Usage, users and impacts of private hire services

Similar documents
FRENCH NATIONAL SURVEY ON CARSHARING - EDITION

What role for cars in tomorrow s world?

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Drivy How does our service impact cities across Europe?

NEW MOBILITIES EMERGING IN PARIS

Kauai Resident Travel Survey: Summary of Results

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

SEPTEMBER 2017 EVALUATION REPORT NEW MOBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Electric vehicles in the craft sector

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

2017 FLEET BAROMETER. Belgium

Carsharing for Older Populations

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS THE

2018 Automotive Fuel Economy Survey Report

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

How to enable Munich s Freedom (from private cars)? Impacts of the first Mobility Station on urban mobility

Car sharing in Europe

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

Le covoiturage Table ronde. 18 septembre 2017

Innovative collective mobility solutions carsharing as a case

EVOLUTION OF MOBILITY: FOUR PREDICTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

American Driving Survey,

Luxury Through the Eyes of the Affluent January 2015

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

How to manage large scale infrastructures? Infrastructure planning within Toulouse s SUMP. Alexandre Blaquière. 1st December 2016

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Conducted from November 1 to 10, 2017 and answered by 4,101 of the Electric Circuit s 17,644 members.

Continental Mobility Study Klaus Sommer Hanover, December 15, 2011

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

New Mobility Business Models

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Getting around the future Paris-Saclay urban campus

Verkehrsingenieurtag 6. March 2014 Carsharing: Why to model carsharing demand and how

Mysuru PBS Presentation on Prepared by: Directorate of Urban Land Transport

Public engagement on Electric Vehicles. evidence published by the Department for Transport

Model based analysis of the deployment of electric vehicle in the Paris Ile de France region

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Motorcycling. New Zealand Household Travel Survey October 2015

2016 Car Tech Impact Study. January 2016

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Carpooling and Carsharing in Switzerland: Stated Choice Experiments

EVOLUTION OF MOBILITY: AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

Streamlining the District s Nightlife Curbside Access. Managing High-Demand Curbside Passenger Loading Zones

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

History of Subway in Kyoto

URBAN MOBILITY DESIGN INTELLIGENTLY

MaaS - AN ACCELERATING REVOLUTION AND THE LESSONS LEARNED TO DATE 20 FEBRUARY 2018

City of Montréal s strategies to move smarter

ASSESSING TERRITORY READINESS FOR AUTONOMOUS TRANSPORT SERVICE AND EVALUATING MARKET SIZE. N. Faul S. Sadeghian B. Créno

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

2016 FLEET BAROMETER. Switzerland

Vivaldi, Trees, and Urban Mobility. Jakob Puchinger September 28, 2016

RKH Qitarat, the joint venture between Keolis, RATP Dev and Hamad Group, will operate the first Qatar public transport network

Private Hire Regulations Consultation London Travelwatch briefing. Helen Chapman, General Manager of London Taxi & Private Hire

Networks of pedestrian's paths

From a marketplace for mobility towards Mobility as a Service in Rotterdam (Nl)

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization

DAILY TRAVEL AND CO 2 EMISSIONS FROM PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES

MOBILITY AND THE SHARED ECONOMY

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

New Energy Activity. Background:

VEDECOM. Institute for Energy Transition. Presentation

French Cities Cut Drivers Costs by 90 Percent with Intelligent Car-Sharing Solution

ELVITEN: #Let sgoelectric

RAA Member Panel. Older Drivers. Self-regulation by older drivers

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Public attitudes to road safety

Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

Parking Management Element

Electric Mobility-on-Demand a long step beyond carsharing. Jan-Olaf Willums Chairman EMN and Move About

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Electric Vehicles in Motion in Paris. News and development axis. ooooo. Better Transport Forum

Hoboken Citywide Parking Master Plan. 1 st Public Workshop June 11, 2014

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Table of Contents. 1.0 Introduction Demographic Characteristics Travel Behaviour Aggregate Trips 28

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Nathalie Popiolek, Senior Expert

Early adopters of EVs in Germany unveiled

Survey Report Informatica PowerCenter Express. Right-Sized Data Integration for the Smaller Project

Memorandum. To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject:

Preprint.

