THE SUPERCLAUS PROCESS. J.A. Lagas, Comprimo J. Borsboom, Comprimo P.H. Berben, VEG-Gasinstituut

Similar documents
Internal Combustion Engines

Claus unit Tail gas treatment catalysts

The Prime Glass DeNOx solutions in the present scenario of the glass industry NOx containment technologies

Rarely Acknowledged Energy Benefits of Sulphur Recovery. Sulphur 2016 London, UK November 9, 2016

Combustion Control Problem Solution Combustion Process

GASCO Habshan SRUs - Challenges of Operation. Abdulkader Ahmed Al Kasem, Jumaa Al Marzouqi

Investigate Your Options

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

There are thousands of

MEETING ULTRA-LOW SULPHUR DIOXIDE (SO 2 ) EMISSIONS LIMITS THE REGENERABLE WAY

Increased flexibility of refineries by O 2 enrichment. Sulphur recovery and new opportunities.

PERFORMANCE AND EMISSION ANALYSIS OF DIESEL ENGINE BY INJECTING DIETHYL ETHER WITH AND WITHOUT EGR USING DPF

CONVERSION OF GLYCEROL TO GREEN METHANOL IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER

Onboard Plasmatron Generation of Hydrogen Rich Gas for Diesel Engine Exhaust Aftertreatment and Other Applications.

clean Efforts to minimise air pollution have already led to significant reduction of sulfur in motor fuels in the US, Canada, Keeping it

A Practical Approach to 10 ppm Sulfur Diesel Production

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF HYDROGEN BLENDING ON THE CONCENTRATION OF POLLUTANTS EMITTED FROM A FOUR STROKE DIESEL ENGINE

IED RELATING TO OIL AND GAS BURNERS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE

Retrofitting of Mitsubishi Low NOx System

Measures against Incineration Problems Caused by Clogging of White Smoke Prevention Preheater

Converting low quality gas into a valuable power source

Q1.This question is about the temperature of the Earth s atmosphere. Give one reason why it is difficult to produce models for future climate change.

Edexcel GCSE Chemistry. Topic 8: Fuels and Earth science. Fuels. Notes.

Development of super low-level NOx RT burner for annealing furnace TAKAHITO SUZUKI KUNIAKI OKADA

White paper. MARPOL Annex VI fuel strategies and their influence on combustion in boilers

Emission from gasoline powered vehicles are classified as 1. Exhaust emission 2. Crank case emission 3. Evaporative emission. Table 1.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CATALYTIC DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER; (SOOT OXIDATION UTILIZING EXHAUST NOx)

Quantification of GHGs Emissions from Industrial Sector in Mauritius

REACTORS C 0.2 barg STEAM SULPHUR PIT. Figure 4.11: Simplified process flow diagram of a sulphur recovery unit (CLAUS) unit

STUDIES OF NITROUS OXIDE CONVERSION IN GLIDING ARC DISCHARGES

Module 5:Emission Control for SI Engines Lecture 24:Lean de-nox Catalysts and Catalyst Poisoning. The Lecture Contains: Lean de-no x Catalysts

Exhaust System - 2.2L Diesel

Ignition Strategies for Fuel Mixtures in Catalytic Microburners.

METHODS OF REDUCTION OF FUEL CONSUMPTION AS MEANS FOR CO2 EMITTED BY SEAGOING SHIPS MINIMISING

FCC pretreatment catalysts

Chapter 8 Production of Power from Heat

Module7:Advanced Combustion Systems and Alternative Powerplants Lecture 32:Stratified Charge Engines

Improving car environmental and operational characteristics using a multifunctional fuel additive

ENVIRONMENT. The Diesel Engine and the Environment

RULE NOX REDUCTIONS FROM MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES (Adopted 12/13/2016)

Report No. 35 BUTADIENE. March A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE I PARK, CALIFORNIA

