Comparing Percentages of Iditarod Finishers

Similar documents
Correlation to the Common Core State Standards

Summarizing a Set of Data with Iditarod Race Statistics

What is an Average Leg?

What is an Average Leg? Fairbanks Start

Busy Ant Maths and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence Year 6: Primary 7

Busy Ant Maths and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence Foundation Level - Primary 1

Objective: Estimate and measure liquid volume in liters and milliliters using the vertical number line.

All Lit Up: Circuitry, Engineering, and the Last Great Race on Earth

Problem Solving Recording Sheet

Objective: Estimate and measure liquid volume in liters and milliliters using the vertical number line.

Houghton Mifflin MATHEMATICS. Level 1 correlated to Chicago Academic Standards and Framework Grade 1

Correlation to the New York Common Core Learning Standards for Mathematics, Grade 1

Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations - Mathematics

3-1 Constant Rate of Change

Correlation to the. Common Core State Standards. Go Math! 2011 Grade K

correlated to the Virginia Standards of Learning, Grade 6

Population Along the Trail: Fairbanks Restart

Material World How Does the USA Compare?

Student Exploration: Advanced Circuits

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MATHEMATICS ADOPTION. Common Core State Standards Correlation. and

PUMPED UP GAS PRICES. Student/Class Goal Students are outraged about current high gas prices and question the relationship between supply and demand.

GRADE 7 TEKS ALIGNMENT CHART

AUTO 140A: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

MiSTE STEM Camp Solar Lesson July, 2016 Standard(s) Learning targets Assessment Essential vocabulary. Informal - Discussion and participation

Cylinder Balance and Percent Changes Lesson 11

SUBJECT AREA(S): Amperage, Voltage, Electricity, Power, Energy Storage, Battery Charging

Meeting John Beargrease By Analyzing Sources

Module: Mathematical Reasoning

CC COURSE 1 ETOOLS - T

Correlation to the New York Common Core Learning Standards for Mathematics, Grade K

INVESTIGATION ONE: WHAT DOES A VOLTMETER DO? How Are Values of Circuit Variables Measured?

Life-Size Scaling Creating Full Size 3-D Body Systems

Sales, Discounts and Rebates

Car Comparison Project

Engineering Diploma Resource Guide ST280 ETP Hydraulics (Engineering)

Grade 3: Houghton Mifflin Math correlated to Riverdeep Destination Math

Submarine Force Museum Lesson Plan

Instructionally Relevant Alternate Assessments for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

6.6 Optimization Problems III:

NEW CAR TIPS. Teaching Guidelines

Index. Calculator, 56, 64, 69, 135, 353 Calendars, 348, 356, 357, 364, 371, 381 Card game, NEL Index

Fourth Grade. Multiplication Review. Slide 1 / 146 Slide 2 / 146. Slide 3 / 146. Slide 4 / 146. Slide 5 / 146. Slide 6 / 146

Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction. Work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication.

Fourth Grade. Slide 1 / 146. Slide 2 / 146. Slide 3 / 146. Multiplication and Division Relationship. Table of Contents. Multiplication Review

Mound Math Excel Exercise Numbers and Operations

Math 135 S18 Exam 1 Review. The Environmental Protection Agency records data on the fuel economy of many different makes of cars.

The fractions 2_ 4, 3_

School Transportation Assessment


complete. Would you like to race in the Iditarod someday? Why or why not?

Objectives. Materials TI-73 CBL 2

Can You Light the Bulb?

Pros and cons of hybrid cars

The Magnetic Field in a Coil. Evaluation copy. Figure 1. square or circular frame Vernier computer interface momentary-contact switch

STEM Energy Lesson Plan Elements Inclusion

SCHOOL START-UP - Maths

Car Comparison Project

Lesson Plan. Time This lesson should take approximately 180 minutes (introduction 45 minutes, presentation 90 minutes, and quiz 45 minutes).

Renewable Energy Sprint

SCHOOL START-UP - Maths

Objectives: I can convert units using conversion factors in the same system. I can convert units using conversion factors between systems.

Vehicle of Revolution: How many turns will it take?

Crash Cart Barrier Project Teacher Guide

8.1 Comparing and Interpreting Rates

Series and Parallel Circuits Virtual Lab

Orientation and Conferencing Plan Stage 1

Institutional Research and Planning 440 Day Hall Ithaca, New York PULSE Survey

City University of New York Faculty Survey of Student Experience (FSSE), Spring 2010

Inquiry-Based Physics in Middle School. David E. Meltzer

FAMU Completers Satisfaction Survey Results 2010

Objective: Students will create scatter plots given data in a table. Students will then do regressions to model the data.

Evaluation copy. Wind Power. Computer

Evaluation copy. The Magnetic Field in a Slinky. computer OBJECTIVES MATERIALS INITIAL SETUP

Section 6 HOW ARE VALUES OF CIRCUIT VARIABLES MEASURED?