[Report Title] [Report Tag Line]

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

THE REAL-WORLD SMART CHARGING TRIAL WHAT WE VE LEARNT SO FAR

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

Summary of survey results on Assessment of effectiveness of 2-persons-in-the-cockpit recommendation included in EASA SIB

The proposed Escondido Village Graduate Student Housing project would include the following features:

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

Presentation: Mobihubs in Flanders

BMW GROUP AND THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABLE (E)-MOBILITY. LATIN AMERICA CLEAN TRANSPORT FORUM.

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

Future Funding The sustainability of current transport revenue tools model and report November 2014

Transcription:

1 Usage, users and impacts of private hire Results of the first large-scale survey on the impacts of private hire This study was carried out by 6t-bureau de recherche and was distributed by Uber to its account holders in June 2015. The need to reduce the negative environmental, economic or societal impacts of automobile use on the lives of city dwellers is ever more strongly felt within urban areas and constitutes a real challenge for public authorities. New shared transport that are supported by digital applications have developed within this context. Based on an increasing divergence between the possession and use of private cars, these must both: respond to the growing demand of the population, and.adapt to the urban environment in complement to the existing transport offer. Evaluating the impact of private hire While the offer of private hire is experiencing strong growth, the usage, users and impact of these remain unknown. The objective of this study is to describe and understand them: Amid all these, private hire car with drivers are in full development. The dissemination of mobile telephones during the 2000s, followed by the smartphone and global positioning systems (GPS) since the beginning of the 2010s, have created an upheaval in the personal transport industry. Thanks to these smartphone applications, users are able to geolocate themselves to request a ride from the nearest vehicle, with no need for a switchboard. Who are the users of private hire? Why do they use these? In what ways are these complementary to the range of alternatives to the private car?.to what extent do these influence changes in mobility behavior?

2 Understanding the phenomenon of private hire >> What type of are we are talking about? Licensed transportation In the study, the expression licensed transportation designates transport that are proposed via the use of an application that connects users with licensed drivers. They correspond to private hire vehicles (PHV). Peer-to-peer transportation We will use the term peer-to-peer transportation in the context of applications that connect users with peer-to-peer drivers. Djump and uberpop, two applications that connect users with peer-to-peer transportation in France, were suspended on July 3, 2015. On July 30, 2015, Djump was purchased by the PHV application Chauffeur-Privé. >> What is the place of private hire within the existing transport offer? Today, Uber is the largest operator for matching users with private hire in France and Switzerland: 1,026,373 users have used the service at least once during the last twelve months in these two countries. Among these, 777,650 are account holders who signed up to the application in France or Switzerland (Uber figures on 10 July 2015). Uber is thus an ideal field of study. The challenge of the present study is not to analyze the users of Uber, but to better understand the phenomenon of private hire within the environment of the existing transport offer, ranging from private cars to all the alternative modes: public transport, walking, bicycles, car-sharing, taxis, etc. 1 INSEE, Census of the population 2012 - Territorial limits from 1 January 2013. 2 OSF, Recensement de la population 2010. 3 6t-bureau de recherche, Enquête Nationale sur l Autopartage : l autopartage comme déclencheur d une mobilité alternative à la voiture particulière, 2013. The results of the study have been brought into perspective with: data from the French 1 and Swiss 2 population censuses, a sample of users of return-trip car-sharing in France from a study conducted by 6t in 2013 3 (2.090 users), a sample of users of single-trip car-sharing in France from a study conducted by 6t in 2014 4 (644 users), a sample of taxi users in France from a study conducted by 6t in 2015 5 (1.001 users). 4 6t-bureau de recherche, ENA.3 Enquête sur l autopartage en trace directe (le cas d Autolib Paris). L autopartage en trace directe : quelle alternative à la voiture particulière?, 2014. 5 6t-bureau de recherche, Usagers, usages et impacts du taxi enquête auprès de 1000 usagers du taxi en France, 2015.