Suggested Technical Annex IV to the Gothenburg Protocol

Preface... xii. 1. Refinery Distillation... 1

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Internal Combustion Engines

Marc ZELLAT, Driss ABOURI and Stefano DURANTI CD-adapco

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

M1.(a) C 6 H [5] Page 2. PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Make a great improvement of Engine fuel efficiency. Explanation

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

Development of a Non-Catalytic JP-8 Reformer

Comprehensive Review of Three way Catalytic Converter

NO TROUBLE WITH NOx AN ADVANCED CONCEPT FOR EFFECTIVE NO X REDUCTION

3.2 The alkanes. Isomerism: Alkanes with 4 or more carbons show a type of structural isomerism called chain isomerism

FCC pre-treatment catalysts TK-558 BRIM and TK-559 BRIM for ULS gasoline using BRIM technology

Sustainable Energy Mod.1: Fuel Cells & Distributed Generation Systems

Wärtsilä NO X Reducer. Environmental Efficiency

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

R&D on Oil-Burning, Environment - Friendly, High-Efficiency Boiler

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FAILURES ON THE EXHAUST GAS CONTENT OF SHIP DIESEL ENGINE WORKING ON HEAVY FUEL OIL

Impact of Cold and Hot Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Diesel Engine

C C A. Combustion Components Associates, Inc.

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

PRINCIPLES OF COMBUSTION

Development of In-Line Coldstart Emission Adsorber System (CSEAS) for Reducing Cold Start Emissions in 2 Stroke SI Engine

Q1. Useful fuels can be produced from crude oil. Crude oil is a mixture of hydrocarbons.

Module 5 Propulsion and Power Generation of LNG driven Vessels (23 th November to 27 th November University of Piraeus, Greece)

Unit 1. Naphtha Catalytic Reforming. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

GLASSMAN EUROP CERCAT : A Technology for Air Pollution Control. Process, Construction & Performances

Methanol distribution in amine systems and its impact on plant performance Abstract: Methanol in gas treating Methanol impact on downstream units

How does Common Rail Injection work?

Engine Emission Control 6.7L Diesel

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

WORK STUDY CATALYTIC CONVERTER DURING STARTING A COLD ENGINE

A REVIEW ON EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION (EGR) SYSTEM IN IC ENGINES

Economic and Social Council

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 203 ALKANE DEHYDROGENATION AND AROMATIZATION (September 1992)

Development of HS-FCC (High Severity FCC) Process

EMISSION CONTROL EMISSION CONTROLS

Determination Of Fire Effluents From Products On Railway Vehicles

Thermal Exploitation of Wastes in Lignite Combustion Facilities

Topic 1.6 PETROLEUM AND ALKANES. Fractional Distillation Cracking Combustion

SULFIDING SOLUTIONS. Why Sulfide?

Field experience with considerably reduced NOx and Smoke Emissions

Catalytic Reforming for Aromatics Production. Topsoe Catalysis Forum Munkerupgaard, Denmark August 27 28, 2015 Greg Marshall GAM Engineering LLC 1

Concept of 3-Cylinder Engine

General Guide of Lubricants Recycle

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Relative volume activity. Type II CoMoS Type I CoMoS. Trial-and-error era

Comparison of techniques for the gas phase analysis of ammonia and nitrogen oxides in Diesel exhaust gases

How. clean is your. fuel?

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

The Role of the Merox Process in the Era of Ultra Low Sulfur Transportation Fuels. 5 th EMEA Catalyst Technology Conference 3 & 4 March 2004

Case Study of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Engine Performance

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

amperometric (currentbased) cell coupled with a potentiometric

Diesel Particulate Filter: Exhaust aftertreatment for the reduction of soot emissions

New motorcycle driving cycles

Transcription:

/ THE SUPERCLAUS PROCESS by J.A. Lagas, Comprimo J. Borsboom, Comprimo P.H. Berben, VEG-Gasinstituut Presented at the 38th Annual Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, March 7-9, 1988 Norman, Oklahoma, USA 41

