WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

Similar documents
WLTC* methodology. Proposed by Japan (Reviewed by UK, JRC and Mr. Steven) DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group

Economic and Social Council

In-use Vehicle Data Collection in Korea for WLTP/DHC

Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles

76th UNECE GRPE session

Status report of the WLTP Informal Working Group

Development of the Japan s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I

A proposal of collaboration workflow between DC, DTP and DHC has been presented and

ICT-Emissions driving cycles Laura Borgarello CRF

Economic and Social Council

Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Analysis of WLTP typical driving conditions that affect nonexhaust particle emissions

Roadmap Data Update and Model Validation Documentation September 2017

The Automotive Industry

Test results of Validation test 1b and Cycle modifications

Real Driving Emissions

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

WLTP Revision 1

World Light Duty Test Procedure

Progress Report DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines (LabProcICE) Geneva,

EN 1 EN. Second RDE LDV Package Skeleton for the text (V3) Informal EC working document

USES OF ANPR DATA IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND TRANSPORT MODELLING ABSTRACT

Verfication of road test normality Parameter Analysis TF Normalisation

WLTP-DHC Rev.1

EVOLUTION OF RDE REGULATION

DEVELOPMENT OF A DRIVING CYCLE FOR BRASOV CITY

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

Evaluation of the suitability to European conditions of the WNTE control zone concept as set out in the OCE GTR

WLTP for fleet. How the new test procedure affects the fleet business

Analysis of WLTP Utility Factor Distributions

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Measurement of noise emitted by accelerating road vehicles Engineering method Part 2: L category

Evaluation of exhaust emissions from three dieselhybrid. cars and simulation of after-treatment

Update on the development of the WLTP and its implementation into the EU legislation

Particulate Emissions from Typical Light-Duty Vehicles taken from the European Fleet, Equipped with a Variety of Emissions Control Technologies

World Light duty Test Procedures: Fiction or Reality?

Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Measurement of noise emitted by accelerating road vehicles Engineering method Part 2: L category

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) GRBP 68 th session

RDE PN emissions from a GDI vehicle without and with a GPF

Aria Etemad Volkswagen Group Research. Key Results. Aachen 28 June 2017

EMISSION FACTORS FROM EMISSION MEASUREMENTS. VERSIT+ methodology Norbert Ligterink

WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria

On-road emission measurements with PEMS on a MERCEDES-BENZ ATEGO Euro VI N2 heavy-duty truck

FCAI Response to Regulation Impact Statement for Brake Assist Systems

Naturalistic Drive Cycles Analysis and Synthesis for Pick-up Trucks. Zifan Liu Dr. Andrej Ivanco Dr. Zoran Filipi

Status European RDE emission legislation

Technology and policy drivers of the fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles Comparative analysis across selected automotive markets

AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs

GLOBAL SUMMARY REPORT Market for High Voltage Insulators & Bushings

- Status Report - System Power Determination of Electrified (Light Duty) Vehicles. Subgroup Leader: Germany, Korea. EVE-17 meeting

NSW Fleet Forecast for Tunnel Ventilation Design: 2016 to 2040

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

GLOBAL REGISTRY. Addendum. Global technical regulation No. 2

Ensuring the safety of automated vehicles

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Methodological tool Baseline emissions for modal shift measures in urban passenger transport

New results from a 2015 PEMS testing campaign on a Diesel Euro 6b vehicle

WLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Future Powertrain Conference 24 th February C 2016 HORIBA Ltd. All rights reserved.

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Evaluation methods for RDE Outcome of the lessons learnt and proposal for RDE4 package. RDE-LDV Meeting of 7 November 2017

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Post 50 km/h Implementation Driver Speed Compliance Western Australian Experience in Perth Metropolitan Area

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

HALTON REGION SUB-MODEL

EU Refining Sector Fitness Check

HarmonHy (SES ) Harmonization of Standards and Regulations for a Sustainable Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

AEBS and LDWS Exemptions Feasibility Study: 2011 Update. MVWG Meeting, Brussels, 6 th July 2011

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) Overview of Tyre Industry / ISO activities. Ottawa

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Transcription:

