Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME. Date:

Similar documents
Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/ Klausurteil 30 Punkte, 60 Minuten, ohne Unterlagen. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME

Aircraft Design in a Nutshell

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Estimation of Critical Performance Parameters. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Fall 2015

Flying Low and Slow. (and the Tools for its Calculation) Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

Systems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada Mail:

The Airplane That Could!

AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT

The Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis

Aircraft Design Conceptual Design

Preface. Acknowledgments. List of Tables. Nomenclature: organizations. Nomenclature: acronyms. Nomenclature: main symbols. Nomenclature: Greek symbols

Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft

AIAA UNDERGRADUATE TEAM DESIGN COMPETITION PROPOSAL 2017

EAS 4700 Aerospace Design 1

This Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT.

Optimum Seat Abreast Configuration for an Regional Jet

Aeronautical Engineering Design II Sizing Matrix and Carpet Plots. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Spring 2014

Classical Aircraft Sizing II

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)

Chapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view drawing - 2 Topic

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE ground roll

Investigation of a Novel Turboprop-Driven Aircraft Concept Including Future Technologies

AE 452 Aeronautical Engineering Design II Installed Engine Performance. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering March 2016

A Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing. The Big Guys. by Valerio Viti. Valerio Viti, AOE4984, Project #1, March 22nd, 2001

NOVEL LOW-FLYING PROPELLER-DRIVEN AIRCRAFT CONCEPT FOR REDUCED OPERATING COSTS AND EMISSIONS

Preliminary design of Aircraft Landing Gear Strut

1 b. Definition and Discussion of the Intrinsic Efficiency of Winglets. Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

AN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update. Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

Electric Flight Potential and Limitations

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

Design of Ultralight Aircraft

AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Weight Management

Theory of Flight. Main Teaching Points. Definition Parts of an Airplane Aircraft Construction Landing Gear Standard Terminology

Powertrain Design for Hand- Launchable Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport

ECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT. ISSN: International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 1, Issue 2, August 2012

1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS

UNIFIED LECTURE #2: THE BREGUET RANGE EQUATION

ATPL Workbook. ATPL Advanced Aerodynamics, Performance and Systems Knowledge (Aeroplane)

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

Three major types of airplane designs are 1. Conceptual design 2. Preliminary design 3. Detailed design

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE INTERCEPTOR (UAV-Ip)

JetBiz. Six and Eight Passenger Business Jets

TEAM Four Critical Design Review. Kai Jian Cheong Richard B. Choroszucha* Lynn Lau Mathew Marcucci Jasmine Sadler Sapan Shah Chongyu Brian Wang

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF UTM 4-SEATER HELICOPTER. Mohd Shariff Ammoo 1 Mohd Idham Mohd Nayan 1 Mohd Nasir Hussain 2

Team 2. AAE451 System Requirements Review. Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney

blended wing body aircraft for the

3 rd EASN Association International Workshop on AeroStructures

Chapter 4 Lecture 16. Engine characteristics 4. Topics. Chapter IV

General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

OPTIMAL MISSION ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING FOR ENGINE AGING AND EMISSIONS

Answer Key. Page 1 of 10

Conceptual Design Review

DESIGN OF A FIFTH GENERATION AIR SUPERIORITY FIGHTER AIRCRAFT

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Propulsion and Fuel System Integration. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND AERODYNAMIC STUDY OF JOINED-WING BUSINESS JET AIRCRAFT

Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control

INVESTIGATION OF ICING EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRCRAFT AT TSAGI

Missile Interceptor EXTROVERT ADVANCED CONCEPT EXPLORATION ADL P

7. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A SINGLE AISLE MEDIUM RANGE AIRCRAFT

Design of a High Altitude Fixed Wing Mini UAV Aerodynamic Challenges

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Tip-Mounted Engines

Conceptual Design and Analysis of a High-Efficient Low-Emission Supersonic Aircraft HELESA

AAE 451 Conceptual Design Review

2008/2009 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design

Part 1 Aerodynamic Theory COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL

Environmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study

FURTHER ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZED METALLIC AND COMPOSITE JETS

ME 408 Aircraft Design Final Report for Team FSLAP Four-Seat Light Airplane

Heavy Lifters Design Team. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Free-Weight Final Report Spring 2007

