Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Similar documents
Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

SUMMARY REPORT ON EVALUATION OF A FUEL ADDITIVE AT SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

FUEL EFFICIENCY CASE STUDY

1996, or for which modification is commenced on or before March 16, 1998, shall not exceed the

# of tests Condition g/mile ± g/mile ± g/mile ± (miles/gal) ± Impact of Diesel Extreme on emissions and fuel economy USDS results:

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

Olson-EcoLogic Engine Testing Laboratories, LLC

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

CASE STUDY 1612B FUEL ECONOMY TESTING

CraneSafe. Certification. CraneSafe Certification. CraneSafe. Certification

80 Tonnes & Under. Restriction: 20 Tonnes & Under. CraneSafe Certification

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

THE EFFECTS OF OXYGENATED ADDITIVE AND EGR IN A DIESEL ENGINE

CASE STUDY 1612C FUEL ECONOMY TESTING

CraneSafe. Certification. CraneSafe. Certification CraneSafe Certification

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

SEPA Statement Processed Fuel Oil

ETV Joint Verification Statement

REPORT ON TEST CONDUCTED AT EPS COURIER SERVICES

AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015

WRITTEN COMMENTS OF THE MANUFACTURERS OF EMISSION CONTROLS ASSOCIATION ON THE U.S. EPA-HQ-OAR

TREATMENT FOR DIESEL FUEL

DaimlerChrysler Alternative Particulate Measurement page 1/8

FUEL EFFICIENCY CASE STUDY

Pertaining to Clause 28(1)(2) and 29(1)(2) of the Offensive Weapons Bill

February 28, Definition of Engines Covered Under the Rule

Debswana Anglo American Fuel Additive Test Criteria. Centron Diesel Fuel Enhancer Lab & Performance Test Results TOMORROW S FUEL TECHNOLOGY TODAY

EN 1154:1997 / A1:2002

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

A division ofolson Engineering, Inc. FINAL REPORT

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

Determination of Volume Correction Factors for FAME and FAME / Mineral-diesel blends

Section: Deterioration Factor Version: 4 +EUROMOT COMMENTS Date: 19 Oct 2015 (revised by EUROMOT 29 Nov 2015)

HST ANTI-SPALL WINDSCREENS (0071/070042)

SCC Greenhouse Gas Assessment

ANALYSIS OF THE ENGINE FUELS IMPACT ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Title: The Fire Resistance Performance of Modified Doorsets. WF Assessment Report No: Prepared for:

Fuel Economy of Jeepneys Using 2% and 5% CME-Diesel Blends in the Philippines

24 July Fuel Quality Review Marsden Jacob. Dear Sir or Madam

Z-Score Summary - Concrete Proficiency Testing Program (70) Z-SCORES SUMMARY. Concrete April 2017 (70)

Compliance, Performance, Support

GRITTING FOR IMPROVED EARLY LIFE SKID RESISTANCE OF STONE MASTIC ASPHALT SURFACES

EPA Registration. 1. Attached is the EPA letter confirming the registration of the MPG-CAPS.

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT

The Effect Of XFT Fuel Catalyst On Fuel Consumption In Similar Tractor-Trailer Test Units Using The SAE/TMC J1321 Type II Test Protocol

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FAILURES ON THE EXHAUST GAS CONTENT OF SHIP DIESEL ENGINE WORKING ON HEAVY FUEL OIL

RULE BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS, AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted 5/11/93, Revised 6/13/95, 6/13/00, 9/11/12)

EXECUTIVE ORDER D Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156

Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

OPTIMISING SEWAGE PUMPING STATION PERFORMANCE

SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM SCOTTISH AND SOUTHERN ENERGY

CHAPTER-3 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP. The experimental set up is made with necessary. instrumentations to evaluate the performance, emission and

PEMS Testing of Porsche Model Year 2018 Vehicles

Alcohol & Substance Abuse Information. Please complete the following six pages. Sign all forms where highlighted in yellow

Diesel Fuel Additive

ASTM E 1354 Caloric Content Determination of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540"

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY FOR FLARE NOS. 1, 5 & 6

What to Expect from Your New Low (and Ultra-Low) Sulfur Fuels

The Used Petroleum and Antifreeze Products Stewardship Regulations

BULK FOOD TROLLEY MODEL BFT-150-E

SCHEDULE 6 RESIDENTIAL SERVICE ON-SITE GENERATION

SpiritPFC Torque/Horsepower Comparison Dynamometer Test Date: 5/7/2006

The topic of exhaust emission regulation and reduction is extremely complex. In order to comply with the permissible emission values, increasingly

Renewable Diesel: The Sustainable High-Performance Fuel

BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co KG Potential of Different Injection Systems for High Performance Two-Stroke Engines Nigel Foxhall October, 17th 2016

Chief Operating Officer. Nigel Bell, Energy Resource Manager

Dependence of particle size distribution on injection pressure

Smarter Network Storage: Introduction to grid-scale storage and applications, the DNO perspective

GIBRALTAR ERDF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME POST ADOPTION STATEMENT

APPENDIX 1 TECHNICAL DATA OF TEST ENGINE

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Net Metering in Missouri

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

EMISSIONS AND FUEL ECONOMY TEST FINAL REPORT (OAE-APSI-4) Locomotive EMD Engine FITCH FUEL CATALYST

IC Chapter 4. Private Assembly of Vehicles; Engine Identification Numbers

Fuel Maximizer Combustion Catalyst Diesel Fuel Additive

BG Diesel Fuel Products THE PROOF

After opening the printer drawer, the data plate is visible showing 'e1 84'. Any printer paper used must also show on the reverse side "e1 84".

