CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

Similar documents
Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Demographics and Sales

1 Have you used Sun Trolley (which also includes Riverwalk Trolley)? Yes (Go to Question #2) No (Go to Question #10)

A North American Survey of Electric Bicycle Owners. NITC-RR-1041 March 2018

CTR Employer Survey Report

Electric Bikes - Smart, Networked, Sustainable?

Travel to Work Survey 2018

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

CTR Employer Survey Report


Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Ministry of Infrastructure and Watermanagement

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study

American Driving Survey,

List of Figures. List of Tables Membership. Parking ations

Manual Where Do I Get Cars Save Gas Mileage Than Automatics

EV Consumer Survey Dashboard Questions

List of Figures. List of Tables Membership Parking ations...

CTR Employer Survey Report

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro

Demographics Booklet

RAA Member Panel. Older Drivers. Self-regulation by older drivers

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

CTR Employer Survey Report

Nebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report

A Survey of Electric Vehicle Awareness & Preferences in Vermont

EV Owner Demographics & Diffusion Survey

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

USC Aiken 2004 Freshman Orientation Survey Results Selected questions have been made parallel to those on the CIRP Freshman Survey

Right dir - wrong track Number of cases

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Travel Decisions Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Kauai Resident Travel Survey: Summary of Results

DISCOVER U.S. SPENDING MONITOR SM

Food-Labeling Poll 2008

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Carsharing for Older Populations

The Streamlined Public Transit Commute.

Driver Travel New Zealand Household Travel Survey May 2014

The Adoption and Impact of Mobile Money in Kenya: Results from a Panel Survey

Would you say you approve or disapprove of how Governor Charlie Baker is dealing with the transportation system in your area?

Mysuru PBS Presentation on Prepared by: Directorate of Urban Land Transport


201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

Predicted response of Prague residents to regulation measures

Transportation Demand Management Element

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

Onward travel. Insights from HS2 online panel

Is The Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project the answer?

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

Parking & Transportation Services (P&TS) C a r d i n a l a t W o r k W e l c o m e C e n t e r

Car passengers on the UK s roads: An analysis. Imogen Martineau, BA (Hons), MSc

What We Heard. Edmontonians in communities Northwest of City Centre share their vision of the Metro Line NW LRT Expansion

Appendix A: Additional Respondent Information

Boalsburg Tech Park Build-to-Suit. 176 Technology Drive, Boalsburg, PA 16827

Online Shopper: New Car Intenders

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

Q1 I have heard of driverless cars.

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION QUESTION HYPOTHESIS

Analyzing Uber s Ride-sharing Economy

North Florida Transportation Survey

Future Of Transportation National Survey #10131

NZ Drivers Readiness for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. Nicola Starkey and Samuel Charlton, Transport Research Group, University of Waikato

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Denver Dockless Mobility Program Pilot Interim Report

Puerto Rico: Impact of the Car Seat Campaign

The South Waterfront District and the Portland Aerial Tram

Produced by the BPDA Research Division:

University of Vermont Transportation Research Center

YouGovR. YouGov Survey Results YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved

AAA and Fuel Conservation

Best Route. Best Care. The Milwaukee Regional Medical Center s Alternative Transportation Program

Certificate in a vocational program

Naturalistic Experiment to Simulate Travel Behavior Implications of Self-Driving Vehicles: The Chauffeur Experiment

Gas Watcher s Guide. Tips for Conserving Fuel, Saving Money and Protecting the Environment. AAA and Fuel Conservation

Contemporary Attitudes Toward Motorcycle Riding Safety and Riding Risk Factors Part 2

Berkeley Lab - Innovative Fleet Ideas, Goal Performance & Challenges

Contemporary Attitudes Toward Motorcycle Riding Safety and Riding Risk Factors Part 1

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

Regents Exam Questions A.CED.A.2: Speed 2a

SOUTHWEST TRANSIT SEPTEMBER 2017 RIDER SURVEY. 1. What city do you live in? 2. How many years have you been a rider on SWT?

POWER ASSISTED BICYCLES OWNERS MANUAL

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

AAA and Fuel Conservation

Boston Complete Streets Initiative. PROJECTS and GUIDELINES

Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

Schoolcraft County Public Transit

Weaving a local web. Evaluating the effectiveness of Let s Carpool to encourage carpooling to work. Prepared for Greater Wellington Regional Council

Welcome! Think carpool, then think bigger! Questions? Contact our Vanpool team!

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

Retail Site Analysis. Filling Station Car Wash FM 1092 Missouri City, Texas 77459

VOTRAN & the Volusia TPO Transit Development Plan (FY2012 FY2021) & Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan ( )

SAFE COMMUNITIES SURVEY RESULTS 2000

Transcription:

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA Christopher Cherry (University of Tennessee), Ziwen Ling (University of Tennessee), John MacArthur (Portland State University), and Jonathan Weinert (Bosch).

NORTH AMERICAN E-BIKE USER SURVEY 2013: PORTLAND STATE UNIV.