WLTP DHC subgroup Date 30/10/09 Title Working paper number Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle WLTP-DHC-02-05 1.0. Introduction This paper sets out the methodology that will be used to generate the world harmonized light duty driving test cycle (WLTC). This methodology was developed and agreed following a full discussion at the 1 st DHC subgroup meeting (held in September 2009). An outline methodology, including details on developing a data weighting matrix and gearshift points, is presented here. 1.1. Terminology Term Drive cycle Drive cycle phase (phase) Drive cycle sub phase (sub phase) Short trip (ST) Regional weighting factor Driving conditions weighting factors Driving period Region Traffic volume Description The speed time trace that defines how a vehicle will be driven during the WLTC test Part of a drive cycle; the WLTC will have three phases representative of urban, rural and motorway driving Part of a drive cycle phase; the WLTC might have an urban phase divided into two sub phases (e.g. congested and noncongested) Any period of driving cycle from standing start to next vehicle stop. Weighting factor, determined by total number of vehicle hours per region, used to weight data from regions when creating the unified distributions 1 Weighting factors referring to driving period, road type Peak, off-peak, weekend Geographical region represented by each Contracting Party Number of vehicles 1 At the 1 st DHC meeting India and China raised objections to determining regional weighting factors based on current vehicle hours in each region. It was agreed to note these objections. For the purposes of developing a draft methodology, it is assumed that regional weighting factors will be determined as stated in table 1.1 with the proviso that the method for determining these weighting factors may be changed at a later stage if required. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 1/17

2.0. Overview of proposed drive cycle development Figure 2.1 gives an outline of the steps involved in the development of the WLTC. The work comprises four work streams: a. In-use data collection b. Determination of weighting factors c. Data analysis and drive cycle development d. Validation/confirmation testing Work streams c and d will be an iterative process; validation/confirmation testing will undoubtedly result in modifications being made to the early versions of the drive cycle until the final drive cycle is agreed. Input will be required from the Development of Test Procedure (DTP) subgroup. A joint meeting is scheduled between the DHC and DTP subgroups in June 2010. After that, the Chairpersons of the DHC and DTP subgroups will coordinate further joint meetings as necessary based on the progress made in each subgroup. Guidelines for in-use data collection are being developed in parallel to developing the data analysis and cycle development methodologies. See paper WLTP-DHC-01-06 for more details on data analysis guidelines. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 2/17

Figure 2.1. Flow diagram of DHC Group work Classification of parameters Collection of in-use data Collection of statistics on light duty vehicle use Determine factor weighting Gear shift analysis Development of reference database and unified speedacceleration distributions Gear points shift Cold/Hot start Development of initial drive cycle Validation test (1) Input from DTP subgroup Modification (1) Cycles and gearshift points Validation test (2) Confirmation tests Round tests robin Modification (2) Cycles and gearshift pints WLTC (final drive cycle) WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 3/17

3.0. Method for developing drive cycle The WLTC drive cycle will be developed based on combination of collected inuse data and suitable weighting factors. It is proposed to follow the method used in developing the worldwide harmonized motorcycle emissions certification procedure (WMTC), i.e., aggregating in-use data according to road type (urban, rural and motorway) and processing data pertaining to these road types separately in order to produce drive cycles phases that are road type specific. These drive cycle phases will then be combined to yield the final drive cycle. Real world in-use data will be collected from a range of Contracting Parties in the following regions: China, EU, India, Japan, South America, South Korea, USA, and a reference database of short trips developed. Raw in-use data will be weighted and aggregated to produce unified speed-distributions (again based on road type). Analysis will be undertaken to determine the average short trip durations and idling times which will then be used to determine the number of short trips that should be included in each drive cycle phase. Short trips (selected from the reference database) will then be combined to develop the final drive cycle. 3.1. In-use data All Contracting Parties will be required to supply raw in-use data, collected at a frequency of at least 1 Hz. When vehicle acceleration is not measured during in-use data collection, it will be calculated from consecutive vehicle speed samples using the following equation: a i = ( υi+ 1 υi 1) ( t t ) i+ 1 i 1 3.6 where a = acceleration (m s 2 ) ν = velocity (km/hour) t = time (s). WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 4/17

