: 2883 Miller Road Fax No: Address 2: City: Decatur State/Prov: GA Postal Code: 30035 E-mail: Crop Description Crop 1: CYNDA Cynodon dactylon Bermudagrass Variety: Tifway / 419 Description: Established BBCH Scale: BGRM Planting Date: Planting Method: Rate, Unit: Depth, Unit: Perennial Age, Unit: Row Spacing, Unit: Spacing Within Row, Unit: Seed Bed: Soil Temperature, Unit: Soil Moisture: Emergence Date: Harvest Date: Harvest Equipment: Harvested Width, Unit: Harvested Length, Unit:

Site and Design Plot Width, Unit: 1 FT Site Type: TURF - GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY Plot Length, Unit: 2 FT Tillage Type: Replications: 4 Study Design: Randomized Complete Block Soil Description Description Name: Tifway Research Area % Sand: 64 % OM: Texture: SANDY LOAM % Silt: 16 ph: 6.2 Soil Name: % Clay: 20 CEC: Fert. Level: EXCELLENT Additional Measured Elements Element Quantity Unit Calcium 1592 lb/ac Potassium 163.7 lb/ac Magnesium 150.6 lb/ac Manganese 72.78 lb/ac Phosphorus 46.95 lb/ac Zinc 3.288 lb/ac Application Description A Application Date: 31/Aug/2005 Time of Day: 2:30 pm Application Method: Shake Application Timing: Application Placement: Topical Applied By: LW/KE Air Temperature, Unit: 85 F % Relative Humidity: 56 Wind Velocity, Unit: 7 MPH Wind Direction: Dew Presence (Y/N): N Water Hardness: - Soil Temperature, Unit: 88 F Soil Moisture: ADEQUATE % Cloud Cover: 65 Appl. Equipment: Operating Pressure: Pressure Unit: Nozzle Type: Nozzle Size: Nozzle Spacing, Unit: Nozzles/Row: Band Width, Unit: Boom Length, Unit: Boom Height, Unit: Ground Speed, Unit: Incorporation Equip.: Hours to Incorp.: Incorp. Depth, Unit: Carrier: Spray Volume: Volume Unit: Spray ph: Propellant: Tank Mix (Y/N): Application Equipment A Shaker Jar

Rating Date 6/Sep/2005 6/Sep/2005 6/Sep/2005 12/Sep/2005 Days After First/Last Applic. 6 6 6 12 Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 6 DA-A 6 DA-A 12 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 1 Nontreated 6 b 52 b 71 b 16 b 2 Sand 5 b 23 c 38 d 5 b 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 5 b 40 b 55 c 9 b 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 38 a 80 a 90 a 76 a 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 6 b 47 b 68 b 10 b 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 29 a 83 a 89 a 77 a 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 5 b 23 c 43 cd 7 b LSD (P=.05) 10.8 13.6 11.9 13.7 Standard Deviation 7.3 9.2 8.0 9.2 CV 54.24 18.44 12.36 32.27 Grand Mean 13.39 49.82 64.88 28.63 Rating Date 14/Sep/2005 16/Sep/2005 19/Sep/2005 21/Sep/2005 Days After First/Last Applic. 14 16 19 21 Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 19 DA-A 21 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 5 6 7 8 1 Nontreated 29 b 43 c 61 c 82 c 2 Sand 9 c 13 d 23 d 33 d 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 38 b 57 b 75 b 88 bc 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 86 a 91 a 98 a 99 a 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 36 b 64 b 85 b 91 abc 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 87 a 91 a 98 a 98 ab 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 31 b 55 b 79 b 81 c LSD (P=.05) 12.1 11.7 10.4 10.1 Standard Deviation 8.2 7.8 7.0 6.8 CV 18.15 13.29 9.44 8.26 Grand Mean 44.94 59.05 73.99 81.9