AIAA Foundation Student Design Competition 2015/16. Undergraduate Individual Aircraft

Chapter 4 Estimation of wing loading and thrust loading - 10 Lecture 18 Topics

Small Fixed Wing Aircraft Operational Weight and Balance Computations

Karpuk Aircraft KR-1 Multi-Mission Amphibian

Prof. João Melo de Sousa Instituto Superior Técnico Aerospace & Applied Mechanics. Part B Acoustic Emissions 4 Airplane Noise Sources

AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT

TURBOPROP ENGINE App. K AIAA AIRCRAFT ENGINE DESIGN

FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (1) MASS AND BALANCE

THE ANALYSIS OF WING PERFORMANCE FOR RECONNAISSANCE UAV ZULKIFLI BIN YUSOF UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG

Preliminary Design of High Altitude and High Endurance UAV: SAURON

Span m [65.16 ft] Length m [43.89 ft] Height m [12.08 ft]

AIRCRAFT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN USING MULTI- OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION.

Automatic Aircraft Configuration Redesign The Application of MDO Results to a CAD File

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF ECOLOGICAL AIRCRAFT FOR COMMUTER AIR TRANSPORTATION

A STUDY OF STRUCTURE WEIGHT ESTIMATING FOR HIGH ALTITUDE LONG ENDURENCE (HALE) UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV)

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

PAC 750XL PAC 750XL PAC-750XL

Environautics EN-1. Aircraft Design Competition. Presented by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Application of PreSTo: Aircraft Preliminary Sizing and Data Export to CEASIOM

Diamond Star DA40 Pre-Solo Written Exam

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Power Estimation for a Two Seater Helicopter

European Aviation Safety Agency

In this lecture... Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay

Typical Reserve Policy

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS 2015 Duration of examination: 180 minutes Last Name: Matrikelnummer: First Name: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Date: 11.07.2015 Points: of a maximum of 73 points. Grade: 1. Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books 1.1) Please translate to German. Please write clearly! Unreadable text will not harvest points! 1. aeroplane 2. airplane 3. aircraft 4. flying wing 5. aerodynamic center 6. payload 7. sweep 8. taper 9. dihedral 10. twist 11. camber 12. bending 1.2) Please translate to English. Please write clearly! Unreadable text will not harvest points! 1. Flugzeugentwurf 2. Machzahl 3. Fahrwerk 4. Leitwerk 5. Höhenleitwerk 6. Seitenleitwerk 7. Rückenflosse 8. Anstellwinkel 9. Einstellwinkel 10. Hängewinkel 11. Steigwinkel 12. V-Winkel page 1

1.3) Shown is a de Havilland DH 106 Comet. It was the first production commercial jet. Developed and manufactured by de Havilland at its Hatfield Aerodrome, Hertfordshire the location of our long term ERASMUS partner university, the University of Hertfordshire. Source: http://www.zoggavia.com Please name 4 technical characteristics and for each characteristic at least one advantage and one disadvantage! 1.4) What is the value of a typical zero-lift drag coefficient for a passenger aircraft? Calculate its drag coefficient at minimum drag speed! 1.5) What is the value of a typical ratio between wetted area and wing area of a passenger aircraft? Estimate the maximum glide ratio (L/D) max for such an aircraft with an aspect ratio of 6! 1.6) What is the value of a typical equivalent skin friction coefficient for a passenger aircraft? And what is again the value of a typical ratio between wetted area and wing area of a passenger aircraft? Calculate the value for the zero lift drag coefficient of a passenger aircraft from these numbers! 1.7) What is the minimum speed (with respect to stall speed) at take-off of a business jet? 1.8) What is the minimum speed (with respect to stall speed) at approach of a business jet? 1.9) What is the ratio of the maximum lift coefficient and the actual lift coefficient at minimum approach speed of a business jet? 1.10) Please write down the First Law of Aircraft Design from which you can calculate the maximum take-off mass m MTO from payload m PL? Everything else equal: How much more is the maximum take-off mass m MTO if the payload m PL doubles? 1.11) How is the tail volume coefficient defined for a vertical tail? Explain how to obtain the vertical tail surface area from the vertical tail volume coefficient! Explain how to get each parameter needed! page 2