Services used for personal and recreational reasons >> A mode that is very widely used for private journeys within the urban area of residence... Sixty-two percent of the users of private hire use them exclusively for private reasons. If we consider only the users of peer-to-peer driver, 83% use them exclusively for private reasons, whereas only 57% of taxi users use taxis for private reasons (6t taxi panel, 2015). In addition, 84% of the journeys made with private hire take place within the user s area of residence, whereas this is the case for only 64% of taxi journeys. >>... and for recreational activities. The principal reason for journeys made with private hire concerns recreational outings (47%). This is followed by journeys that link with stations or airports (21%). Conversely, the principal reason for taxi travel concerns access to a railway station or airport (36%), followed by travel for leisure (20%). Business travel and access to medical respectively represent 14% and 12% of taxi travel, while they concern only 8% and 2% of the journeys with private hire. A service that complements the public transport offer >> A mode that is primarily used when the alternative is less attractive >>.A mode in the service of urban mobility Private hire dominate the night transport market (midnight - 8 a.m.): 37% of all journeys made with these take place at night, mainly during the weekend but also during the week. These journeys are mainly provided by peer-to-peer driver, with 47% taking place after midnight, compared with 26% for licensed drivers. The night market represents only 20 % of the journeys made by taxi. >> A mode that is integrated into the existing transport offer Users have a multimodal approach toward the use of private hire. Over 70% of the journeys made with a private hire service are preceded or followed by a journey with an alternative mode to the private car: in 20% to 30% of the cases the journey is continued on foot (depending on whether the pick-up or drop-off point is the home) and in 29% to 47% of the cases by public transport. 3 On one hand, these facilitate connections between city centers and their peripheral areas, and on the other hand they develop alternatives within these peripheral areas. Thus, 44% of the journeys with private hire have a pick-up and/or drop-off point in the suburbs of the urban area, including 8% which are entirely made within the peripheral area. In the Paris metropolitan area, this amounts to 47% of all journeys, i.e. a little more than the number of journeys made with the Autolib car-sharing system, for which 44% of the journeys have a pick-up or drop-off point in the suburbs (Autolib activity report, 2014). Distribution of users by their place of residence (center or suburbs) in the Île-de-France region Uber 41 % 59 % Autolib Communauto 27 % 12 % 73 % 88 % Sources : 6t, 2015, sample of 2 738 respondents living in the Île-de-France region and having already used Uber ; 6t, 2014, sample of 978 respondents living in the Île-de-France region and having already used Autolib or Communauto.

4 Who are the users of private hire? >> The users of peer-to-peer driver are mostly young people and students The users of peer-to-peer driver are predominantly students or young employed people under 30 years old, living alone or as a couple without children and with modest income. They use these above all for private reasons and are looking for efficiency in terms of cost and/ or travel time. >> The users of licensed driver are older, wealthier and have a higher level of education The users of licensed driver are older (38 years old), better educated, more affluent and are more likely to live as a couple with children. They use these both privately and 34% of students and 63% of people under 30 among the users of peer-to-peer 48.% of managers among the users of licensed driver professionally and approach them more from the point of view of comfort and convenience, without under-estimating the functional aspect of the service. >> Few users are retired There are few pensioners among the users of private hire users (1%). They are more widely represented among taxi users (13%), but still less than within the French population (25%). Conversely, students represent 25% of private hire users whereas they represent 10% of taxi users. Contrary to pensioners, students tend to live in large cities and to make intensive use of smartphones. >> A mode which inspires confidence Information about private hire is distributed mainly through word-ofmouth. The reputation of these among users is therefore particularly important for their development. The users show a confidence in these which goes beyond the mere question of efficiency. Indeed, 53% declare that they are favorable to the idea of allowing their child to travel unaccompanied with a private hire service while only 38% of taxi users would let their child travel alone in a taxi. >> Private hire change mobility behaviour In relation to the various niche modes of transport (car-sharing, carpooling, etc.), private hire have a very direct and massive impact on the changes in mobility behavior. Sixty-four percent of the users of private hire report that this service (and not other events of life like relocation or change of employment, etc.) is responsible for changing their behavior. In the Paris metropolitan area, almost 70% consider that this is the case, whereas only 40% of carsharers consider this to be true (6t, 2013).