3.2. Initial data analysis In-use data will be combined to generate a short trip database and an idle database. Combinations of short trips and idle periods will be used to develop candidate drive cycle phases (see section 3.4). Raw in-use data will initially be analysed according to road type (urban, rural and motorway) and region (e.g. Japan, Europe, India, etc), i.e. all urban data from Japan will be analysed independently to all urban data from India. A global unified distribution will be developed for each road type by combining the appropriate regional in-use data with the appropriate weighting factors (see section 4.0 for more detail regarding weighting factors). Initially, it is proposed to generate unified speed acceleration distributions and to use these to compare the representativeness of the drive cycle phases. However, it has been agreed that other unified distributions and averages will also be considered; these include (but are not limited to): Maximum speed Maximum acceleration Cruise speed Relative positive acceleration. 3.3. Determination of test cycle length It will be necessary to decide the length of the final drive cycle. WMTC is comprised of three sections relating to urban, rural and motorway driving; each section is of equal length (600 s). The worldwide heavy duty certification procedure (WHDC), EPA Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS), New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and JC08 are not divided into sections and have total durations of 1800, 1371, 1180 and 1204 s, respectively. For WLTC, it is proposed to follow the WMTC method and develop a drive cycle that contains individual phases relating to urban, rural and motorway driving. As a first step, it will be necessary to decide the length/duration of each drive cycle phase. The number of short trips and idle periods in each section will be determined by the average short trip and idle period durations, as determined from analysis of the in-use data. 3.4. Development of the drive cycle Drive cycle phases will be compiled for the three different road types and these combined to yield the overall drive cycle. The first step will be to identify short trips and idle periods that will be considered for the drive cycle. Cumulative frequency graphs based on the short trip and idle databases will be derived and from these it will be possible to select short trips and idle periods of suitable length (distance/time) to be included in the drive cycle phase. It is agreed that all drive cycle phases will begin and end with an idle period. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 5/17

Selected short trips and idle periods will be combined to develop candidate drive cycle phases. The speed acceleration distributions of these candidate drive cycle phases will be compared with the relevant unified speed acceleration distributions using a chi-squared analysis. The final drive cycle phase will be chosen as the combination of short trip and idle periods that minimises the difference between the speed acceleration distributions of the drive cycle phase and the unified distribution. Of course it is possible to use other statistical analyses to compare the unified distributions and the speed acceleration distribution (or indeed other unified distributions/averages) of the candidate drive cycle phases. Use of these different statistical analyses and distributions/averages can be considered as data analysis progresses. As a starting point, we will proceed as outlined above to develop the preferred drive cycle phases. These will then be compared using other statistical analyses and making use of other unified distributions/averages. 3.5. Validation, modification and confirmation The overall drive cycle as described above in section 3.4 will be subject to validation and confirmation testing. The outcome of such testing is likely to lead to modification of the drive cycle as factors such as driveability, repeatability etc. are accessed. The result will be a somewhat iterative process of validation and modification in order to develop the final WLTC drive cycle. 4.0. Weighting factor matrix Previous studies to develop driving cycles have weighted in-use data according to a number of different factors: Region Road type Vehicle category Power to mass ratio. These factors were combined to produce classification matrices with weighting factors based on either the distance or time driven. Driving duration was used to derive the weighting matrix for WHDC, while driving distance was used for WMTC. In development of JC08, both average vehicle speed and driving duration were used. 4.1. Weighting factors This section provides an overview of how weighting factors will be applied to the raw data to develop the drive cycle. This outline method was agreed at the 1 st DHC meeting; however, it was also agreed to retain flexibility regarding the weighting of data. Therefore, this outline methodology will be reviewed to assess its appropriateness as data are analysed. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 6/17

At the 1 st DHC subgroup it was agreed to consider the following parameters when developing weighting factors: Region Road type (urban, rural, motorway) Driving period (peak, off-peak, weekend) Vehicle category (passenger car, light duty commercial vehicle 2 ). It was also agreed to assign weighting factors on a time basis. Weighting factors will be applied to the raw data collected during the in-use data collection exercise before these data are added to the unified distributions. Weighting is needed to ensure that the unified distributions are representative of world-wide driving patterns and that these distributions are not dominated by those contacting parties that might be able to supply more in-use data than others. The weighting factors discussed in this paper only relate to generating of the drive cycle. As WLTP progresses, it may become appropriate to weight certain parts of the drive cycle during emissions testing; this additional weighting should be considered as part of the test procedure development and thus is not considered here. It is important to note that because all contacting parties are required to submit raw data, it will be possible to change our approach to weighting during the data analysis stage. The method presented in this paper thus represents a general framework for weighting that can be modified at a later stage if required. 4.1.1. Different types of weighting factors For the purposes of drive cycle development, there are two types of weighting factor: regional weighting factors and driving condition weighting factors. Table 4.1. Summary of weighting factors Weighting factor Description Regional weighting factor Determined by the total number of vehicle hours in a region 3 Driving condition weighting factors Determined on a regional basis for the following parameters: road type (urban, rural, motorway), driving period (peak, offpeak, weekend) 2 Vehicle category may be further subdivided depending on the in-use data collected. 3 See footnote 1 of table 1.1. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 7/17

