City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

Similar documents
~ u..v Q- c./ Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer/Public Works Director to install parking lot speed bumps on Hall Park Drive.

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Agenda Cover Memorandum

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

AGENDA REPORT. TO: Office ofthe City Administrator ATTN: Deborah Edgerly FROM: Community and Economic Development Agency DATE: June 24, 2008

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 th day of November, Caretto, Jackowski, Putz, Herrick, Jahn. W.E. Jahn, Mayor ATTEST:

DATE: March 21, 2017 REPORT NO. PW TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ] 2.0 TOPIC

SUMMARY REPORT City Council

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, California

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLESEX CENTRE BY-LAW NUMBER

WHEREAS, Fees for parking meters, devices or timed parking systems have been historically approved by the City using the Ordinance process; and

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1620

RESOLUTION NO Mobilehome or trailer parking Parking not to obstruct traffic

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution:

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

ITEM 10. ct-/ C.~~ STAFF REPORT. Mayor and City Council. Chief Angel Bernal, Police Department

ERIC S. CASHER, CITY ATTORNEY WINSTON RHODES, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM: URSULA LUNA-REYNOSA, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; JACK HOLDEN, BUILDING OFFICIAL

ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE NOVATO MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF RV S ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHOUT A PERMIT

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

ORDINANCE NO. 15,187

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to advance the use of electric vehicles; and

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONOENCE

Vista Municipal Code

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. Honorable Bill Rosendahl, Chair Transportation Committee

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

ORDINANCE NO O-015 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS

CITY OF STEVENS POINT AGENDA

Ordinance No. 1624(16) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lompoc, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, Regulating Shopping Carts

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

4/15/2015 Item #10D Page 1

TOWN OF WINDSOR AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. 15,658

Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

CITY OF SEABROOK ORDINANCE NO

MSRC CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

forwarddallas! Implementation Proposed Chapter 43 Code Amendment On-Street Parking Transportation and Environment Committee Briefing January 14, 2008

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

The minimum number of accessory off-street parking spaces. shall conform to the requirements of the Table of General

TOWN OF BRIDGTON TRAFFIC ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

RALEIGH COUNTY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES (ATV) ORDINANCE

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council January 15, 2019

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AMENDING WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEARS THROUGH

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

LIVERMORE FALLS PARKING AND TRAFFIC ORDINANCE. Adopted July 28, 1980 Grace Period for Enforcement Thru August 25, 1980

ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

ITEM 8 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

DRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:

The City Council will consider revising the City' s parking code to distinguish between enforcement of on- street and off-street parking meter spaces.

LACEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 09, 2015

City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No

#4 PARKING ORDINANCE. 2. Rye Beach Precinct:

CONSTRUCTION PARKING MANAGEMENT POLICY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY S MOBILE FOOD TRUCK REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 11 SNOWMOBILES AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES SNOWMOBILE AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE REGULATIONS

TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE 70. GENERAL PROVISIONS 71. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 72. PARKING REGULATIONS 73. TRAFFIC SCHEDULES 74.

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF BOISE. ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION NUMBER: Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Parking Ordinance

# TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: DATE: SUBJECT:

2 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE WEST JOG ELIMINATION AT HUNTINGTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

ORDINANCE NO. 14,336

INSTALLATION OF A CONVEX MIRROR FOR A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY OR STREET

CORE AREA SPECIFIC PLAN

City Council Staff Report Regarding Interim Urgency Ordinance January 14, 2013 Page 2 of 4 issuance of new business licenses for mobile food trucks, b

5 SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS ON REGIONAL ROADS JANUARY UPDATE

CHAPTER 9 PARKING REGULATIONS (SEE CHAPTER 7 FOR DEFINITIONS, SCOPE AND APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS CHAPTER)

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: April 12, 2017 Item: UN Prepared by: Robert Eastman

ORDINANCE NO parking. of recreational vehicles Prohibited.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM

M I D - C O A S T REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 166 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 201 ROCKLAND, ME (207)

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official. 1. North York Community Council approve the request for sign variance at 515 Drewry Avenue.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL STEVEN N. ANNIBALI, CHIEF OF POLICE

Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official

Transcription:

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission Meeting Date: September 5, 2016 Staff: Subject: James Hinkamp, Transportation Planner Consideration of a No Parking Zone on Victoria Avenue Summary Staff request Commission consideration of a proposed no parking zone on Victoria Avenue. Background On June 30, 2017, City staff received a letter from a resident suggesting a series of changes to existing on-street parking regulations along Victoria Avenue in order to improve travel sight distance near the intersection of the said street and Moraga Boulevard. The letter author, Ms. Pam-Anela Messenger, opines that on-street parking should be prohibited on both sides of Victoria Avenue, from the Moraga Boulevard intersection and extending eastward approximately 200 feet along Victoria Avenue. As alleged in the letter, sight distance is compromised when neighbors vehicles are parked on the shoulder of both sides of Victoria Avenue. A copy of the letter received is provided in Attachment 1 to this report. Staff have assessed existing conditions to verify the cause for concerns described in the letter. Photo documentation and analysis are detailed in the subsequent section of this report. Supplemental to the site visit, staff also researched available collision data at this location and found no reported incidents in the last ten years. In response to Ms. Messengers concerns, staff propose prohibiting on-street parking on the south side of Victoria Avenue, extending approximately 140 feet eastward from the Moraga Boulevard intersection. This proposal aims to mitigate sight distance obstructions caused primarily by vehicles parked on the roadway shoulder adjacent to the eastbound lane along Victoria Avenue. Per the Lafayette Municipal Code Article 10, Section 8-893, prior to implementing a no parking area the City Council must adopt a resolution to permit legal enforcement of the parking prohibition. Discussion Victoria Avenue is a local streetway located southeast of Downtown Lafayette. The roadway is generally aligned east-west parallel to Moraga Boulevard, although it is also a through street that intersects Moraga Boulevard in two locations, essentially forming a loop. The two intersections with Moraga Boulevard are approximately 900 feet apart. The area of concern and focus of this report - is specific to the west side of Victoria Avenue, within 200 feet of that intersection with Moraga Boulevard. Within the subject area of concern, the maximum roadway width is twenty-two feet. Page 1 of 4 Item 6B