Geography of survey respondents

Demographics 85% Male Gender n=553 15% Female 65 and over 55 to 64 45 to 54 35 to 44 25 to 34 18 to 24 1% Age 13% 18% 26% n=451 32% n=448 4% High School Education 25% Some College 37% 34% College Graduate Graduate Degree $150,000 or more $100,000 to$150,000 $75,000 to $100,000 $50,000 to $75,000 $35,000 to $50,000 $25,000 to $35,000 $15,000 to $25,000 Under $15,000 Income 7% 7% 5% 16% 18% 16% 18% 13% N = 448

What were the main reasons you bought an electric bike, or converted a standard bicycle? 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% To replace some car trips Health - medical condition reduced your ability to ride a standard bike Health - to increase physical fitness Because you live or work in a hilly area To ride with less effort To be able to keep up with friends/family when I go for rides Male Female Respondents w/ physical limitation Respondents w/out a physical limitation Respondents <55 Respondents >55

What is the main reason that you use your electric bike (purpose of trips)? 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% Commute to work/school Local trips (shopping and errands) Recreation Male Female Respondents w/ physical limitation Respondents w/out a physical limitation Respondents < 55 Respondents > 55 Other

Bike Use 94% indicated they had rode a standard bike as an adult 55% rode their standard bike weekly or daily prior to e-bike purchase --this went up to 93% after purchase Of the 6% that hadn t rode a bike as an adult, 89% ride their e-bike daily or weekly Over 90% use their e-bikes weekly or daily To replace 95% of car trips and make commuting fun Survey Respondent

Getting around 45% indicated that they take a different route on their e-bike than a standard bike 35% don t avoid hills on e-bike and 31% will take more direct or higher traffic route on e-bike but 30% say they take lower traffic or less direct route Three quarters (73%) ride to different destinations on their e-bikes than they did on a standard bike I have bad knees (I'm retired, 68 years old). If I pedal a bike my range is limited by pain to about 5 to 6 miles. The e-bikes has a range per charge of 30 to 35 miles. Survey Respondent

What are the different destinations you ride to on your electric bike? 52% of women responded that they take a different route on their electric bike than they did on their standard bike, compared to 42% of men. 82% of women responded that they ride to different destinations on their electric bike than they did on their standard bike, compared to 73% of men. 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 5% 0%

KAISER PERMANENTE E-BIKE PILOT PROJECT 2015: PSU

Kaiser Permanente E-bike Pilot Project 30 Currie izip E3 Compact Top Speed: 18 mph Range: 15-22 miles Weight: 42 lbs. Folding Kaiser Employees at 3 campuses (1 st /last mile commuting) Project ran from May 2014 to Oct 2015

Map overview of employment centers, transit and survey respondents' homes - Portland Metro.

Mode choice by trip purpose Commuting 68% 7% 2% 7% 15% 1% Personal Errands 66% 13% 4% 13% 4% 1% Visiting Family/Friends 48% 32% 7% 3% Entertainment & Socializing 36% 44% 6% 7% 6% 2% Exercise/ Recreation 30% 13% 33% 21% 2% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Drive alone Carpool/passenger Walk Bike Public transit Other

Barriers to participation in cycling cited by respondents Standard bicycle E-bike (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Sample size (n) 56 31 87 80 86 Weather conditions 45% 39% 67% 59% 55% Trip logistics, preparation and/or time constraints 45% 61% 2% 14% My destination is too far 44% 56% 16% 23% The bike is uncomfortable or causes pain 11% 16% 0% 11% 19% I can t carry the things I need 0% 0% 41% 43% 50% I am concerned for my safety 5% 3% 15% 16% 14% I do not have access to a bicycle OR there was an issue with my e-bike 11% 12% 0% 0% There is no place to securely store my bicycle 0% 0% 2% 6% 17% I don't like to arrive sweaty/no showers at work 4% 0% 47% 14% I am unable to bike for health concerns or am physically unable 15% 16% 3% 5% Transit connections are not easy or convenient 0% 0% 0% 8% 9% "Laziness" (self-reported) 2% 6% 2% 1% 1% Hills 4% 0% 38% 1% 0% Other 2% 6% 3% 4% 7% (A): Pre-use: Why did you stop biking for transportation to work? (B): Pre-use: Why did you stop biking for recreation? (C): Pre-use: What are the main factors keeping you from biking more often? (D): Mid-use: If you would like to use the e-bike to commute to work more often, what prevents you from doing so? (E): Post-use: If you weren't able to use the e-bike as often as you would have liked, what prevented you from doing so?