Car-sharing and demotorisation: a closer look at the Paris metropolitan area Private hire with professional or peer-to-peer drivers CAR-SHARING Car-sharing is a system of car hire, usually within urban areas, which allows users to use vehicles on an ad hoc basis with or without booking. UBER Booking is made in real-time via a smartphone application. In the Ile-de-France region, the average journey lasts 22 minutes for a distance of 9 km. These are more used by the residents of suburban areas than car-sharing. AUTOLIB : single-trip system The vehicle is booked in real-time. It may be returned to a station other than the pick-up station. The average rental is for 40 minutes and 9 km. It is mainly used by Parisians to drive within the city of Paris. COMMUNAUTO : return-trip system The vehicule is booked in advance and the duration of the rental must be specified. The average rental is for 5 hours and 40 km. It is widely used by Parisians for trips to the outside of Paris. >> Uber users use cars less than Autolib users in the Ile-de-France region The effects of Uber on mobility behavior are similar to those of Autolib. All modes of transport are seeing their use decrease following the adoption of these two car-sharing. For users both of Uber and Autolib, it is the use of private cars and taxis which has decreased the most. Nevertheless, Uber users distinguish themselves from the users of Autolib in that on average they use cars less often, all forms combined (private and shared): the first use cars on average 10.7 times per month following their adoption of Uber, while the latter use them on average 13.6 times per month after adopting Autolib. This is explained by the fact that, unlike Uber, Autolib is a mode that is used frequently, which very largely compensates the decrease observed in the use of private cars. Conversely, Uber remains an occasional mode of transport. The users of Uber use this service for new journeys that they did not make before, whereas Autolib users use Autolib instead of other modes of transport to make journeys which they already carried out before. Thus, the increase of mobility by car among Uber users is especially determined by these new journeys, which is not the case for Autolib. Evolution of the monthly usage of different modes of transport before and after subscription to a car-sharing service in the Ile-de-France region Private hire in the Ile-de- France region (Uber) before after Autopartage en trace directe IdF (Autolib') before after Autopartage en boucle IdF (Communauto) before after Private car 6,1 5,0 4,8 2,5 3,5 0,5 Public transport 16,4 14,5 16,1 14,1 16,7 17,0 Bicycle 3,3 2,9 4,4 3,7 6,4 6,8 On foot 7,0 6,9 9,4 9,0 11,5 11,9 Two-wheeled motor vehicles 2,5 2,2 2,5 2,2 2,2 2,2 Taxi 3,4 0,8 3,1 1,5 1,5 1,4 Shared-car / 4,9 / 9,6 / 1,6 Total car use 9,5 10,7 7,9 13,6 5,0 3,5 Sources : 6t, 2015, sample of 2 738 respondents living in the Île-de-France region and having already used Uber ; 6t, 2014, sample of 978 respondents living in the Île-de-France region and having already used Autolib or Communauto. 5

>> Uber: the car-sharing service that has removed the largest number of private cars from the Paris metropolitan area. In the Paris area, private hire have brought about a 5.4% decrease of its users fleet of vehicles. This decrease is lower in percentage terms than for the fleet of vehicles owned by Autolib (- 23%) and Communauto (- 67%) users. Yet, in absolute terms, Uber has already removed more cars from the Ile-de-France region than Autolib and Communauto combined. One UBER vehicle replaces 4 private cars and frees up 3 parking spaces. Autolib : 79,411 active subscribers 1 Communauto : 2,427 active subscribers 2 Uber : 621,171 active subscribers Autolib : 3,276 vehicles 1 Communauto : 112 vehicles 2 Uber : 9,000 vehicles Uber : 3 times more vehicles than Autolib for 9 time more users, 75 times more vehicles than Communauto for 250 times more users. One Autolib vehicle replaces 3 private cars and frees up 2 parking spaces. 22 000 feewer cars in the Paris metropolitan area thanks to private hire No car One car Two cars or more In absolute terms, Uber has already removed more cars from the Île-de-France region than Autolib (10,000) and Communauto (800) combined. Before UBER 43% 40% 17% With UBER 46% 38% 16% A 5.4% decrease in the vehicle fleet of Uber subscribers following their subscription. 1 Source :.Autolib activity report, 2014 2 Source :.6t-bureau de recherche, ENA.3 Enquête sur l autopartage en trace directe (le cas d Autolib Paris), 2014 No car One car Two cars or more Before Autolib 50% 37% 13% 6 With Autolib 60% 30% 10% A 23% decrease in the vehicle fleet of Autolib subscribers following their subscription. One Communauto vehicle replaces 7 private cars and frees up 6 parking spaces. Source iconographique : Noun Project No car One car Two cars or more Before Communauto 56% 41% 3% With Communauto 87% 10% 3% A 67% decrease in the vehicle of Communauto subscribers following their subscription.