CONTENTS Io Abstract 2. Introduction 3. The Claus process 4. The SUPERCLAUS process 5. SUPERCLAUS-99 6. SUPERCLAUS-99.5 7. The SUPERCLAUS-catalyst 8. Investment costs 9. Experience I0. References 42

1. ABSTRACT The SUPERCLAUS process is a new development of the well-known Claus process and produces elemental sulphur from H2S. The SUPERCLAUS process implies a modification of the process control system and the use of a newly developed selective oxidation catalyst in the third reactor with the object to yield 99% or 99.5% overall sulphur recovery (two versions) without any further tail gas clean-up. The catalyst has several unique characteristics: - Conversion of H2S with excess oxygen into elemental sulphur for more than 90%. - No establishment of the reverse Claus reaction 3 - - Sn + 2 H20 ~- 2 H2S + SO 2 n High water concentrations in the process gas have hardly any influence on the conversion of H2S into sulphur. Other combustibles are not oxidized. The SUPERCLAUS process can be applied in new as well as in existing Claus plants. SUPERCLAUS-99 In the normal Claus process a H2S : SO 2 ratio of 2:1 is essential to reach optimal sulphur recovery rates. In the SUPERCLAUS-99 process the Claus reaction is carried out with excess H2S to realize an almost complete conversion of SO 2 after the second reactor stage. The H2S concentration downstream the second Claus reactor is controlled between 0.8-3.0 vol.%. Air is added to the tail gas which is subsequently passed over the newly developed selective oxidation catalyst for direct conversion of the remaining H2S into elemental sulphur. 43

The extra investment or retrofit costs are low. The costs for retrofittfng a three stage Claus plant are only 5% of the total investment costs. The extra utility costs are also low. SUPERCLAUS-99.5 In this version the Claus reaction in the first two reactors is operated at the normal H2S : SO 2 ratio of 2:1. The tail gas of the second reactor stage is then routed to a hydrogenation reactor for conversion of all remaining sulphur components into H2So Subsequently the gas from the hydrogenation reactor is passed directly over the new selective oxidation catalyst to convert the H2S into elemental sulphur. As the newly developed catalyst is not sensitive to water, there is no need to condense the water downstream the hydrogenation reactor, which is the case in practically all Claus Tail Gas Clean-up processes. 44

2. INTRODUCTION On a worldwide scale the exploitation and processing of crude oil and natural gas have increased significantly during the past thirty years. This large expansion has caused severe pollution problems, especially as a result of sulphur dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. A general public awareness calls for regulations to limit the absolute amount of SO 2 emitted to the atmosphere and thereby the destructive consequences of acid rain. The EEC is preparing legislation that by 1992 Claus plants should have sulphur recovery rates of at least 98.5%. In the Federal Republic of Germany strict regulations are already prevailing and require recoveries up to 99.5%. In some parts of the world where emissions lead to serious problems, requirements may even be more stringent. When processing crude oils and sour natural gases, large quantities of H2S gas are released. In sulphur recovery plants, or so-called Claus plants, this H2S gas is converted into elemental sulphur. The Claus plants can be blamed for part of the SO 2 emissions, as the sulphur recovery rate is 90-98% depending on the number of reactors. During the last decade a great number of Claus Tail Gas Treating (TGT) processes have been developed to increase the total sulphur recovery efficiency. Removing the last percentages of sulphur by means of these Claus TGT processes is expensive, both in terms of capital investment cost and energy consumption. The Dutch companies Comprimo andvec--gasinstituut, in co-operation with the University of Utrecht, have developed an essentially new version of the well-known Claus process, called the SUPER- CLAUS process; this SUPERCLAUS process increases the sulphur recovery rate of a Claus plant to more than 99%. Two process versions have been developed: the SUPERCLAUS-99 process and the SUPERCLAUS-99.5 process. 45