1.12) Assume you investigated the one class seat layout of many passenger aircraft in order to find out the value of the ratio between the number of rows n R and the number of seats abreast n SA. Assume you found the ratio of n R /n SA = 4. Determine n SA for an aircraft seating 169 passengers! Explain your choice in light of certification rules CS-25! Write the equation to determine n SA for any ratio n R /n SA! 1.13) You plan to design a fuselage with circular cross section for minimum zero lift drag. How do you set up your optimization? Select all correct options! A The task is to minimize zero lift drag per cabin volume B The task is to minimize zero lift drag per cabin area C The task is to minimize zero lift drag per frontal area D The task is to minimize zero lift drag per total area of the passenger doors E The task is to minimize zero lift drag per total area of the cargo doors 1.14) You want to design a cabin with 6 seats abreast. What are your options with respect to the number of aisles? Discuss! 1.15) In which sequence is it best to allocate wing parameters in a hand calculation? Input parameter is the cruise Mach number. Select all correct options! A First: wing vertical position, sweep, dihedral angle. Then: taper ratio, thickness ratio. B First: wing vertical position, sweep. Then: taper ratio, dihedral angle, thickness ratio. C First: sweep. Then: wing vertical position, taper ratio, dihedral angle, thickness ratio. D First: dihedral angle, sweep. Then: taper ratio, wing vertical position, thickness ratio. 1.16) Please order these Mach numbers with respect to increasing flight speed: (typical) cruise Mach number, MMO, critical Mach number, MD, M DD! Discuss your sequence if necessary! 1.17) Name three parameters that you would change, if asked to reduce wing drag in transonic flight at given cruise Mach number! Would you increase or decrease each of these parameters? 1.18) You need to carry much fuel for your long range aircraft. How would you change (increase or decrease) each parameter listed (if you are still free to decide): Wing area, wing aspect ratio, wing sweep, taper ratio, relative thickness of the wing? Discuss your selection if necessary! 1.19) Many wings have a kink and are hence formed by two trapezia. Why is this necessary? State aerodynamic benefits (if any)! 1.20) Explain why wing twist may help to optimize the lift distribution in the design point, but causes more drag in off-design situations! 1.21) For a quick design of a main landing gear: How many tons from the maximum take-off mass do you allocate to each of the main wheels? Or in other words: How many wheels do we need on the main gear? page 3

1.22) How is the concrete of a runway more likely to fail due to a certain large aircraft with given mass: if each main landing gear leg has two wheels or if each main landing gear leg has four wheels? 1.23) At a certain angle of attack, a wing would "theoretically" show the distribution of the lift coefficient as given in the diagram that gives actually the behavior of four wings with different taper ratios. Here "theoretically" means that the diagram was produced with an aerodynamic code that can not predict stall. You plan to use an airfoil with a maximum lift coefficient of 1.2. Which of the wings stalls at the given angle of attack and where does it stall? Which wing(s) will produce most lift? Discuss! 1.24) What is the ultimate design goal (objective function) for commercial aircraft? Questions from the Lecture Series 1.25) Has metal a chance in aircraft design in the future, or will aircraft continue to be dominated by composite materials? Explain your answer! 1.26) ICAO puts aircraft in various classes. What are the span limitations (at airports) for aircraft in Class C and D respectively? 1.27) What is the advantage of a propeller driven aircraft compared to a propfan with respect to engine integration certification? 1.28) How efficient are winglets? A Winglets have no effect on the aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft. B Winglets 1 m high have roughly the same effect as a horizontal wing span increase of 0.5 m on each wing tip. C Vertical winglets have the same aerodynamic effect as a horizontal wing span extension of the same size. 1.29) What amount of fuel saving can be achieved with a "Smart Turboprop" (as described in the evening lecture) against the jet powered A320? 1.30) Explain how it is possible to achieve "double digit" (%) savings in fuel consumption of passenger aircraft just based on parameter choice in aircraft design without any introduction of new technologies! page 4