Renewable Energy Endurance Marathon

Electrical Connections

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and. the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Scholastic s Early Childhood Program Correlated to the Minnesota Pre-K Standards

Scientific Notation. Slide 1 / 106. Slide 2 / 106. Slide 3 / th Grade. Table of Contents. New Jersey Center for Teaching and Learning

Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

CH 19 MEASURING LENGTH

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

2009 Community College of Student Engagement (CCSSE) College Results: Frequency Distributions

Charging Battery with Clean Energy

1.2 Flipping Ferraris

Algebra 2 Plus, Unit 10: Making Conclusions from Data Objectives: S- CP.A.1,2,3,4,5,B.6,7,8,9; S- MD.B.6,7

INVESTIGATING SOLAR ENERGY TEACHER S GUIDE

Scale Score to Percentile Rank Conversion Tables Spring 2018

Task Group(s): A1: Read continuous text A2: Interpret documents C3: Use measures

Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Reliable Reach. Robotics Unit Lesson 4. Overview

Mathematics 43601H. Cumulative Frequency. In the style of General Certificate of Secondary Education Higher Tier. Past Paper Questions by Topic TOTAL

UTCRS ELEMENTARY STEM CURRICULUM

2010 Prince Edward Island Department of Education and Early Childhood Development P.O. Box 2000, Charlottetown Prince Edward Island Canada, C1A 7N8

Using Multiple Cylinder Engines

Don t Freeze the Engine Answer Key

Developing PMs for Hydraulic System

Content of the workshop. Observation as a primary concept for the computational thinker. How can the computer help?! Questions 18/06/2016

Column Name Type Description Year Number Year of the data. Vehicle Miles Traveled

Transcription:

Comparing Percentages of Iditarod Finishers Developed by: Brian Hickox, 2019 Iditarod Teacher on the Trail Discipline / Subject: Math Topic: Analyze and Solve Percent Problems Grade Level: 6, 7, 8 Resources / References / Materials Teacher Needs: Race data which outlines the number of Iditarod mushers and Iditarod finishers from each year Lesson Summary: Students will analyze data which outlines the total number of mushers and finishers from every Iditarod Race since 1973. Students will write ratios in which the numerator represents the number of finishers and the denominator represents the total number of mushers. They will convert the ratios into percents and decimals, and then they will compare the percentage of finishers from each year and each decade. Standard s Addressed: (Local, State, or National) MP.1 - Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. MP.2 - Reason abstractly and quantitatively. MP.4 - Model with mathematics. MP.6 - Attend to precision. CCSS. MATH. CONTENT.7.RP.A.3 - Use proportional relationships to solve multistep ratio, rate, and percent problems. CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.NS.2.d.- Convert a rational number to a decimal using long division; know that the decimal form of a rational number terminates in os or eventually repeats

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.RP.A.3- Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems, e.g., by reasoning about tables of equivalent ratios, tape diagrams, double number line diagrams, or equations. CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.RP.A.3.C- Find a percent of a quantity as a rate per 100 CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.SP.A.1-Recognize a statistical question as one that anticipates variability in the data related to the question and accounts for it in the answers. CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.SP.B.4- Display numerical data in plots on a number line, including dot plots, histograms, and box plots. CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.RP.A.1- Compute unit rates associated with ratios of fractions, including ratios of lengths, areas and other quantities measured in like or different units. Learning Objectives: 1. Students will calculate percents using data from the Iditarod race archives. 2. Students will analyze percents of a number in a real-world context. 3. Students will interpret percents and make comparisons. Method of assessment for learning: Students have successfully written ratios of Iditarod finishers to overall mushers, they have converted those ratios to percents and decimals, and they have compared their findings in order to determine which year(s) had the highest percentage of Iditarod finishers. Procedural Activities 1. Ensure that students know how to write a ratio, convert ratios to percents, convert ratios to decimals, and round decimals to the nearest hundredth. 2. Engage in a classroom discussion and generate a list of where we see ratios, decimals, and percents in our everyday lives. Discuss how and why percents are used in sports. What are the benefits of comparing sets of data? 3. Model for students how to write a ratio, convert it to a percent and convert it to a decimal (rounded to the nearest hundredth). 4. Give each student a copy of the assignment and review the directions.