3. THE CLAUS PROCESS The Claus process was developed around 1890 and was based on passing H2S and air over a catalyst. In that period, its application was extremely difficult due to the technical problem of handling the large amount of heat generated by the process. In 1938 this problem was basically solved by I.G. Farben by the introduction of a thermal stage in which the reaction heat is used to generate steam. Nowadays a Claus plant consists of a thermal stage followed by two or three catalytic reactor stages. In the thermal stage, which consists of an H2S burner with combustion chamber and waste heat boiler, one-third of the H2S gas is combusted at a temperature of about 1200 C to SO 2 according to the reaction 3 H2S + 1.5 02 ~ 2 H2S + SO 2 + H20 (a) and the major part of the H2S reacts subsequently with the SO 2 to elemental sulphur, according to the Claus reaction 2 H2S + i SO 2 ~ 1.5 S 2 + 2 H20 (b) The heat generated by the reactions in the H2S burner and by cooling the gases in the waste heat boiler is used to produce steam. The gases are cooled to about 160 C so that the formed sulphur is condensed (fig ' i) and separated as liquid sulphur. The Claus reaction is an equilibrium reaction and in the thermal / f stage 65-70% of the total H2S is converted into sulphur (I). Thusthe gases i~eaving-the thermal stage still contain a rather large quantity of sulphur. To reach higher conversions the Claus reaction has to continue with the aid of a catalyst. The gases are passed through two or three reactor stages, each consisting of a heater, reactor and sulphur condenser. 46

reheater steam []-"I []-"-~ incinerator [~ /'~' tack c:::[-l t"l=eam I i'/ I I III t condenser t I,.~ --I "~" S S S I J feed gas air Figure 1 Claus process The gases are heated up to about 200-250 C and as soon as equili- brium conditions have been reached, the sulphur is removed before the gases are passed to the following reactor stage. Quite a number of different types of Claus processes have been developed during the last twenty years (2). The principle control variable in all these Claus processes is the air to acid gas ratio. The plant efficiency or sulphur recovery is quite depending on the two components H2S and SO 2 being in the correct ratio of 2:1 for the Claus reaction (b). As a result the air control becomes more critical for plants to be operated with high efficiencies as is illustrated by figure 2. 47

100 99 98 97 G 96 ~ 95 P, "~ 94 9a 92 / 91 90-8 -6-4 -2 shortage. 0 2 4 6 8 excess air, % Figure 2 Conversion H2S + 0.5 02 ~ S + H20 Figure 2 shows that for a Claus plant with a sulphur conversion of 98% the loss in conversion efficiency due to 5% deficiency of air, is about 3% and 1½ % for 5% excess air operation. As the plant efficiency depends on the exact H2S : SO 2 ratio of 2:1 for the Claus reaction 3 S + 2 H20 (b) 2 H2S + SO 2 ~ ~ n it is clear that, notwithstanding the fact that modern Claus plants are equipped with H2S/SO 2 tail gas analysers to control the air demand, the process control is very sensitive. Water is produced by the reactions (a) and (b) and the concentration in the process gas increases proportionally to the ~f--ev~a!~ c~s~o~ - of the H2S. As the water cannot be removed from the Claus process gas because of practical reasons such as sulphur plugging and corrosion, the steady increasing water concentration has an opposite effect on the conversion of H2S and SO 2 in the Claus equilibrium reaction (b). This process water hinders the conversion to sulphur and limits the total sulphur recovery. 48