Rating Date 26/Sep/2005 28/Sep/2005 3/Oct/2005 6/Oct/2005 Days After First/Last Applic. 26 28 33 36 Trt-Eval Interval 26 DA-A 28 DA-A 33 DA-A 36 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 9 10 11 12 1 Nontreated 87 b 91 a 95 a 96 a 2 Sand 48 c 60 b 74 b 86 b 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 95 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 98 a 99 a 100 a 100 a 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 96 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 98 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 95 ab 90 a 99 a 99 a LSD (P=.05) 7.6 10.7 9.4 5.3 Standard Deviation 5.1 7.2 6.3 3.5 CV 5.81 7.93 6.6 3.63 Grand Mean 88.27 90.65 95.54 97.32 Rating Date 9/Oct/2005 17/Oct/2005 1/Sep/2005 7/Sep/2005 Days After First/Last Applic. 39 47 1 7 Trt-Eval Interval 39 DA-A 47 DA-A 1 DA-A 7 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 13 14 15 16 17 1 Nontreated 96 b 100 a 0.331 bc 0.282 b 2 Sand 91 c 100 a 0.840 a 0.211 c 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 100 a 100 a 0.487 bc 0.211 c 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 100 a 100 a 0.219 c 0.448 a 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 100 a 100 a 0.584 ab 0.278 bc 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 100 a 100 a 0.631 ab 0.439 a 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 100 a 100 a 0.462 bc 0.221 bc LSD (P=.05) 3.2 0.5. 0.3142 0.0685 Standard Deviation 2.2 0.3. 0.2115 0.0461 CV 2.23 0.31. 41.68 15.46 Grand Mean 98.15 99.94. 0.51 0.3

Rating Date 12/Sep/2005 14/Sep/2005 16/Sep/2005 22/Sep/2005 Assessed By DIT DIT DIT DIT Days After First/Last Applic. 12 14 16 22 Trt-Eval Interval 12 DA-A 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 19 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 18 19 20 21 1 Nontreated 0.309 b 0.445 d 0.555 d 0.846 b 2 Sand 0.228 c 0.339 e 0.425 e 0.693 c 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.297 bc 0.509 c 0.686 c 0.932 a 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.533 a 0.781 a 0.851 a 0.938 a 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.351 b 0.604 b 0.775 b 0.905 ab 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.540 a 0.784 a 0.872 a 0.942 a 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.289 bc 0.505 cd 0.715 c 0.898 ab LSD (P=.05) 0.0745 0.0636 0.0523 0.0604 Standard Deviation 0.0501 0.0428 0.0352 0.0407 CV 13.78 7.55 5.05 4.63 Grand Mean 0.36 0.57 0.7 0.88 Rating Date 26/Sep/2005 28/Sep/2005 3/Oct/2005 19/Oct/2005 Assessed By DIT DIT DIT DIT Days After First/Last Applic. 26 28 33 49 Trt-Eval Interval 26 DA-A 28 DA-A 33 DA-A 49 DA-A No. Name Rate Unit 22 23 24 25 1 Nontreated 0.838 b 0.839 a 0.884 a 0.816 a 2 Sand 0.704 c 0.764 b 0.762 c 0.762 b 3 Nitamin Coated Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.917 a 0.899 a 0.860 ab 0.717 bcd 4 Nutrelene 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.929 a 0.900 a 0.872 ab 0.732 bc 5 Nutrelene + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.925 a 0.882 a 0.843 b 0.710 cd 6 Ammonium nitrate 34-0-0 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.930 a 0.852 a 0.868 ab 0.682 d 7 Ammonium nitrate + Sand 2.0 LB A/1000 FT2 0.922 a 0.865 a 0.798 c 0.696 cd LSD (P=.05) 0.0414 0.0651 0.0404 0.0483 Standard Deviation 0.0278 0.0438 0.0272 0.0325 CV 3.16 5.11 3.24 4.45 Grand Mean 0.88 0.86 0.84 0.73