5. Instruct the students to complete the first problem. Check for understanding by reviewing as a class. 6. Have students complete the rest of the assignment. Circulate around the room to check for understanding and provide assistance. -You may decide to have students complete this assignment with a partner for some or all of the assignment. 7. For problem 26, review what a histogram is and remind students that they need to consider the frequency of percentages before they create their histograms. Click here for a resource which shares key information about histograms. 8. When students have finished, share the results as a class. Materials Students Need: Each student must have a copy of the assignment which shows the number of mushers and finishers of each Iditarod race Chart paper to create a histogram Access to Microsoft Excel in order to create a histogram (optional) Technology Utilized to Enhance Learning: Iditarod race archives Technology to access Microsoft Excel in order to create a histogram Other Information: This lesson opens up a tremendous opportunity to discuss all of the different factors and elements which cause a musher to scratch from the Iditarod Modifications for Special Learners/ Enrichment Opportunities: Allow students the use of a calculator and math reference sheet Reduce the number of problems Do not provide students with the data; have them research the data and create their own tables Students can research how the Iditarod has evolved from its start Students can conduct research in order to develop an understanding about why certain years and/or decades had more mushers and finishers compared to others

Name: Date: Comparing Percentages of Iditarod Finishers Directions: Look at the following set of data which shows the total number of mushers and finishers for each year the Iditarod ran during the 1970s. Use the data to help you answer 1-4. Year of Race Mushers Finishers 1973 34 22 1974 44 26 1975 41 25 1976 47 34 1977 47 36 1978 39 34 1979 55 47 1. For each year, write a ratio in which the numerator reflects the number of finishers and the denominator reflects the total number of mushers for that particular year. Then, convert each ratio to calculate the percent of mushers who finished the Iditarod. You must also convert the ratio into a decimal and round to the nearest hundredth. Show ALL of your work on a separate sheet of paper. Record your answers below. Year of Race Ratio Percent Decimal 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 2. Which year had the highest percentage of finishers? 3. Which year had the lowest percentage of finishers? 4. Overall, including all of the years, what percent of mushers finished the Iditarod in the 1970s? You must show you work.

Directions: Look at the following set of data which shows the total number of mushers and finishers for each year the Iditarod ran during the 1980s. Use the data to help you answer 5-8. Year of Race Mushers Finishers 1980 60 36 1981 53 38 1982 54 46 1983 68 54 1984 67 45 1985 61 40 1986 73 55 1987 63 50 1988 52 45 1989 49 38 5. REFER to the DIRECTIONS from number one. Year of Race Ratio Percent Decimal 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 6. Which year had the highest percentage of finishers? 7. Which year had the lowest percentage of finishers? 8. Overall, including all of the years, what percent of mushers finished the Iditarod in the 1980s? You must show you work.

Directions: Look at the following set of data which shows the total number of mushers and finishers for each year the Iditarod ran during the 1990s. Use the data to help you answer 9-12. Year of Race Mushers Finishers 1990 70 61 1991 76 60 1992 76 63 1993 68 54 1994 58 50 1995 59 49 1996 60 49 1997 53 44 1998 63 51 1999 56 47 9. REFER to the DIRECTIONS from number one. Year of Race Ratio Percent Decimal 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 10. Which year had the highest percentage of finishers? 11. Which year had the lowest percentage of finishers? 12. Overall, including all of the years, what percent of mushers finished the Iditarod in the 1990s? You must show you work.

Directions: Look at the following set of data which shows the total number of mushers and finishers for each year the Iditarod ran during the 2000s. Use the data to help you answer 13-16. Year of Race Mushers Finishers 2000 81 68 2001 68 57 2002 64 55 2003 64 44 2004 87 77 2005 79 63 2006 83 71 2007 82 58 2008 96 78 2009 67 52 13. REFER to the DIRECTIONS from number one. Year of Race Ratio Percent Decimal 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 14. Which year had the highest percentage of finishers? 15. Which year had the lowest percentage of finishers? 16. Overall, including all of the years, what percent of mushers finished the Iditarod in the 2000s? You must show you work.

Directions: Look at the following set of data which shows the total number of mushers and finishers for each year the Iditarod ran during the 2010s. Use the data to help you answer 17-20. Year of Race Mushers Finishers 2010 71 55 2011 62 47 2012 66 52 2013 66 54 2014 69 49 2015 78 66 2016 85 71 2017 72 64 2018 67 52 17. REFER to the DIRECTIONS from number one. Year of Race Ratio Percent Decimal 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 18. Which year had the highest percentage of finishers? 19. Which year had the lowest percentage of finishers? 20. Overall, including all of the years, what percent of mushers finished the Iditarod in the 2010s? You must show you work.

21. Which decade had the highest percentage of Iditarod finishers? What was the percent? 22. Which decade had the lowest percentage of Iditarod finishers? What was the percent? 23. Which year had the highest percentage of Iditarod finishers? What was the percent? 24. Which year had the lowest percentage of Iditarod finishers? What was the percent? 25. What percent of mushers have finished the Iditarod between 1973 and 2018? 26. Now that you have calculated the percent of mushers who have finished the Iditarod each year, create a histogram in which you graph the percent of mushers who finished the Iditarod during each decade (1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s). You can graph your histogram on chart paper or you can make it using Microsoft Excel. Use the table on the next page to help you determine the frequency of Iditarod finishers.

Percents Frequency Percents Included in this Interval 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100