Currently, on-street parking is permissible on the north and south sides of Victoria Avenue, with the exception of approximately 60 feet of raised curb fronting the north side, notwithstanding an existing driveway. Although parking is not explicitly regulated along this raised curb section via signs or red curb markings, California Vehicle Code section 22500 (g) prohibits stopping, standing, or parking a vehicle in a manner that obstructs traffic. Thus, along this particular curb section parking is impermissible since it would result in nearly complete obstruction of the WB travel lane. Otherwise, on-street parking on the northerly side is permissible eastward of the raised curb, along the rolled curb shoulders and flat paved sections adjacent to the WB travel lane. Comparably, on-street parking is also permissible along the southerly side, including rolled curb and flat sections adjacent to EB travel lane. Photo documentation below confirms the existing conditions at the subject location. Photo 1 Existing Parking Conditions: Raised Curb Frontage Raised curb frontage prevents driver encroachment onto shoulder. On-street parking not allowed along curb per CVC section 22500 (g). Photo 2 Existing Parking Conditions: Rolled Curb Sections On-street parking permissible along north and south shoulders with rolled curb. Page 2 of 4

Two additional photos, below, simulate a driver s view at the Victoria Avenue/Moraga Boulevard intersection. The first point of view is looking northeast from Moraga Boulevard, towards Victoria Avenue (Photo 2); the second point of view provides an EB perspective of the same condition (Photo 3). As sampled in these photos, a single compact vehicle partially obstructs the EB travel lane, effectively reducing the lane width to six feet. In addition to partially obstructing through EB travel, the presence of a parked vehicle in this location obstructs sight distance around the curve for both EB and WB travelers and causes EB travelers to maneuver into the opposing lane at the curvature. (Staff personally observed this maneuver during field observations). Although on-street parking demand is not considered prevalent at this location, staff foresee circumstances where a large vehicle or even multiple vehicles parked in the same location could exacerbate safety concerns when maneuvering through the curvature in the aforementioned manner. Photos 3 & 4 Car Parked on South Side Shoulder of Victoria Avenue (facing EB) By introducing a resolution for the proposed no parking area on the southerly side of the subject street, the prohibition can become enforceable by law and ameliorate line of sight visibility concerns brought forth by the resident. To implement the proposed modifications would necessitate two signs to be installed on the southerly side: the first would be placed at the northeast corner of the western-most Victoria Avenue/Moraga Boulevard intersection whereas the second would be placed approximately 140 feet eastward along the same rolled curb frontage. Installing these signs, rather than painting new red curb, would require lower installation and maintenance costs, as well as preserve recognizable signage already governing no parking areas throughout Lafayette. A conceptual aerial view of proposed modifications can be viewed on the following page in Figure 1. Page 3 of 4

Figure 1 Recommended No Parking Area (aerial perspective) Proposed signs indicating No Parking between these points. Red dashed lines indicate extent of proposed formal no parking area (approximately X feet.) To further maximize sight distance at the subject location, staff have also ordered vegetation trimming and will prepare letters to nearby residents reminding them to park vehicles as far to the right as practicable where parking is permissible along roadway shoulders within the subject area of concern. Next Steps After receiving feedback from the Commission, staff intend to present this matter to the City Council for final approval. Lafayette Municipal Code Article 10, Section 8-893, requires resolution by Council for a no parking area. A draft resolution is provided in Attachment 2 to this report. The City Attorney has reviewed the language as to form. Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission support the draft Council resolution to formalize the no parking area on the south side of Victoria Avenue, extending eastward from the intersection with Moraga Boulevard approximately 140 feet. Attachments 1. Resident s letter, dated June 30, 2017 2. Location map 3. Draft Council resolution Page 4 of 4

ATTACHMENT 1 Resident s Letter

Attachment 2 Location Map

Victoria Ave (within X of Moraga Boulevard intersection)

ATTACHMENT 3 Draft Council Resolution

RESOLUTION 2017-XX BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE IN THE MATTER OF: Prohibiting On-Street Parking on the Southerly Side of Victoria Avenue, Extending Eastward 140 Feet from Moraga Boulevard WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 22507 provides that cities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit the stopping, parking or standing of vehicles on certain streets or highways, or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day; and WHEREAS, the City of Lafayette Municipal Code Article 10, Section 8-893 (c) prohibits stopping and parking a vehicle in any area established by resolution of the City Council as a no parking area; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City Council of the City of Lafayette establishes a no parking area on the southerly side of Victoria Avenue as depicted in the attached Exhibit A. The City shall provide notice of the no parking area through appropriate signage as required by applicable law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on September 11, 2017 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: APPROVED: ATTEST: Mike Anderson, Mayor Joanne Robbins, City Clerk

Resolution 2017-xx Exhibit A Proposed signs indicating No Parking between these points. Red dashed lines indicate extent of proposed formal no parking area (approximately X feet).