Weighting factors are generated using statistical data collected in each region. There are several methods for generating these factors and these are discussed in more detail below (see section 4.2). Regional weighting factors Regional weighting factors are needed to allow data from different regions to be combined when generating the overall unified distributions. At the 1 st DHC meeting it was agreed, initially, that these weighting factors should be based on the total number of vehicle hours (for light duty vehicles) in each region. As data analysis progresses it may become necessary to revisit the generation of regional weighting factors. Driving condition weighting factors Driving condition weighting factors are required for the following parameters: road type (this will be used when developing the test procedure), driving period and vehicle classification (passenger car, or light duty commercial vehicles). These weighting factors will be determined on a regional basis using statistical data (see section 4.2). When developing the driving condition weighting factors it will be necessary to define driving conditions. Each Contracting Party should define the following parameters according to the driving patterns observed in their region: Road type - Urban - Rural - Motorway Driving period - Peak - Off-peak - Weekend Table 4.2 provides some suggested definitions for road types; however, it is expected that these definitions may not be suitable for each region and thus Contracting Parties may choose to use their own definitions. Table 4.2. Suggested definitions of road types Road type Urban Rural Definition Paved roads in urban areas with a speed limit 50 km/hour Paved non-motorways outside and inside urban areas with a speed limit between 50 and 100 km/hour Motorway Paved multilane roads specifically constructed and controlled for fast traffic Contracting Parties should clearly define road types and driving periods and WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 8/17

provide these definitions when submitting raw data 4. In addition, it is also important to ensure that the same definitions for road type and driving period are used when collecting in-use data. 4.1.2. Applying weighting factors: an overview The different weighting factors will be applied at different stages of the data analysis to generate unified distributions (e.g. unified speed acceleration or average speed, etc). Figures 4.1 and 4.2 provide an overview of how the weighting factors will be applied to raw data. The raw data from Contracting Parties will be split according to road type and driving period. Driving condition weighting factors will then be applied to the aggregated raw in-use data on a regional basis to generate unified distributions that are specific to each region. These regional unified distributions can then be combined with regional weighting factors to develop the overall unified distribution (note that overall unified distributions will be generated for each road type). Table 4.3. Regional unified distributions Regional unified Road type distribution U R M Urban Rural Motorway Driving period Peak Off-peak Weekend Peak Off-peak Weekend Peak Off-peak Weekend 4 It was agreed at the 1 st DHC meeting that Contracting Parties should endeavour to collect photographic/videographic evidence to support road type classification. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 9/17

Figure 4.1. Applying weighting factors to generate a regional urban unified distribution Raw data urban x WF off peak Urban unified distribution for region A x WF peak x WF weekend Figure 4.2. Applying the regional weighting factors to generate the overall urban unified distribution Regional urban unified distributions x WF A Overall urban unified distribution x WF B x WF C WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 10/17

4.2. Generating weighting factors Regional weighting factors These will be based on the total number of vehicle hours in each region. Contracting Parties should provide statistical estimates of the total number of vehicle hours in their region based on latest available data. Driving condition weighting factors Four methods are possible for generating weighting factors. These are (in order of decreasing preference): Full traffic census Partial traffic census combined with statistical data Partial traffic census combined with survey Survey Driving condition weighting factors will be applied on a regional basis to develop the regional unified distributions thus allowing Contracting Parties to choose which weighting factor generation method is best suited to their region. 4.2.1. Full traffic census A full traffic census can be conducted to measure the volume of traffic for each driving condition (road type, driving period) and for each vehicle category (car, light duty commercial vehicle). Whilst this method is time consuming, it will yield the most accurate weighting factors. Data collection takes place over a number of different routes coving all road types. Automated detection allows the number of vehicles travelling on each section of the route to be counted and the average vehicle speeds to be determined. These data can then be analysed to determine the number of vehicles travelling during the different driving periods (i.e. peak, off-peak and weekend). The actual data on traffic volume (number of vehicles) measured between two points is then combined with the average vehicle speed to determine the number of vehicle hours for that section of road. Data can then be collated for all similar sections of road and driving period. Figure 4.3 shows how different routes can be broken down into sections; measurements are made of the number and vehicle category passing through these sections. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 11/17