April 24, Docket No. CPSC

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/08/2013.

Clyde Waste Transfer Facility Quarterly Truck Noise Measurements April 2009

BULDER 00 ROOMHEATER

Test report. About the effect of Lambda System Cleaning Products. No

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET. Exhaust Gas Recirculation 3 and High Pressure 3 - Tank treatments

HYDROGEN BASED DIESEL REDUCTION SYSTEM for TRANSPORT & HAULAGE SYSTEMS

Transcription:

Copyright Statement All rights reserved. All material in this document is, unless otherwise stated, the property of FPC International, Inc. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect these materials. Reproduction or retransmission of the materials, in whole or in part, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law.

FOLLOW UP FUEL EFFICIENCY STUDY AT DARLOT GOLD MINE POWER GENERATION FACILITY December, 2006 Prepared by: Fuel Technology Pty Ltd 2 Tipping Road KEWDALE WA 6105 Tel: (08) 9353 1016 Fax: (08) 9353 1013 E-mail fueltech@iinet.net.au ACN 100 293 490

C O N T E N T S Executive Summary Page 1 Introduction Page 2 Test Methods Page 2 Test Results Page 3 Conclusion Page 4 Appendix A B Carbon Balance Printouts Carbon Balance Data Sheets

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The FTC Combustion Catalysts, manufactured and marketed by Fuel Technology Pty Ltd, have proven in laboratory and field trials to reduce fuel consumption in the range 3% to 8% under comparable load conditions and to also substantially reduce carbon emissions. Following Fuel Efficiency tests conducted in Darlot Gold Mine s Power Generation facility where a 3.7% fuel efficiency was measured following FTC treatment of fuel, identical tests after a further two months FTC treatment was scheduled with these conducted 12 December 2006. The International Engineering test procedure Carbon Mass Balance (CMB) as initial tests was employed in this test program. The average net efficiency gain (reduction in fuel consumption) measured by the second CMB test procedure was 3.3%. Page 1

INTRODUCTION Baseline (untreated) fuel efficiency tests were conducted on four Caterpillar 3516 Generator sets, Nos 6, 7, 9 and 10 during the week commencing 26 th July 2006 employing the CMB test procedure. Bosch Smoke Tests were also conducted in conjunction with CMB tests. Darlot Gold Mine purchased and installed an FTC catalyst metering system which was calibrated and commissioned following completion of the baseline tests. This unit injected FTC-3 Catalyst into the fuel supply as fuel was pumped from bulk storage tanks to Power Generation facility day tank. The first treated tests were conducted during the week commencing 25 th September 2006 on Generator sets 7, 9 and 10 only as unit 6 was undergoing a rebuild. The second treated tests were conducted 12 th December 2006 on Generators 9 and 10 only. Power Generation loads for both treated CMB tests were significantly lower than experienced during untreated tests and calculations have been applied to compensate for this factor. TEST METHODS The Carbon Balance Measurement (CB) is a procedure whereby the mass of carbon in the exhaust is calculated as a measure of the fuel being burned. The elements measured in this test include the exhaust gas composition, its temperature and the gas flow rate calculated from the pressure and exhaust stack cross sectional area. Whilst this is an engineering standard test (AS2077-1982) in field testing we are unable to comply with the procedure in relation to employing a chassis dynamometer. However, in the case of power generation the alternator substitutes as a mechanism to apply a constant load. Page 2

TEST RESULTS The Table below provides results achieved in the second CMB test program. As the kws produced during the treated tests were significantly lower than that produced during untreated tests, results have been calculated as grams/second per kilowatt and shown in the following table. Carbon Mass Balance Fuel Consumption Second Test Results grams per second flow of carbon per kw Unit No. Baseline 26/7/06 Treated12/12/06 Variation g/s per kw g/s per kw 9 0.01784 0.01721-3.5% 10 0.01772 0.01718-3.1% Average g/s 0.01778 0.017195-3.3% The second CB test procedure confirms the first test that addition of FTC-3 Catalyst to the fuel supply provides a reduction in carbon flow (fuel consumption) of 3.3 to 3.7%. Computer printouts of results and raw data sheets are contained in the Appendix. Bosch Smoke Tests A Bosch smoke test was also undertaken during second set of tests and results are shown in Table 2. Smoke emissions are generally reduced by up to 30-40% following the introduction of FTC Combustion Catalyst. This second treated test has resulted in a slight decrease in smoke emissions from first treated tests. As the Bosch Smoke test Scale reads from 0.1 (very clean) to 9.9 (very dirty) we are measuring at a very low base from the start. TABLE 2 Bosch Smoke Measurements Unit No. Baseline 26/7/06 Treated 12/12/06 Variation 9 0.6 0.7 7% 10 0.7 0.8 14% Average 0.65 0.75 15% Page 3

CONCLUSION These carefully controlled second test procedures conducted on Caterpillar 3516 generator sets Nos 9, and 10 provide clear evidence of reduced fuel consumption in the range 3.3%. This is within repeatability of initial test results of 3.7%. Additional to the fuel economy benefits measured and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions due to a more complete combustion of the fuel, a reduction over time in engine maintenance costs will also be realised. Page 4

Appendix A Carbon Balance Printouts

Appendix A Carbon Balance Printouts

Appendix B Carbon Balance Data Sheets