4. THE SUPERCLAUS PROCESS The Claus proces@ indeed has limitations that hinder higher conversion efficiencies. Firstly the establishment of the Claus equilibrium 3 2 H2S + SO 2 ~ n S + 2 H20 n which is thermodynamically limited and secondly the increasing water content in the process gas during conversion into sulphur with the simultaneous decrease of the H2S and SO 2 concentration. The Claus process also calls control in the tail gas. for an accurate H2S/SO 2 ratio The basic condition for the development of the SUPERCLAUS process was to overcome the limitations of the Claus process. The new process should have - a simpler and more flexible air to acid gas control - a new catalyst for selective oxidation of H2S directly to sulphur. The principle of the new SUPERCLAUS process is that the wellknown critical H2S : SO 2 = 2:1 ratio control has been left and replaced by an operation with excess H2S. The excess H2S suppresses the SO 2 concentration in the Claus tail gas after the second reactor stage. The H2S left in the tail gas is then oxidized with air to sulphur by means of a newly developed catalyst. Although the total quantity of air for oxidation of the H2S gas according to reaction (a) is the same, the air in the SUPERCLAUS process is divided into two parts. 49

The major part is introduced into the Claus burner, while the rest is charged to the third reactor filled with this new catalyst. The introduction of an additional amount of air to the third reactor will create the requested flexibility in the air to acid gas control The requirement for this new catalyst was that H2S should be completely converted, with a high selectivity to elemental sulphur so that formation of SO 2 should be very small even in the presence of excess air Moreover, the catalyst should not be sensitive to high water concentrations present in the process gas. In other words, this catalyst should have no Claus reaction activity, so that the reverse Claus reaction 3 n -- S + 2 H20 n 2 H2S + SO 2 would not take place. Other requirements were no CO/H2/CH 4 oxidation, no COS/CS 2 formation, and the catalyst should be chemically and thermally stable with sufficient mechanical strength. 50

5. SUPERCLAUS-99 The SUPERCLAUS-99 process consists of a thermal stage followed by three catalytic reactor stages (fig. 3). Reactors no. 1 and no. 2 are loaded with standard Claus catalyst, while reactor no. 3 is filled with the newly developed selective oxidation catalyst. In the thermal stage the acid gas is burnt with a substofchiometric amount of air in such a way that the tail gas leaving the second reactor stage will contain 0.8-3 vol.% H2S. The combustion air is controlled by both a flow ratio controller with the incoming acid gas feed and an H2S analyser controller located downstream the second reactor stage, acting on a trim valve in the combustion air supply. steam reheater [~- - r~ stack I,! r-~ feed gas air Figure 3 SUPERCLAUS-99 process The H2S burns according to reaction (a) with now a substo[chiometric amount of air, resulting in a gas mixture in which H2S is in excess of SO 2 for the continuation of the Claus reaction (b). The excess H2S will practically consume all SO 2 in the process gas. 51

Sulphur is produced in the thermal as well as in the two catalytic Claus reactor stages and steam is generated in the waste heat boiler and sulphur condensers like in the standard Claus process The H2S concentration in the tail gas leaving the second reactor stage will be controlled between 0.8-3 vol.%. Air is added to the tail gas for the selective oxidation of the H2S directly to elemental sulphur. The quantity of air is set in excess of this H2S to cover fluctuations of the H2S concentration in the tail gas. Sulphur is produced according to the reaction 1 H2S + 0.5 02 ~ -- n S n + H20 (c) The third reactor stage consists of a heater, reactor and sulphur condenser. However, the normal operating conditions i.e. oxidation of H2S with SO 2 have been replaced by oxidation of H2S with oxygen. Due to the operation with excess H2S in the thermal, first and second reactor stages, the efficiency of conversion into sulphur decreases about 1-2%. However, the loss of conversion efficiency is more than compensated in the third reactor stage by the selective oxidation of the H2S to elemental sulphur. The new catalyst installed in this third reactor has an oxidation efficiency of H2S to elemental sulphur of more than 90%. Because the new catalyst hardly oxidizes H2S to SO 2 and has no Claus" activity for the reverse reaction of sulphur and water to H2S and SO 2, a total sulphur recovery rate of more than 99% can be reached (fig. 4). 52

99.5 99.4 95% oxidation efficiency 99.3 ~' 99.2 0 99.1,- 99.0,,, 98.9 ~. 98,8 98.7 98.6 90% 85% i i I I! I I I i! I J I I I! I I I! 1 2 3 4 VoI.% H2S in Claus tail gas from reactor No. 2 7 Figure 4 Total recovery SUPERCLAUS-99 process 53