7 Private hire : the response to a demand for mobility that has not been satisfied until now >> Private hire respond to the demand... Licensed driver satisfy a latent demand. It is not the price that is highlighted by the users of these but rather the quality of service. According to them, the main strengths of these with respect to taxis are the effectiveness of the smartphone application and the method of payment; two assets which taxis could benefit from by strengthening the development of a similar application for their users. >>... and also create a new demand. Peer-to-peer driver are creating a new market and a new demand. The users of these are predominantly young people and students, a target that is virtually non-existent among taxi users and not very present among the users of licensed driver. In addition, the users of peerto-peer driver constitute a reserve for licensed driver and taxis. Indeed, one can imagine that when they are older and have higher incomes, they will also use licensed driver and taxis. In other terms, peerto-peer driver create habits of usage among a young population that will massively use the full range of private hire when they are older. >> Services that extend the mobility of users In addition, the smartphone application has very clearly expanded the use of private hire. Indeed, whereas the average frequency of use of a taxi user is 2.6 journeys per month, the average frequency of use of private hire is 4.2 journeys per month, i.e. 60% more journeys. In addition, when private hire are not available, the taxi option becomes an alternative for 39% of the users, even though they were not taxi users before. Moreover, forty percent of users declare that private hire allow them to make journeys (and therefore undertake activities) that they could not have done before. Twentyseven percent say that they could not have made their most recent journey with any other mode. It can therefore be assumed that 27% of the journeys made with these are for travel that would not have taken place without them. For the most part, these are for recreational outings (restaurant, cinema, theatre, nightclub, etc.) and mainly take place in the evening. They therefore have a direct impact on economic activity, while limiting the number of road accidents that can be related to nightlife and alcohol consumption. The 10 most frequently mentionned adjectives by Uber users to describe private hire

8 Survey methodology >> A self-administrered online survey was carried out from 12 June 2015 to 22 June 2016 (before the peer-to-peer uberpop and Djump were suspended in France on July 3, 2015). A survey of 6,476 users >> 150 questions were asked in order to determine the use and interest not only for private hire but also for other modes of transport. >> It was distributed by Uber to its account holders. >> The respondents reside in 6 urban areas in France (Paris, Lyon, Lille, Nice, Bordeaux and Toulouse) and 2 urban areas in Switzerland (Lausanne and Geneva). >> After auditing the data, 6,476 respondents were retained for the study, including: 1,175 using only licensed driver ; 1,442 using only perr-to-peer driver ; 3,859 using both types of private hire service. >> The 95% confidence interval reaches 0.2 points at its minimum and 1.2 points at its maximum. + infos Nicolas Louvet 6t-bureau de recherche info@6t.fr www.6t.fr/blog 01 53 09 26 36 www.6t.fr Twitter : @6tRecherche Report of the complete analysis available on request. 6t bureau de recherche in brief - www.6t.fr The aim of the 6t research consultancy is to combine academic research and applied research to meet social demand with a high level of expertise while supplying scientific and technical information to aid decision-making. Our skills at 6t mobilise different types of methods to aid understanding of sociology and urban geography, and to conduct qualitative, quantitative and cartographic analysis. This variety of skills is based on a multidisciplinary team of sociologists, geographers, political scientists, engineers and planners who regularly accompany private and public stakeholders in France and abroad, on urban issues related to mobility, practices and lifestyles.