Figure 4.3. Breakdown of routes into sections N 1, 1 V 1, 1 N 1, 2 V 1, 2 N 1, m V 1, m Route 1 L 1,1 L 1,2 L 1,m Route n N n, 1 V n, 1 N n, 2 V n, 2 N n, m V n, m L n,1 L 1,2 L n,m The total number of vehicle hours is then calculated using the following equation: T = n m Lj N V i= 1 j= 1 j j where T = Number of vehicle hours L = distance of section (km) N = number of vehicles (traffic volume) V = average speed (km/hour) i = route number j = section number 4.2.2. Partial traffic census combined with statistical data A partial traffic census can be used to measure the traffic volume on given road types during different driving periods. It is necessary to ensure that measurements are taken on parts of the road network that are representative of the region. It is recommended that the traffic census measurement period is not less than two weeks in duration. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 12/17

Automated sensors (or other methods) are employed to measure the number of vehicles passing the measurement points, differentiated according to vehicle category (passenger car/light duty commercial vehicle) over different driving periods (peak/off-peak/weekend). Existing statistical data are then used to determine the total network distance for each road type and these are combined with the measured data to determine the number of vehicle hours for each combination of vehicle category, road type and driving period. Table 4.4 gives and example of how the urban weighting factors would be calculated. The same method would be used to calculate the weighting factors for rural and motorway driving. Table 4.4. Example calculation for determining weighting factors using a partial traffic census combined with existing statistical data Traffic volume (number of vehicles) Urban Weekday Weekend Peak Off-peak Passenger car 5000 2000 2500 Light duty 2000 1000 500 commercial vehicle Total network 80 000km distance (derived from statistical data) Average vehicle 20 km/hour speed (derived from traffic census data or in-use data) Weighting factor (see equation below) Passenger car 20,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 Light duty 8,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 commercial vehicle Weighting factor (normalised) Passenger car 10 4 5 Light duty 4 2 1 commercial vehicle Where, traffic volume network distance Weighting factor = average vehcile speed WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 13/17

4.2.3. Partial traffic census combined with survey This method can be used when there are no statistical data available on a region s total road network distance. A survey of vehicle users can be carried out to estimate the average distance travelled on each road type (urban, rural and motorway). Traffic volumes during different driving periods can be measured by a partial traffic census (as detailed above) and these data combined to yield weighting factors as per the calculation used in Table 4. 4.2.4. Survey This is the least favoured method for generating driving condition weighting factors. A survey can be conducted of an appropriate proportion of vehicle users in the region. The questionnaire will need to collect the following data: Vehicle category (passenger car/light duty commercial vehicle Number of hours driven in each of the following road type/driving period combinations Combination Road type Driving period 1 Urban Peak 2 Urban Off-peak 3 Urban Weekend 4 Rural Peak 5 Rural Off-peak 6 Rural Weekend 7 Motorway Peak 8 Motorway Off-peak 9 Motorway Weekend When using this method, you must ensure that the survey population size is sufficiently large to be representative of driving behaviour in your region. The survey data is collected and the number of total number of vehicle hours in each combination of vehicle category/road type/driving period is added up. The ratio of these vehicle hours is equal to the weighting factor (see table 4.5). Table 4.5. Example calculation for determining urban weighting factors by survey Urban Peak Off-peak Weekend Passenger car 12000 6000 8000 Total Light duty 10000 2000 4000 number of commercial vehicle vehicle Passenger car 6 3 4 Light duty 5 1 2 commercial vehicle hours Weighting factor WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 14/17

4.3. Generating the weighting factor matrix Statistical data on light duty vehicle use, as described by the factors outlined in section 4.1, should be gathered from each region. These data will then be analysed, aggregated according to road type, and a suitable weighting matrix developed. Table 4.6 provides an outline of the proposed weighting matrix. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 15/17

Table 4.6. Outline of weighting factor matrix Vehicle category 1 Urban Rural Motorway China EU India Japan South America USA Peak Off-peak Peak Off-peak (week (weekend) (week (weekend) day) day) Offpeak (week day) Offpeak (week day) Passenger car Light duty commercial vehicle 1 Vehicle category may be subcategorised to allow differentiation between different passenger car categories (e.g., GVW, engine displacement, power:mass, etc.) and van categories (small, medium, large van, etc.). WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 16/17

5.0. Gear shift point analysis In developing the WLTC, it will be necessary to prescribe gear shift points. Data on gear shift points will be collected during the in-use data collection exercise. Gear shift points are mostly influenced by traffic condition, vehicle specification and vehicle conditions (e.g. laden weight). The in-use data collection exercise will seek to collect data which cover a range of these conditions. It is proposed to apply the gear shift analysis method used in the development of JC08. A separate paper discussing this method has been circulated to DHC members. WLTP-DHC-02-05e.doc 17/17