6. SUPERCLAUS-99.5 If a sulphur recovery rate of more than 99 5% is required, a hydrogenation stage has to be added between reactor no. 2 and the selective oxidation reactor. The SUPERCLAUS-99.5 process therefore consists of a thermal stage, two Claus reactors, a hydrogenation tive H2S oxidation reactor (fig. 5). reactor and a selec- reheater steam [7--'---I 0~ hydroge- ] i nation boi,er I / / / I,I I I I ' so2-]l I I ~"~er h-hh h-h5 h-hh','-'-, c ndenser St S t ts I gascooler incinerator /~ S tack P leed gas air Figure 5 SUPERCLAUS-99.5 process As the newly developed selective oxidation catalyst is not sensitive to water, there is no need to condense the water downstream the hydrogenation reactor as is the case in practically all Claus Tail Gas Clean-up processes. The gas from thehydrogenation reactor is cooled to the optimum inlet temperature of the selective oxidation reactor. 54

Since all sulphur components like SO 2, COS, CS 2 and S-vapour are converted into H2S in the hydrogenation reactor, there is no need to operate the thermal stage and reactors no. 1 and no. 2 with excess H2S, and the normal H2S : SO 2 ratio of 2:1 can be applied, but is less critical than for norm~l Claus operation. The desired flexibility is again obtained by introducing excess air to the selective H2S oxidation reactor. f 55

7. THE SUPERCLAUS CATALYST The newly developed catalyst has some unique proper ies compared to the conventional Claus catalyst. The catalyst consists of a carrier on which active metal oxides have been brought. With newly developed preparation techniques it is possible to cover the carrier completely with active metal oxides, resulting in the following specific properties of this catalyst: H2S is completely converted with a high selectivity into sulphur, while the formation of SO 2 is very small even in the presence of an 0verstofchiometric amount of oxygen. The catalyst does not establish the Claus equilibrium reaction. This means that the equilibrium reaction of sulphur with water to H2S and SO 2 does not occur. A high water concentration in the process gas has hardly any influence on the conversion of H2S into sulphur. The catalyst is selective for H2S oxidation. Other components like hydrogen, CO and other combustibles are not oxidized. In case of misoperation when the catalyst is subjected to reducing gas conditions due to shortage of oxidation air, H2S will react with the metal oxides of the catalyst to metal sulfides. However, with excess oxygen the catalyst can be easily regenerated. 56

8. INVESTMENT COSTS The SUPERCLAUS process can be applied in new as well as in existing Claus plants. Because of the simplicity of the process and the limited amount of equipment parts required, the extra investment costs are low. For retrofitting an existing three stage Claus plant the extra investment costs are only 5% of the total original costs. For a two stage Claus plant the extra costs amount to 17% of the toal original costs. In case a sulphur recovery rate of 99.5% is required, the addit- ion of a hydrogenation step is necessary and the extra investment costs will then be 30% of the price of a two stage Claus plant. 57

9. EXPERIENCE The SUPERCLAUS catalyst was developed and tested on laboratory bench scale for more than three years As the results were very promising, it was decided to test the SUPERCLAUS process directly in a commercial unit. A three stage I00 t/d Claus plant in a natural gas plant in the Federal Republic of Germany has been retrofitted to SUPERCLAUS, and since 21st January 1988 the SUPERCLAUS process is being successfully in operation. The stage has been reached that the SUPERCLAUS process is available for natural gas Claus plants. 58

I0. REFERENCES (I) Gamson B.W. and Elkins, R.H., Chem. Eng. Progress, 49 (1953), p. 203-215. (2) Sames, J.A., Sulphur Recovery - Process Fundamentals, presented at the Comprimo Sulphur Workshop, Katwoude, The Netherlands, November 1987 and January 1988. 59