100% Frequency of bicycle usage by trip purpose, before and during program All trips Commuting PersonalFamily SocialRecreation 90% 80% 70% 48% 47% 32% 41% 46% 45% 50% 58% 60% 60% 48% 49% 60% 50% 30% 40% 29% 43% 29% 25% 30% 20% 0% 43% 49% 19% 42% 33% 46% 29% 30% 17% 22% 21% 19% 16% 9% 6% 3% 6% 9% 4% 2% 6% 9% All trips Commuting Personal Family Social Recreation Before program (standard bicycle) During program (e-bike) 4-7 days/ week 1-3 days/ week 1-3 days/ month < 1 day/ month

Reported usage of e-bike (trip frequency) for commuting by distance from work. 60% 50% 40% 42% 38% 52% 52% 30% 20% 21% 21% 24% 16% 28% 0% 0% 5 mi (n=24) 3% 4% > 5 mi, < 10 mi (n=29) 10 mi (n=50) 5+ day/week 3-4 days/week 1-2 days/week Less than once per week

Respondents rating of specific e-bike features and functions Average 31% 40% 18% 7% 3% Engaging throttle (TAG) assist (n=127) 54% 36% 7% Engaging pedelec (PAS) assist (n=127) 45% 41% 13% Battery range for most trips (n=125) 42% 44% 11% Charging the battery overall (n=124) 40% 49% 9% Braking/slowing down (n=127) 37% 43% 15% 5% Stability while riding (n=126) 34% 44% 14% 6% Time it takes to recharge battery (n=123) 33% 53% 14% Size of e-bike folded (n=117) 28% 40% 20% 2% Size of e-bike unfolded (n=125) 21% 46% 28% 4% Pedaling without electric assist (n=126) 19% 28% 25% 17% Folding the e-bike (n=119) 14% 39% 27% 13% 7% Weight of e-bike (n=125) 7% 23% 35% 27% 7% 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor

US NATIONWIDE END CONSUMER ONLINE SURVEY 2015: BOSCH DATASET

Demographics Characteristics Age Gender (N=806) Over 60 44% 100% 80% 82% 50 to 59 45 to 49 9% 28% 60% 35 to 44 11% 40% 20% 0% Male 18% Female 24 to 34 18 to 23 Under 18 1% 0% 7% E-bike owners (N=360) Total sample (N=794) 35% Education Level (N=801) Annual Household Income (N=655) 30% Above $200K 8% 25% $ 181 K to 200K 3% 20% $ 141K to 180K 9% 15% $ 101K to 140K 20% $ 61K to 100K 29% 5% 0% High School/ GED Trade/ Technical Education Some college Bachelors Degree Advanced College Degree $ 20K to 60K Below $ 20K 27% 5% 0% 20% 30% 40%

How often do you ride? 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 5% 0% Avg. frequency: bike 2.7 day per week Avg. frequency: e-bike 3.8 day per week Less than Once a Month* Once a Month* 2-3 times a Month* Bicycle (N=387) Once a week 2-3 times a week* E-bike (N=363) Daily or Every day* 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% 1 to 2 miles* How far do you ride every day? 3 to 5 miles 6 to 15 miles* Bicycle (N=372) 16 to 25 miles 26 to 50 miles* E-bike (N=363) More than 50 miles

What are the most important reasons you ride bicycle or e-bike?-multiple Choices Other* No. of bicycle owners answered = 372 No. of e-bike owners answered = 363 To save time* To get from one place to another* For fun To save the environment* For better health* To save money* 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% E-bike Bicycle

What interests you most about e-bikes?-multiple choices Less sweat when riding* No. of bicycle owners answered = 432 No. of e-bike owners answered = 363 Ease of keeping up with other riders* Ability to go further Ability to go faster* Like new techonology Assistance in riding against the wind* Assistance in riding uphill* 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% E-bike Bicycle

Which criteria do you feel are most important for an e-bike to have?-multiple choices Top 5 criteria Bicycle owner (N=416) E-bike owner (N=363) 1 Range(riding distance) per battery charge 2 Quality of technical support and service after purchase 3 Lighter weight 4 On board computer features(range calculator, speedometer) 5 Anti-theft feature Motor power greater than 350 w

No. of participants 35% Expected maximum speed of e-bike What is your primary barrier to owning an ebike? Multiple choices (Only for non-ebike owners) 30% 25% 400 350 300 Price 20% 250 15% 200 150 5% 0% 15 mph* 20 mph 25 mph* Above 25 mph I'm not sure* Bicycle (N=432) E-bike (363) 100 50 0 Expensive purchase price Expensive to maitain Concern about safety No availability in my area Not availablenot a proven in type/style techonology I would want No place to ride Other What do/would you use e-bike for most often? Multiple choices 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% Commuting Work related transportation Running general errands around residence Carrying goods/kids For recreation and exercise Racing Trail/Mountain Primary means Biking of getting around Other E-bike owner (N=361) If you own an e-bike (N=374)

CONCLUDE

Demographics E-bikes still not mainstream (male, affluent, first adopters) Are their experiences representative of mass market? Trip Rate and Length E-bike trip rates are higher in all studies E-bike trip lengths tend to be longer (over five miles is still very long) Mode Shift Surveys support intuition, e-bikes shift (stated) motorized trips E-bikes potentially capture more utilitarian trip purposes Limitations on the nature of these surveys (e.g., typically ) Naturalistic data collection is next/ongoing step.