2. Part Name: 110 minutes, 38 points, open books and laptop Task 2.1 (18 points) Design "The Rebel"! These are the requirements for the aircraft: Payload: 180 people on board with baggage. 93 kg per person. Additional cargo: 2516 kg. Range 1510 NM at a cruise Mach number M CR = 0.55 (payload as above, with reserves as given in FAR Part 121, domestic reserves, distance to alternate: 200 NM) Take-off field length s TOFL 2700 m (ISA, MSL at maximum take-off mass) Landing field length s LFL 2700 m (ISA, MSL at maximum landing mass) Furthermore the requirements from FAR Part 25 121(b) (2. Segment) and FAR Part 25 121(d) (missed approach) shall be met For your calculation The factor k APP for approach, k L for landing and k TO for take off should be selected according to the spread sheet and to the lecture notes. The ratio of maximum landing mass and maximum take-off mass m ML /m MTO = 0,92 Maximum lift coefficient of the aircraft in landing configuration C L,max,L = 3,1 Maximum lift coefficient of the aircraft in take-off configuration C L,max,TO = 3,1 The glide ratio is to be calculated for take-off and landing with C D0 = 0.02 and Oswald factor e = 0.5 Oswald factor in cruise e = 0.68 Aspect ratio A = 34.8 Calculate the maximum glide ratio in cruise, E max with e = 0.68 und S wet / S W = 9.1 The ratio of cruise speed and speed for minimum drag is set to the optimum value: V / V 4 CR md 3. Design point is the intersection from take-off and landing line!!! The operating empty mass ratio is m OE / m MTO = 0.59. The by-pass ratio (BPR) of this generic engine is close to μ = 15.5; their thrust specific fuel consumption for cruise and loiter is assumed to be c = 10,3 mg/(ns). page 5

Use these values as Mission-Segment Fuel Fractions: Engine start: 1.00; Taxi: 0.997; Takeoff: 0.994; Climb: 0.994; Descent: 0.994; Landing: 0.994. Results to task 2.1 Please insert your results here! Do not forget the units! Wing loading from landing field length: Thrust to weight ratio from take-off field length (at wing loading from landing): Glide Ratio in 2. Segment: Glide Ratio during missed approach maneuver: Thrust to weight ratio from climb requirement in 2. Segment: Thrust to weight ratio from climb requirement during missed approach maneuver: V CR /V md : Design point o Thrust to weight ratio : o Wing loading: Cruise altitude: maximum take-off mass: maximum landing mass: wing area: thrust of one engine in N: required tank volume in m 3 : Draw the matching chart (you need to change the scale of the axis for the wing loading!) and indicate the design point in the matching chart! Label your line in the legend on the right of page of the chart. Here is your translation: Durchstarten = missed approach Start = take-off Reiseflug = cruise Landing = landing 2. Segment = 2. Segment Steigflug = climb (not required here) page 6

page 7

Task 2.2 (4 points) A wing is designed for low manufacturing costs with = 1 (no taper). Calculate the sweep angle for an approximate elliptical wing loading! Calculate the dihedral angle for a high wing aircraft with this sweep angle! NIŢĂ, Mihaela Florentina: Contributions to Aircraft Preliminary Design and Optimization. München : Verlag Dr. Hut, 2013. - URL: http://opera.profscholz.de --- Equations (2.25) and (2.80), take own values from table. Task 2.3 (8 points) Calculate the Oswald Factor e for a jet in cruise! The unsept wing with = 0.25 has an aspect ratio of 35. Fuselage diameter is 4 m and wing span is 49 m. Cruise Mach number: 0.55. NIŢĂ, Mihaela Florentina: Contributions to Aircraft Preliminary Design and Optimization. München : Verlag Dr. Hut, 2013. - URL: http://opera.profscholz.de --- Equation (2.30a) and related equations. Task 2.4 (8 points) Find the slenderness ratio (also called fineness ratio) l F /d F of the fuselage of a passenger aircraft that yields the lowest zero lift drag of its fuselage per unit of cabin area (assumed to be proportional to an area equal to fuselage length multiplied by fuselage diameter)! Use the equations to estimate the fuselage wetted area for fuselages with a cylindrical middle section from TORENBEEK and the form factor for fuselages from DATCOM as given in the lecture notes. You may want to plot the function that gives some relative zero lift drag as a function of slenderness ratio. You may want to work with your computer. page 8